{"id":261651,"date":"2009-10-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-04T10:51:23","modified_gmt":"2017-10-04T05:21:23","slug":"pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n
WP No.6-4058 of 2009\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBEA1~3\\~~-i\ufb012'\u00a7)V\u00bb'f:)'__\u00a7'.j'  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I~ION'BLE DRJUSTICE B\u00a7;i\u00a7:;AI:1*11Av2\u00a7*rs.z;L@g ; \n\nWRIT PETITION No.64\u00bbO58\/240-Q19'~--(GM\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;ZRN}   %k\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nPyramid Developer,  --\n\nRepresented by its Farther', \"  1 _   '\n\nSri Amn, S \/ o KaHappa.._KVhi1}e1<a;f, "\n\nAge 40 years,_  _    :\n\nResiding at N.Q.5\u00a7S;'3T\u00a2 1arie;V   " \n\nShivajinagar, 'B.e1ga3'1;.-m'-5--9VOO.10_.   ' ...PETITIONER\n\n(By Sr3'j. C\u00a5.'B; Ad\ufb01ocare] \n\nAND:A\n\n1. Tl\u00e9leusuperiritenvdent of Police,\n\n A Kar\ufb01ataka Lokajfiiktha,\n'  ' 'B.e1gaum*..,_  _\n\n ; :;I"'he \n\nB.e1gg;u;1'_1  ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
‘r*(13yLsri.eeJ’agadish Patil, Advocate for R1
\n _ ‘Sari. R.K.Hatti, HCGP for R2)<\/p>\n
WP No.64058 of 2009<\/p>\n
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226  227
\nof the Constitution of India praying to quashing”\u00bbthe
\ndirection\/letter dated 04.03.2009 issued -7_b”y.__”‘~\u00ab_the<\/p>\n
Superintendent of Police, Karnataka L0}:ayu’ki;__a,
\nBelgaum as per Annexure–A and declare’ thgate-“thiet 0′ ‘
\ndirections issued not to register the  ._V0id’
\nand without jurisdiction; and to quash the enldorsemient.
\ndated 10.06.2009 issued by the} ‘Sub-‘Regist_rar,.i<\/p>\n
Belgaum, produced at AnneXure~!B._ <\/p>\n
This writ petition comi.ni’g.,_gon for.  ‘day, 0<\/p>\n
the Court made the following:\n<\/p>\n
The    ijjthisiw\u00e9lourt praying for
\nquashing__th’e .:0V45_.Ci3.20O9 at Annexure-A
\nissued:’1.i,b&-.  respondent No.2 not to<\/p>\n
register the  and also to quash the<\/p>\n
 endeifsericient ida-ted____\u00e91v0.06.2009 at Annexure-B issued<\/p>\n
 by*respv0nde\u00ab;dtv No.2<\/p>\n
0  2.i.__Th-edhrief facts of the case leading to filing of the<\/p>\n
  Vijw.rit_petition may be stated as under:-<\/p>\n
WP N0.64058 of 2009<\/p>\n
The petitioner being the owner of CT S No.4877 \/ 29<\/p>\n
and CTS No\/-1877\/30, has constructed second<\/p>\n
both the premises, after obtaining  V’<\/p>\n
permission. He intended to sellVthe—seccf4nd_ifio:o4rVto.’jthe–.A<\/p>\n
buyer and sale deed was presented in faV0’ur\u00ab.o”fjthe’._<\/p>\n
vendor before respondentf’No.2\u00a7Sub-=Regis’tr\u00e9r ‘ for V<\/p>\n
registration. But, he refusedinito  th\ufb02e’s’a1e’f:deed on
\nthe ground that there that  at
\nAnnexure–A  of
\nPolice, i\u00e9eilgeum, not to register
\nthe sa:.edeediin  tneiiane bearing Sy.No.1387.
\nSince  have been formed from<\/p>\n
Sy.  ._th’edSu.b–R’egistrar has refused to register<\/p>\n
f\ufb02”thVe”‘ss1ie”fde’ed_ in  of the vendor and in that regard<\/p>\n
,..y1e~\u00ab.11aisvvgi*.re11 ,At\u20ac:i,IT1″\u20ac1’ld.OI’S\u20acII1t’3I’1t at Annexure–B. Therefore,<\/p>\n
the””peti._tioner is before this Court praying for quashing<\/p>\n
impugned direction dated 04.03.2009 given by<\/p>\n
 i.’_’revspo’ndent No.1 at Annexure~A and the endorsement<\/p>\n
 ‘;’3Lr1i’1’eX1ire–i3~..A<\/p>\n
WP No.64058 of 2009<\/p>\n
dated 10.06.2009 issued by respondent No.2p–___Sub–<\/p>\n
Registrar at anneXure–‘B’.\n<\/p>\n
3. Though the petition is iisted for  ‘<\/p>\n
the arguments for final disposal.\u00bb  <\/p>\n
4. Learned counsel for the <\/p>\n
respondent No.1 has no  .gix;e:’v.direetion to it<\/p>\n
respondent No .2–Subv-i?egistrar  to register ‘sale deed
\npertaining to the plots :’oL;.t.ii”off:.iSy_.No.1387 and<\/p>\n
the direction\u00a7.vissi1ed is .;w:i.thoii’tii{_a1.1thfority of iaw and<\/p>\n
excessioiii  No.2 in obedience of
\nthe direction of No.1, he has refused to<\/p>\n
registerthe”sa\ufb02ledeed and issued the endorsement at<\/p>\n
    counsei appearing for respondent No.1<\/p>\n
su’o.mitsv.thia;t the investigation is going on with reference<\/p>\n
 the disproportionate sources of income pertaining to<\/p>\n
it   \u00abEase of Sri. II).B.Naik, who was the Chief Executive<\/p>\n
WP No.64058 of 2009<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 and the endorsement dated
\n10.06.2009 at Annexure-~B on the file of respo0r1\u00abde~nt<\/p>\n
No.2 are quashed.\n<\/p>\n
Granted three Weeks time ….1.:o_ the’Wiear_r_;.e0d’  0″<\/p>\n
Court Government Pieader to fife’ n}i._e01n:o of ‘appgax\u00a5an’&1ei<\/p>\n
for respondent No.2.\n<\/p>\n
Kms*    _  V\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 Author: K.Bhakthavatsala WP No.6-4058 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBEA1~3\\~~-i\ufb012’\u00a7)V\u00bb’f:)’__\u00a7’.j’ BEFORE THE I~ION’BLE DRJUSTICE B\u00a7;i\u00a7:;AI:1*11Av2\u00a7*rs.z;L@g ; WRIT PETITION No.64\u00bbO58\/240-Q19’~–(GM\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;ZRN} %k BETWEEN : Pyramid Developer, — Represented by its […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-261651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-04T05:21:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-04T05:21:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":530,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-04T05:21:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-04T05:21:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-04T05:21:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009"},"wordCount":530,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009","name":"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-04T05:21:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pyramid-developer-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pyramid Developer vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}