{"id":26178,"date":"2009-06-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009"},"modified":"2014-12-28T04:06:08","modified_gmt":"2014-12-27T22:36:08","slug":"sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN_GA\u00a7Q'_B\u00e9E A' \n\nDATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JUNE V' ' \nBEFORE   A '  _\nTHE H()N'BLE MR. JL!ST\u00a3CI*i'A_:S'--BOPA;,N.?\u00a7;\u00a7: '' n .\nREGULAR SECOND A?P;*\u00a3Q\u00a7L No. 338';  \nBETWEEN :     \n\nSUBBAN SHIVA RAG S\/O SHIVA RAD \n\nAGED ABOUT 55 YEARS  _   ..\n\nR\/A SI-IIVABAGHV    * .4  ' \nKADRI, MANGA\u00a3;oR'j7:-575 002  \" _  \nREP. BY HIS _,1D0wEI+2._0;F A'If:.QR.NE'i' V\n\nVENKATAPPA sHE'r&lt;\u00a7:QAR,_&quot;&#039; _ * &quot;\n\nS\/ 0 GOVIN\u00a3)A= s:--.1E&#039;I&#039;r;GAR ~ \u00bb \u00abV &#039;-\n\nAGED ABOUT 60 YEARS * V  _\n\nC\/O SUBBAN SFHVARAO   &#039;\n\nSHIVABAGEL KADR1_ V &#039; _ &quot; \n\nMANGALORE-.573 002  &#039;   APPELLANT\n\n _ (BY s~:.z%\u00a7;1;&#039;VK~cHAr\u00a7&quot;DRn;:~\u00a7A&#039;r;\u00bb\u00a3 ARIGA, ADV.)\n\n1 &#039;A &#039;KUMUJ&#039;.}fA.TD\/O LATE POOVAPPA\n AGE3D.ABOU&#039;I&#039; 68 YEARS\nR] ABABU GUDDA\nMANGALORE\n\n   , _ GADI NARNAPPA 3\/0 NARNAPPA\n\n&quot; AGED ABOUT &#039;76 YEARS\nR\/O DOOR&#039; NO. 8-883,\nNEAR&#039; KORAGAPPA POCJJARY\nHOUSEBAGUDDE\nMANGALORE  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>THIS APPEAL U \/s 100 OF&#8217; CFC, AGMNS1&#8242; THE JUDGMENT<br \/>\n85 DEGREE DATED: 12.1.2009 PASSED IN RA. N0. 138\/20!38*.ON<br \/>\nTHE FILE OF THE 1 AlI)E)L.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) _&amp;_c.,Jr.4,<\/p>\n<p>MANGALORE, DISNHSSENG &#8216;THE APPEAL AND c0NF1R;y1i:~:(3&#8211;&#8216;mE~<br \/>\nORDER DATED: 7.3.2008 PASSED IN EXCASE No; 1&#8217;34_i;20_C&#8217;?___ _<br \/>\n(HRC 3105; on THE FILE 0? THE 1 ADDL. c1vIL;Ju&#8217;:3&lt;x11297&#039;&quot;1&#039;o 101090.\n<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal cozmng on for  \ufb01iis &#8216;day;\n<\/p>\n<p>delivered the foliowing :  _ <\/p>\n<p>The appellant hcrei\ufb01 is  q\u00a7;e:;__t:ion the order<br \/>\ndated 1V2;&#8217;0&#8217;1.2.0(;9 \u00bb:;;j:~RA.&#8217;1\u00a7&#8217;c;&#8217;1ias; 2003.<\/p>\n<p>  am that the respondents<\/p>\n<p>herein. had&#8217; levied an A&#8217;e\u00a7st6s:1ition peti\ufb01on in execution case<\/p>\n<p> _No. 3;&#8217;.\u00a7i\u00a7\/ seeking___e:;ecu\ufb01on of the judgment and decree<\/p>\n<p>passsa 1j;;&#8217;~1.\u00ab~::a.&gt;.&#8217;CV 1003\/2005. The appeiiant herein \ufb01led an<\/p>\n<p> order XXI Rules 9?, 98, 99, 100 and 101<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V of  ebjeeiting to the said execution petition. The said<\/p>\n<p> * &#8220;_\u00bbapp1;;g;a\ufb01;5n was reg&#8217;ste;red as {A No.11.<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;o<\/p>\n<p>3. A\ufb01er considering the rival COHt\u20ac\ufb02tiOI1S&#8217;,&#8221;*-\u00a7T_l\u20ac. <\/p>\n<p>application \ufb01led by the appellant was   \ufb02ie&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Executing Court by its order dated  <\/p>\n<p>said order, the appeiiant herein. _preferred._a  pe&#8217;tvit.io&#8217;r2v &#8216;V <\/p>\n<p>in Rent Revision Petition No.&#8217; 20038&#8242;:    \ufb01ent<br \/>\nrevision petition was  -.;;&amp;1ot A&#8217;<br \/>\nConsidering that the exeeiitioo   possession<br \/>\nof the pmpextyr   jjeefened a regular<br \/>\nappeal in  the \ufb01ling of the<br \/>\n herein also \ufb01led a revision<br \/>\npetiiion  i:&gt;efore &#8216;    assailing the order dated<\/p>\n<p>1s.1c;2eo.s puasse_Vc:1&#8243;\u00a7n \u00a72R\u00a7=.No.24\/ 2008 dismissing the said<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Vievision  as not maintain&#8221; able. The said. revision<\/p>\n<p>  %s.sv&#8221;1\u00e9gi\u00a7tered as HRRP No.2&#8217;?8\/ 2003.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  &#8216;V4.   on notice to respondent had heard and<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;.\u00a7iisposet:1&#8243;ojf the revision petition in HRRP No.f.278\/ 2003 by its<\/p>\n<p>A dated 30.01.2909 holding that the rent revision<\/p>\n<p>petition No.24\/&#8217;.2008 is maizzxtainabie and aeconiingiy on<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>setting aside the order dated 18.10.2008 I{3$\u00a7OI&#8217;C(}&#8230;..tiil&#8217;6:.&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>to the \ufb01ie of the revisional court and directed&#8221;  Ififisiehai _ V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Court to consider and dispose of \ufb02iee\u00e9jce &#8216;on -;1:1ei&#8217;i&lt;f:s._ &quot;iV&quot;he&quot;&#039;.<\/p>\n<p>present position appears to be that  \u00e9aicl RRI5_&#039;NO.&#039;24\/<\/p>\n<p>was thereafter considened on mexlits. V  v\u00abEi.ie\u00a7is;,sed<br \/>\nagainst the appenant heztjn an.a&quot;&#039;th\u00ab\u00a7;;ca15*;;g;2ant&#039; hemi:{: is said<br \/>\nto have challenged the ca&#039; VA \ufb01n&#039; &#039;c&quot;  ..pet_fm&#039;.on which is<\/p>\n<p>pending consider\u00e9iion   V&#039;  <\/p>\n<p>5. In  the pmseut appeal would take<br \/>\na differe\ufb01t    in a normal circumstance, it<\/p>\n<p>woul\ufb01g &#8220;have l:.See3;1V_V aijpxcpfiate to consider the appeai only<\/p>\n<p>Vaftcx&#8217; issiie cf.._notice to the respondent. However, in the<\/p>\n<p>1   above mentioned facts leading to the tum.<\/p>\n<p>of ctreutsivwoviiaitl indicate that insofar as the consideration of<\/p>\n<p>T &#8220;&#8221;&lt;_ &quot;&#039;\u00a31:gejco1i&quot;c:c:i:ne$s or othcxwise of the order dated 67.08.2008<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;   by the Executing Court and the a\ufb01ixmatieu of the<\/p>\n<p> by the Lower Appeliaie Court in RA No.138\/2008<\/p>\n<p> wouid not survive for consideration in this appeal though the<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&quot;L<\/p>\n<p>said order are impugned, since that is an aspeet  V&#039;<\/p>\n<p>ultimately to be eonsnfiered in the   dt u<\/p>\n<p>the RRP No. 24\/ 2008 which was a ptejins\ufb01tnted <\/p>\n<p>held. to be majntainable by ~.._Co1ir&#039;t :09 be \u00bb &#039;<\/p>\n<p>conskiened on its mezeits sinoedvdjjptesentltjfd &#039;- ER? No.<br \/>\n24\/ 2008  been  Tofton   . &#039;<\/p>\n<p>6. Therefore,    Ve\ufb01veidienge to the<br \/>\ncorrectness 0; of   Lmjtthat aspect of the<\/p>\n<p>matter, my V\\%ie;*.\u00a3r\u00ab.Vdees&#8221;316t.._s;u&#8217;vive for consideration in the<\/p>\n<p>present apmu    extent the appeai becomes<\/p>\n<p>infruemons e$&lt;&lt;::ept&#039;for  that the \ufb01ndings rendered by<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02vthedn  would not bind the appellant<\/p>\n<p>  proceedings which would be considered<\/p>\n<p>independyenttd\u00e9i\u00e9ot&#039; the present proceedings would decide the<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;issue. .\n<\/p>\n<p>  The only other question which arises for<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; Heonsidezation is that the Lower Appellate Court while<\/p>\n<p>dismissing the appeal in RA.No.138\/ 2008 has imposed<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;r<\/p>\n<p>punitive costs on the appellant herein and the  <\/p>\n<p>imposing such costs has been indicated as    it <\/p>\n<p>process of Court. In this regard, tiiettiiiewer <\/p>\n<p>has indicated that the appeilant  tiespiteie&#8217;;&#8211;av_t&#8217;.jm&#8221; mg&#8221; ~.<\/p>\n<p>to property has not pmducedi =\u00a7ioc11:me.nts. sihas it<\/p>\n<p>instituted parallel p1oeee;iings..&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;  the tact that<\/p>\n<p>this Court in HRRP No\ufb01\ufb01sj .&#8217;2c~(S:3\u00a7vh\u00a7s.etIier;\u00a71ci&#8211;.:hat the order<\/p>\n<p>dated 18.10.2003   2008 as not<br \/>\nmaintajnablgm: thexea\ufb01er since the RR?<br \/>\nNo.24]&#8217;.3VO08. iA\u00ab.tV&#8217;_ieo1_1sidered on its merits, the<br \/>\ncorrectness-_   to the claim put forth<\/p>\n<p>by tiieappe\ufb02eint   eonsidered in the said proceedings<\/p>\n<p>Kittie  proceedings therefore being inconsequential<\/p>\n<p>I  2 iieensidezed as abuse of process. Further<\/p>\n<p>co\ufb01sigderjzigtigxe fact that the imposition of costs is a course<\/p>\n<p>  V&#8217;8-xiaptetivvtietveen the litigant and the Court, I am of the View<\/p>\n<p>it    the instant case, even without notice to the<\/p>\n<p>  gfe\u00e9pondent, the erder dated 12.91.2609 insofar as ixnposing<\/p>\n<p> costs on the appellant require to be set aside and the same is<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.\n<\/p>\n<p>accordingly set aside. it is further made clear <\/p>\n<p>appeal is ljmiteci only to the said aspect of  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>shall not be treated as a pmnoimcemeno  <\/p>\n<p>contaentions put forth by the    <\/p>\n<p>in respect of the property  the isubj\u00e9of in = L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>execution case No. 134\/ 2007 and&#8230;\ufb01ke._sa;ne 1\u00a7\u00e9o&#8217;tL1ci&#8217;Ah;a;Ve to be<br \/>\nconsidextd in the    <\/p>\n<p>In terms &#8220;of t&#8217;i1e_   sn\ufb01a\ufb01ds disposed of.<\/p>\n<p>No order &#8216;a\u00e9io xo;3sts.&#8217;7-I  V<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-3<br \/>\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN_GA\u00a7Q&#8217;_B\u00e9E A&#8217; DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JUNE V&#8217; &#8216; BEFORE A &#8216; _ THE H()N&#8217;BLE MR. JL!ST\u00a3CI*i&#8217;A_:S&#8217;&#8211;BOPA;,N.?\u00a7;\u00a7: &#8221; n . REGULAR SECOND A?P;*\u00a3Q\u00a7L No. 338&#8242;; BETWEEN : SUBBAN SHIVA RAG [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-27T22:36:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-27T22:36:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":893,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-27T22:36:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-27T22:36:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-27T22:36:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009"},"wordCount":893,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009","name":"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-27T22:36:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-subban-shiva-rao-vs-smt-kumuda-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Subban Shiva Rao vs Smt Kumuda on 1 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26178"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26178\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}