{"id":262135,"date":"2011-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011"},"modified":"2018-11-19T05:17:43","modified_gmt":"2018-11-18T23:47:43","slug":"varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nSA.No. 189 of 1998()\n\n\n\n1. VARUNNY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. CICILY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.SHEEJO CHACKO\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN\n\n Dated :20\/01\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                          P. BHAVADASAN, J.\n               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                         S.A. No. 189 of 1998\n              - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n             Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011.\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
            The plaintiff, who lost before the courts below,<\/p>\n
is the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
            2. The parties are siblings. Their father had<\/p>\n
executed Ext.A1 Will, whereby he bequeathed plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property, which is item No.5 in A schedule to<\/p>\n
the Will. Plaintiff laid the suit claiming absolute right<\/p>\n
over A schedule having 10 cents in extent and alleging<\/p>\n
that the defendant had no manner of right over the 10<\/p>\n
cents except to take water from the well situate in the<\/p>\n
property.\n<\/p>\n
            3. The defendant resisted the suit by pointing<\/p>\n
out that he has got half share in the property and the<\/p>\n
plaintiff is not justified in excluding him from enjoyment<\/p>\n
of the suit property.\n<\/p>\n
S.A. 189\/1998.                  2<\/span><\/p>\n
             4. The trial court raised necessary issues for<\/p>\n
consideration.    The evidence consists of the testimony of<\/p>\n
P.Ws.1 and 2 and documents marked as Exts.A1 to A3 from<\/p>\n
the side of the plaintiff. The defendant had examined D.Ws.<\/p>\n
1 to 5 and marked Exts.B1 and B3. Exts.C1 and C2 are the<\/p>\n
commission report and plan. Exts.X1, X1(a) and X2 are third<\/p>\n
party exhibits.\n<\/p>\n
             5. The trial court, after an evaluation of the<\/p>\n
evidence in the case, came to the conclusion that the claim<\/p>\n
of the plaintiff that he is entitled to absolute right over 10<\/p>\n
cents of property cannot be countenanced and dismissed<\/p>\n
the suit. The plaintiff took up the matter in appeal as A.S. 13<\/p>\n
of 1986. The defendant died during the pendency of the<\/p>\n
appeal and his legal heirs were brought on the party array<\/p>\n
as respondents 2 to 9.       The lower appellate court on a<\/p>\n
careful consideration of the evidence in the case concurred<\/p>\n
with the trial court and confirmed the decree. Hence this<\/p>\n
Second Appeal.\n<\/p>\n
S.A. 189\/1998.                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
             6. It is seen that during the pendency of this<\/p>\n
appeal, the appellant passed away and his legal heirs were<\/p>\n
brought on the party array as additional appellants 2 to 4.<\/p>\n
             7. Notice is seen to have issued on the following<\/p>\n
questions of law:\n<\/p>\n
             “A) Whether the courts below have not<\/p>\n
      committed error in law in the construction of<\/p>\n
      Ext.A1 Will for dismissing the suit.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             B)  Whether the courts below have not<\/p>\n
      misconstrued and misunderstood Ext.A1 and the<\/p>\n
      pleadings and other evidence in the case for<\/p>\n
      dismissing the suit.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             C) Whether the findings recorded beyond the<\/p>\n
      pleadings    and    evidence   in   the case    are<\/p>\n
      sustainable in law.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             D) Whether the interpretation of Ext.A1 Will<\/p>\n
      is correct in law and in accordance with the well<\/p>\n
      established legal principles.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             E) When distinct and separate properties are<\/p>\n
      bequeathed to different legatees under a Will<\/p>\n
      whether it can be held that the legatees are<\/p>\n
      co-owners in joint possession of those properties.<\/p>\n
S.A. 189\/1998.                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             F) Whether the findings of fact by the courts<\/p>\n
      below are not perverse, illegal and unsustainable<\/p>\n
      on    the  basis  of  total  misconstruction    and<\/p>\n
      misunderstanding of Ext.A1 Will.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n
             8. The essential dispute in this case     centers<\/p>\n
round the construction of two clauses in the Will said to have<\/p>\n
been executed by the father of the parties. Both the courts<\/p>\n
below have extracted the portion in their respective<\/p>\n
judgments and it is unnecessary to re-quote those portions<\/p>\n
in this judgment.     Both the courts below on a careful<\/p>\n
consideration and evaluation of the clauses came to the<\/p>\n
conclusion that the      word ”  ” mentioned in the<\/p>\n
respective portions set apart to the parties mean that the<\/p>\n
vacant land should be taken in equal shares.         On going<\/p>\n
through the relevant recital, there is no reason to take a<\/p>\n
different view. The plea of the plaintiff that ”  “(equal<\/p>\n
share) is confined to the taking of water from the well<\/p>\n
cannot be accepted as found by both the courts below.<\/p>\n
S.A. 189\/1998.                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Moreover, it is pointed out that the plaintiff has been paying<\/p>\n
tax only for 6 = cents, whereas the total extent is 13 cents.<\/p>\n
It is also seen that in his ceiling return, the extent shown is<\/p>\n
8 cents. It was also mentioned in the commission report<\/p>\n
that the entire property lies as a compact plot without any<\/p>\n
division.\n<\/p>\n
             9. Both the the courts below have noticed that the<\/p>\n
Will has been carefully drawn and specific rights have been<\/p>\n
given to the legatees.       In relation to the staircase, the<\/p>\n
plaintiff is given only a right of user.     It shows that the<\/p>\n
testator was very conscious of the dispositions made by him<\/p>\n
and a reading of the relevant clauses will clearly show that<\/p>\n
the recital is clear to the effect that the vacant land should<\/p>\n
be taken equally by the legatees.        That alone has been<\/p>\n
found by the courts below.          There is no illegality or<\/p>\n
irregularity in the finding of the courts below nor could it be<\/p>\n
said to be perverse or unwarranted.\n<\/p>\n
S.A. 189\/1998.                6<\/span><\/p>\n
             No question of law, much less any substantial<\/p>\n
question of law arises for consideration in this second<\/p>\n
appeal. This second appeal is without merits and it is liable<\/p>\n
to be dismissed. I do so. There will be no order as to costs.<\/p>\n
                                         P. BHAVADASAN,
\n                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n
sb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM SA.No. 189 of 1998() 1. VARUNNY … Petitioner Vs 1. CICILY … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM For Respondent :SMT.SHEEJO CHACKO The Hon’ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN Dated :20\/01\/2011 O R D E R P. BHAVADASAN, J. – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-262135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVarunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-18T23:47:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-18T23:47:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":827,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-18T23:47:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-18T23:47:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-18T23:47:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011"},"wordCount":827,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011","name":"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-18T23:47:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/varunny-vs-cicily-on-20-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Varunny vs Cicily on 20 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262135"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262135\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}