{"id":262166,"date":"2010-01-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-14T17:58:39","modified_gmt":"2018-09-14T12:28:39","slug":"state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCA\/8061\/2009\t 8\/ 8\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 8061 of 2009\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nMISC.CIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 2101 of 2004\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 8478 of 1990\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 8062 of 2009\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nMISC.CIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 2103 of 2004\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 8474 of 2009\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 8464 of 2009\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nMISC.CIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 2102 of 2004\n \n\nIn\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 8477 of 2009\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nTARLIKABEN\nWD\/O SAMIR MAHENDRAPRASAD TRIPATHI & 7 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance : \nGOVERNMENT\nPLEADER for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, \nMR JITENDRA M PATEL for Respondent(s) : 1,\n1.2.1, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5, 1.3.1,1.3.2  \nNone for Respondent(s) :\n1.2.2  \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 27\/01\/2010 \n\n \n\nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
Rule.\n<\/p>\n
\tShri Jitendra M.Patel, learned advocate waives service of notice of
\n\trule on behalf of private respondents herein in each of the
\n\tapplications. With the consent of learned advocates appearing for
\n\tthe respective parties, all these applications are heard finally
\n\ttoday. As the common question of law and facts arise in all the
\n\tthree applications, they are being disposed of by this common
\n\tjudgment and order.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tall these applications, respective applicants-State of Gujarat has
\n\tprayed for an appropriate order to condone the delay in preferring
\n\tthe applications to recall the order passed by the learned Single
\n\tJudge in special civil application Nos.8478 of 1990, 8474 of 1990,
\n\t8477 of 1990 and to restore the same to the file, which were
\n\tdismissed as having been abated by the learned Single Judge in view
\n\tof the repeal of Urban Land Ceiling Act<\/a> observing that the
\n\tpossession of land in question was not taken over by the State
\n\tGovernment.\n<\/p>\n
Shri
\n\tMengdey, learned AGP has submitted as such, the possession of the
\n\tland in question was already taken over by the State Government
\n\twhich were declared as excess surplus land under the provisions of
\n\tthe Urban Land Ceiling Act<\/a> after following necessary procedure and
\n\tthe notifications under Section 10(5)<\/a> of the Urban Land Ceiling Act
\n\tand after drawing necessary panchnama and even the factum of taking
\n\tover the possession was also recorded in the revenue record. It is,
\n\ttherefore, submitted that the order passed by the learned Single
\n\tJudge dismissing the main special civil application(s) as having
\n\tbeen abated in view of the repeal of Urban Land Ceiling Act<\/a>
\n\tobserving that the possession of the land in question was not taken
\n\tover by the Sate Government is on factually wrong premise. It is
\n\tsubmitted that as such, through oversight and for whatever the
\n\treason, the correct position was not pointed out by the learned AGP
\n\tat the relevant time, who appeared in the aforesaid petitions. It is
\n\tsubmitted that delay caused in preferring restoration applications
\n\tand\/or to review the order passed by the learned Single Judge is
\n\tsufficiently explained in the applications. It is submitted that the
\n\trespective applicants-State of Gujarat, has a meritorious case and
\n\tthere are chances in succeeding the Misc. Civil Applications and
\n\ttherefore, it is requested to allow the present applications by
\n\tcondoning the delay in preferring the respective applications to
\n\treview and\/or recall the order passed by the learned single Judge in
\n\tmain special civil applications.\n<\/p>\n
Shri
\n\tMengdey, learned AGP has relied upon the order passed by this Court
\n\tdated 11.10.2005 passed in Civil Application for Condonation of
\n\tdelay No.9103 of 2005 in Misc. Civil Application No.2222 of 2005
\n\twhich came to be confirmed upto the Hon’ble Supreme Court by which,
\n\tin a similar set of circumstances the delay in preferring the
\n\tapplication to review \/ recall the order passed by the learned
\n\tsingle Judge by which, similar type of order was passed by the
\n\tlearned Single Judge disposing of \/ dismissing the special civil
\n\tapplications as having been abated in view of the repeal of Urban
\n\tLand Ceiling Act<\/a> on the ground that possession of the land in
\n\tquestion was not taken over by the State Government and which was
\n\tdisputed by the State Government, delay came to be condoned. By
\n\tmaking above submissions, it is requested to allow the present
\n\tapplications.\n<\/p>\n
All
\n\tthese applications are opposed by Shri Jitendra M.Patel, learned
\n\tadvocate appearing on behalf of private respondents. It is submitted
\n\tthat there is a gross negligence on the part of the applicants in
\n\tpreferring the applications to review and\/or recall the order passed
\n\tby the learned Single Judge belatedly. It is submitted that for the
\n\tnegligence on the part of the State Government and\/or its officers,
\n\tthe private respondents should not be made to suffer. It is
\n\tsubmitted that even the applications for Condonation of delay were
\n\tnot submitted along with the Misc. Civil Applications and they have
\n\tbeen filed after period of 4 (four) years. Therefore also, it is
\n\trequested to dismiss the present applications. Shri Jitendra
\n\tM.Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the private
\n\trespondents has relied upon the following decisions of the Hon’ble
\n\tSupreme Court as well as this Court.\n<\/p>\n
State
\n\tof Gujarat & Anr. V\/s. Duda Megha reported in 1995 (2)
\n\tGLH (UJ) 19;\n<\/p>\n
State
\n\tof Gujarat & Anr. V\/s. Urban Land Tribunal & Ors.
\n\treported in 1998 (1) GCD 237 (Guj);\n<\/p>\n
Collector
\n\tV\/s. Maganlal Karshandas Katakpara vide Civil Application
\n\tNo.6481 of 1998, dated 19.8.1998;\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tState of West Bengal V\/s. The Administrator, Howrah Municipality and
\n\tOthers reported in AIR 1972 SC 749;\n<\/p>\n
P.K.Ramachandra
\n\tV\/s. State of Kerala reported in AIR 1998 SC 2276;\n<\/p>\n
Ajit
\n\tSingh Thakur Singh and Another V\/s. State of Gujarat reported in
\n\tAIR 1981 SC 733;\n<\/p>\n
Budha
\n\tRam V\/s. The State and Others reported in AIR 1999 Rajasthan
\n\t249;\n<\/p>\n
Principal
\n\tV\/s. V.M.Joshi vide Civil Application No.12044 of 2000 and
\n\tcognate matter dated 26.7.2001.\n<\/p>\n
Relying upon the aforesaid decisions
\n\tand making above submissions, it is requested to dismiss the present
\n\tapplications.\n<\/p>\n
Shri
\n\tJitendra M.Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of private
\n\trespondents has stated that if this Court is inclined to condone the
\n\tdelay in that case, he does not invite any further reasoned order as
\n\tit might prejudice to the case of the private respondents in the
\n\tmain applications.\n<\/p>\n
Heard
\n\tthe learned advocates appareling on behalf of the respective
\n\tparties.\n<\/p>\n
It
\n\tis to be noted that respective Misc. Civil Applications have been
\n\tpreferred by the State Government to review and recall the order
\n\tpassed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the said special civil
\n\tapplications as having been abated on the repeal of Urban Land
\n\tCeiling Act<\/a> and by observing that the possession of the respective
\n\tlands in question having not taken over by the State Government and
\n\tthe case on behalf of the Sate Government is that as such,
\n\tpossession of the lands in question, which were declared as excess
\n\tsurplus land under the provisions of Urban Land Ceiling Act<\/a> were
\n\ttaken over by the State Government. However, the same has not been
\n\tconsidered by the learned Single Judge and the orders have been
\n\tpassed in wrong premise. In back ground of the above, present
\n\tapplications are required to be considered. Considering the
\n\taverments in the applications, as such, State Government has tried
\n\tto explain the delay sufficiently. It also appears that
\n\tapplicant-State of Gujarat has reasonably prima-facie good case on
\n\tmerits and there are all chances in succeeding in Misc. Civil
\n\tApplications. It is the contention on behalf of the private
\n\trespondents that there is gross negligence on the part of the State
\n\tGovernment in preferring the applications belatedly. However, it is
\n\tto be noted that for the negligence on the part of the officers for
\n\twhatever the reasons, the State should not be made to suffer. In the
\n\tfacts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion
\n\tthat the State is to be given one opportunity to submit the case on
\n\tmerits in the Misc. Civil Applications.\n<\/p>\n
It
\n\tis to be noted that it is not the case on behalf of the private
\n\trespondents that there is a deliberate delay on the part of the
\n\tapplicants in preferring respective Misc. Civil Applications within
\n\tthe period of limitation and\/or preferring the applications
\n\tbelatedly. It appears to the Court that if the delay is condoned, no
\n\tprejudice to be caused to the parties, more particularly, private
\n\trespondents in the respective Misc. Civil Applications and
\n\trespective Misc. Civil Applications will be heard on merits and the
\n\trespective private respondents shall have an opportunity to submit
\n\tthe case on merits. On the other hand, if the delay is not condoned,
\n\tin that case, applicants would be deprived of submitting the case on
\n\tmerits.\n<\/p>\n
Considering
\n\tthe aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the dispute
\n\tinvolved in the respective Misc. Civil Applications, this Court is
\n\tof the opinion that delay be condoned and the respective applicants
\n\tbe given an opportunity to submit the case on merits by condoning
\n\tthe delay.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tview of the above and the request made by Shri Patel learned
\n\tadvocate appearing on behalf of the private respondents, this Court
\n\tis not assigning any further reasons and discussing the judgments
\n\tcited on behalf of the respective parties. Suffice is to say that in
\n\tthe facts and circumstances of the case narrated herein above, delay
\n\tdeserves to be condoned.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tview of the above and for the reasons stated above, delay caused in
\n\tpreferring Misc. Civil Applications to review and recall the order
\n\tpassed in main special civil application Nos.8478 of 1990, 8477 of
\n\t1990 and 8474 of 1990 is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute in
\n\teach of the applications. In the facts and circumstances of the
\n\tcase, there shall be no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
(M.R.SHAH,
\nJ.)<\/p>\n
(ashish)<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CA\/8061\/2009 8\/ 8 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8061 of 2009 In MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2101 of 2004 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8478 of 1990 With CIVIL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-262166","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-14T12:28:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-14T12:28:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1479,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\",\"name\":\"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-14T12:28:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-14T12:28:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-14T12:28:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010"},"wordCount":1479,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010","name":"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-14T12:28:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-tarlikaben-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State vs Tarlikaben on 27 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262166","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262166"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262166\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262166"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262166"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262166"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}