{"id":262187,"date":"2008-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2"},"modified":"2017-07-18T17:31:47","modified_gmt":"2017-07-18T12:01:47","slug":"lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">IN TIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE WP.NO.268i9 OF 2995\n-1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARMA TAKA A TBANGALORE\n\nI}A'I'ED THIS 'TKE 301:]: DAY OF JUNE, 2008\nBEFORE\n\nms Houms MR. JUSHCE NJCPA m _     n\n\nW.P.NO. Q6819 OF 2005     %\n\nBETWEEN\n\n'I\n\nLAKSHMI G BHAT\nAGED ABOUT 53 YEARS  _\n\nW10 GANESH N Bl-{AT _  _  'V\nNELLIKUNJA HOUSE, I-7.0 DCDDATHOTA,  \" V \nSULUA 'mun ~ 3 1  V . ~--  '\n\nVISHALAKSHI L_34A5~\u00a33 Vi_Li.AG\u00a3\u20ac  ' \nBANTWAL T;.a'.'uI';KNO iv. \" , \nKATIPALLASURA'THKIf-1.  \nMAMGALQRE TALUK.\n\nrm' 'msxnacr 5%. 149. .. ..... V4 \u00bb\n\n. FARVATH! .8' \u00a73HAT\nA j \"AGED ABOUT 51T_Yi':'\u00a7ARS,\n 'WK? SHANiiAR Bi-!\ufb01;T\n\nMATHRUSHREE NILAYA,\nKI'.-NYANA ~':!_2Li;AGE AND P'.O\nBAN'fWAL TALUK\n\n' V  ox oasjmcr 574 279\n\n V. \"SHARADA &lt;3 BHAT\n\n . agar; ABOUT49Yt-ZARS,\n\n&quot; VWIGAGANAPATHY BHAT\nlif.ABBiNAHiTHLU HOUSE,\n\n= .. \u00ab-BALNADU VILLAGE P.O UJIRUPADE\n\nPUTTUR TALUK D.K DISTRICT 574 203\n\nJAYANTHI C K\nAGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,\n\nIN THE? HIGH COHRT OF KARNATAKA AT \u00a3\u00a7ANGA1..ORE WP.NO-268i9 OF 3305\n\n\n\n(BY SRLK SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE)&quot; \nAND ;  A&#039;\n\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH CGIJRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. W.P3~EO.268I9 OF 2905\n\n-2-\n\nW10 CHANNAKESHAVA BHAT\n\nCID LAKSI-{Mi G BHAT NELLiKUNJA HOUSE\nPOST DODATHOTA, SULLEA TALUK\n\nD-f( DlSTR\u00a3CT\n\nSUMANA F&#039;RABHAKAR,   \nAGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, I\nWIO PRABHAKAR\n\nNO 36, BANASHAMKARI NILAYA\n\n4TH CROSS, 88K fl STAGE,  \nKADERENAHALLI BANGAUJRE 560 976;\n\n  \n\nTHE SECRETARY,_   &#039;\n\nLAND TRIBUNAL S\u00a3Jt.i._lA \ncm msmncr  \n\nTHE sEcR\u00a3:rARY----&lt;aov*s__oF &#039;K5R%NaJ5s<A>u:VooR VELLAGE,\nP.o'a&lt;ua&lt;Ku.;AoKA, SULUA TALUK\n\n&quot; D K m;STR\u20acJCT-5?4212\n\nfa nN&#039;jKR\u00a3SHNA KUMAR\n-  &#039;SIQSUBRAYA am:\nMAJOR, mm: srones,\n\nAMARA MUDNOOR VILLAGE&#039;\n\n&#039;V - T3 O KUKKUJAHKA, SULLIA TALUK\n\nD.K MSTRICT-574212\n\nLE\u00a3.AVATH\u00a3 TEAHCER\nAGED ABOUT 54 YEARS\n\nIN THE HIGH CQHRT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE VJ.P.NO.26319 OF 2005\n\n\n\nIN &quot;HIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. \\V_P.N0.268l9 OF N05\n-3-\n\nJAYANAGAR, P.O SULUA\nBK {}iSTRlCT--~57421 2\n\n7 sum BHAT N\n33.3291 7:2, &quot;SUVISMITHA&quot; _ V\nCHANDRIKA LAYOUT. NETHAJEE   x *\nsue:-man CHANDRA BOSE ROAD, KA9R\u00a3 VKAMBLA 9 &quot; ~  ~\nBEJA\u00a3,MANGA1.0RE-04  .  \n\n(BY SRWABIGA SHIVANANDAF&#039;-&#039;PA, HCGP 1&#039;~&#039;c;s.z_ R1 3.&quot; V&#039; V\nSRl.KM.NATARA..\u00a5 ADVOCATE FOR R3;    \nR4, R5, R6 AND R? ARE SERVED)\n\nTHIS WP. 13 FILED UN AR&#039;HCLsfES  ARD 227 OF THE\nCONSTITURGN OF NDIA, PRAYING TC! THELOARQER PASSED BY\nR1 LAND REFORMS TR\u00a5BUNAi. AT SULLIA &#039;{Q., D.K;&quot;\u00a3?$l LR&#039;y*:\u00a3839l74-75 DT.\n29.8.79 GRANT\u00a3NG OCCUPANCY R!GH&#039;l&quot;&#039;!&#039;.Q SR!cRAMA\u00bbN{$lKA THE R3 WDE\n\nANNEXA. TO THE WRBT  1: \n\nmas w.P. ciommts.\u00a25i~&amp;&quot;Fcei&#039;ti$\u00a7isLIs:::\u00e9sA:\u00a7&quot;{ HEAR!NG N *3&#039; emu?\n\n&#039;\u00a31-us DAY, TH\u00a3v\u00a2QpRI_a&#039;1Ac:;&quot;--3_Tg\u00a7E  \nThese l$5i&#039;i\u00a7ic\ufb01\u00e9rs cfciming to be c the tegat\n:g5grmn:;tex:es  Smt. Parameswariamma\n\nwlc  questioning the cwrectness of the\n\nTV viirapugn\u00e9ti &#039;Hated 29&quot;&#039; August 1979 passed by the\n\n Tribunal, Sutlia in proceeding No.\n\n granting the occupancy right in favour\n\nIN &#039;I&quot;HE RIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.NO.268l9 OF 2905\n\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. WP.NO.2IS8i9 OF 2995\n-4\u00bb\n\nof 3&quot;&#039; respondent in respect of the land in ques\ufb01on,_4vh\u00a7a%.r;e~<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">prwented this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2. The third respondent claimirlgto    <\/p>\n<p>respect of the lands in question had <\/p>\n<p>registration of occupancy  tlefore~ Vfirejt<br \/>\nrespondent- Land Tribuna\u00a3:$ulIla;&#8221;&#8216;  reeperi\ufb02dent.<br \/>\nLand Tribunal, Sullia, are  and after<br \/>\nfollowing the  under the<br \/>\nrelevant  tl\ufb01e   Act, and in the<br \/>\nlight of   available on<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01le, has registered \ufb01le  rights in favour of third<\/p>\n<p>respondent e..holdiiig_V_VV:  the request of the landowner<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;for&#8217; en has been considered and matter was<\/p>\n<p>  V adjourned  the land owner was not present<\/p>\n<p> and   the basis of due materials available on<\/p>\n<p>  has passed the impugned order. Being<\/p>\n<p>  .e\u00a7grieved by the impugned order passed by the first<\/p>\n<p>IN ms. meg COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE w3&gt;,1szo.2sa19 or 2005<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH CO{}&#8217;R&#8217;\u00a3&#8217; OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. W.P.N0.26819 OF E065\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">-3,<\/p>\n<p>communicatidn, requesting for adjournment stating thgat<\/p>\n<p>her mother had gone to attend family <\/p>\n<p>1412,1977\u00bb The said applications subrhitted\ufb01zay  <\/p>\n<p>moiher of the petitioners the 6&#8243;&#8216; res&#8217;pdndsni&#8217;,  <\/p>\n<p>red ink page Nos-3.23 and 33 rem %  \u00a2r:ganatt&#8217;r r<\/p>\n<p>records. Further, after micros\u00e9stiic evsiustisri<br \/>\noriginal records it   had<br \/>\nproduced several receipts fer.:hsv\u00a7riVgf.:psid..tf\u00bb1s_&#8211;!svy and the<br \/>\nsaid receipts arei: if}.  at red<br \/>\nink page   third respondent has<\/p>\n<p>produced  paid the assessment of<\/p>\n<p>vv4.rsyenl\u00a5\u00bb\u00a7,,&#8217;\u00a7u3:;&#8217;.g~ Vv atudred\ufb02 ____  page Nos. 12 to 32. Third<\/p>\n<p>risprir1dent_v&#8217;hasv..s?&#8217;iso produced the receipts in Form No.11<\/p>\n<p>Viikamr-ztaka Food and Civil Supplies<\/p>\n<p>_.j_.&#8217;_j3.4Carporatio;t&#8221;:i_imited which are in his name, for having<\/p>\n<p>  the food grains which was grown in the land in<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;jdt:sstion by the 3&#8242;&#8221; respondent at ink page Nos. 2 to 10.<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;Fixrlttmer it is pertinent tof\u00e9gthat, after giving sufficient<\/p>\n<p>IN Tiif-I HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W_P.N(,&#8217;}.\u00a3\u00a36829 GP 21305<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. WP.NO.36819 OF 2905<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">-9-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>opportunity to the land owner\u00bb Smt. Parameswariemrrre..V_<\/p>\n<p>and to her daughter, 6&#8243;&#8216; respondent, and   <\/p>\n<p>due procedures, the first rmpondentg-Larid&#8221;&#8216;v&#8221;&#8216;iiribii&#8217;ria&#8217;_i;_  <\/p>\n<p>Sullia, has registered the occupanoy&#8217;l%ri\u00a7,rhte  <\/p>\n<p>third respondent. Not righting aiiiejhfgthy order<br \/>\nTribunal is not a ground&#8217; for   &#8220;riot a<br \/>\nspeaking order.   V   has<br \/>\nconducted the  ae:  die relevant<\/p>\n<p>provisions of    Flules and as to<\/p>\n<p>whether en a  conducted on the<\/p>\n<p>application \ufb01iediby  on the basis of the<\/p>\n<p>:_l.&#8217;relevan?\u00a7&#8217;;rna_t:erials &#8216;airaii&#8211;et3le on file has to be looked into.<\/p>\n<p> of-ase, after microscopic evaluation of<\/p>\n<p> of&#8217;   records available on file as referred<\/p>\n<p>  it emerges is that, third respondent has<\/p>\n<p>  substantial documentary evidence to establish<\/p>\n<p>  was cultivating the said land as on 1.3.1974 and<\/p>\n<p>  said land is vested with the government and dwerefore,<\/p>\n<p>%&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.NO.268l9  2005<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. W33.}*\u00a5O-268 19 OF 2605<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">-11-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>submission made by learned counsel appearing <\/p>\n<p>petitioners is liable to be set aside at threshoid.__;&#8221;&#8216;i-iei(ing&#8221;w\u00ab&#8217; i <\/p>\n<p>regard to the facts and circumstances of the 3&#8243;  i <\/p>\n<p>stated above, the writ petition filed   :;_:A<\/p>\n<p>to be dismissed at threshold as&#8221;devoid of\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">7. For yet another    by<br \/>\npetitioners&#8221; is liable to be  costs<\/p>\n<p>is on the ground iofdeiay    order<br \/>\nhas been  \ufb01sirspssent. Land Tribunal ,<br \/>\nsunia. aseariy on  \ufb01ugust 1979 and time<\/p>\n<p>petitioners never&#8217;  this writ petition on 15&#8243;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p> and\ufb01were is an inordinate delay of nearly<\/p>\n<p>  the said inordinate delay has not<\/p>\n<p>  been  by the petitioners satisfactorily by<\/p>\n<p> sogent and valid reasons, except making a<\/p>\n<p> statement that \ufb01wrey are also interested parties<\/p>\n<p>T &#8216;:&#8217;1.snd&#8217;they have not been notified and they have got their<\/p>\n<p>_&#8217;_&#8217;____,___,,,._&#8230;&#8230;.&#8212;&#8212;u.<\/p>\n<p> share in the joint family pr\ufb01ty. In View of not expiaining<\/p>\n<p>in THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.263l9 or 2005<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. WP.NO.268i9 OF 3305<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">-12-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the inordinate deiay satisfactorily by the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>assigning cogent reasons, the instant writ petitio_n:&#8217;_:\ufb01ie\u00a7d_&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>petitioners is liable to be dismissed umegscsgzndi at j  <\/p>\n<p>delay and lashes also.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">3. For the foregoing &#8216;fe\u00a7sons,A&#8221;&#8216;\ufb02je&#8217;<br \/>\npetition \ufb02ied by petmonerg is  a\u00e9sdeu\u00e9id of<br \/>\nmerits and also on the  &#8216;Q?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">{N THE HIGH CQIIRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.268I9 OF 2065<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil IN TIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE WP.NO.268i9 OF 2995 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARMA TAKA A TBANGALORE I}A&#8217;I&#8217;ED THIS &#8216;TKE 301:]: DAY OF JUNE, 2008 BEFORE ms Houms MR. JUSHCE NJCPA m _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-262187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-18T12:01:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-18T12:01:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":708,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\",\"name\":\"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-18T12:01:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-18T12:01:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-18T12:01:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2"},"wordCount":708,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2","name":"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-18T12:01:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmi-g-bhat-vs-the-secretary-land-tribunal-on-30-june-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lakshmi G Bhat vs The Secretary Land Tribunal &#8230; on 30 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262187"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262187\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}