{"id":262435,"date":"2008-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-02-04T13:57:24","modified_gmt":"2017-02-04T08:27:24","slug":"present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n            CHANDIGARH\n\n                         ***\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">            CWP NO. 19875 OF 2006<br \/>\n            DATE OF DECISION: 22.09.2008<\/p>\n<p>                         ***<\/p>\n<p>Wonderland Skate Club vs       Union of India and others.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">                         ***<\/p>\n<p>CORAM: Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice T.S.Thakur, CJ and<br \/>\n       Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">                         ***<\/p>\n<p>Present:    Shri Jatin Salwan, Advocate, for the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">            Shri Onkar Singh Batalvi, Advocate, for UOI.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">            Shri Ashok Bhasin, Sr.Advocate, with<br \/>\n            Shri Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate, and<br \/>\n            Shri Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents<br \/>\n            No. 1 and 2.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">            Shri A.Roy, Advocate.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">            Shri Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent No.4.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">                         ***<\/p>\n<p>T.S.Thakur, CJ (Oral)<\/p>\n<p>            This petition has been filed in public interest. It prays for a<\/p>\n<p>mandamus directing Union of India and the Indian Olympic Association<\/p>\n<p>through its Secretary    to include Roller Skating as one of the medal<\/p>\n<p>disciplines in the National Games that were then scheduled to be held from<\/p>\n<p>9th February to 18th February, 2007 at Gauhati (Assam).<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">            In response to a notice of motion issued by this Court to the<\/p>\n<p>respondents, no one entered appearance on behalf of respondent No.2-<\/p>\n<p>Indian Olympic Association, to justify the non-inclusion of Roller Skating<\/p>\n<p>in the games referred to above. This Court, therefore, passed an order on\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">                                 -2-   CWP NO. 19875 OF 2006<\/p>\n<p>January 31, 2007 directing the Indian Olympic Association and the Assam<\/p>\n<p>Olympic Association (Organizer of the National Games-2007) to include<\/p>\n<p>Roller Skating as one of the medal disciplines in the National Games<\/p>\n<p>referred to above. Since the Indian Olympic Association failed to comply<\/p>\n<p>with the said direction, contempt petition No. 524 of 2007 was filed in this<\/p>\n<p>Court in which the petitioner alleged a deliberate defiance of the order<\/p>\n<p>passed by this Court on the part of the Indian Olympic Association as well<\/p>\n<p>as Assam Olympic Association.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">            The Indian Olympic Association has in its counter affidavit and<\/p>\n<p>the reply to the contempt petition mentioned earlier not only questioned the<\/p>\n<p>locus standi of the petitioner, to maintain this writ petition but additionally<\/p>\n<p>pointed out that Roller Skating is not a recognized Olympic event for<\/p>\n<p>Olympic Games. It is, according to the Indian Olympic Association only a<\/p>\n<p>demonstration game which is more popular in some part of the country than<\/p>\n<p>others. It is submitted that National Games are organized by the Indian<\/p>\n<p>Olympic Association every two years, in which apart from Olympic events<\/p>\n<p>the Association includes only two such games as are popular in a given<\/p>\n<p>region. Since the    number of such regionally popular games is large,<\/p>\n<p>selection of two games played as demonstration events depends also on the<\/p>\n<p>venue of the said games. The process of selection of such demonstration<\/p>\n<p>games in the National Games also takes place much in advance of the<\/p>\n<p>holding of the games to enable the participating States to select and send<\/p>\n<p>their teams to compete in such games. The respondents in the above<\/p>\n<p>backdrop contend that the directions issued by this Court for inclusion of<\/p>\n<p>Roller Skating as a medal discipline in Gauhati, could not be implemented<\/p>\n<p>as the period available for such inclusion was too short to enable the\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">                            -3-   CWP NO. 19875 OF 2006<\/p>\n<p>participating States to send their participating teams and the Olympic<\/p>\n<p>Association to arrange necessary technical assistance        in the form of<\/p>\n<p>Referees, technical hands etc. Besides the       necessary infrastructure for<\/p>\n<p>hosting the said event could not be created by the Organizing Committee of<\/p>\n<p>the National Games.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">                The respondent Indian Olympic Association has further stated<\/p>\n<p>that although there is a federation at the National level for holding Roller<\/p>\n<p>Skating as a game but no request was received from the said Federation for<\/p>\n<p>inclusion of Roller Skating as a medal event in the National Games till<\/p>\n<p>recently. The Indian Olympic Association is, according to M\/S Ashok<\/p>\n<p>Bhasin and Lovkesh Sawhney now ready to examine the said request and<\/p>\n<p>take an appropriate decision in the matter, under intimation to the Roller<\/p>\n<p>Skating Federation of India and also to the petitioner. It is contended by the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel that the selection for the next games scheduled to be held in<\/p>\n<p>Ranchi in the State of Jharkhand has already taken place and that any<\/p>\n<p>decision regarding inclusion of Roller Skating at this stage maybe difficult<\/p>\n<p>yet feasible.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">                On behalf of the petitioner-club, it was argued by Mr. Jatin<\/p>\n<p>Salwan that Roller Skating is recognized by the Indian Olympic<\/p>\n<p>Association and was earlier included in the National Games. He further<\/p>\n<p>contended that Roller Skating has       also been included in 2010 Asians<\/p>\n<p>Games as a medal discipline. There is therefore no justification for treating<\/p>\n<p>roller skating as a regional game nor can it be compared with any other<\/p>\n<p>demonstration event. He argued that in the competition held in December<\/p>\n<p>2007 in Kolkata Indian Women had won the championship while the boys<\/p>\n<p>won bronze medal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">                                -4-   CWP NO. 19875 OF 2006<\/p>\n<p>            We have given our careful consideration to the submissions<\/p>\n<p>made by the learned counsel. The Indian Olympic Association it is common<\/p>\n<p>ground holds the National Games every two years in which all such events<\/p>\n<p>as are recognized by the International Olympic Committee are included. It<\/p>\n<p>is not in dispute that Roller Skating is not one of such events recognized by<\/p>\n<p>the said committee. Even so, Roller Skating has been included in some of<\/p>\n<p>the National games held in the past and may be even in the Asian Games as<\/p>\n<p>pointed out by the counsel for the petitioner. Whether or not Roller Skating<\/p>\n<p>deserves to be included on a regular basis as a medal discipline, is however<\/p>\n<p>a matter upon which this court cannot authoritatively pronounce any<\/p>\n<p>judgment. That is because the inclusion of a particular game would depend<\/p>\n<p>upon a variety of factors to be considered by the Olympic Association.<\/p>\n<p>Having said so, we see no reason why the request made by the Roller<\/p>\n<p>Skating Federation of India to the Indian Olympic Association for inclusion<\/p>\n<p>of Roller Skating Game in the forth coming Games should not be<\/p>\n<p>considered on its merits by the said Association. To that extent even M\/S<\/p>\n<p>Bhasin and Sawhney, appearing for the Indian Olympic Association have no<\/p>\n<p>objection. They submitted that for the inclusion of the event in the forth-<\/p>\n<p>coming Games, the Indian Olympic Association would consider the request<\/p>\n<p>made by the Federation and take an appropriate decision un-influenced of<\/p>\n<p>the fact that the petitioner-club has dragged them to this Court and even<\/p>\n<p>accused them of having committed contempt.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">            In the totality of the above circumstances, therefore, this writ<\/p>\n<p>petition can in our opinion be disposed of with a suitable direction to the<\/p>\n<p>Indian Olympic Association to consider the request made by the Roller<\/p>\n<p>Skating Federation of India for inclusion of the Roller Skating as a medal\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">                          -5-   CWP NO. 19875 OF 2006<\/p>\n<p>discipline in the forthcoming games. The needful shall be done by the<\/p>\n<p>Indian Olympic Association expeditiously but not later than four weeks<\/p>\n<p>from today, under an intimation to the Roller Skating Federation of India<\/p>\n<p>and also to the petitioner herein. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed<\/p>\n<p>of with the above direction, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. All<\/p>\n<p>the previous orders passed by this court on the subject shall to that extent<\/p>\n<p>stand modified.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">            A copy of the order be given dasti.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">\n<p id=\"p_19\">                                                   (T.S.THAKUR)<br \/>\n                                                   CHIEF JUSTICE<\/p>\n<p>                                                   (SURYA KANT)<br \/>\n                                                       JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>September 22, 2008<\/p>\n<p>Malik\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH *** CWP NO. 19875 OF 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 22.09.2008 *** Wonderland Skate Club vs Union of India and others. *** CORAM: Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice T.S.Thakur, CJ and Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-262435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-04T08:27:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-04T08:27:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1208,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-04T08:27:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-04T08:27:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-04T08:27:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008"},"wordCount":1208,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008","name":"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-04T08:27:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/present-shri-jatin-salwan-vs-shri-ashok-bhasin-on-22-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Present: Shri Jatin Salwan vs Shri Ashok Bhasin on 22 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262435\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}