{"id":263207,"date":"2008-02-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008"},"modified":"2017-03-24T09:47:16","modified_gmt":"2017-03-24T04:17:16","slug":"ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 29462 of 2003(G)\n\n\n1. M\/S. M.K.V.K.SAW MILLS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, KASARAGOD.\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL\n\n3. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.T.RADHAMANY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :29\/02\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                   C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.\n                   --------------------------------------------\n                       W.P.C. NO. 29462 OF 2003\n                   --------------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 29th day of February, 2008\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">       Petitioner is challenging Ext.P6 whereunder the Commissioner of<\/p>\n<p>Commercial Taxes, confirmed the demand of tax and penalty under<\/p>\n<p>Section 30B(3) and (4) of the KGST Act. Petitioner transported timber<\/p>\n<p>from Mangalore to Mahe through the border checkpost B. Manjeshwar<\/p>\n<p>in Kerala. Under the KGST Act and Rules, petitioner has to collect<\/p>\n<p>transit pass in Form No. 27C from the border checkpost and surrender<\/p>\n<p>it at the exit checkpost. In this case, petitioner though collected Form<\/p>\n<p>No. 27C from the border checkpost B. Manjeshwar for transport of<\/p>\n<p>timber through Kerala to Mahe through the exit checkpost at New<\/p>\n<p>Mahe, petitioner did not surrender form No.27C which is the proof for<\/p>\n<p>entry into Mahe.       Consequently the Department presumed sale in<\/p>\n<p>Kerala in terms of Section 30B(2) and proposed fine under sub-sections<\/p>\n<p>(3) and (4) of Section 30B. While the consignor, namely, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>even after receipt of notice did not file any reply,the consignee, driver<\/p>\n<p>and owner of the vehicle, did not even respond to notices. Therefore<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>tax and penalty were levied under Section 30B (3) and (4) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p>In the revision, the first revisional authority though confirmed in<\/p>\n<p>principle the demand of tax and penalty, reduced the penalty to equal<\/p>\n<p>amount of tax. In second revision, the Commissioner confirmed the<\/p>\n<p>same vide Ext.P6 order against which this W.P. is filed.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">       2. The contention raised by the petitioner is that substantial<\/p>\n<p>portion of the goods were sold in Mangalore itself and for the balance<\/p>\n<p>quantity petitioner obtained C forms from Mahe. This argument is<\/p>\n<p>unacceptable because if sales were made in Mangalore which is in<\/p>\n<p>Karnataka State, there is no need for the petitioner to collect any Form<\/p>\n<p>No. 27C at border checkpost in Kerala and if any such form No. 27C is<\/p>\n<p>collected, then it is only for transport of goods in transit and the form<\/p>\n<p>itself is issued only when the goods arrive at the checkpost. Therefore<\/p>\n<p>this argument after collecting Form No.27C from the border checkpost<\/p>\n<p>is absolutely false and bogus. So far as the case of the petitioner that C<\/p>\n<p>forms were issued by the Purchaser at Mahe, this argument is not<\/p>\n<p>acceptable because such C forms issued by the Purchaser from Mahe<\/p>\n<p>cannot negative the presumption of local sale in Kerala in terms of<\/p>\n<p>Section 30B(2) of the Act.        The accounting of the goods by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>purchaser at Mahe to help the petitioner is not going to save the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner from tax and penalty which is provided under Section 30B<\/p>\n<p>(2) and (3) of the Act on failure to surrender Form No. 27C at the exit<\/p>\n<p>checkpost.    It is to be noted that petitioner has not offered any<\/p>\n<p>explanation as to why Form No. 27C was not surrendered at the exit<\/p>\n<p>checkpost if the petitioner has in fact transported the goods to Mahe as<\/p>\n<p>claimed by it. Therefore this contention is only to be rejected and I do<\/p>\n<p>so.   Petitioner has contended that the Commissioner is wrong in<\/p>\n<p>sustaining the order under Section 30B(4) which according to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has no application. Of course I find that Section 30B(4) is<\/p>\n<p>relied on by the Commissioner only because consignee and the<\/p>\n<p>transporter were not traceable and consequently he treated the transport<\/p>\n<p>as made to bogus persons. I do not think reliance by Commissioner on<\/p>\n<p>Section 30B(4) will affect the validity of the order otherwise<\/p>\n<p>sustainable under Section 30B (2) and (3) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">      W.P. therefore fails and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">\n<p id=\"p_4\">                                     (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)<br \/>\n                                                   Judge<br \/>\nkk<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">4<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 29462 of 2003(G) 1. M\/S. M.K.V.K.SAW MILLS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, KASARAGOD. &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, For Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-02-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-24T04:17:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-24T04:17:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\"},\"wordCount\":610,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-24T04:17:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-02-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-24T04:17:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008","datePublished":"2008-02-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-24T04:17:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008"},"wordCount":610,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008","name":"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-02-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-24T04:17:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-k-v-k-saw-mills-vs-the-sales-tax-officer-on-29-february-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. M.K.V.K.Saw Mills vs The Sales Tax Officer on 29 February, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263207\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}