{"id":263208,"date":"2010-03-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010"},"modified":"2015-12-03T10:30:10","modified_gmt":"2015-12-03T05:00:10","slug":"shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                            Central Information Commission\n                                                                          CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/001473-AD\n                                                                                Dated March 25, 2010\n\n\nAdjunct to                                        :   Shri Vijay Pal Singh\n\nName of the Public Authority                      :   Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n\n\n                  Adjunct to CIC Decision of even No. dt.27.8.09 and 30.12.09\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.     The Commission received a complaint dated 21.2.10 from Shri Vijay Singh in which he<br \/>\n       alleged that Shri Kawar Singh, DEO &amp; PIO had issued false information without any certified<br \/>\n       copy of the documents. The Commission vide letter dated 22.2.10 directed the Respondents<br \/>\n       to comply with the decision of the Commission by 15.3.10 under intimation to both the<br \/>\n       Commission and the Complainant. The CPIO was also asked to appear before the<br \/>\n       Commission on 25.3.10 at 10.30 am to explain why this should not be registered as a<br \/>\n       complaint u\/s 18(1) of the <a href=\"\/doc\/671631\/\" id=\"a_1\">RTI Act<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">      The Order passed by the Commission on 27.8.09 is as follows:<br \/>\n       &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;i)     The Commission in the light of the submissions directs the CPIO to provide<br \/>\n                 complete information to the Appellant:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">                 (a)         By sending a circular to all the schools under MCD indicating the<br \/>\n                             information required from them\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">                 (b)         Collecting the information from the agency from whom the Judo mates<br \/>\n                             were purchased including number of mats purchased by each school,<br \/>\n                             the details of the cheque through which the payment was made.<br \/>\n                             Information to be provided by 26.9.09<br \/>\n         ii.     The Commission also directs the CPIO to show cause why the Appellate Authority&#8217;s<br \/>\n                 orders were not complied with and why a penalty of Rs.250\/- per day (subject to<br \/>\n                 a maximum of Rs.25000) should not be imposed on him for not furnishing the<br \/>\n                 information within the statutory period&#8230;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">      This was followed by the subsequent Order passed by the Commission on 30.12.09 as<br \/>\n      follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>                 &#8220;&#8230; the Commission directs the Respondent to provide within 10 days from the<br \/>\n               date of hearing, the missing information from the schools about the Judo mats<br \/>\n               which were purchased, in a format decided during the hearing including number<br \/>\n               of mats purchased by each school; name of principal; name of school; whether<br \/>\n               payment was made by cheque or cash, and if by cheque, the Cheque number;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">\n               and the number of the bill.        The information to be provided to the Complainant\n                       th\n               by 30        January 2010....\"\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>2.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the hearing for<br \/>\n      March 25, 2010.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_5\"> 3.    Ms. Seema Sharma, AEO and Shri Anil Kumar, School Inspector represented the Public<br \/>\n      Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">4.    The documents on record indicate that the Respondents vide the letter dated 14.01.2010<br \/>\n      had already provided information in terms of the direction passed by the Commission in its<br \/>\n      order dated 30.12.09. The entire information in from the schools about the purchase of Judo<br \/>\n      mats purchased in the format as directed by the Commission including the number of mats<br \/>\n      purchased by each school; name of principal; name of school; whether payment was made<br \/>\n      by cheque or cash, and if by cheque, the Cheque number; and the number of the bill had<br \/>\n      been annexed alongwith the covering letter dated 14.01.2010. The same information was<br \/>\n      once again sent by the letter dated 25.03.2010 to the Commission. This was followed by<br \/>\n      another communication dated 26.03.2010 whereby the Respondent explained that there was<br \/>\n      no delay in furnishing of the information while replying to the Show cause issued by the<br \/>\n      Commission. The Respondent has submitted a letter dated 11.10.2007 issued by the then<br \/>\n      PIO, DC, South that is the DEO\/AEO\/SH-S which demonstrates that despite the Education<br \/>\n      Department having furnished response to all the 9 queries of the Appellant and clearly<br \/>\n      instructed the PIO to allow inspection of all related documents between 9.30 am to 5.30 pm<br \/>\n      on any working day, the applicant failed to approach the concerned office for inspection. It<br \/>\n      has further been explained in the said letter dated 11.10.2007 that while the information<br \/>\n      sought was voluminous, due to lack of adequate manpower, the Education Deptt. \/SH-S was<br \/>\n      not in a position to collect all documents from all 59 schools. Therefore, information as could<br \/>\n      be collected were provided to the Appellant within the mandatory period. For the remaining<br \/>\n      information, if any, sought by the Appellant, he was requested to inspect the original records<br \/>\n      of the particular school, with prior intimation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">5.    It is further observed from perusal of records that in response to the Commission&#8217;s directions<br \/>\n      dated 22.2.10, the    APIO sent a letter dated 15.3.10 to the Commission stating that the<br \/>\n      Complainant had applied for information to DC\/Sh-S, Karkardooma, Delhi and in the<br \/>\n      application, there were 9 questions in total wherein he had sought information related to<br \/>\n      MCD schools. It has been contended by the Respondent that vide letter dated 1.10.07, the<br \/>\n      Appellant was invited to inspect all related documents but he did not turn up.          By his<br \/>\n      subsequent letter dated 11.10.07, the Appellant approached the then PIO\/DC\/SH-S<br \/>\n      regarding submission of the incomplete information whereas by the letter dated 27.11.07,<br \/>\n      the Appellant stated that the PIO had not submitted complete information. The APIO added<br \/>\n      that in all the above mentioned letters, since the information was being sought through<br \/>\n      DC\/SH-S (Shahadra) about MCD schools, it appeared that the information was to be given<br \/>\n      about MCD schools falling within the SH-S zone only. It was only from the letter dated<br \/>\n      22.2.10, that the Respondents realized that the Appellant is actually seeking information<br \/>\n      from not just Shahdara South Zone but from the rest of 11 zones also which has yet to be<br \/>\n      submitted. The APIO further added that in none of the above letters as also in the<br \/>\n      RTI application has the Complainant ever mentioned that the information has to be<br \/>\n      submitted for all 12 zones of MCD. The APIO added that for seeking information from<br \/>\n        other 11 zones, the Appellant will have to file a fresh application to the PIO (Edn) of the<br \/>\n       concerned zone.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">6.     The Commission on perusal of the RTI application and the submissions on record observed<br \/>\n       that the Appellant had indeed filed the RTI application with the PIO, Shahadra Zone and had<br \/>\n       indeed not sought information in any of his letters from all the zones and that it was<br \/>\n       understood by all that information about MCD schools only in Shahadra South zone were<br \/>\n       sought and hence were required to be provided. In his complaint to the Commission the<br \/>\n       Appellant has sought information from all the remaining 11 zones which is additional<br \/>\n       information being sought at a later stage, after two hearings at the Commission. Hence, the<br \/>\n       Commission, while observing and holding that complete information has been furnished to<br \/>\n       the Appellant regarding MCD schools in the Shahadra South Zone, advises him to file a fresh<br \/>\n       RTI application in order to seek information from other zones.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">7.     The case is disposed of on the above terms.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">                                                                                (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                        Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">1.     Shri Vijay Pal Singh<br \/>\n       H.No.1449\/18A<br \/>\n       Durga Puri<br \/>\n       Loni road<br \/>\n       Shahdara<br \/>\n       Delhi 110 093<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">2.     The PIO<br \/>\n       Municipal Corporation of Delhi<br \/>\n       O\/o Dy. Education Officer<br \/>\n       Kanti Nagar<br \/>\n       Shahdara South Zone<br \/>\n       Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">3.     The Appellate Authority<br \/>\n       Municipal Corporation of Delhi<br \/>\n       O\/o Addl. Commissioner (HQ)<br \/>\n       Town Hall<br \/>\n       New Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">4.     Officer incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">5.     Press E Group,\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 Central Information Commission CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/001473-AD Dated March 25, 2010 Adjunct to : Shri Vijay Pal Singh Name of the Public Authority : Municipal Corporation of Delhi Adjunct to CIC Decision of even No. dt.27.8.09 and 30.12.09 Background 1. The Commission [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-03T05:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-03T05:00:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1109,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-03T05:00:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-03T05:00:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-03T05:00:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010"},"wordCount":1109,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010","name":"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-03T05:00:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vijay-pal-singh-vs-municipal-corporation-of-delhi-on-25-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Vijay Pal Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}