{"id":263247,"date":"2010-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-21T12:55:06","modified_gmt":"2016-06-21T07:25:06","slug":"mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                                Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                                 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000784\n\n\n                                                                                                Dated\u00a0August\u00a011,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                :    Mr.\u00a0Ramesh\u00a0Mishra\u00a0Chanchal\u00a0\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                         :    Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a028.01.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       point\u00a0wise\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0eight\u00a0points\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0recruitment\u00a0of\u00a0one\u00a0Sh.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee,\u00a0as\u00a0Sr.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       DCM.\u00a0The\u00a0questionnaire\u00a0varied\u00a0from\u00a0queries\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0appointment\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Sr.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       DCM;\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0times\u00a0leaves\u00a0were\u00a0sanctioned\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0authorities\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Banerjee\u00a0for\u00a0leaving\u00a0the\u00a0Baroda\u00a0Headquarter\u00a0for\u00a0visiting\u00a0which\u00a0places;\u00a0salary\u00a0structure,\u00a0office\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       expenses, \u00a0 travel\u00a0 expenses, \u00a0 telephone \u00a0 expenses; \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 times\u00a0 Railway\u00a0 reservations\u00a0 were\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       availed\u00a0to\u00a0travel\u00a0between\u00a0Ratlam\u00a0and\u00a0Baroda\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">\n<p id=\"p_2\">2.     The \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 responded \u00a0 vide \u00a0 the \u00a0 letter \u00a0 dated \u00a0 26.02.2010 \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commercial,\u00a0Signal\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Telecommunication\u00a0and\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Departments\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Division.\u00a0The\u00a0Department\u00a0and\u00a0item\u00a0wise\u00a0replies\u00a0dated\u00a011.02.2010\u00a0and\u00a008.02.2010\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the \u00a0 Sr. \u00a0 DCM \u00a0 (P), \u00a0 Sr. \u00a0 DSTE \u00a0 and \u00a0 Sr. \u00a0 DPO \u00a0 were \u00a0 also \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 alongwith \u00a0 the \u00a0 said \u00a0 reply. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a025.03.2010\u00a0confirmed\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO&#8217;s\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a026.02.2010\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       while\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appeal\u00a0dated\u00a005.03.2010.\u00a0It\u00a0was\u00a0further\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0said\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a025.03.2010\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee\u00a0was\u00a0personal\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       nature\u00a0and\u00a0therefore,\u00a0 disclosure\u00a0thereof\u00a0 would\u00a0cause\u00a0invasion\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0privacy\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0 such\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information \u00a0 need \u00a0 not \u00a0 be \u00a0 disclosed. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 thus \u00a0 denied \u00a0 the \u00a0 access \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0public\u00a0purpose\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0served\u00a0in\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0personal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\"> 3.           The\u00a0Third\u00a0Party\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0being\u00a0Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee,\u00a0approached\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a025.03.2010\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     stating\u00a0that\u00a0personal\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R\u00a0M\u00a0Chanchal\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0denied\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0elaborating\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     further\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0apprehends\u00a0threat\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0life\u00a0and\u00a0property\u00a0in\u00a0case\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0shared\u00a0with\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R\u00a0M\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Chanchal\u00a0who\u00a0allegedly\u00a0has\u00a0criminal\u00a0cases\u00a0pending\u00a0against\u00a0him\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Ratlam\u00a0Court.\u00a0Furthermore,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Applicant\u00a0before\u00a0this\u00a0Commission\u00a0viz.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee\u00a0has\u00a0also\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0even\u00a0if\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     part\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R\u00a0M\u00a0Chanchal,\u00a0the\u00a0antecedents\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0seeker\u00a0be\u00a0verified\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     the\u00a0Lower\u00a0Court,\u00a0Ratlam\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0avoid\u00a0threat\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0life\u00a0and\u00a0property.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">4.           The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 registered \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 and \u00a0 notices \u00a0 were \u00a0 issued \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 parties \u00a0 concerned \u00a0 on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     13.07.2010\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0hearing\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0Conferencing\u00a0on\u00a029.07.2010.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">     5.      Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">     6.      Mr.\u00a0R\u00a0S\u00a0Saxena,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.<\/p>\n<p>     Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">     6.      Upon\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0evident\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             the\u00a0Third\u00a0party\u00a0who\u00a0seeks\u00a0the\u00a0relief\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0personal\u00a0details\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             not \u00a0 be \u00a0 divulged \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 seeker \u00a0 Mr. \u00a0 R \u00a0 M \u00a0 Chanchal \u00a0 owing \u00a0 to \u00a0 his \u00a0 antecedents \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             involvement\u00a0in\u00a0criminal\u00a0case\u00a0which\u00a0creates\u00a0the\u00a0apprehension\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0mind\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Third\u00a0Party\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             disclosure \u00a0 of \u00a0 such \u00a0 information \u00a0 about \u00a0 his \u00a0 personal \u00a0 details \u00a0 could \u00a0 cause \u00a0 threat \u00a0 to \u00a0 his \u00a0 life \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             property.\u00a0However,\u00a0as\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0legal\u00a0and\u00a0factual\u00a0position\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0case\u00a0to\u00a0adjudicate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 to \u00a0 deliberate \u00a0 on \u00a0 whether \u00a0 information \u00a0 can \u00a0 be \u00a0 disclosed \u00a0 or \u00a0 not. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             functions\u00a0and\u00a0powers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0are\u00a0in\u00a0relation\u00a0of\u00a0providing\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             specific\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0relief\u00a0that\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.\u00a0The\u00a0relief\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             the\u00a0instant\u00a0case\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0fall\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0purview\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005.\u00a0Moreover\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             seeker \u00a0 has \u00a0 not \u00a0 even \u00a0 approached \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 despite \u00a0 notice \u00a0 issued \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             therefore\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0prematured\u00a0and\u00a0dismissed\u00a0as\u00a0infructuous.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">7.           Accordingly,\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0terms.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">                                                                                                            \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\"> (G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">1.    Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee<br \/>\n      Sr.\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Commercial\u00a0Manager\u00a0[P]<br \/>\n      Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Divisional\u00a0Office<br \/>\n      Pratapnagar<br \/>\n      Vadodara\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0390\u00a0004<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">2.    PIO<br \/>\n      Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n      Vadodara\u00a0Division\u00a0<br \/>\n      Vadodara\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0390\u00a0004<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">3.    Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n      Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n      Vadodara\u00a0Division\u00a0<br \/>\n      Vadodara\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0390\u00a0004<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">4.\u00a0   Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000784 Dated\u00a0August\u00a011,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Mr.\u00a0Ramesh\u00a0Mishra\u00a0Chanchal\u00a0 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0 Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a028.01.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0seeking\u00a0 point\u00a0wise\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0eight\u00a0points\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0recruitment\u00a0of\u00a0one\u00a0Sh.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0Banerjee,\u00a0as\u00a0Sr.\u00a0 DCM.\u00a0The\u00a0questionnaire\u00a0varied\u00a0from\u00a0queries\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0appointment\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Sr.\u00a0 DCM;\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0times\u00a0leaves\u00a0were\u00a0sanctioned\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0authorities\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0Mr.\u00a0P\u00a0A\u00a0 Banerjee\u00a0for\u00a0leaving\u00a0the\u00a0Baroda\u00a0Headquarter\u00a0for\u00a0visiting\u00a0which\u00a0places;\u00a0salary\u00a0structure,\u00a0office\u00a0 expenses, \u00a0 travel\u00a0 expenses, \u00a0 telephone \u00a0 expenses; \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 times\u00a0 Railway\u00a0 reservations\u00a0 were\u00a0 availed\u00a0to\u00a0travel\u00a0between\u00a0Ratlam\u00a0and\u00a0Baroda\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0 2. The \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 responded \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-21T07:25:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-21T07:25:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":681,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-21T07:25:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-21T07:25:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-21T07:25:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010"},"wordCount":681,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010","name":"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-21T07:25:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-m-chanchal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.R M Chanchal vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263247","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263247"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263247\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}