{"id":263559,"date":"2010-02-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-04-05T03:46:32","modified_gmt":"2018-04-04T22:16:32","slug":"smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF FEBRUAR'\u00a7{\";\"2'CQ L \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICEIV. JAGANDNAi*H,AN'CT\n\nC.R.P.No. 1007\/2&amp;0\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nSMT.R.SALAMMA _\nW\/O RANGASWANiY._,\"; _   \nAGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,    \nOCC:COOLIE,   V. V'  ' '\n\nSMT.ANA1'\u00a7fTA'}2y!\u00a3AI\\dJ'\\    \"  \nw\/0 CI_.-IAANNA-EPA,\"    \u00bb\nAGED ABOUT 55\"--\u00a5sAI2s,\u00a2  \nOCC.:'C,O0LIE';:,IIIjj' \" A ' \n\nGOVINDAPPA':@A-GQVIVNDA -\ns \/0' 'BELDARV BAsAP.PA~,. \nAGE\u00a3)'A_BOUT' 45 'YEARS,\nocVc:co\"eLIE..VV---  \n\nBAsAvA\u00a7AJ ------ A \"\n\nC A . 3 S\/O' SEIANKRAMMA\n TADEVD ABOUT 48 YEARS,\n\n\"'LAKSHMAMMA\nW\/O*SUND.ARACI~iAR\nCAGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,\n\n'\u00bb ' COOLIE\n\n ALL 132\/ 0 III WARD PATEL NAGAR,\n\nNEAR VENKATESI-IWARA TALKIES,\n\n\n\nHOSPET, BELLARY DISTRICT..... PETiTiONERS___\n\n(By Sri.S.G.Kadadal~:atti, Adv.)\n\nAND\n\nDJVIADURAI NAIDU   \ns\/o VEERASWAMY NAIDU V '\n\nAGED 72 YEARS,\n\nHINDU, 3RD WARD,\n\nPATEL NAGAR, HOSPET, _   V g_  \nBELLARY DISTRICT.  V'  . .. RE-SPQ.NDENT\n\n(By Sri.A.Vijay Kumar Bhat';..Adv_{)  \n\nThis petition is \ufb01led u7nder'fSeetio_n'v1f1Sj.of CPC against\nthe order dated 'V'1.2.01:'.gf}\"J.'():VV p'a_ss_ed 1 in'Execution Case\nNo.210\/2005 on 'the'-\ufb01leg of the '~Pr'1.f_\"Ci_viifi Judge (Sr.Dn.) 85\nJMFC, Hospet, rleje\u00a7;ting~.t'iae o_bje_etions' contentions raised by\n\nthe judgment\u20ac'debtorsi\u00a7 \n\nmade the\"-f_oiiowi'ng':'    __\nE  E VQRDER\n\nThis petition co:nVing\u00a2V:on__for admission, this day, the court\n\n the 'learned counsel for the parties \ufb01nally in\n\nl'Vre'sple'e.tV of_v4the'\u00abvrevision petition \ufb01led by some of the judgment\n\ndebtors in Vthej  court.\n\n*2.  Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent at<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">  out\u00e9set\ufb02isubmitted that the impugned order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>~.jE3x&#8221;eo1C.itiing Court does not call for any interference because<\/p>\n<p>,2\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>an<\/p>\n<p>though the respondent was successful in getting a decree in his<\/p>\n<p>favour in the suit \ufb01led by the respondent in C).S.l\\Io.2&#8242;.1&#8242;,i&#8217;.._l9E\u00a7J5,<\/p>\n<p>for declaration and possession of suit schedule&#8221;*prop:erty,x<\/p>\n<p>appeal preferred by the defendants was dismiss.edlV_iib3?VvhtniS court  <\/p>\n<p>in R.F.A.No.1191\/2004 on 13.08.2007:iib;.f&#8221;\u00ab_pc:;\ufb01f:mi:;g&#8221;&#8216;the<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree of the trial _court&#8217;.&#8212;-A There ga;fi,erward\u00e9} <\/p>\n<p>respondentwdecree holder movedithe   for<br \/>\ndelivery of vacant possession of are in<br \/>\nthe hands of the judgment thot1fgh__delivery warrant<br \/>\nwas issued by  could not be<br \/>\nexecuted for    Once again the<br \/>\n  application for delivery<br \/>\nwarrant  the :&#8217;a.plpl\u00abication is one such which was<\/p>\n<p>filed in_.,E&#8217;.P.2il&#8221;0,;&#8217;:V2O0lf5 a.nd&#8221;: the court after considering the<\/p>\n<p>iflobjectlons:,,,&#8217;\ufb01led..by thiefjludgment debtors ultimately passed the<\/p>\n<p>ordercirej\u00e9ctiingi&#8221;the_j..objections raised by the judgment debtors<\/p>\n<p>l   anddirectedlthelbailiff to break open the lock: of the premises<\/p>\n<p>occupation of the judgment debtors and direction was also<\/p>\n<p>  to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hospet, to<\/p>\n<p> _._:ii15roy\u00a7ide assistance to the bailiff to execute the delivery warrant.<\/p>\n<p>Er<\/p>\n<p>will be taken. in view of the said fact being brought to the<br \/>\nnotice of the Executing Court, the Executing Court ought to<\/p>\n<p>have refrained from passing the impugned order. There.fo&#8217;re,<\/p>\n<p>the submission made is that the matter be ren1itted&#8221;&#8211;to ~<\/p>\n<p>Executing&#8217; Court for fresh consideration, _<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">5. Having thus heard both sides:&#8217;and_&#8217;_i into <\/p>\n<p>the provisions of the Karnatakai__SC1~um Area (Improv\u00abe:n1&#8211;ent&#8217;: and * it<\/p>\n<p>Clearance) Act, in the case on handui&#8217;tris&#8217;VVnot  disvpute that the<br \/>\nrespondent&#8211;decree ho1der&#8221;&#8216;wiasA suc*{:gess&#8217;1&#8217;ujii \u00abthe suit filed by<\/p>\n<p>him i.e., O.S.21\/19.95 fovrrideciaratioiniiandiipoissession of the<\/p>\n<p>suit property.and&#8221;the:;appeai=prefe-rrediby the judgment debtors<br \/>\nwas disrnissed b\ufb01rviiithispj&#8217;Cro4urt:'&#8221;in&#8217;R.F.A.No.1191\/2004 by order<\/p>\n<p>dated 13.08.&#8221;&#8216;.2QO7_. xNoiivhere:&#8221;_.i&#8217;n the suit proceedings nor before<\/p>\n<p>__this c,o_ip,1rit &#8216;in the &#8216;above &#8216;mentioned Regular First Appeal, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;_i1.1.(Sig),&#8217;\u00ab&#8221;&#8216;\ufb01k(&#8220;:Ii1i_v&#8217;C&#8217;;.(.33.}ILC17S took up any contention or ground to the<\/p>\n<p>ef:fe.ct&#8217;i.t_if;;at&#8221;the___sLii&#8221;t&#8217;V..area false within the Slum Area as per the<\/p>\n<p>v_provisi&#8221;ons\u00bbj. of Karnataka Slum Area (Improvement and<\/p>\n<p>ii.&#8221;&#8216;Ciieariance)&#8221;&#8216;nct, 1973 and as such the Executing Court has<\/p>\n<p> ciear1y&#8217; -observed that though the present petitioners referred to<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01cevrtain proceedin\u00a7s initiated by them way back in the year<\/p>\n<p>,9\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>: 3<\/p>\n<p>1995, the petitioners never pleaded such a ground in the___tria1<\/p>\n<p>court in their written statement nor was there any reference<\/p>\n<p>made to the said ground before this cofigrt  .\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">aforementioned Regular First Appeal. __Aps_such;&#8217;ti&#8217;1*e:&#8217;_EXer:uting <\/p>\n<p>Court did not find any merit in the i&#8217;~objep&#8217;oti.onseraisedi&#8217;by\u00bb.__tI&#8217;ie_e<\/p>\n<p>petitioners. Moreover, the eXe&lt;:uti&#8211;n_g court&#039; cannot i..go.V_pbev\u00a7ond <\/p>\n<p>the decree when the decree had attiaiin:Ved.iinaiityiii:  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">6. The other aspect iis&lt;iithatii*.   petitioners aiso<br \/>\napproached this &#039;=&#8211;cvourt:.*&quot;  1:&#039;:  v_  petition in<br \/>\nW.P.No.60164  iofithis court by order<\/p>\n<p>dt.\u00a38.01.2010    petitioners for interim<\/p>\n<p>order. This &#039;fact hast&#039;-\u00bbbeen&quot;su&#039;ppir*essed in the present revision<\/p>\n<p>petition that&quot;eisiifi.1eid _sn.bseo{11ent to the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;.learne.d.i&#8211;p: Single Jud-gev inpfthe aforementioned Writ Petition on<\/p>\n<p> .1i0i..pTheVpresent petition was \ufb01led on 20.01.2010 and<\/p>\n<p>thierei&#039;is;no&#039; viih..i_speriiiin the present petition about the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>hhavin\u00e9&quot; fiv1ied*&quot;ithe writ petition and they having been<\/p>\n<p> &quot;u_nsue::__(:essI&quot;1.1I in getting any interim order passed in their<\/p>\n<p> _of_avour.\u00b0i \u00a7\\<\/p>\n<p>we\/X<\/p>\n<p>r<\/p>\n<p>Jrn\/-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">7. Under the above circumstances, I see no good ground<\/p>\n<p>made out for this court to interfere with the impugzieciforder<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Executing Court more so keepinggi-in &#8216;<br \/>\nscope of revision 11\/ s 115 of the __CPC__. &#8216;1%-}};.:%&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>therefore is rejected as tacking any rriAerit;&#8217;an{i eo.nsetjuent\u00a3y_the<\/p>\n<p>interim order passed earlier also does no&#8217;tv.survive,_ A  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">8. It is also made clear&#8217; at this&#8217;ji1I1Vet11Vre.that the&#8217; dismissal of<br \/>\nthis petition shall not eorrie  flzhe:  &#8216;of the present<br \/>\npetitioners in the  pro\ufb01joieeeiirigs\ufb01iiaiiielfi is &#8216;pending.<\/p>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">    t&lt;j      JUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 Author: V.Jagannathan IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF FEBRUAR&#8217;\u00a7{&#8220;;&#8221;2&#8217;CQ L BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICEIV. JAGANDNAi*H,AN&#8217;CT C.R.P.No. 1007\/2&amp;0 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.R.SALAMMA _ W\/O RANGASWANiY._,&#8221;; _ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE, V. V&#8217; &#8216; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263559","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-04T22:16:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-04T22:16:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":747,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-04T22:16:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-04T22:16:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-04T22:16:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010"},"wordCount":747,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010","name":"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-04T22:16:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-r-salamma-vs-maduraiah-naidu-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt. R.Salamma vs Maduraiah Naidu on 9 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263559"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263559\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}