{"id":263581,"date":"2009-09-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2"},"modified":"2016-05-28T00:12:01","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T18:42:01","slug":"ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 12400 of 2007(A)\n\n\n1. RAVIKUMAR ALIAS RAVINDRAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KESUKUTTAN NAIR, AGED 72,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. K.N. SREEKUMAR, AGED 38,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SUKUMARAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :29\/09\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n               S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n                   -------------------------------\n               W.P.(C).NO.12400 OF 2007 ()\n                 -----------------------------------\n       Dated this the 29th day of September, 2009\n\n                       J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">      The writ petition is filed seeking mainly the following<\/p>\n<p>relief:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">\n<p id=\"p_2\">            i.     to   call   for   the    records  in<br \/>\n            O.S.No.159\/2005 on the file of the IInd<br \/>\n            Additional Sub Court, Ernakulam and to<br \/>\n            direct the learned Sub Judge to vacate<br \/>\n            the stay of the suit and to issue a<br \/>\n            commission as prayed for in Ext.P1<br \/>\n            application setting aside Ext.P4 order<br \/>\n            thereon by an appropriate writ, direction<br \/>\n            or order.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">\n<p id=\"p_4\">      2. Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.159 of 2005 on the<\/p>\n<p>file of the Sub Court, Ernakulam. Suit is for a declaration that<\/p>\n<p>a purchase certificate issued in favour of the 1st defendant is<\/p>\n<p>vitiated by fraud, and a sale deed created by him in favour of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">WPC.12400\/07                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the 2nd defendant, on the basis of the purchase certificate, is<\/p>\n<p>null and void.    The defendants, both of them, entering<\/p>\n<p>appearance, filed written statement resisting the suit claim.<\/p>\n<p>An application was moved by the plaintiff for appointment of a<\/p>\n<p>Commission to measure out the suit property, and it was<\/p>\n<p>objected to by the defendants, contending that in respect of<\/p>\n<p>the very same property, another suit O.S.No.1413 of 1994,<\/p>\n<p>was tried and disposed and the decision thereof is pending in<\/p>\n<p>appeal as A.S.No.327 of 2005 on the file of the District Court,<\/p>\n<p>Ernakulam. The learned Sub Judge, after hearing both sides,<\/p>\n<p>found merit in the objection canvassed by the defendants, and<\/p>\n<p>vide Ext.P4 order, held that in view of the previous report and<\/p>\n<p>plan prepared in another suit as between the same parties in<\/p>\n<p>respect of the very same subject matter, a fresh commission<\/p>\n<p>cannot be allowed. However, the learned Sub Judge, after<\/p>\n<p>taking the above view over the Commission application<\/p>\n<p>proceeded further and passed an order that in view of the<\/p>\n<p>challenges made by the plaintiff against the purchase<\/p>\n<p>certificate imputed in the suit before the Appellate authority<\/p>\n<p>instituted under the Land Reforms Act, and also the pendency<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">WPC.12400\/07                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of the appeal, A.S.No.327 of 2005, the trial of the suit has to<\/p>\n<p>be stayed, and, accordingly, in Ext.P4 order, stay of the suit<\/p>\n<p>was also ordered. Propriety and correctness of Ext.P4 order is<\/p>\n<p>challenged in the writ petition invoking the supervisory<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction vested with this Court under <a href=\"\/doc\/1331149\/\" id=\"a_1\">Article 227<\/a> of the<\/p>\n<p>Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p id=\"p_6\">      3. I heard the counsel on both sides. At the time of<\/p>\n<p>hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents<\/p>\n<p>fairly submitted that the essential ingredients to satisfy the<\/p>\n<p>stay of the suit as contemplated under Section 10 of the Code<\/p>\n<p>of Civil Procedure are not made out in the present case, and<\/p>\n<p>so much so, the order of the court below for staying the trial of<\/p>\n<p>the suit, for the reasons stated in Ext.P4 order, cannot be<\/p>\n<p>sustained. I appreciate the stand taken by the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the respondents, as I find that without even affording an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to the plaintiff, while deciding on the merit of a<\/p>\n<p>Commission application, the court has jumped to a conclusion<\/p>\n<p>that the suit is liable to be stayed under Section 10 of the CPC,<\/p>\n<p>for the reason that other proceedings are pending in respect<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">WPC.12400\/07                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of the very same subject matter before a court and also before<\/p>\n<p>the Appellate Authority under the Land Reforms Act. Whether<\/p>\n<p>the issues involved in the present case were directly and<\/p>\n<p>substantially involved in the other proceeding was not<\/p>\n<p>considered by the court while passing the order of stay of trial<\/p>\n<p>of the suit. The order passed by the court below directing stay<\/p>\n<p>of the suit, in the circumstances, is liable to be set aside, and<\/p>\n<p>it is ordered accordingly. The reasonings of the court below<\/p>\n<p>that in view of a previous commission report in a connected<\/p>\n<p>suit as between the parties, the commission application moved<\/p>\n<p>by the plaintiff in the present suit cannot be allowed as<\/p>\n<p>expressed in Ext.P4 order, I find cannot be accepted as<\/p>\n<p>correct. The Commission report collected in a suit after all is<\/p>\n<p>only a piece of evidence. In the very same suit, a second<\/p>\n<p>commission without deciding the merit of the former<\/p>\n<p>commission report, if identical matters are sought for<\/p>\n<p>determination again is impermissible, as covered by the<\/p>\n<p>decision in <a href=\"\/doc\/1611197\/\" id=\"a_1\">Swami Premananda Bharathi v. Swami<\/p>\n<p>Yogananda Bharathi<\/a> (1985 KLT 144). But, in a different<\/p>\n<p>suit, even assuming that in respect of the very same property<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">WPC.12400\/07                     5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>as between the same parties, a Commissioner had collected a<\/p>\n<p>report in a previous suit by itself will not debar one or other<\/p>\n<p>party from applying for a commission to collect the details<\/p>\n<p>required for the adjudication of the disputes or controversies<\/p>\n<p>involved in that suit or proceeding. Of course, the evidentiary<\/p>\n<p>value of the previous commission report can be canvassed in<\/p>\n<p>trial, provided, it has been accepted in evidence in the other<\/p>\n<p>suit.    Even if it is not accepted by examining the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner, who prepared it, the report can be let in as a<\/p>\n<p>piece of evidence in the subsequent case as well. But the<\/p>\n<p>mere fact that in another suit, a commission had been taken<\/p>\n<p>previously in respect of the very same property between the<\/p>\n<p>parties so long as the decision in that suit would not constitute<\/p>\n<p>a bar of the present suit under any law for the time being in<\/p>\n<p>force, is not sufficient to hold that a fresh commission cannot<\/p>\n<p>be allowed in the subsequent suit.           Irrespective of the<\/p>\n<p>question whether a commission report is collected in the<\/p>\n<p>present suit,   it is open to the defendants to canvas the<\/p>\n<p>evidentiary value of the previous commission report in respect<\/p>\n<p>of the very same property in a suit between the same parties,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">WPC.12400\/07                   6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>but, to dismiss a commission application on the ground that<\/p>\n<p>another report had been collected in a previous suit, is not<\/p>\n<p>proper and correct, so long as the trial of the present suit is<\/p>\n<p>not barred in any way by the decision in the previous suit. So<\/p>\n<p>much so, I direct the learned Sub Judge to consider the<\/p>\n<p>commission application afresh in the light of the observations<\/p>\n<p>made above, and in accordance with law and dispose the<\/p>\n<p>application on its merit. Writ petition is disposed as indicated<\/p>\n<p>above.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p id=\"p_8\">                          S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN<br \/>\n                                       JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>prp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 12400 of 2007(A) 1. RAVIKUMAR ALIAS RAVINDRAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. KESUKUTTAN NAIR, AGED 72, &#8230; Respondent 2. K.N. SREEKUMAR, AGED 38, For Petitioner :SRI.N.SUKUMARAN For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-27T18:42:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T18:42:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1046,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T18:42:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-27T18:42:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T18:42:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2"},"wordCount":1046,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2","name":"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T18:42:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravikumar-alias-ravindran-vs-kesukuttan-nair-on-29-september-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ravikumar Alias Ravindran vs Kesukuttan Nair on 29 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}