{"id":26373,"date":"2011-07-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011"},"modified":"2017-01-25T04:43:29","modified_gmt":"2017-01-24T23:13:29","slug":"ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                     Writ Petition No.11497\/2011\n\n\n\n                                      1\n\n\n\n18.07.2011\n       Shri Suyash Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner.\n       This writ petition has been filed Pro Bono Publico by an Advocate.\n       The grievance as set forth in the writ petition is that the\nrespondent no.2 by a notification dated 4.7.2011 has increased the fee of<\/pre>\n<p>the students of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th years of Bachelor of Veterinary Science and<br \/>\nAnimal Husbandry which is arbitrary and is unjust.\n<\/p>\n<p>       By the aforesaid notification, the tuition fee for free seats has been<br \/>\nenhanced from Rs.14,000\/- to Rs.18,000\/-. Similarly, in respect of seat<br \/>\nof N.R.I. quota, the fees has been enhanced from 3000 dollars to 3500<br \/>\ndollars.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The petitioner has alleged that the action of the respondents in<br \/>\nenhancing the fees in the mid session is arbitrary and would cause<br \/>\nimmense financial crises to the students and their parents.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In the aforesaid factual background the petitioner has approached<br \/>\nthis court.\n<\/p>\n<p>       We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.<br \/>\n       In People&#8217;s Union for Democratic Rights Vs. Union of<br \/>\nIndia, (1982)3 SCC 235, the Supreme Court while dealing with the scope<br \/>\nand ambit of public interest litigation has held as follows :\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;Public Interest litigation is brought before the Court<br \/>\n              not for the purpose of enforcing the right of one<br \/>\n              individual against another as happens in the case of<br \/>\n              ordinary litigation, but it is intended to promote and<br \/>\n              vindicate public interest which demands that<br \/>\n              violations of constitutional or legal rights of large<br \/>\n              numbers of people who are poor, ignorant or in a<br \/>\n              socially or economically disadvantaged position<br \/>\n              should not go unnoticed and unredressed&#8221;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Similar view was taken by the Supreme Court in Sheela Barse<br \/>\nVs. Union of India, (1998)4 SCC 226.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India, (1992)4 SCC 605, the<br \/>\nSupreme Court while dealing with the public interest litigation in which<br \/>\nchallenge was made to proceedings of removal of a Supreme Court Judge<br \/>\nheld that ordinarily it is person aggrieved and directly affected who must<br \/>\n                             Writ Petition No.11497\/2011<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     seek the relief himself unless disabled from doing so for a good reason<br \/>\n     which permits someone else to seek the relief on his behalf.\n<\/p>\n<p>            While summarizing the principles evolved by the Supreme Court<br \/>\n     with regard to maintainability of the public interest litigations, in<br \/>\n     Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee Vs. C.K.Rajan,<br \/>\n     (2003) 7 SCC 546, the Supreme Court held that a writ petition can be<br \/>\n     entertained as public interest litigation by any interested person in the<br \/>\n     welfare of the people who is in a disadvantageous position and not in a<br \/>\n     position to knock the doors of the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Similar view has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in State of<br \/>\n     Uttaranchal Vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal, 2010(3) SCC 402.\n<\/p>\n<p>            From the perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, we<br \/>\n     do not find that it contains averments that either guardian or students<br \/>\n     are unable to approach this Court on account of some disability. There is<br \/>\n     no element of public interest involved in the instant writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>            For the aforementioned reasons, we hold that the writ petition at<br \/>\n     the instance of the petitioner who is an Advocate, with regard to increase<br \/>\n     in the tuition fee of B.V.Sc. and A.H. course cannot be entertained as<br \/>\n     Public Interest Litigation.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Accordingly the same is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n<pre>             (S.R.Alam)                                (Alok Aradhe)\n            Chief Justice                                  Judge\nHS\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011 Writ Petition No.11497\/2011 1 18.07.2011 Shri Suyash Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed Pro Bono Publico by an Advocate. The grievance as set forth in the writ petition is that the respondent no.2 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa ... on 18 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa ... on 18 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-24T23:13:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-24T23:13:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":508,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa ... on 18 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-24T23:13:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa ... on 18 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa ... on 18 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-24T23:13:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-24T23:13:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011"},"wordCount":508,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madhya Pradesh High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011","name":"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa ... on 18 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-24T23:13:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramkumar-patel-vs-madhya-pradesh-pashu-chikitsa-on-18-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramkumar Patel vs Madhya Pradesh Pashu Chikitsa &#8230; on 18 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}