{"id":266027,"date":"2008-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008"},"modified":"2015-06-04T02:21:24","modified_gmt":"2015-06-03T20:51:24","slug":"chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">SETWEEN:\n\n'i\n\nEN THE HIGH COUIQT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\nDATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JULY. 2008\n: BEFORE:\nTHE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATEL\n\nCHANORAKANT\nare SHARANAPPA PANCHAKATTL\nAGE 50 YEARS ~ \n#213 C18 COLONY  \"\nGULBARGA\n\nREVANSIDDAPPA .  \nSIG ESHIVRAYA BEERNALH  _ L\nAGE 46 YEARS T '\nRIO TAJ SULTANPUR\nGULBARGA \n\nD!GAi\\k'iSAR  sA:&lt;:f3APmg\nAGE_5\u00a33YEARf.$._\u00bb H   . _ --\nRIO QHA-NVEER wrxzaaab  1.\nGULBARGA - &quot;   \n\nBASAWAF:-A4 - -_  \nS\ufb01G--$HARANAPPM&lt;ALLUR\nme 55 YEARS ~ \n\n- RIO ESEQDAPUR c:o&#039;L&#039;css*\u00bbi&#039;a*&#039;\n\nV &quot; ~ . _.GULBA.R:3_A&quot; \u00ab \n\n&quot; :;j&#039;~._A&#039;r-\u00abso:\n\nV \u00e9w ASHWM wto GANESH KAWALE\n\n&#039; &#039; * --!&#039;-33E 30 YE-ZAR8, occ; HOUSEHOLD\n\n PETTHONERS\n\n&#039;   (BY s:s.1f_r&#039;fMA5:_.1.u&#039; L2!g_ .*~{TE.xAs\\~I, ADVC}CATE,)\n\nRIO 1131783, BE!-{!ND PRIYADARSHIM\nWOMENS COLLEGE, VIDYANAGAR\nGULBARCM\n\nTHE COMWSSIONER\n\nW.P.N0. 3623 of 2006 (GM-PBS)   \n\n\n\nFOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER\nAFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, CUNNINGHAM ROAD\nBANGALOREJ31\n\n3 THE DIRECTOR\nFOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT\nCUNNINGHAM ROAD\nBAI&#039;~iGALORE~0&#039;I\n\n4 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER\nGULBARGA DISTRICT\nGULBARGA--0I\n\n5 THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR\nFOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES  V&#039; \u00bb\nAND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTII:IE&#039;I~iT_ \n\nMINI VIQHANA souom .\nGULBARGA-81 V  ._\n\nV &#039;; :\u00e9;2\u00e9_PmoENTs\n(SRI.H.S.CHANDRAMOULI&#039;ADV. s=;&#039;&lt;jII2&#039;I\u00a71&#039;~} _    &quot;\nBY SRIMKUMAR, AGA&quot;FC3,Fi2 IGR5}  &quot;   \n\nTHIS WRIT PE.TiT_IC\u00a7N IS FIILED-UINIDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF\nTHE CONSTITLIIIQ_N&quot;OF IIIIDIA, &#039;~PRA_YING&quot;&#039;TQv&#039;OUASH THE IMPUGNED\nORDER AT AI\\INEX.G.=.DT. 26,&#039;I2.20I35 PASSED BY R4, AND QUASI-I THE\nIMPUGNED ORDER AT A&#039;I\u00e9\u00a3IS\u00a3E}(\u00a7I4. DT, &#039;I&#039;G;2.;&#039;-IOCI6 PASSED BY R5.\n\nTHIS WRITPETITIDNIIIICOMDETS ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING\nIN &#039;B&#039; GROUP THIS DAY,&#039; TI-IE jCOI;.IRT&quot;MADE THE FOLLOWING?\n\n . . . . . \n\n   assaiiing the correctnacs of the\n\n\ufb02\u00b0.&#039;A.in:ppgn&lt;;d ..  dated 26.12.2005 passed by 4&amp;1\n\n &quot;Vida Annexure~G and the order dated\n\n   passed by the 5&quot;&#039; respondent vide Annexure~H,<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\"> ~h.#&#8217;Je prwented this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2. The grievance of the petitioners in the instant<\/p>\n<p>writ peti\ufb01on is that, they are Kerosene A. H<\/p>\n<p>converted Retailers who are holding   <\/p>\n<p>Kamateka Essential Commodities ipns; semi<\/p>\n<p>1992, from 1987 onwards to .eel.l Keroeene retell  V.<\/p>\n<p>Gulbarga proper and they are ijecna;g;5g  \ufb02duties<br \/>\nsincerely and honestly    the<br \/>\nfour\ufb01i respondeum::.\u00a7;i&#8217;   mandatory<br \/>\nprovisions laid    Karnetaka<br \/>\nEseentialv~x3omnfreTdi;Eiee(F\ufb01\ufb01ei  order 1992, vvithout<br \/>\nissuing nvoiiee.  the Control order and<\/p>\n<p>withoutAVcallinQ&#8221;fo;r the ep_olicetione, has issued impugned<\/p>\n<p> icumluhaea\ufb01oneto  respondent vide Annexure-G<\/p>\n<p> on the Thesis of Annexure&#8211;G has<\/p>\n<p> _granie\u00abd euiherizetion to the \ufb01rst respondent, without<\/p>\n<p> ring {he procedurm as envisaged under the Control<\/p>\n<p> lllolrderi 1992. The said authorization given by the fourth<\/p>\n<p>it  &#8216; A &#8220;&#8216;*:VV:res&#8217;r3ondent in favour of first rapondent without calling for<\/p>\n<p>any application is not jue\ufb01\ufb01able and it is liable to be set<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">-4-<\/span><br \/>\neside. Having regard to these backgrounds, petitieners<\/p>\n<p>herein fett necessitated to present this writ petitien<\/p>\n<p>seeking appropriate relief as stated supra.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3. After careful perusal of the principa&#8217;l.:::grodnd  <\/p>\n<p>urged by petitioners in the instant  -1<\/p>\n<p>hearing teamed Additionaie Governrrzent  <\/p>\n<p>appearing for respondents-2 to it   that,<br \/>\nthese petitioners are   Hairtfkers converted<br \/>\nretailers and after V obtalinihng  they are<br \/>\ndistributing the   the :ig;:ardh;51c:ers in their<br \/>\njurisdiction as  competent authority. it is<\/p>\n<p>the ease of\u00ab.._theT&#8217;  that, the jurisdictional<\/p>\n<p> without following the procedures as<\/p>\n<p> the Control order 1992 as referred<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;the light of the direetions- cum &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;75:;-j~ommunit:ation issued by the found&#8221;: respondent and En<\/p>\n<p>  of the application \ufb01led by first respondent,<\/p>\n<p> Thee&#8212;i\u00a7wi&#8217;ri1drawn eome of the cards entrusted to these<\/p>\n<p>Aifpetitionere and transferred the same to die first<\/p>\n<p>respondent without following the due procedure-m_..__as<\/p>\n<p>envisaged under the Control order, 1992. Furtherfit.<\/p>\n<p>&lt; I<br \/>\n&quot;s V<br \/>\nit &#039;.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">signi\ufb01cant to note that, petitioners cannot   <\/p>\n<p>matter of right to continue their authotizetioriti to  <\/p>\n<p>the kerosene eil to the card hoiders icontf\u00e9hdp&#8217; befoije <\/p>\n<p>this Court that procedures  been fastener iiiiiihe<br \/>\nsaid contention of the  aceepted. it<br \/>\ndepends upon the things  epportunity to<br \/>\nthe persons    of the first<br \/>\nrespondent   fourth respondent<br \/>\nand e dires\ufb01oni  to the fifth respondent to<\/p>\n<p>consider the cese_sf&#8221;first:_respondent and accordingiy, \ufb01fth<\/p>\n<p> has  &#8220;e.ons_idered and taken appropriate<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;decisions Vthefinterest of public in general and in<\/p>\n<p> particulef,  interest of cardholders of the said<\/p>\n<p>. ioeelity. iiihierefore, no injustice as such has been caused<\/p>\n<p>  pttti\ufb01oners. Nor i find any error committed by the<\/p>\n<p>h  &#8216;resp_ondents~4 and 5 in taking such a decision. Further it<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;is~iipertinent to note met, this matter is pending since 2006<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab\u00a33-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">and petitioners have not obtained any interim order,&#8221;.:.ir1._V<\/p>\n<p>View of the order passed by the jurisdiotionai   <\/p>\n<p>authority, as referred above and the pe\ufb01tion.erev*&#8211;e:r_e &#8216;also.&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>distributing the kerosene oii to the  oerici&#8217;-f<\/p>\n<p>who comes within their  V _VVA&#8217;i&#8217;hAereiore&#8217;;;<br \/>\ninterference by this Court isynot  writ<br \/>\npetition filed by petitioner&#8217; as<br \/>\ndevoid of merits.      i it  it<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">4. For yet   petition filed by<br \/>\npe\ufb01tionersje&#8221;ii&#8221;grei\u00e9&#8217;Vi5%E\u00a7&#8217;  is on the<br \/>\nground   have got speedy,<\/p>\n<p>inexpensive,_ effeotiye&#8217; and et\ufb01cacioos alternative remedy<\/p>\n<p>  {Sf  their grievance before the<\/p>\n<p>oonioetent  provided under the Controi order<\/p>\n<p>992, and  exhausting the said alternative remedy<\/p>\n<p>.iA.ite\u00a7ariiiebie4_.Atovv&#8217;them, they are invoking the extra ordinary<\/p>\n<p> of this Court under Articie 36 of the<\/p>\n<p> of India by way of filing \ufb01zis writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>Ther\u00e9ore, on this ground also, the writ petition filed by<\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01tiomrs is Eiabie to be dsmissed.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">5. For the forego\u00e9ng reasons, the writ    H<\/p>\n<p>by petitioners. is dismissed<\/p>\n<p>ml-[lit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil SETWEEN: &#8216;i EN THE HIGH COUIQT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JULY. 2008 : BEFORE: THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATEL CHANORAKANT are SHARANAPPA PANCHAKATTL AGE 50 YEARS ~ #213 C18 COLONY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-266027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-03T20:51:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\\\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-03T20:51:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":627,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\\\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-03T20:51:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\\\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-03T20:51:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-03T20:51:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008"},"wordCount":627,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008","name":"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-03T20:51:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrakant-vs-smt-ashwini-wo-ganesh-kawale-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandrakant vs Smt Ashwini W\/O Ganesh Kawale on 23 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266027\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}