{"id":266087,"date":"2009-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-30T21:42:02","modified_gmt":"2017-01-30T16:12:02","slug":"p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 17752 of 2006(L)\n\n\n1. P.M. KASIM, AGED 93 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE STATE OF KERALA,\n\n3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.A.SREEKALA, ADDL.CGSC\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :09\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                    C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.\n                    ------------------------------\n                 W.P.(C)No. 17752 OF 2006\n                    ------------------------------\n             Dated this the 9th day of July, 2009\n\n                        J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">                        &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     1.    The original first petitioner in this writ petition was a<\/p>\n<p>freedom fighter, who was sanctioned with &#8216;Freedom Fighters<\/p>\n<p>Pension&#8217; by the Central Government as per Ext.P1 with effect<\/p>\n<p>from 20.8.1973, on a provisional basis. Subsequently the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent had suspended the above said order on 11.10.1976,<\/p>\n<p>and thereafter it was cancelled as per Ext.P6 order,<\/p>\n<p>dt:12.1.1978. It was also recommended for recovery of amounts<\/p>\n<p>already paid. Since various attempts made by the first petitioner<\/p>\n<p>for having a reconsideration of the decision fetched no positive<\/p>\n<p>results, he approached this Court on an earlier occasion, in<\/p>\n<p>OP.No:22830\/01.      Through Ext.P11 judgment, this Court<\/p>\n<p>quashed Ext.P6 order observing that the findings arrived at the<\/p>\n<p>enquiry referred to in Ext.P6 was not disclosed or extracted and<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 does not show any reason for cancellation of the pension<\/p>\n<p>sanctioned. The 1st respondent was given liberty to pass fresh<\/p>\n<p>orders if they choose so. Ext.P12 is the order issued by the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent subsequent to Ext.P11 judgment. Observing that the<\/p>\n<p>State Government had not recommended the application for<\/p>\n<p>grant of pension on two occasions, vide its reports dt:19.8.1976<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">W.P.(C).17752\/06                 2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and 3.12.1977, it is informed that the 1st petitioner is not eligible<\/p>\n<p>for the pension.    Further the 1st respondent found that the<\/p>\n<p>certificates produced along with the application was not proper<\/p>\n<p>and it does not contain all informations required under the<\/p>\n<p>scheme. Hence it is found that the applicant had not fulfilled the<\/p>\n<p>minimum eligibility conditions and therefore the 1st respondent<\/p>\n<p>is not in a position to restore the pension. Ext.P12 proceedings<\/p>\n<p>is under challenge in this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">      2.    The above writ petition was filed on 6.7.2006. But the<\/p>\n<p>1st petitioner died on 27.8.2006, shortly after filing of this writ<\/p>\n<p>petition. The wife of the 1st petitioner filed I.A.8007\/09 for<\/p>\n<p>getting herself impleaded as additional 2nd petitioner along with<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.8008\/09 seeking to set aside abatement. Those petitions<\/p>\n<p>are allowed and the wife of the 1st petitioner is impleaded as 2nd<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">      3.    As stated above, Ext.P12 decision of the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent refers to two reports of the State Government,<\/p>\n<p>dt.19.8.1976 &amp; 2.12.1977, through which they declined to<\/p>\n<p>recommend for Freedom Fighters Pension. The learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for petitioners had produced copy of another letter with<\/p>\n<p>reference No.120230\/FFP.A3\/92\/GAD, dt:23.6.1993 issued by the<\/p>\n<p>State Government addressed to the Secretary to Government of<\/p>\n<p>India, Minstry of Home Affairs. On a perusal it is revealed that<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">W.P.(C).17752\/06                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the application of the 1st petitioner was recommended for<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Swathanthrata Sainik Samman Pension&#8221;. The relevant portion<\/p>\n<p>of the letter reads as follows.\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>          &#8221; The case in question was discussed at the District<\/p>\n<p>          Advisory Committee held on 1.6.1992 and the<\/p>\n<p>          members     of  the  District  Advisory    Committee<\/p>\n<p>          unanimously recommended this case for SSS Pension<\/p>\n<p>          as they were aware of the role of the applicant in the<\/p>\n<p>          freedom struggle.     The District Collector has<\/p>\n<p>          recommended the case for SSS Pension. Since the<\/p>\n<p>          certificates produced found acceptable and the<\/p>\n<p>          movement in which the applicant participated has<\/p>\n<p>          been recognised for grant of SSS Pension.      In the<\/p>\n<p>          above circumstances, the case of Shri.P.M. Kassim<\/p>\n<p>          may be reconsidered for SSS Pension.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_4\">\n<p id=\"p_5\">     4.     It is evident that while issuing Ext.P12 order, the<\/p>\n<p>above quoted recommendation was not available with the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner pointed<\/p>\n<p>out that, as per the provisions of the Swathanthrata Sainik<\/p>\n<p>Samman Pension Scheme, 1980, the widow of the freedom<\/p>\n<p>fighter is an eligible dependent entitled for grant of SSS<\/p>\n<p>Pension. Therefore sought interference of this Court to issue<\/p>\n<p>directions to the 1st respondent for re-consideration of the matter<\/p>\n<p>and for grant of pension to her. But it is evident that the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent had no occasion to consider the recommendations of<\/p>\n<p>the State Government, as contained in the letter dt:23.6.1993.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">W.P.(C).17752\/06                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>So also, it is for the 1st respondent to decide on the eligibility of<\/p>\n<p>the 2nd petitioner for getting pension. It is also to be decided as<\/p>\n<p>to whether the cancellation can be treated as annulled and in<\/p>\n<p>such a case as to who are the persons eligible to receive the<\/p>\n<p>arrears. Under such circumstances it is only just and proper in<\/p>\n<p>the interest of justice to relegate the 2nd petitioner to the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent for getting appropriate relieves.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">     In the result the 2nd petitioner is directed to submit a<\/p>\n<p>representation to the 1st respondent seeking re-consideration of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P12, producing copy of the letter of the State Government<\/p>\n<p>dt:23.6.1993, and a copy of this Judgment. The 1st respondent is<\/p>\n<p>directed to re-consider the matter on receipt of such<\/p>\n<p>representation and to take a final decision thereof, as early as<\/p>\n<p>possible at any rate within a period of 3 months from the date of<\/p>\n<p>receipt of such representation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">     The writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">\n<p id=\"p_9\">                             C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">okb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 17752 of 2006(L) 1. P.M. KASIM, AGED 93 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, For Petitioner :SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-266087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-30T16:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-30T16:12:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":824,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\",\"name\":\"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-30T16:12:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-30T16:12:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-30T16:12:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009"},"wordCount":824,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009","name":"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-30T16:12:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-kasim-vs-the-government-of-india-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.M. Kasim vs The Government Of India on 9 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266087\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}