{"id":266101,"date":"2011-03-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-16T18:41:41","modified_gmt":"2018-07-16T13:11:41","slug":"mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\nRoom\u00a0No.296,\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\u00a0B\u00a0Wing,\u00a0August\u00a0Kranti\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Bhikaji\u00a0Cama\u00a0\n                     Place,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00ad110066\n     Telefax:011\u00ad26180532\u00a0&amp;\u00a0011\u00ad26107254\u00a0website\u00adcic.gov.in\n\n            \u00a0Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001641\u00a0\n\n\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\/Complainant         :     Shri\u00a0Vijay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Goyal,\u00a0\nSangrur\u00a0(Punjab)\nPublic\u00a0Authority                :     \u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0\nCorpn.\u00a0Ltd.,\u00a0Mumbai\n                                (Shri\u00a0Vinay\u00a0Batra,\u00a0Mgr.,\u00a0\nCPIO\/AA)\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0                :     18\/03\/2011\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision                :     \u00a018\/03\/2011\u00a0\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">:\u00ad\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.     By \u00a0 preferring \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 request \u00a0 dated \u00a0 13 \u00a0 March \u00a0 2010\u00a0<br \/>\nbefore \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 the \u00a0 New \u00a0 India \u00a0 Assurance \u00a0 Company\u00a0<br \/>\nLimited,\u00a0Mumbai,\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0sought\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nreceipt\u00a0register\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0office\/secretariat\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CMD\u00a0<br \/>\nof \u00a0 the \u00a0 company \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 period \u00a0 8 \u00a0 February \u00a0 2008 \u00a0 &#8211; \u00a0 15\u00a0<br \/>\nMarch\u00a02008.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2.    The \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 vide \u00a0 his \u00a0 order \u00a0 dated \u00a0 25 \u00a0 March \u00a0 2010\u00a0<br \/>\ndenied\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a0citing\u00a0section\u00a08\u00a0<br \/>\n(1) \u00a0 (d) \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Act. \u00a0 The \u00a0 applicant \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 appeal\u00a0<br \/>\ndated \u00a0 21 \u00a0 April \u00a0 2010 \u00a0 against \u00a0 this \u00a0 order \u00a0 before \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nfirst\u00a0appellate\u00a0authority\u00a0who\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0<br \/>\nvide\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a029\u00a0April\u00a02010\u00a0by\u00a0concurring\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nCPIO.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">3.    The\u00a0appellant\u00a0preferred\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission\u00a0to\u00a0challenge\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0orders.\u00a0The\u00a0matter\u00a0<br \/>\nwas \u00a0 heard \u00a0 today. \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 was \u00a0 present \u00a0 in \u00a0 person.\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant \u00a0 was \u00a0 present \u00a0 and \u00a0 heard \u00a0 through\u00a0<br \/>\nvideoconferencing \u00a0 from \u00a0 Sangrur. \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 stated\u00a0<br \/>\nthat \u00a0 information \u00a0 pertaining \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 register\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CMD\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nregister \u00a0held \u00a0not\u00a0only \u00a0the\u00a0 names\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0senders \u00a0but\u00a0<br \/>\nalso\u00a0had\u00a0a\u00a0column\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0subject\u00a0matter\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nletter \u00a0 was \u00a0 listed. \u00a0 Therefore \u00a0 it \u00a0 was \u00a0 very \u00a0 possible\u00a0<br \/>\nthat\u00a0matters\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0commercial\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncompany \u00a0 which \u00a0 would \u00a0 normally \u00a0 not \u00a0 be \u00a0 divulged \u00a0 under\u00a0<br \/>\n the \u00a0provisions \u00a0of\u00a0section \u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(d) \u00a0would \u00a0be\u00a0placed\u00a0<br \/>\nin\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0domain\u00a0 \u00a0through\u00a0this\u00a0disclosure\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ndetriment \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 business \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 company. \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0<br \/>\nstated \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 was \u00a0 interested \u00a0 to \u00a0 have \u00a0 information\u00a0<br \/>\npertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0award\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nown\u00a0case\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CMD.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">                             Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">4.    After \u00a0hearing \u00a0both\u00a0 sides\u00a0 the\u00a0Commission \u00a0directs\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondent \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 a \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 register \u00a0 after\u00a0<br \/>\nsevereing \u00a0 columns \u00a0 4 \u00a0 and \u00a0 5 \u00a0 on \u00a0 each \u00a0 page \u00a0 as \u00a0 per \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nprovisions\u00a0of\u00a0section\u00a010\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nall \u00a0 entries \u00a0 except \u00a0 the \u00a0 ones \u00a0 pertaining \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nappellant\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0mentioned\u00a0above.\u00a0Information\u00a0<br \/>\nto \u00a0 be \u00a0 provided \u00a0 within \u00a0 two \u00a0 weeks \u00a0 of \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\norder.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">                                        (Smt.\u00a0Deepak\u00a0Sandhu)<br \/>\n                               Information\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0(DS)<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">(T.\u00a0K.\u00a0Mohapatra)<br \/>\nUnder\u00a0Secretary\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\nTel\u00a0No.\u00a0011\u00ad26105027<\/p>\n<p>Copy\u00a0to:\u00ad<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">1.    Shri\u00a0Vijay\u00a0KumarGoyal<br \/>\n      B\u00ad11\/314,\u00a0Padhian\u00a0Street<br \/>\n      Sangrur\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0148001\u00a0(Punjab)<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">2.    The\u00a0Central\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n      The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.,\u00a0<br \/>\n      Regd.&amp;\u00a0HO\u00a0:\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Bldg.,<br \/>\n      87,\u00a0M.G.\u00a0Road,\u00a0Fort,<br \/>\n      Mumbai\u00ad400001.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">3.    The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n      The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.,\u00a0<br \/>\n      Regd.&amp;\u00a0HO\u00a0:\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Bldg.,<br \/>\n      87,\u00a0M.G.\u00a0Road,\u00a0Fort,<br \/>\n      Mumbai\u00ad400001.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission Room\u00a0No.296,\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\u00a0B\u00a0Wing,\u00a0August\u00a0Kranti\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Bhikaji\u00a0Cama\u00a0 Place,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00ad110066 Telefax:011\u00ad26180532\u00a0&amp;\u00a0011\u00ad26107254\u00a0website\u00adcic.gov.in \u00a0Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001641\u00a0 \u00a0Appellant\u00a0\/Complainant : Shri\u00a0Vijay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Goyal,\u00a0 Sangrur\u00a0(Punjab) Public\u00a0Authority : \u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0 Corpn.\u00a0Ltd.,\u00a0Mumbai (Shri\u00a0Vinay\u00a0Batra,\u00a0Mgr.,\u00a0 CPIO\/AA) Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0 : 18\/03\/2011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision : \u00a018\/03\/2011\u00a0 Facts :\u00ad\u00a0 1. By \u00a0 preferring \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 request \u00a0 dated \u00a0 13 \u00a0 March \u00a0 2010\u00a0 before \u00a0 the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-266101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-16T13:11:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T13:11:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":392,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T13:11:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-16T13:11:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T13:11:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011"},"wordCount":392,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011","name":"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T13:11:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-vijay-kumar-goyal-vs-insurance-division-on-18-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Vijay Kumar Goyal vs Insurance Division on 18 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266101\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}