{"id":26631,"date":"2009-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-11T22:50:07","modified_gmt":"2017-09-11T17:20:07","slug":"parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATIQQQ' ' ' i'_:f   \nCIRCUIT BENCH Af1j;:)r\u00a7ARwArr  f   A\nQATED THIS THE 1 1m mg 0:?\nBEEQgE __ V \".. .v; V\n\nTHE HOBFBLE Mi?.JUu5.\u00a7'1\"f:CE_VV JA{afA:;$ :\u00a7AH 1:M\nCRL.P.NO.?66%3i~?Q_Q_.\u00a7 .\u00e9fwj' (;~..\u00a71;P,}76g\u00a7Z;\u00a3\u00a7o9\n\nIN cxL.:~.xo.7_563\/2009;    '\nBETWEEN:    \n\nh x  %;4.\"k#f8w' \nS\/0 Nagappa, age: 43{J' y\u00a2ars, ' '\n\nI. Pmasap\u00e9za \n\n2.  Manjappa,\nS\/0' Nagappag. :':a.gc':v  yams,\n\ngv\ufb01rxth   _Vid{'\u00e911t.S' of:\n_\" ' *\n K1id\u00a32Iigi.ff'a1uk,\n\n ,Qi_sm'ct.  PETITIONERS\n\n( '3;g\".\u00e9\u00a7.=.%-1; (3. P351, Advocatzz)\n\nV ,m;A% % \n\n * 7'{'.hcvT.'$11b~ft1sp<zctor of Police,\n its SPF,\n  'High Court ofKarz1a.taka,\n--.  B61163}, Dhaxwad.  RESP\u20ac)NE)ENT\n\n " " my Sri.P.H. Gotkhindi, ace?)\n\n\ufb02\n\n\n\nto grant bail in SC No.36\/2009 (Crime 'm~..o.1$s'j--ag;-----.m\n\nThis criminal petition is \ufb01led 11\/8 439 of  \n\npetitioners.\n\nIN CRL.P.NO.7626[ 2009:\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nMahalingappa, 'v . _ . 2\n\nS\/0 Ma1inagappa.r:;VNag;-1ppa,_:'- * . _ \ufb02\nAge: 35 Years,   I  2  '\nOcc: Agriculturist, _  \n\nR\/o. Kafik-'E'._1111 Ho$*&}'..ai;3:i, ~_ _ \u00abV \nKudligim-'~\u00ab._V      \nBcnary%.I3isnf"'__._V_ . I    '\n\nShivaiinaap::sa.kk _  \nS;\/o Maa'ii3aga;5Par\u00e9'Nfagappa,\n  \nR] o.x'z'<I_ai'i1\\vta31'1:_ Hogalgalli,\n\n1. \u00a7{!.1\u00a71ligi .V'l'q." V " "\n  Ilisf." \u00ab  ..... 14 v\n\n" --v.Dasc5bgm3,ai1alIi Prakash,\n Sj=:3:'Tl;ip}{.\u00a7e\u00e9wamy,\nA V  .23'i_3rc9'a1s,\n\n0655;: Aagficultu\ufb01st,\n\nR,'VoA.'1~Ka1*ikal1u Hosahalli,\n\n" : Kutiligi Tq.\nx  Bellaxy Dist.\n\nParashumma s\/0 Thippeswamy,\nAge: 24 years,\n\nOcc: Agzriclilturist,\n\nR\/0. Karikallu Hosahalli,\n\n3,3?\u00bb\n\n\n\nXudlig Tq.\nBcllary Dist.\n\n5. Giddaparaaappaza Kariyappa, \nS\/0 Siddappa,  \nAge: 35 years, \n00\u00a2: Agriculturist, _\nR\/0. Karikallu Hosahalii, _V\n\nKudligi Tq. Bcllary Dist.  ..     \n\n(By Sri.G.N. ._ vani,"Adirs.)\n\nAND:\n\nThe State, ._  _ _   _ \nRcpterl. By the i_as'ps;\u00a2;or'n,,V  '_ \" \n1<uc11igi'T.aT\ufb01:1<,VL,5\u00bbi'., H    .\nBe\ufb02aryv-Bis\ufb01iet. *  '   ' ' .. RESPONDENT\n\n 11\/3 439 Cr.P.C. praying to release:\ntht:  110' 5 on conditional bail and etc.\n\nV.  :Vh1:k=:_f\u00a3:itioI1syH;:<::111i11g on for orders this day, the court\n\n ' mV.'a\u00e9e_ t11,\u00a2'fQ}3.o\ufb01ring common. order:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
” ..’1’if3t3 \ufb01\ufb02e\ufb01tisnem in bath these: petitions are accused roped<\/p>\n
 V. ioge\ufb01lea: to face charge for offences punishable u\/s 143, 147,<\/p>\n
‘::43’, 3o2 r\/W sezction 149 ofIPC and section 1203 <:vfIF'C.<\/p>\n
Cr}.P.'?626\/2009 is by the accused 1105.1 ta 4 While<\/p>\n
C.r1.P.7663\/2009 is by accused nosfu and 6.<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
2. The State has opposed grant of baii and has \ufb01led 3.<\/p>\n
defaile\u00e9 counter.\n<\/p>\n
3. The facts as manifesting from   <\/p>\n
Woukl reveal that Kubcrappa was mgidergt of ” ” V<\/p>\n
along with his family members.     ‘i_3;_:f:\u00ab<\/p>\n
adjacent land is owned by t11eV3::}eEitio11V1:i Nagappa gave a statement before the police that<\/p>\n
 \u00a3I:ie..g1a}r following 14.11.2008 the accused 11%.} to 4 as also<\/p>\n
 b\ufb01ctitioners in (Itr.P.’7663\/2% viz. Paxasappa and<\/p>\n
j “l\\?I\u00e9ihjunath had approached him ooufcssing to have committed<\/p>\n
V  the muntier of Kuberappa and sought his help to save<\/p>\n
8. At this juncture, it is seen pmsecu\ufb01efi  “its<\/p>\n
possession sumcient material regarding z;1efi*1e  VV <\/p>\n
1103.1 to 4 to do away with the \ufb01fe’eif Ki3’b’81’T\u00a3i}\u00a7)\u00a739;,V”:i5\u00a7*_h;{:) ‘aAppears’ j <\/p>\n
to have disturbed ma1:ri1nonia1 \u00ab1\u00a7f\u00bb\u00e9;–_V_ X5; 1 ‘~ ..1’=$ ”
\nMahalingappa by   ‘3ij’heze”i\u00a5.\u00a7
\nalso allegation of sevemlv.dispu\ufb01eyhefwecn,’ {hem .regarding the
\nland. The statement   seen the accused
\nalong with decreased    indicting
\naccused  ”   ” V’ <\/p>\n
‘.Bu_t es\u00e9 aeeueed 303.5 and 6 are concerned, no
\nmotive “is   mind except for the last seen,<\/p>\n
tsogeiher c\ufb01czjgasfanee egainst them in the aiieged extra\u00bb<\/p>\n
‘V ” ..\u00a71itiici:\u00e9\ufb01” et;3:;fessioii”.'” Pemsal of extra-judicial confessions<\/p>\n
   Nagappa has nasrrated what was told to him<\/p>\n
 fwerd of it is referable tn accused 130.: but it is not<\/p>\n
 Acle-ax.’  ‘\u00a30 Whether accused 1103.5 and 6 have made extra\u00bb<\/p>\n
1, a . H \ufb01l\u00e9gcial confession. ‘Therefore, ccmsidering these<\/p>\n
__?<:ircumstanees, it could be said that the material available for<\/p>\n
prosecution reasonably \ufb01ves an imrlieation of accused 1103.1 to<\/p>\n
&j}\/\/<\/p>\n
s
\n4 rcsponsibic for the crime. As far as accused 5 and 6 are<\/p>\n
cancemed, matcnlal is not so convincing.<\/p>\n
9. Hence, without expressing ft11’tI1t:r.c3pi3;g\u00a7:)VIV_:1′-.\u00a71:V_ the<\/p>\n
merits of the casc, E 3:11 persuaded 1:0 accep\u20ac_:\u00abHth\u00e9V.’ bf<\/p>\n
petitioners (accused nos\ufb01 and 6) in Cr1.P–. <\/p>\n
disinclmed to accept the plea of   T  ‘<\/p>\n
CrLP.7626\/2009. mace, the,\u00a3o13pwizig:_ “-
\nORI’5E-=11″ V
\nin the   is <\/p>\n
  admitting Parasappa @<\/p>\n
Hasim”:1ra\u00ab ~  Manjunath @ Hasimuragi<\/p>\n
_ Ma1;j:;z;:%pa,  ms and 6 to bail, subject to foilowigag<\/p>\n
 ice-.n_iiitioizfS:_ <\/p>\n
V iibetitiioxzers shall execute a bond in a sum of
\nV ~  }\u00e9:si:25,o0cs;~ with two sureties for the like sum to
\nV L the; satisfaction ef ma} court;\n<\/p>\n
V’   f’ii. They shali appear before tax: SEQ\/Investigation
\nO\ufb01iccr in\u00bb-chargc of izuvcstiga\ufb01on and mark their<\/p>\n
attendance {met in two weeks on Sunday bctvozreen<\/p>\n
9 am. and ‘? pm. until \ufb01ling ofchargc sheet<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
iii. They shall not tamper pmsecuti<}:i–\u00ab <\/p>\n
prevail upon witnesses  m_3:ii\u00a31\u00e9r{_'  .<\/p>\n
Sub*<\/p>\n
IO'<\/p>\n
JRJ: CRLP NO.7626\/2009
\n14.8.2009 <\/p>\n
ORDER ON 'BEING SPOKEN TO'<\/p>\n
Crl.P i\\los.7663\/09 and 7626\/09 are  <\/p>\n
who are facing charge together in (:'.riir1'e'   it<\/p>\n
file of respondent ~ police and had ithis"Ciou.rt..<\/p>\n
bail. Both the petitions were posted on Boa.rd".on~.li'.l82009"V 0<\/p>\n
and at bar two advocates that they'a.re..p\u00a7resenting
\nin the case. Accordinglg\/0  together as the
\npetitioners in these  in the same
\ncrime  disposed of by<\/p>\n
order d.-t.–~] <\/p>\n
A 1rie_nl1o_  on"'_.\u00bb13i.8.2009 requesting to post these<\/p>\n
pe,ti\u00a7tion's for  spoken to. Today learned counsel Smt.<\/p>\n
.  appears and submits that she was representing in<\/p>\n
  and she was not present on 11.8.2009,<\/p>\n
when  "matter was heard. Her contention is that since she<\/p>\n
 nh,a__s notibeen heard and as she has ground to urge to show<\/p>\n
"g_it}'iat there is no prima facie case made out against the<\/p>\n
—–[petitioners (in this petition). The order dated 11.8.2009 be<\/p>\n
an<\/p>\n
,H’<\/p>\n
recalled and she be heard. Learned counsel Sri
\nNarasammnavar who had appeared on 11.8.2009 :is”‘.also<\/p>\n
present today.\n<\/p>\n
First of all the submission that counsel.-A4’appeariir1g V’<\/p>\n
Crl.P. No.7626\/O9 has not been he.ard.._has.’_toiiloedisicoilinted K”<\/p>\n
with displeasure, as it is seen fr’orn3’_ithe <\/p>\n
Narasammanavar, the defen\u00a3:e’*~._ counsel   the’-it<\/p>\n
matter. He is one of the Advo.cate.S’on recordig’A’Iflfferefore, I
\nam unable to accept tl\ufb01isipeointe?ntior1–i;that.,”The petitioners’<\/p>\n
counsel has notvbeen    learned counsel<\/p>\n
Smt.    havti appeared, but the lawyer who
\nappeared undioubtedlyiiirepresented the petitioners.<\/p>\n
V.l_3esidie’s V_F’ro\\f.i-sionsi”iinder Sec.362 of the Cr.P.C. is a<\/p>\n
‘ii”~v.Acle’\u00e91.Ii’i’ bar \u00bb.for reVie’wing or recalling the order passed<\/p>\n
 petition \ufb01nally. The Apex Court has clearly<\/p>\n
disproved.ithespractice of review of orders passed in criminal<\/p>\n
 proceedings for one or the other reason. Clear mandate<\/p>\n
A ernerges from the dictum. of the Apex court in the case of<\/p>\n
sf” \u00a7\u00a7ur””:’<\/p>\n
STATE OF ORISSA Vs. RAM CI-IANDER AGARWALA reported<\/p>\n
in 1979 SC 87 that whatsoever may be the merit s11jp’;5o’rtii1g<\/p>\n
the said ground, there is no legal perrrlissibilityiof  ‘<\/p>\n
or reviewing any order by whicihr the erirriinal ‘appeal-,_ it<\/p>\n
revision or petition has been finally, disposedhof:  <\/p>\n
View has been reiterated by the Apex Court eveij:lre[r:’en.t1y..3and . ”<\/p>\n
as the bar under Sec.362 Cr.P.\u00a7’;”.lope.rates.’  question of
\nreviewing the said order not arise.\n<\/p>\n
Lastly, it: ‘mat the proceedings
\nin question   provisions of 439 of
\nCr.P.C.   _obviously been disposed of.
\nThere isvvnorbar  to apply fresh seeking bail, if<\/p>\n
the circtlrnstaneess .p.errn.it.  Therefore, in no way petitioners<\/p>\n
  have been deprived of any right.\n<\/p>\n
 “the’se’lobs_eif;ation request for recalling the order is<\/p>\n
r6jQ\u00e9:\ufb02,\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7\\1\/  ‘ l ”\n<\/p>\n
  sd\/—\n<\/p>\n
]UDGEt<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATIQQQ’ ‘ ‘ i’_:f CIRCUIT BENCH Af1j;:)r\u00a7ARwArr f A QATED THIS THE 1 1m mg 0:? BEEQgE __ V “.. .v; V THE HOBFBLE Mi?.JUu5.\u00a7’1″f:CE_VV JA{afA:;$ :\u00a7AH 1:M CRL.P.NO.?66%3i~?Q_Q_.\u00a7 .\u00e9fwj’ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nParasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-11T17:20:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-11T17:20:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":965,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-11T17:20:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-11T17:20:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-11T17:20:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009"},"wordCount":965,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009","name":"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-11T17:20:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parasappa-hasimuragi-parasappa-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parasappa @ Hasimuragi Parasappa vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26631\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}