{"id":266448,"date":"2009-07-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-06-23T05:01:03","modified_gmt":"2015-06-22T23:31:03","slug":"p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">          CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n         Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066\n\n                          File No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/01413\/LS\n                       P.G. Tahilramani Vs DDA dated 17.7.2009\n       The Commission had heard this matter on 24.10.2008 and recorded a\ndecision which is reproduced here below :-\n\n\"FACTS OF THE CASE:\nBy his letter of 16\/08\/2007, the Appellant had requested for certain information from\nDDA in connection with the allotment of a flat to him. PIO had sent a letter to him\nvide his letter dated 18\/09\/2007. Not satisfied with this, the Appellant had filed an\nAppeal on 27\/09\/2007. The Appellate Authority had decided the matter vide letter of\n16\/10\/2007.\n\n2. The present Appeal has been filed against decision of the Appellate Authority.\n\n3. The matter was heard on 24\/10\/2008. The Appellant appeared in person. The\nDDA was represented by Smt. Krishna Mehta, Deputy Director, and two other\nofficers. I heard the Appellant and also Smt. Mehta. The main grievance of the\nappellant is that his letter dated 16\/09\/1985, wherein he had given his local address\nas also permanent address was duly received by DDA and was duly recorded by the\nSystems Department of DDA, and yet the DDA failed to deliver the flat allotment\nletter to him on the permanent address. On the other hand, the submission of Smt.\nMehta is that they have caused an internal inquiry into the matter in October, 2007 as\nper which the letter purported to have been sent by the Appellant was not received by\nDDA.\n                                       DECISION\n4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, Deputy Director, DDA, is directed to\nhave an inquiry caused by an officer of the rank of Assistant Director, to determine\nwhether the letter dated 16\/09\/1985 of the Appellant was received in any section,\nincluding the Systems Department, of the DDA or not, and thereafter send the\noutcome of the inquiry to the Appellant within a period of four weeks.\n\n5. The matter is disposed of accordingly.\"\n\n2.      It may be recalled that in the aforesaid order Dy. Director, DDA, was\ndirected to have an inquiry conducted through an officer of the rank of Asstt.\nDirector to determine whether appellant Shri A.G. Tahilramani's letter dated\n16.9.2005 regarding change of address was received in any section of DDA or not.\n\n3.      Vide letter dated 23.3.2009, appellant Shri Tahilramani had filed a non-\ncompliance petition before this Commission. Hence, it was decided to issue notices\nto the concerned officer of DDA and the appellant for deciding the non-compliance\npetition.\n 4.      The matter was heard on 17.7.2009. DDA is represented by Shri Mahabir\nSingh, Dy. Director (MIG). Appellant Shri Tahilramani is also present. It is the\nsubmission of Shri Mahabir Singh that in compliance of the order of this\nCommission, an Asstt. Director had conducted inquiry into the matter and submitted\na report to Dy. Director (MIG) (H) on 7.1.2009. He produces the report before the\nCommission which is perused. A bare reading of the Asstt. Director's report\nindicates that appellant's letter dated 17.9.1985 was duly received in the Housing\nDepartment of DDA which contained his new address. It is the submission of the\nappellant that he was allotted a MIG flat by DDA in 2003 but no Demand-cum-\nAllotment letter was sent to him and he came to know about it only in 2005.\nThereafter he took up the matter with DDA and he was allotted another flat in 2005\nwhich was smaller than the original allotted flat. His principal submission is that late\nallotment of flat not only caused to him metal torture but he had also to pay\nadditional amount to DDA for no fault of his. According to him, the total loss\ncaused to him is about Rs. 3.36 lakhs.\n\n5.      Needless to say, it is the duty of DDA to ensure that a valuable document like\nDemand-cum-Allotment letter is delivered to the allottees on the addresses given by\nthem. But this did not happen in this case, even though the appellant had duly\nindicated his new address to DDA vide his letter dated 17.9.1985 which was duly\nreceived in DDA. He, thus, cannot be held responsible for non-delivery of original\nDemand-cum-Allotment letter to him. There, thus, appears to be a deficiency in\nservice on the part of the DDA which has caused avoidable financial loss to the\nappellant.\n                                        DECISION\n6.       In view of the above, Shri Mahabir Singh, Dy. Director, is hereby directed to\nprovide certified copies of the relevant documents to the appellant in 02 weeks time.\nIt is open to the appellant to seek relief in the appropriate forum, if so advised.\n\n7.     The matter stands closed at the Commission's end.\n                                                                                Sd\/-\n                                                                      (M.L. Sharma)\n                                                   Central Information Commissioner\n\n       Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO of this\nCommission.\n\n(K.L. Das)\nAssistant Registrar\n\nAddresses of parties :-\n1.<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">    Shri Mahabir Singh                      2.      Shri Prakash G. Tahilramani<br \/>\n      Dy. Director (MIG),                             237, MIG, Prasad Nagar,<br \/>\n      DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA,                          New Delhi-110005<br \/>\n      New Delhi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 File No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/01413\/LS P.G. Tahilramani Vs DDA dated 17.7.2009 The Commission had heard this matter on 24.10.2008 and recorded a decision which is reproduced here below :- &#8220;FACTS OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-266448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-22T23:31:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-22T23:31:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":38,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\",\"name\":\"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-22T23:31:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-22T23:31:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-22T23:31:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009"},"wordCount":38,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009","name":"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-22T23:31:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-tahilramani-vs-dda-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.G. Tahilramani vs Dda on 17 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}