{"id":266876,"date":"2009-06-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-02T10:04:09","modified_gmt":"2017-10-02T04:34:09","slug":"the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">IN THE HIGH COIIRT' or xanxamrm  \nCIRCUIT Bmtca AT IJHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS Tim 1113 DAY or  A} % T 1  \n\nPRESEM \n\nTHE HQNBLE hm.J{.TSTICE n.v.$mfu::mRA \n\nTI-IE I-IONBLE nm.JtIs'rIcE K;rI;_KEsHAvA1\u20acAm;.YANA\n\n,m\u00a7cELLArIEoU\u00a7 FIR$'I' 1m5;;?PE;\u00a7+L;;;\u20acmQ.68\u00a73\"[2O03\nA\/'W m*A%c.Raa \u00ab:4.\/2094 \n\nIR M!-'A 1-ae.5s93i2w;3_  '\n\nBetween:\n\nTHE BRAN{f:H MA?\u20ac\u00e9.GE;R,     \n\nUNITED :N1:%qA_ i:~$;f~:+U:\u00a723&lt;1&#039;&lt;:;7:&#039;%k&lt;:.A@\u00a3UR,SINQANUR TALUK\nR3PREsENTE1:a_BY 1'1'-s ' .   \n\nTHE DEPIj'\u00a3*Y M15d\u00a7AGER,'{\u00a3EC\u00a3IONAL OFFICE,\n\nN\u00a7).2;'.3, S1%iANKARAN5RAYANA BU:L.mN\u00ab::;, '\nM.(3,,ROAI),2,.BANGALO'R'\u00a7:'56G 001.  APPELLANT\n\n{mi wv. 1\n\n SIDRAM RARGAPPA BYAKUD\n\n 5&amp;3 =22 YEARS, 00\u00a2; AGRICULTURAL\n\n  vC:{}C!LI_\u00a3&lt;;;, R\/O SANGANKERI, GOKAK TALUK,\n\n%  :Z;--&#039;$i\u00a5i_5S\u00a3DDAPPA BASAPPA KANDRATTI,\n\n&quot;-\u00ab.MAJOR, ace: QRIVER,\n\nA&#039; *  .52\/0 MQKASHE GALLI, GGKAK TALEIK.\n\n  &quot;*3. SR1 GZREPPA SIDRAMAPPA gem, \n\nE:\/&#039;\n\n\n\nMAJOR, 00\u00a2: AGRICULTURE,\nOWNER OF TRACTOR,\n\nR\/O SANGANKERE, GOKAK TALUK.\n\n4. SR1 A. SURYANARAYANA\n\nS\/O VENKATRAO, MAJOR,\n\n00: AGRICULTURE,  %\nR\/O 4TH MILE CROP A M \n\nSINDANUR, SINDANUR&#039; &#039;I&#039;ALU}i{, &#039;\n\nRAIGHLIR DISTREC1&#039;.   41f-zm5P03iDI\u00a7N&#039;rs\n\n(BY smrosn s. !iATTIi\u00a7:iTAG$;= fax R1.\nsm MUDIIKAHA  1&#039;\u00a2.%%PA&#039;m.,  25%;):-: R4.)\n\nTHIS APPI?\u00a7AL;:;:sk:?ILE:\u00a3) &#039;UNDER &#039;SEQVPEON 173(1) OF Mv\nACT AGAIN$&#039;1&#039; &quot; ;J&#039;{J_fE}G:MEiN&#039;.\u00a5f HAND AWARD DATED\n19.4.2003 PASS*EII;\u00a7 IN  nN&#039;@.s:;4&#039;\/01 ON THE FILE 0;?\nTHE CI\\fIv1Z;&quot;d{j[}.GI\u00a3&quot; ::;gs1*&lt;;--13;:~:) A&#039;\ufb01I--\u00a5;).. AMACI&#039;, GQKAK, PARTLY\nALLOWIP-EG THE ?&#039;\u00ab:;L,A1zse1 EETITIQN FOR COMPENSATION.\n\nIN mm cites  \n\n4_    BE&#039;3:wEf;E1~:~:\n\n% %~%S1?1&#039; S.I?i)\u00a7_;=Q%:%&amp;\u00a3\u00ab-._RANGAFPA BYAKUNZ),\n\nAGEVABQEET 24.YEARS,\noca&#039;:::&#039; 1%~\u20ac&#039;xf~3iE;&quot;\u00a7&#039;*C3(},{3LIE,\n\n&#039;V  j    \u00ab R\/(3 S4ANGAN\u00a3;~KERI C\u00a7{ZiKA;E&lt;: TALUK\n i3ELAc;aUg4 :3:sTR:Cr. .. mass QBJEQQR\n\n%   \u00a7{L{YSR1S\u00a7\u00a71\u00a7THGSH S. \u00a7~IA&#039;:*r*:KA&#039;:*AG:, Ami}\n\n  &quot;\n\ni&#039; A ~. % &quot;  SR1 SIDDAPPA \u00a7ASAPPA KANBRATFI,\n\nAGE MAJOR, OCC: DRIVER\nR\/&#039; O M\u00a7KASHi GALL1, GCIKAK.\n\n\n\n2. SR1 GIREPI-&#039;A SIDRAMAFPA KOLI,\nAGE MAJOR, OCC: ACrRIL.,\nR\/O SANGANAKERI, GOKAK TALUK.\n\n3&quot; *m}_: UNITED INDEA INSURANCE..f30..4LT{)  &#039;\nREPPD. BY ITS MANAGER,     %\nBUS STAND RGAD, SENDANUR,  _   \u00e9  \nRAICHUR DIS&#039;\u00a5&#039;RICT.   &#039;._..&quot;-RES7?\u20ac;INDEN*\u00a7?S&#039;* \n\nmis MFA CROE. IS FILEI)._UNDE\u00a7&lt;&#039;~QRDER 41 RULE\n22 OF 0130 AGAINST THE; JU[}G}iE&#039;EN&#039;?_AND&#039;AW.Ai\u00a5iD DATED\n19.4.03 PASSED IN Mvc&#039;:%\u00abNc%.8:;4j&quot;2_c2o1,0N THE FILE 01:&#039;\nTHE CIVIL JU[)GE(SR.DN) {}O\u00a7xi,AK;&#039;, PAI&lt;&#039;rL1~:f ALLOWING THE\nCLAIM PETI&#039;:&#039;:oN_ FOR... CGMPENSATIGN  AND SEEKING\nENHANCEMENT (3F&#039;--C0Is{IPEN:.3ATI&#039;QN7 %  %\n\n&#039;1&#039;m&lt;s [%AppE3AL;::%Ar\u00a2 i)k :\u00a7::2t\u00a7s[ s--\u00a7\u00a7BJECr:oN COMING 01\u00bb:\nF014: H1E2ARIN\u00a33i;_V &#039;}&#039;HIf3_ &quot;{\u00a7AY, M K&#039;.N.KESHAVANAI~&quot;iAYANA.J.,\nDELIVERED. ;e:@LL.QavT:r\u00ab:G: %\n\n&#039; &quot;   gnrirmimnr\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\"> The jnsgirernf tragibr bearing No.KA&#8211;37\/T~289I has<\/p>\n<p> ftiiisa apgi\u00e9\u00e9i in respect of the award made in<\/p>\n<p>L The crlaimamz has f\ufb01ed the &lt;:m$s<\/p>\n<p>V V&#039; _obje:{:\u00a7;i.;a~z1$v&#039;s\u00a2\u00a21{iI1g enhancement of compensation.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     &#8216;}&#8217;\u00a71\u20acI&#8217;\u20ac is 11:3 dispute that in the accident that cccurred<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  ..__&#8221;V&#8217;it1v{:-ivizig the tractor, responcient N0.Zi-cIai211amt su_stainee:1<\/p>\n<p>V   severe ifljufif\u00e9\ufb01lti} his ie\ufb01 leg which was ultimately amputated<\/p>\n<p>above the lmee and thus the claimant sustained perxnanent<\/p>\n<p>r&#8217;:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">\n<p>  ~  &#8216;T disability<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>disability. In the claim petition by him before &#8220;the.<\/p>\n<p>ha cozitanded that he was a loader and<br \/>\nRs.3,00(}\/&#8211; per month and as 3 resuii. Qf  <\/p>\n<p>is not in 3 position to work and tI1a\u20ac&#8217;:.as1\u00a7i I;\u00e9:si1l_t&#8221;\u00a3:}\u00a7e-r\u00e9  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>loss of future earnings. He a1S:}V &#8216;c:\u00a7.aim\u00e9d Vc01_apcn&#8217;s a&#8221;t\u00e9Qu:und&#8217;e1&#8243;<\/p>\n<p>ather permissibie heads._ &#8216;1&#8217;he  ptetitieeii wasVA..{E)pposed by<\/p>\n<p>the insurer of the o\ufb02&#8221;\u00e9I&#8217;1\u20ac1\u00a711g&#8211;  n The &#8216;i&#8217;rib1.::1a.i an<\/p>\n<p>assessmeni: cf thr-{G131  evidence awarded<\/p>\n<p>the fcliowing __ <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1&#8217;ov\u00e9&#8217;a1&#8217;d.s 931;: &#8216;a\ufb01ci _;s&#8217;u\ufb01&#8221;\u20ac:;.\u00b0i\u00a31g Rs.<\/p>\n<p>T0War(i3__i.03s bf \u00e9mez\ufb01\u00e9ies Rs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">T\u20aci3wards 10\u00e9s= of v_maf;&#8221;ri.a:ge<\/p>\n<p>.  A &#8220;j;)1*ois&#8221;p\u20ac(\u00a7i;s, Rs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">&#8221; .fFd1x:s\u00a7;1=zis irze\ufb01ical expenses<\/p>\n<p>.  \u00a3%r1&lt;:Iudit}g \u00e91tt\u20acndan\u20ac charges Rs.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;[&#039;\u20ac}\u00a3\u00a7*9\u00a7\u00a7d\u00e9 &#039;I033 :31&#039; future \u20ac8I&#039;I}\u00a7I1gS<br \/>\nas afesult cf mrinanerit<\/p>\n<p>50,000\/~<\/p>\n<p>10,000] ~\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>10,000\/~<\/p>\n<p>33,095}\/&#039; =-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">Rs.3,l\u00a7,GO{}\/~<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,15,eo0\/_<\/p>\n<p>(but. wrongly shawn as Rs.4,3 1,039} &#8211; in the judwzaitzt 0f<\/p>\n<p>tha Txtibunai)<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\ufb01g,<\/p>\n<p>_ ..1fec0rd::-.3&#8242;:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">The Tribunal for the purpase of assessing the less git&#8221;-fxzture<br \/>\neaxaijzxg tack the iI&#8221;1C{)I\u00a51\u20ac of th\u00e9 Claimant at<br \/>\nand the loss of futljre earning capacity at 85%.} &#8216;   &#8216;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">3. The insurer has filed the .. iv  14&#8242;<br \/>\nCompensaticsn awarded by theV.&#8217;E&#8217;rj1.bui&#8217;\u00e9:i\u00e9a1 i.1mde:\u00a7<br \/>\nis on the higher si\u00e9e. The   that the<br \/>\ncompermatioiz awarded   he;1d % is on the<\/p>\n<p>lower side.    _  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">4. We  .,_ha?ve   -&#8216; counsei appeaxting for the<\/p>\n<p>insurance  as {ha c}ai211aI:t and per\ufb01sed the<\/p>\n<p>    &#8216;  natjce\u00e9 above, the claimant suffered<\/p>\n<p>  ampfzt-afgtian  ie\ufb01; leg abave the knee as a result of which<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  ;\u00a7&#8217;i\u00a7:7&#8243;*3.&#8221;3,a$ Sil\ufb01i\u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01 pemznanemt disability which he has to andtzre<\/p>\n<p> {ha zest of his lifts. There is no serieus disputa that<\/p>\n<p>VT  &#8216;i:&#8217;m.r.:\u00a71ain1aI;t W33 a cooiie: garorksr. &#8216;With {his disability, in our<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;a3f:)\u00a7r:io:}, the ciaimazxt will net be in 21 pasition to war}: as 3<\/p>\n<p>C(){}1i\u20ac3. That, in any apinian has resuited in 100% functionai<\/p>\n<p>\u00abW<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9isability a\ufb01ec\ufb01ng his completa future aartzfmg  A&#8217; In<\/p>\n<p>this View of 1:316 matter, we are 61&#8242; the  3211134. 3 the-,9 <\/p>\n<p>Triburxai is I1(::~\u00a3 justified in assessi11g:=__th\u20ac\u00a7_.1(\u00a7$s Qf 7<\/p>\n<p>Capacity at 85%. The &#8216;Tribuna1s0u__gh&#8217;t iic._}&#8217;:i&#8217;ave   cijf,<\/p>\n<p>future earning capacity at  Ci\u00e9zinxaxlt has<br \/>\nasserted in his evidence &#8216;*5-53:&#8217; \u00a346  R;s.\u00e9&gt;,()\u00a3){)\/~ per<br \/>\nmonth, the &#8216;}Z&#8217;r&#8217;i\u00a5&#8217;::1.2 r:a }  calming of the<br \/>\nCsiaimant at   $11 the: year 200 1.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">Durixzg   gvages of a cooiie was<br \/>\nR$.&#8217;?&#8217;0 1:o &#8216;.._Rs.8 {\\\ufb01[&#8216;\u00a7&#8217;\u00bbi?\u00a7;\u00ab.:i:J:9\u00a7;\u00a7yv,\ufb02,&#8217;:.: &#8216;*Th\u00a7refo:&#8221;e, in 011:&#8217; opixuon, the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal xs;a7s,__p;e:  Vtaking the daily income cf fine<\/p>\n<p>~ at Rs\ufb02f) day. Taking into consideration the<\/p>\n<p> r1_a;t1}L\u00a7&#8221;e_V of.1:f:\u00a2:&#8217;\u00abai&#8221;I@\u00a2ati0n Qf the ciaimant, we cieem it prop\ufb01r &#8216;:0<\/p>\n<p>  ta,}<i>Vf&#8217;ie&lt;:i by the T\ufb01bljmal Works 911&#039;: to Rs.\u00bb4,i28,4C!Q\/- as<\/p>\n<p>  Rs.3,12,8G{}\/&#8211; award\ufb01d by the Tribunaig Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>V   &#039; w&#039;e exihanca C0}fI}p\u20ac\u00a7{1S8.&#039;Ci{}I} under this head to Rs;.4,i28,4\u00a3)$\/ ~.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;\ufb02y<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">6. We see considerable force in the {:::)1&#8243;1t&lt;i:1&#039;,w;.~t\u00e9.:f:+&#039;1_&#039;;..&quot;_(;f;~ Vthg<\/p>\n<p>claimant that the cemp\ufb01nsation awarded    \u00a7 _ <\/p>\n<p>1053 cf amenities an\u00e9 loss of future 1:&#039;;r0s;};\u00a7C\u00a7.s*ar\u00e9; &#039;(}I:&#039;I!&#039;1:&#039;,i&lt;l$&quot;1&quot;V{;}&#039;7\u00a7\u00a7V&#039;(:fiI&#039; &#039;<\/p>\n<p>side. Having regard to the factihaj: tf1e._{:iiaimaT;75t  s1}{i&#039;fer\u00e9t1~ -&#039;<\/p>\n<p>a111putatior1 of 1::-aft leg above f.11 M<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Z. We    awarcled a sum of<br \/>\n.Rs,.33,()OCt:,V\u00a2&#8221; &#8216;\u00e9&#8217;f\u00a7:$\u00e9V1:1ses, attendant Charges,<br \/>\nKm1spori\u00a7tiQ\ufb01;  e*\u00a3:c:., Having regard to the<\/p>\n<p>nature Qf -. E316   by the claimant and the Grdeal<\/p>\n<p> _2\u00a7\u00e9&#8217;h.a\u00a7\u00a7&#8221;z\u00a7I1\u00a7\u00a2rge1;1e  the treatznent and also the pnssible<\/p>\n<p>\u20acx;&gt;\u00a2nsa2s3; &#8216;V &#8216;:r3i::;:3i:&#8217; have made, the award 01&#8242; the Tribmml<\/p>\n<p> :__11&#8242;:,der&#8221;&#8216;\u20ac7.%1is,__v}&#8221;1e.\u00a7~1.\u00a7i:iAis on the Icwer sida. We deem fit to ar2_ha:1ce<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8221;    gs.SJs,%:500\/ &#8211;.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">   Thus, in ail the claimant is emtitieci Ea total<\/p>\n<p>L\ufb01ffonapensation of R3.5,&#8217;?8,4~00\/- as agajzzsi&#8217;: the award 0:&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,I.5,{}{){}\/~ passed by the Tribunal. T9 this ext\ufb01m, {ha<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&amp;<\/p>\n<p>crass objection {dad by the claimant deserves to i3c:1 \u00a711Qwt::d<br \/>\nwhile the appeal filfid by the insurer has no   \u00a7.La \u00a531e<\/p>\n<p>to be ciismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">9. Accordingly, the appea} filad   i~<\/p>\n<p>is dismisse\u00e9. Cross objection v\ufb01lgd b3f&#8221;t_}&#8221;i6:  i&#8217; $ Ei;11.:&#8217;.)\\;&#8217;\u20ac\ufb01.:d<\/p>\n<p>enhancing the compensatien S&#8217;,4\u00a7f3\/- \u20ac13 against<br \/>\nRfS.4, 15,000\/~ awarded&#8217;     enhanced<br \/>\ncompensation 01&#8242; R5. 1,63,A4f}\u00a7)_f-:  i\ufb01terest at 6% pa.<\/p>\n<p>from this c}a:\u00a7\u00e9&#8221;&lt;}f&#039;pe}iif\u00a3io\u00a7i::f&#039;;iH &#039;\ufb01ayment. Th\u00e9 insura&quot;<br \/>\nshall daposit R1;-151% erihaj&quot;g\u00a7:\u00e9\u00a7c!V_i:c\ufb01i1p:\u00a7z1s3ti{::1 with interest within<br \/>\neight Weeis \u00a7:)ef0i*\u00e9~~ tjie:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>ggj\/W<br \/>\nEUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH COIIRT&#8217; or xanxamrm CIRCUIT Bmtca AT IJHARWAD DATED THIS Tim 1113 DAY or A} % T 1 PRESEM THE HQNBLE hm.J{.TSTICE n.v.$mfu::mRA TI-IE I-IONBLE nm.JtIs&#8217;rIcE K;rI;_KEsHAvA1\u20acAm;.YANA ,m\u00a7cELLArIEoU\u00a7 FIR$&#8217;I&#8217; 1m5;;?PE;\u00a7+L;;;\u20acmQ.68\u00a73&#8243;[2O03 A\/&#8217;W m*A%c.Raa [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-266876","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Branch Manager United India ... vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-02T04:34:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-02T04:34:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":916,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\",\"name\":\"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-02T04:34:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-02T04:34:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-02T04:34:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009"},"wordCount":916,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009","name":"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-02T04:34:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-siddappa-rangappa-byakud-on-11-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Branch Manager United India &#8230; vs Siddappa Rangappa Byakud on 11 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266876","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266876"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266876\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}