{"id":267055,"date":"2008-10-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-22T00:02:11","modified_gmt":"2016-01-21T18:32:11","slug":"kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nAO\/85\/2008\t 7\/ 7\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nAPPEAL\nFROM ORDER No. 85 of 2008\n \n\n=====================================================\n\n\n \n\nKARTIKBHAI\nJASHUBHAI PATEL - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nRUBIBEN\nWD\/O RAMAJI VARVAJI &amp; 10 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n===================================================== \nAppearance\n: \nMR HARIN P RAVAL for\nAppellant(s) : 1, \nMR. DEVANG NANAVITY FOR Respondent No. 8 &amp; 9\n \n\nNone\nfor Respondent(s) : 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5, 1.2.6,\n1.2.7, 1.2., 1.2.,1.2.10 - 3, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5,\n3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.,3.2. - 7, - 11. \n- for Respondent(s) : 0.0.0\n \n=====================================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 08\/10\/2008 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.\tPresent<br \/>\nAppeal from Order is filed by the appellant original plaintiff<br \/>\nchallenging the impugned order passed by the learned 2nd Additional<br \/>\nSenior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad Rural dated 3.12.2007 passed below Exh.<br \/>\n5 in Special Civil Suit No. 50 of 2007, by which the learned trial<br \/>\nCourt has dismissed the said application Exh. 5.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2.\tAppellant<br \/>\noriginal plaintiff had instituted Special Civil Suit No. 50 of 2007<br \/>\nin the Court of learned Principal Civil Judge (S.D.), Ahmedabad Rural<br \/>\nfor specific performance of deed dated 23.5.1991 as well as for<br \/>\ndeclaration that the agreement dated 13.2.1992 regarding cancellation<br \/>\nof agreement to sell is illegal and void ab-initio. The<br \/>\nappellant-plaintiff has also prayed for permanent injunction<br \/>\nrestraining the defendants from selling, assigning or transferring<br \/>\nthe suit property to any third party. In the said suit the<br \/>\nappellant-plaintiff filed application for interim injunction below<br \/>\nExh. 5 restraining the defendants their agents and servants from<br \/>\ntransferring\/ alienating the suit land and \/or putting up any<br \/>\nconstruction on the suit land. Considering the fact that the suit is<br \/>\nfiled after a period of 16 years of the Satakhat and after 15 years<br \/>\nof cancellation of the agreement to sale and that in between there<br \/>\nare so many transactions and the last transaction is in favour of<br \/>\ndefendant Nos. 8 &amp; 9, the learned trial Court rejected the<br \/>\napplication Exh. 5. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order<br \/>\npassed by the learned trial Court passed below Exh 5 dismissing the<br \/>\nsame, the appellant-plaintiff has preferred the present Appeal from<br \/>\nOrder.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3.\tShri<br \/>\nHarin Raval, learned advocate appearing for the appellant-plaintiff<br \/>\nhas vehemently submitted that the learned trial Court has materially<br \/>\nerred in dismissing the application Exh. 5 when the suit was filed<br \/>\nfor specific performance of the agreement to sell. It is submitted<br \/>\nthat the learned trial Court ought to have appreciated that on the<br \/>\ndocuments pertaining to cancellation of agreement to sale dated<br \/>\n13.2.1992, did not bear the signature of the plaintiff and the said<br \/>\nagreement was forged and concocted. He has also further submitted<br \/>\nthat the learned trial Court has erred in misreading and<br \/>\nmisconstruing the facts on record. It is submitted that the learned<br \/>\ntrial Court ought to have appreciated that the plaintiff had paid<br \/>\nconsideration of Rs. 2 lacs and that as per the agreement to sale the<br \/>\ndefendants No. 1 to 4 were responsible for clearing the title of the<br \/>\nsuit land and it was the duty of the defendants No. 1 to 4 to obtain<br \/>\ntitle clearance certificate. As the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 failed and<br \/>\nneglected to obtain title clearance certificate of the suit land and<br \/>\nthey further attempted and in fact transferred the suit land to the<br \/>\nthird party, the plaintiff was constrained to file the aforesaid suit<br \/>\nfor specific performance of the agreement to sale. Therefore,<br \/>\nconsidering above and with a view to see that further third party<br \/>\nrights are not created, the learned trial Court ought to have allowed<br \/>\nExh. 5 by further restraining the defendants from putting up the<br \/>\nconstruction on the suit land. Therefore, it is requested to allow<br \/>\nthe present Appeal from Order.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">4.\tAppeal<br \/>\nfrom Order is opposed by Shri Devang Nanavati, learned advocate<br \/>\nappearing for the respondent-defendant Nos. 8 and 9. It is submitted<br \/>\nby him that defendants No. 8 &amp; 9 are the bonafide purchaser of<br \/>\nthe land in question, which they have purchased from original<br \/>\ndefendants No. 5 to 7. It is submitted that considering the fact that<br \/>\nsuit has been filed after a period of 16 years and in between there<br \/>\nare so many transactions, the learned trial Court has rightly<br \/>\ndismissed the application Exh.5. He has relied upon the decision of<br \/>\nthe Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in the case of Mandali Ranganna &amp;<br \/>\nOrs. etc. Vs. T. Ramachandra &amp; Ors reported in AIR 2008<br \/>\nSC, 2291 therefore, it is requested to dismiss the present Appeal<br \/>\nfrom Order.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">5.\tHeard<br \/>\nthe learned advocates for the respective parties.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">6.\tAt<br \/>\nthe outset, it is required to be noted that the appellant-plaintiff<br \/>\nhas filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell<br \/>\ndated 23.5.1991 in the year 2007 after a period of 16 years. It<br \/>\nappears that in the year 1992 itself the said agreement to sell has<br \/>\nbeen cancelled. The original defendants No. 1 to 4 have sold the suit<br \/>\nland to various persons, more particularly, defendants No. 5 to 7 by<br \/>\nregistered sale deed and thereafter in turn the said defendants No. 5<br \/>\nto 7 have sold the different plots to defendants No. 8 and 9 by<br \/>\nregistered sale deed. The original land owners have sold the land in<br \/>\nquestion in favour of the defendants No. 5 to 6 in the year 2004 and<br \/>\nthe defendants No. 5 to 6 have sold in favour of the defendant Nos. 8<br \/>\nand 9 in the year 2006 and similarly some plots are sold in favour of<br \/>\nthe defendants No. 10 and 11. Thus, prima facie, it appears that<br \/>\ndefendants No. 8 to 11 are the bonafide purchaser of the land in<br \/>\nquestion from defendants No. 5 and 6. Even otherwise, considering the<br \/>\nfact that the suit has been filed after a period of 16 years for<br \/>\nspecific performance of the agreement to sell dated 23.5.1991 and in<br \/>\nbetween there are so many transactions, it cannot be said that the<br \/>\nlearned trial Court has committed any error in dismissing the<br \/>\napplication Exh. 5 restraining the defendants, more particularly,<br \/>\nsubsequent purchaser from dealing with the property in question and<br \/>\nputting up any further construction. As held by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme<br \/>\nCourt in the case of Mandali Ranganna &amp; Ors (supra) if the<br \/>\nsuit is filed belatedly after so many years, the injunction cannot be<br \/>\ngranted. However, an order can be passed that if any transaction<br \/>\nhereinafter, it shall be  subject to ultimate outcome of the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">7.\tConsidering<br \/>\nthe above, when the suit has been filed after a period of 16 years<br \/>\nfor specific performance of agreement to sell dated 23.5.1991 and in<br \/>\nbetween there are so many transactions and last transaction are in<br \/>\nfavour of the defendants No. 8 to 11, it cannot be said that the<br \/>\nlearned trial Court has committed any error and \/ or illegality and<br \/>\nin refusing to grant injunction. Under the circumstances, Appeal from<br \/>\nOrder deserve to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">                              (M.R.SHAH,<br \/>\nJ.)<\/p>\n<p>kaushik<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print AO\/85\/2008 7\/ 7 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 85 of 2008 ===================================================== KARTIKBHAI JASHUBHAI PATEL &#8211; Appellant(s) Versus RUBIBEN WD\/O RAMAJI VARVAJI &amp; 10 &#8211; Respondent(s) ===================================================== [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-267055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-21T18:32:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-21T18:32:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1011,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-21T18:32:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-21T18:32:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-21T18:32:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008"},"wordCount":1011,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008","name":"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-21T18:32:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kartikbhai-vs-rubiben-on-8-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kartikbhai vs Rubiben on 8 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267055"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267055\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}