{"id":267343,"date":"2009-04-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-07-16T06:49:12","modified_gmt":"2018-07-16T01:19:12","slug":"shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                      Complaint No.CIC\/WB\/C\/2008\/00469 dated 17.4.2008\n                         Right to <a href=\"\/doc\/1965344\/\" id=\"a_1\">Information Act<\/a> 2005 - Section 18\n\nComplainant -           Shri Mangesh Joshi\nRespondent       -      Central Information Commission (CIC)\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     By an application of 15.10.07 Shri Mangesh Joshi of Solapur, Maharashtra<br \/>\napplied to the CPIO, Central Information Commission making a brief statement<br \/>\nregarding applications made by him the following public authorities:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>         1. Bank of Maharashtra, Solapur Zonal Office\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>         2. National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>         3. Central Vigilance Commission,\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_3\"><p>         4. Central Bureau of Investigation, Mumbai\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_4\"><p>         5. Central Home Secretary, Home Ministry\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_5\"><p>         6. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance &amp; Pension, New Delhi\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_6\"><p>         7. Supreme Court, New Delhi.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_7\"><p>         8. Chief Justice, High Court\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_8\"><p>         9. Ministry of Overseas Affairs, Govt. of India\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_9\"><p>         10. Rural Development Ministry\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_10\"><p>         11. Maharashtra Public Service Commission\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_11\"><p>         12. Central Information Commission.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_2\">     Aggrieved by the response of CPIO Sh. G. Subramanian, of which there is<br \/>\nno copy on the file, but has been obtained from CPIO Shri G. Subramanian, Shri<br \/>\nJoshi moved a complaint before this Commission on 8.4.08, the essence of<br \/>\nwhich is as below:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_12\"><p>         &#8220;It was binding on Mr Subramanian to provide information sought<br \/>\n         within thirty days of receipt of application in CIC ( and not by him)<br \/>\n         and it was also binding on APIO to transfer the same u\/s 6(3) to<br \/>\n         other authorities for furnishing information sought on the points<br \/>\n         pertaining to them. (Sec. 6(1), 5(2) and 6(3) if read together will<br \/>\n         made the following points clear: &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_3\">    Subsequent to this correspondence took place between CPIO Shri Tarun<br \/>\nKumar, Jt. Secretary in response to the complaint of 8.4.08 and CPIO Shri G.<br \/>\nSubramanian, Asstt. Registrar who had disposed of the application of 15.10.07,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                            1<\/span><br \/>\n consequent to which further orders were issued by CPIO Shri Tarun Kumar on<br \/>\n16.5.08, as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_13\"><p>          1. &#8220;Your complaint against CPIO, Bank of Maharashtra,<br \/>\n              Solapur Zonal Office has been registered in case File No.<br \/>\n              CIC\/PB\/C\/2007\/00225 and has been put up to<br \/>\n              Commissioner for further action.         Further response is<br \/>\n              awaited on the same.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_14\"><p>          2. Your complaint against National Human Rights Commission<br \/>\n              has been registered in case File No. CIC\/OK\/C\/2009\/00356<br \/>\n              and further action will be taken on its turn, which will be<br \/>\n              intimated to you.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_15\"><p>          3. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Central<br \/>\n              Vigilance Commission u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_16\"><p>          4. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Central Bureau<br \/>\n              of Investigation u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_17\"><p>          5. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Ministry of<br \/>\n              Home Affairs u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_18\"><p>          6. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Department of<br \/>\n              Personnel &amp; Training u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_19\"><p>          7. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Supreme Court<br \/>\n              u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_20\"><p>          8. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Ministry of<br \/>\n              Overseas Affairs u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_21\"><p>          9. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Ministry of Rural<br \/>\n              Development u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_22\"><p>          10. This information is not maintained by Central Information<br \/>\n              Commission. This information can be obtained by you<br \/>\n              directly from the concerned public authority, Maharashtra<br \/>\n              Public Service Commission u\/s 6(1) for which you are aware.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_23\"><p>          11. Shri G. Subramanian was posted in this Commission on<br \/>\n              12.6.2006 as Under Secretary and Asstt. Registrar. His<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                         2<\/span><br \/>\n                 Basic pay is Rs. 10,000\/- which falls in pay scale of Rs.<br \/>\n                10,000-15,200\/-&#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_4\">      The complaint was heard through videoconference on 29.4.2009 at 4.30<br \/>\np.m. Only respondents S\/ Shri Tarun Kumar, CPIO \/ Jt. Secy and G.<br \/>\nSubramanian, Under Secy are present. Although informed and arrangement<br \/>\nmade for videoconference, when contacted on the telephone appellant Shri Joshi<br \/>\nsubmitted that he did not intend to be present.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">     A copy of the response of Shri G. Subramanian to the application of<br \/>\n15.10.07 has been taken on record. In this Shri Subramanian has pointed out<br \/>\nthat of all the information that is held by this Commission, he has offered to<br \/>\nsupply copies of the documents sought on payment of fee, but no fee has been<br \/>\nreceived. In addition, he has provided the following response to appellant Shri<br \/>\nJoshi :\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_24\"><p>          &#8220;5.   The Regulations\/ Rules are on public domain and you can<br \/>\n                download them from our website www.cic.gov.in.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_25\"><p>          6.    SEBI is a public authority. You may be referring about Stock<br \/>\n                Exchanges having been brought under RTI regime in case<br \/>\n                Nos. CIC\/AT\/A\/2006\/00684 &amp; CIC\/AT\/A\/2007\/00106 which is<br \/>\n                in our website. If your require printout you may send Rs. 50<br \/>\n                \/- (Rs. 2 x pages 25) by way of DD or IPO in favour of PAO,<br \/>\n                CAT, payable at New Delhi. Documents will be sent on<br \/>\n                receipt of DD\/ IPO.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_26\"><p>          7-15. You have sought information from different pubic authority<br \/>\n                and undersigned is not the custodian of the information.<br \/>\n                This office is not the custodian of the information, as such<br \/>\n                cannot provide you the information which you require. You<br \/>\n                are aware of the Public Authority and as pr <a href=\"\/doc\/1190849\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 6<\/a> (1) of<br \/>\n                the <a href=\"\/doc\/671631\/\" id=\"a_2\">RTI Act<\/a>, the appellant has to apply to the PIO of the<br \/>\n                concerned Public Authority in this case Finance Ministry.<br \/>\n                Therefore, you are requested to kindly apply to the<br \/>\n                concerned Public Authority and seek information. Moreover,<br \/>\n                you are aware of the public authority and you know who the<br \/>\n                custodian of the information is. Moreover, please read<br \/>\n                <a href=\"\/doc\/1190849\/\" id=\"a_3\">section 6<\/a> (3) with <a href=\"\/doc\/1190849\/\" id=\"a_4\">section 6<\/a> (1).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_27\"><p>          16.   Enclosing copy of the decision (Annexure-C) in case this is<br \/>\n                not the same decision you are looking for specify the case<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">                                          3<\/span><br \/>\n               number of search         for   decisions   in   our   website:<br \/>\n              www.cic.gov.in.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_28\"><p>       17.    Information Commissioner, Prof. M. M. Ansari&#8217;s full name is<br \/>\n              Prof Mohammad Mukhtar Ansari. He was appointed as<br \/>\n              Information Commission for five years on 31st October 2006.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_29\"><p>       18.    Copy of the letter is enclosed which was sent by Speed post<br \/>\n              (Annexure-D) a photocopy of the dispatch register is also<br \/>\n              enclosed (Annexure-E).        However, you can visit the<br \/>\n              commission and check our dispatch register for yourself on<br \/>\n              any working day at a mutually convenient date and time.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_6\">A response in Hindi has also been provided to appellant Shri Joshi.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">                               DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>     Under sub sec. (1) of sec. 6, a person seeking information is expected to<br \/>\nmake application accompanying such fee, as may be prescribed to &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">   a) the CPIO or SPIO, as the case may be, of the concerned public<br \/>\n      authority;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">   b) the Central Asstt. Public Information Officer or State Asstt. Public<br \/>\n      Information Officer, as the case may be, specifying the particulars<br \/>\n      of the information sought by him or her.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">     This clause of the <a href=\"\/doc\/671631\/\" id=\"a_5\">RTI Act<\/a> states the position only qualified by sub sec. 3(i)<br \/>\nof sec. 6, which reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_30\"><p>       &#8220;6(3) where an application is made to a public authority requesting<br \/>\n             for an information,&#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_31\"><p>                     (i)    which is held by another public authority;&#8230;&#8230;.<br \/>\n       The public authority , to which such application is made, shall<br \/>\n       transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to<br \/>\n       that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately<br \/>\n       about such transfer&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_11\">      Under the circumstances, it is not open to a citizen to place questions<br \/>\nregarding every public authority before a single public authority unrelated directly<br \/>\nthereto and then expect to get information in accordance with sub sec. (1) of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">                                         4<\/span><br \/>\n sec. 7. If, of course, there is a relationship between the information held by the<br \/>\npublic authority addressed and the public authority that holds the information, in<br \/>\nthat case a citizen can rightly expect that the CPIO to whom the application is<br \/>\naddressed will forward the same to the appropriate public authority.      On the<br \/>\nabove grounds, we find this complaint without merit. Moreover, complainant Shri<br \/>\nJoshi had not taken recourse to sub-sec (1) of sec. 19 in order to move a first<br \/>\nappeal before the Appellate Authority in this Commission.         The appeal is,<br \/>\ntherefore, dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">      Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n29.4.2009<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">(Pankaj Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n29.4.2009<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">                                        5<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC\/WB\/C\/2008\/00469 dated 17.4.2008 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 18 Complainant &#8211; Shri Mangesh Joshi Respondent &#8211; Central Information Commission (CIC) Facts : By an application of 15.10.07 Shri Mangesh Joshi of Solapur, Maharashtra applied [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-267343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission ... on 29 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission ... on 29 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-16T01:19:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T01:19:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1383,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission ... on 29 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T01:19:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission ... on 29 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission ... on 29 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-16T01:19:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T01:19:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009"},"wordCount":1383,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009","name":"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission ... on 29 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T01:19:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mangesh-joshi-vs-central-information-commission-on-29-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Mangesh Joshi vs Central Information Commission &#8230; on 29 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267343\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}