{"id":267591,"date":"2010-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-08T19:02:05","modified_gmt":"2016-10-08T13:32:05","slug":"ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                                                                                  1\n\n                                                                              AFR\nCourt No. - 27\n\nCase :- MISC. BENCH No. - 5744 of 2010\n\nPetitioner :- M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji Morarji Warehousing Co.Pvt.\nRespondent :- State Of U.P. &amp; Ors.\nPetitioner Counsel :- Pushpila Bisth\nRespondent Counsel :- C.S.C.\n\nHon'ble Devi Prasad Singh,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Hon&#8217;ble Yogendra Kumar Sangal,J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. Pushpila Bisth and Shri<br \/>\nMukund Tewari learned counsel for the State.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2.     Petition under <a href=\"\/doc\/1712542\/\" id=\"a_1\">Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution of India has been preferred<br \/>\nagainst the impugned advertisement (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) inviting<br \/>\ntender for supply of Anti Rabies Vaccine. Petitioner is aggrieved by condition no.<br \/>\n13, which provides that only firm dealing with Indian manufacturer shall be entitled<br \/>\nto submit their tenders in response to impugned advertisement. For convenience<br \/>\ncondition no. 13 is reproduced as under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>                        &#8220;\u0938\u0935\u0926\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u093f\u0928\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0924\u093e \u092b\u092e\u0930 \u0939\u0940 \u093f\u0928\u093f\u0935\u0926\u093e \u092e\u0947 \u092d\u093e\u0917 \u0932\u0947 \u0938\u0915\u0947 \u0917\u0940 \u092a\u0930\u0928\u0924\u0941 \u092f\u093f\u0926<br \/>\n                        \u093f\u0915\u0938\u0940 \u0938\u0935\u0926\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u092b\u092e\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0907\u0938 \u0906\u0936\u092f \u0915\u093e \u092a\u092e\u093e\u0923 \u092a\u0924 \u093f\u0926\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948<br \/>\n                        \u093f\u0915 \u0909\u0915 \u092b\u092e\u0930 \u0905\u092a\u0928\u0947 \u0909\u0924\u092a\u093e\u0926\u094b \u0915\u093e \u093f\u0935\u092a\u0923\u0928 \u0915\u0947 \u0935\u0932 \u0938\u094b\u0932 \u0938\u0947\u093f\u0932\u0917 \u090e\u091c\u0947\u091f \u0915\u0947<br \/>\n                        \u092e\u093e\u0927\u092f\u092e \u0938\u0947 \u0939\u0940 \u0915\u0930 \u0930\u0939\u0940 \u0939\u0948 \u0924\u094b \u090e\u0938\u0947 \u090f\u091c\u0947\u0928\u091f \u092d\u0940 \u093f\u0928\u093f\u0935\u0926\u093e \u092e\u0947 \u092d\u093e\u0917 \u0932\u0947<br \/>\n                        \u0938\u0915\u0947 \u0917\u0947 \u092a\u0930\u0928\u0924\u0941 \u092a\u093f\u0924\u092c\u0928\u0927 \u092f\u0939 \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0915\u0940 \u0907\u0938 \u092a\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u090e\u091c\u0947\u091f \u093f\u0915 \u093f\u0928\u093f\u0935\u0926\u093e<br \/>\n                        \u0938\u0935\u0940\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u093f\u0915\u090f \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0940 \u093f\u0938\u0925\u093f\u0924 \u092e\u0947 \u090e\u091c\u0947\u091f \u0915\u094b \u092e\u0942\u0932 \u093f\u0928\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0924\u093e \u092b\u092e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u0928\u093e\u092e<br \/>\n                        \u0938\u0947 \u0939\u0940 \u093f\u092c\u0932 \u092a\u0938\u0924\u0941\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u093e \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0924\u0925\u093e \u093f\u092c\u0932\u094b \u0915\u093e \u092d\u0941\u0917\u0924\u093e\u0928 \u092d\u0940 \u093f\u0928\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0924\u093e<br \/>\n                        \u092b\u092e\u0930 \u0915\u094b \u092d\u0940 \u093f\u0915\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0917\u093e \u0964\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_3\">3.     While assailing the impugned order, it has been stated by the petitioner&#8217;s<br \/>\ncounsel that condition imposed by respondents suffers from arbitrary exercise of<br \/>\npower. Such condition can not be imposed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">4.     Admittedly, petitioner deals with anit rabies vaccine manufactured in China.<br \/>\nIn case, petitioner is not permitted to submit tender then it shall be deprived to<br \/>\nlaunch its product in India. While assailing impugned advertisement it has also<br \/>\nbeen submitted by petitioner&#8217;s counsel that earlier there was no such provision but<br \/>\nlater on by impugned advertisement the condition no. 13 has been inducted. The<br \/>\nsubmission is that it has been done for extraneous reasons to give undue advantage<br \/>\nto some Indian firms.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">5.     Attention has been invited towards an order dated 2.4.2010 passed by this<br \/>\nCourt in Writ Petition No. 2775 of 2010 (MB) where without entering into merit of<br \/>\nthe controversy with regard to earlier tender where no such condition was imposed<br \/>\nthis court had directed to decide the representation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">6.     It has also been submitted that earlier tender was given to M\/s Bharat<br \/>\nBiotech International which has been cancelled later on and thereafter fresh<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                                                                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>impugned advertisement has been issued inviting tender.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">7.     Shri Mukund Tewari learned counsel for the respondents submits that<br \/>\nimpugned advertisement is neither arbitrary nor unjust and improper. Submission is<br \/>\nthat classification is not bad and it is the prerogative of respondent to frame policy<br \/>\nand call for tender accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">8.     We have considered the arguments advanced by the parties&#8217; counsel and<br \/>\nperused the record. Now it is settled proposition of law that government while<br \/>\ndealing with the contractual assignment may frame appropriate rules, regulations<br \/>\nguidelines or conditions (Statutory or non-statutory) to meet out its requirement.<br \/>\nThe condition framed by the Government dealing with the contractual assignment<br \/>\nbeing a policy matter is ordinarily not call for interference under the judicial review<br \/>\nexcept if the condition is arbitrary capricious or malafide. Policy decision of the<br \/>\nstate government may be interfered on there very limited grounds. It falls within<br \/>\nthe domain of state government to make reasonable classification to meet out its<br \/>\nrequirement. In the present case, by impugned condition the foreign manufacturer<br \/>\nhave been deprived to submit tender for supply of anit rabies vaccine. It has been<br \/>\nstated by petitioner&#8217;s counsel that no such condition has been imposed by the state<br \/>\ngovernment with regard to certain other medicinal product but the condition has<br \/>\nbeen imposed only for anti rabies vaccine.        Whether a drug or vaccine or a<br \/>\npharmacy product should be purchased from Indian manufacturer or a foreign<br \/>\nmanufacturer is a subject matter ordinarily call for appropriate decision by the state<br \/>\ngovernment.     Government has got right to take decision giving preferential<br \/>\ntreatment to Indian manufacturer who are producing certain product in this country<br \/>\nfrom giving over and above foreign product. Such classification shall not be bad in<br \/>\nlaw and neither can be termed as unreasonable nor arbitrary exercise of power by<br \/>\nthe State Government or its instrumentalities..\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">9.     One of the argument advanced by the petitioner&#8217;s counsel that condition has<br \/>\nbeen imposed with regard to anti rabies vaccine and not for other products.<br \/>\nSubmission made by the petitioner&#8217;s counsel seems to be misconceived. It is for the<br \/>\nstate government or competent authority to take a decision to impose such<br \/>\ncondition. In case, a product is available in India and it is up to mark, fulfills<br \/>\nnecessary condition and norms then government have right to impose such<br \/>\ncondition. Of course, in case the product is not available in the country<br \/>\nmanufactured by Indian industries or product manufactured by Indian industries is<br \/>\nnot up to mark, government has got option to purchase such product from outside<br \/>\nthe countries by floating global tenders. The action taken by the government<br \/>\nkeeping in view the basic facet of commercial activities can not be termed as<br \/>\nunreasonable exercise of power or may be unjust and improper.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">10.    The Courts are not expert to decide as to which product should be purchased<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                                                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>from Indian manufacturer or which product should be purchased from foreign<br \/>\nmanufacture. Of course there may be cases where from the record if it is found that<br \/>\nthe government while exercising its power is acting arbitrarily with ulterior motive<br \/>\nor as submitted to grant tailor made contract, court may interfere under judicial<br \/>\nreview in pursuance to power conferred by <a href=\"\/doc\/1712542\/\" id=\"a_1\">Article 226<\/a> of the constitution of the<br \/>\nConstitution of India. But present case does not seem to cover by the exception<br \/>\ncalling for interference under extraneous remedy of <a href=\"\/doc\/1712542\/\" id=\"a_2\">Article 226<\/a> of the constitution<br \/>\nof India.   Whether it is one product or more than one product it is for the<br \/>\ngovernment to take a decision which product should be purchased from Indian<br \/>\nmanufactured and which product should be purchased from the foreign<br \/>\nmanufactures. Preferential treatment given to Indian producers by the government<br \/>\nor its instrumentalities does not seem to suffer from arbitrary exercise of power.<br \/>\nGovernment has got right to give preference to Indian manufacturer as observed<br \/>\nherein-above.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">11.    In view of above, writ petition devoid of merit. Dismissed in limine.<br \/>\nOrder Date :- 16.6.2010<br \/>\nMadhu\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 1 AFR Court No. &#8211; 27 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. &#8211; 5744 of 2010 Petitioner :- M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji Morarji Warehousing Co.Pvt. Respondent :- State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. Petitioner Counsel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-267591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji ... vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji ... vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-08T13:32:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\\\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-08T13:32:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":957,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\\\/25 Kalyanji ... vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-08T13:32:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\\\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji ... vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji ... vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-08T13:32:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-08T13:32:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010"},"wordCount":957,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010","name":"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji ... vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-08T13:32:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ava-bio-pharma-f25-kalyanji-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Ava Bio Pharma F\/25 Kalyanji &#8230; vs State Of U.P. &amp; Ors. on 16 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}