{"id":2676,"date":"2008-06-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-01-20T04:58:30","modified_gmt":"2018-01-19T23:28:30","slug":"maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16126 of 2008(T)\n\n\n1. MAIJO KURUVILA, U.P.S.A.,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MANAGER, ST.RAPHEL'S HIGH SCHOOL,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,\n\n4. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,\n\n5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :12\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                 K.T. SANKARAN,J..\n                            --------------------------------------\n                           W.P.(C) No.16126 of 2008 T\n                            --------------------------------------\n                    Dated this the 12th day of June, 2008.\n\n                                   J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>                 The petitioner was appointed as U.P.S.A. at St.Raphel&#8217;s High<\/p>\n<p>School, Ezhupunna, an aided school managed by the first respondent, with<\/p>\n<p>effect from 1.6.2005.   It is stated that she was appointed in the vacancy of Smt.<\/p>\n<p>Sheeba Varghese who was promoted as HSA in the vacancy of Smt.Bridgit<\/p>\n<p>Thomas who retired on 31.3.2005. Ext.P1 is the appointment order. Originally<\/p>\n<p>the District Educational Officer, Cherthala declined approval of appointment of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner on the ground that there was no sanctioned post. The petitioner<\/p>\n<p>filed an appeal before the Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha. The Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Director of Education called for a report from the District District Educational<\/p>\n<p>Officer, Cherthala. It is stated that the District Educational Officer submitted<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P2 reported dated 26.6.2006 stating that there was a vacancy to<\/p>\n<p>accommodate the petitioner.         Thereafter, the Deputy Director of Education<\/p>\n<p>allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner as per Ext.P3 order dated 29.6.2006<\/p>\n<p>and approved the appointment of the petitioner with effect from 1.6.2005. It was<\/p>\n<p>found that there was a vacancy for accommodating the petitioner with effect from<\/p>\n<p>1.6.2005. On the basis of Ext.P3 order dated 29.6.2006, the District Educational<\/p>\n<p>Officer approved the appointment of the petitioner with effect from 1.6.2005.<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.16126\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                     2.      The Director of Public Instruction conducted an audit<\/p>\n<p>in the Office of the Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha. An objection was<\/p>\n<p>raised that the Manager unauthorisedly shifted approved UPSAs as LPSAs for<\/p>\n<p>making fresh appointments without obtaining departmental sanction.              The<\/p>\n<p>Deputy Director of Education, on the basis of the audit objection, issued Ext.P5<\/p>\n<p>letter dated 15.5.2008 to the District Educational Officer stating that the Director<\/p>\n<p>of Public Instruction has directed the Deputy Director of Education to cancel the<\/p>\n<p>approval of appointment of the petitioner and till a final decision is taken by the<\/p>\n<p>Director of Public Instruction, not to disburse the salary to the petitioner. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has challenged Ext.P5 letter dated 15.5.2008 in this Writ Petition.<\/p>\n<p>                     3.      In the counter affidavit filed by the Deputy Director of<\/p>\n<p>Education, it is stated as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>                                       \"2.       It  is    respectfully\n\n                     submitted     that  the  petitioner    Smt.Maijo\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                     Kuruvila and Sri.John Ditto were appointed as<\/p>\n<p>                     Upper Primary School Assistants with effect<\/p>\n<p>                     from 1.6.2005 onwards against the promotion<\/p>\n<p>                     vacancy of Smt.Sheeba Varghese and in the<\/p>\n<p>                     transfer    vacancy   of   Smt.      Thankamma<\/p>\n<p>                     respectively.      At   the   time     of   these<\/p>\n<p>                     appointments there were only 16 UPSA&#8217;s on<\/p>\n<p>                     the roll, including Smt.Maijo Kuruvila and Sri.<\/p>\n<p>                     John Ditto, against the sanctioned post of 16<\/p>\n<p>                     UPSA&#8217;s. However later Government by G.O.<\/p>\n<p>                     (Rt) No.4260\/05\/Gl.Edn. Dated 1.10.05 have<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.16126\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                   ordered to approve the appointments of<\/p>\n<p>                   Sri.Dennis   George     and   Smt.Annie.  M.J.<\/p>\n<p>\n                   (Whose appointments were approved as<\/p>\n<p>                   LPSA     with   effect   from   29.11.04   and<\/p>\n<p>                   continuing as LPSA in the school) as UPSA<\/p>\n<p>                   with effect from 5.6.02.    Hence, the District<\/p>\n<p>                   Educational Officer, Cherthala has rejected<\/p>\n<p>                   the appointment of Smt.Maijo Kuruvila and<\/p>\n<p>                   Sri. John Ditto stating that there were no<\/p>\n<p>                   sanctioned post of UPSA to provide the<\/p>\n<p>                   appointees.     However appeal filed by the<\/p>\n<p>                   Manager was allowed by this Office as the<\/p>\n<p>                   objection raised by the District Educational<\/p>\n<p>                   Officer, Cherthala was occured      due to the<\/p>\n<p>                   issuance    of   G.O.(Rt)   No.4260\/05\/Gl.Edn.<\/p>\n<p>                   dated 1.10.05 and the Manager has made<\/p>\n<p>                   necessary arrangements in this regard whcih<\/p>\n<p>                   is detailed as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                      3.       Smt. Annie. M.J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                   and Sri.Dennis George were appointed as<\/p>\n<p>                   UPSA in St.Raphel&#8217;s        H.S.Ezhupunna with<\/p>\n<p>                   effect from 5.6.02 and these appointments<\/p>\n<p>                   were rejected at first by the department on the<\/p>\n<p>                   reason that protected HSA&#8217;s of the school who<\/p>\n<p>                   were deployed in the Government schools<\/p>\n<p>                   should have been absorbed against these<\/p>\n<p>                   vacancies, in terms of para (3) of G.O(P)<\/p>\n<p>                   No.178\/02\/Gl.Edn. dated 28.6.2002. Hence<\/p>\n<p>                   after recalling these protected High School<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.16126\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                   Assistants to the parent school, the Manager<\/p>\n<p>                   re-appointed the above two teachers against<\/p>\n<p>                   the available vacancies of Lower Primary<\/p>\n<p>                   School Assistants w.e.f.29.11.2004 and the<\/p>\n<p>                   District Educational Officer, Cherthala has<\/p>\n<p>                   approved their appointments as LPSA from<\/p>\n<p>                   29.11.04 and they were continued in the<\/p>\n<p>                   school as such. However, they filed W.P.(c)<\/p>\n<p>                   No.16092\/05 before the Hon&#8217;ble High Court<\/p>\n<p>                   for their approval of appointment as UPSA<\/p>\n<p>                   from 5.6.02 onwards. Meanwhile Smt.Maijo<\/p>\n<p>                   Kuruvila and Sri.John Ditto were appointed as<\/p>\n<p>                   UPSA w.e.f. 1.6.05 in the vacancies of UPSA<\/p>\n<p>                   during 2005. However, on the basis of the<\/p>\n<p>                   Hon&#8217;ble    High Court direction in judgment<\/p>\n<p>                   dated 30.5.05 in W.P.(c) 16092\/05 the<\/p>\n<p>                   Government            vide           G.O.(Rt)<\/p>\n<p>                   No.4620\/05\/Gl.Edn. dated 1.10.05 directed<\/p>\n<p>                   the District Educational Officer, Cherthala to<\/p>\n<p>                   approve the appointment of Smt. Annie M.J.<\/p>\n<p>                   and Sri.Dennis George as UPSA w.e.f. 5.6.02<\/p>\n<p>                   itself.   Hence by the issuance of the<\/p>\n<p>                   Government Order dated 1.10.05 the total<\/p>\n<p>                   number of UPSA&#8217;s become 18 against the<\/p>\n<p>                   sanctioned post 16, even though Smt.Annie<\/p>\n<p>                   M.J. and Sri.Dennis George worked as LPSA<\/p>\n<p>                   from 29.11.04 with the earlier approval from<\/p>\n<p>                   the District Educational Officer, Cherthala.<\/p>\n<p>                   Hence on immediate receipt of the G.O(Rt)<\/p>\n<p>                   dated 1\/10\/05 in order to arrange the excess<\/p>\n<p>                   two    UPSA&#8217;s   the  Manager      has  issued<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.16126\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                   proceedings Dated 4.10.05 by adjusting 2<\/p>\n<p>                   T.T.C.    holder    UPSA&#8217;s     namely     Smt.\n<\/p>\n<p>                   P.V.Thresia   and    Sri. N.T.Ralpy    to  the<\/p>\n<p>                   available vacancies in the L.P.Section. Hence<\/p>\n<p>                   it was clear that there were vacancies for the<\/p>\n<p>                   appointments    of  Smt.Majo     Kuruvila  and<\/p>\n<p>                   Sri.John Ditto with effect from 1.6.05 (there<\/p>\n<p>                   were only 16 UPSA&#8217;s in the roll as on 1.6.05<\/p>\n<p>                   against the sanctioned post of 16, including<\/p>\n<p>                   the appointee), the shifting of UPSA&#8217;s made<\/p>\n<p>                   by the Manager on 4.10.05 was for the<\/p>\n<p>                   compliance of the Government Order Dated<\/p>\n<p>                   1.10.05.   However the Manager had not<\/p>\n<p>                   obtained prior sanction from the District<\/p>\n<p>                   Educational Officer, Cherthala for the shifting<\/p>\n<p>                   of UPSA. Hence this Office has ratified the<\/p>\n<p>                   action of the Manager for the shifting of<\/p>\n<p>                   UPSA&#8217;s exercising the power of the appellate<\/p>\n<p>                   authority and directed the District Educational<\/p>\n<p>                   Officer, Cherthala to approve the appointment<\/p>\n<p>                   of Smt.Maijo Kuruvila and Sri. John Ditto as<\/p>\n<p>                   UPSA with effect from 1.6.05.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                       4.     However the audit<\/p>\n<p>                   cell  of the Director of Public Instruction,<\/p>\n<p>                   Thiruvananthapuram      has  objected    these<\/p>\n<p>                   appointments. Reply furnished by this office<\/p>\n<p>                   was also not accepted by the audit cell<\/p>\n<p>                   pointing that at the time of issuance of the<\/p>\n<p>                   G.O.(Rt) No.4260\/05 dated 1.10.05 there<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.16126\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                    were 18 UPSA&#8217;s in the roll (including the two<\/p>\n<p>                    unapproved UPSA&#8217;s (Smt.Maijo Kuruvila and<\/p>\n<p>                    Sri.John Ditto) against the sanctioned post of<\/p>\n<p>                    16 UPSA&#8217;s.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>                                      5.        In    the     above\n\n                    circumstances     the   Deputy     Director   of\n\n                    Education    as    per   letter No.B1.3361\/08\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                    dt.15.5.08 had requested Director of Public<\/p>\n<p>                    Instruction, Thiruvananthapuram to cancel the<\/p>\n<p>                    appointments of Smt.Maijo Kuruvila and<\/p>\n<p>                    Sri.John Ditto as UPSA&#8217;s from 1.6.05 and<\/p>\n<p>                    directed District Educational Officer, Cherthala<\/p>\n<p>                    to stop payments of salary to these teachers,<\/p>\n<p>                    now the matter is pending with the Director of<\/p>\n<p>                    Public    Instruction,    Thiruvananthapuram.<\/p>\n<p>                    Therefore Writ Petition is devoid of merit.&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>                 4.        A perusal of the counter affidavit shows that the<\/p>\n<p>matter is not finally decided by the Director of Public Instruction. Ext.P5 letter<\/p>\n<p>was issued without hearing the petitioner. The Director of Public Instruction has<\/p>\n<p>also not heard the petitioner as well as the Manager. At the same time, till a final<\/p>\n<p>decision is taken in the matter, the Director of Public Instruction has directed the<\/p>\n<p>Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha to withhold the salary of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>The Deputy Director has in turn issued Exhibit P5 letter to the District<\/p>\n<p>Educational Officer with copy to the Manager, the Headmaster and the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.  To my mind, the direction to withhold the salary is illegal.      The<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.16126\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                           7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>appointment of the petitioner from 1.6.2005 was approved by the competent<\/p>\n<p>authority. Unless and until it is found after hearing the petitioner as well as the<\/p>\n<p>Manager that the approval of appointment of the petitioner was illegal, it is not<\/p>\n<p>proper to withhold the salary of the petitioner. At the same time, the matter has<\/p>\n<p>to be finalised by the Director of Public Instruction. In these circumstances, the<\/p>\n<p>Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:-<\/p>\n<p>                     (1)   The Director of Public Instruction shall issue notice to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner as well as the Manager, hear them and finally decide the matter<\/p>\n<p>after considering all the contentions put forward by the petitioner as well as the<\/p>\n<p>Manager.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                     (2)    Till a final decision is taken by the Director of Public<\/p>\n<p>Instruction, Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance and the direction to withhold the<\/p>\n<p>salary of the petitioner shall not be implemented. Needless to say that this<\/p>\n<p>direction will have the effect of taking necessary steps by the respondents to<\/p>\n<p>continue to pay the salary of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>                                                        K.T. SANKARAN,<br \/>\n                                                             JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16126 of 2008(T) 1. MAIJO KURUVILA, U.P.S.A., &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. MANAGER, ST.RAPHEL&#8217;S HIGH SCHOOL, &#8230; Respondent 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, 4. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, 5. STATE OF KERALA, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-19T23:28:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-19T23:28:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1416,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-19T23:28:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-19T23:28:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-19T23:28:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008"},"wordCount":1416,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008","name":"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-19T23:28:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maijo-kuruvila-vs-manager-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maijo Kuruvila vs Manager on 12 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2676\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}