{"id":268315,"date":"2009-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-12T08:34:49","modified_gmt":"2015-12-12T03:04:49","slug":"sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA, sANsALom3:%[jJ@\n\nDATED THIS THE 26*\" DAY or AUGUST 2q9e%  \" \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HC}N'BLE MRJUSTICE H,N;{NA\u00a2A'ma+AN' \n\nWRIT P\u00a7TmoN NQ,I;14'3_65\/4_?'e0:9'{KL_&amp;}_;\u00a7;i(}_.. \u00b0\n.8;   A V%  \nwan P\u00a7\"l'ITIO\u00a5\\I NQ_:14466~V6\u00a3'\u00bb120G9f.Kf!;B\u00bb'LG}:\u00a7\n\n \n\nBETWEEN:-\n\n1 SRIAVPAILY, _  \ns\/o VARKEY,r    \nAGE: 66 Y,EAR$ .'.'  g  \n\n2 skin b'w':!-v\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7g_L'.'_&gt; ' '.:::' .  \nAGE: rs\u00bb4%1v.\u00a2.A9;s%.    _ \nS\/QCAF'A_l'JLQSE.\"v. M\n\n A 3. _   P VVSAMUEIQ' \"\n A ~._AGE:.3aYEARS.\n A Js;&lt;3% %c:_A%% PAUQGSE.\n\n  4.  SR1 c&#039;?&#039;%&#039;\u00a7&lt;iA%Hsws,\nAces; 45 \n\n  AV ALL ARE Rm GURUPURA VILLAGE,\n A w&lt;:&lt;AvAL:..z VILLAGE,\n &#039;maxxaae TA:.u;E\"rmon:2R.s\n\n \"(SY $ri. A M RUDRESH, Adv.,\n\nFOR Sri: K MANJUNATHA RAG 8!-\u00a7C\u00a5NSLE, Ad\\f.,)\n\n\n\nn\n\u00abU\n\nW' 3\"\n[2\nF7\n\nTHE $TATE OF KARNATAKA\n\nBY ITS SECRETARK,\n\nREVEMUE DEPARTMENT,  _\nVIKAASA SOUQHA,  \nDr.B.R.A\u00a5'v'\u00a5B\u00a5-iEDKAR VEEDHT,.._ V'\nBANGALORE - 560 901.  \"\n\n2 ms DEPUTY c0MMIss:oN\u00a3R,A  \nCHICKMAGALORE DI,STRICT_,_. ; \nCHICKMAGALORE.   _  % \n\n    \"\"~\"\"----;;RESPQNDENTS\n\n(BY 3:1: R 3  $::~g:&lt;;H\u00a7 i\u00e9scsp)\n\nTHISi\u00e9vaz\u00e9fgPE*\u00a3*:imN\u00abkA%z;1Eo&quot;L:;~4osR ARTICLES 226 &amp;\n227 OF T;e;E:c;x3:\\:s1*mrr1o:\u00bbaT_:a:= INDIA PRAYING TO QEJASH\nTHE annex &#039;-DATE_\u00a3i&#039; ..j:.1.9;&#039;a1&#039;.&quot;2\u20ac1&quot;09 VIDE ANNEXURE W R\nPAS$!-ED BY 7&#039;*:41;El%2%&quot;D&#039;RE-:::A_m\u00a7:Lg3Er\u00a2T,\n\nTsfzxs *avaz*r&quot;Pef1j:AoN camms SN FOR FRELEMINARY\n\nHEARIM; ;:%;s; &#039;Bf mow THIS SAY, THE mum&#039; MADE &#039;me\n\nORBER\n\nThe subject matter 0? this writ petition i 3 acr%@5\n\n %%g%\u00a3:5f%t%;5M#Mk%i%n 5mo.1 ef surupara wage, Lakkavaiii Hobii,  v&quot;:\u00a7\/E\n\nK}.\/'\n\n\n\nand Sr\u00e9jttan in the year 1957 with a condition \n\nmust bring tha granted Eand under\" cultivation \n\nyea rs time from the date of taking ;3essess%on.  \"'i'?j'4'e':%*;2a fe{'.' \u00a7\u00a7  \n\non record discicses that m the year i'958 \ufb01:%ie 'sa\u00a7'u:\u00a7aI:EVV \n\nwas issued in favour of the petiii'\u00a7\u00a7_V:r1'e.:js. For_th\u00a7 \ufb01.fS\u20ac._;ti'vm.e*':in\n\n..the year 2001, the respgndentAs..._\u00a7\u00a7j*s\u00a7\u00e9s::1;eci t'im._sp}5t and\n\nfound that the iand in q\"5:z\u00e9'st%cis'n__f\u00a7\u00e9A\u00a7;1\u00a7'*\u00a7f\u00a7'\u00a7g:\ufb01 \"brought urzeier\ncu\ufb01zivation and thesjeftgre f:o'%V'$ri\u00bb.\u00a7:ia\u00a7;i'e:jL..g;!f.V;co.5(\u00a7i'tions of grant\nthe grant ~\u00a7\"\u00a5'E'3'\u00e9-\u00e9: :Ejg-\"&gt;Z\"'\u00a7\u00a3i\u20ac.G!3f\"'\u00e9\u00a7f'-fh\u00e9\"UF\u00a7Q\u00a5%'ia\u00a7 grantees came to\nbe canceli\u00e9\u00e9 \"a{_ide 6E:\u00a7'e%  26.06,2GO1. Aggrieved by\n\nthis erde? ox?'-iglanaefi\ufb01afiuwli=5? grant, the petitieners \ufb01ied\n\n:_.4-\"a:.\u00a7v peai\u00a7zT\u00e9\u00a3:}\u00a7ssi0ner ars\u00e9 reman\u00e9e\u00e9 the matter f9?\" fresh d\u00e9spesa\u00e9\n\n accerdance with iaw. After rema\ufb01\u00e9; the seccrzd\n\nrespandent again gagged ihig impugraed \u00a7F'\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\" at:\n\n;*\"**~\u00a7\u00bb~;:,-\u00bb*\"'z_}'x.\n\n\n\n:19.{11.2@09 setting aside the grant made in  \"\n\nariginai grantees. \ufb01ance this writ petijtidn'.*~\u00ab. A \n\n2. Heard arguments on.\u00a5ba_;_th th5e s\u00a7de an\ufb01 'Vpigt\u00e9ss\u00e9gd\n\nthe entire writ papers.\n\n3. it is necessary4'tub,'n\u00e9tir\ufb01\u00e9;:'th_\u00a7' \u00a7\u00a7*.&amp;V\"'igici dawn by\nthis Court in tE1e_.:,:as: e'---pef  \";aev\u00a7d others -v--~s\nState of Kamat\u00e9k\u00e9;jr\u00e9\u00a7:'\u20ac\u00e93i\u20ac\u00e9d':.ij\u00a7'tiii~\u00a7S'\u20ac\u00a7{i\u00a3E) Kar.L.3., 3e: ht-aid:\n\n \".t&amp;g?\u00a7%\u00e9fz[\u20acs2{it\u00a7g,f9\u00ab\u00a7f?e\u00ab\u00a7::\u00a7;:t of the fands 5!} question\nwas iisade. if: f3ii\u00a3%'\u00a7Ir_'Tcf__[tS:e:pezizfiorzer\ufb01 in {he year\n\n2962, '\u00a7'}2e_:s:0c\u00e9\u00a7dI\u00a73gS\u00bb cancefiatiea of fh\u00e9 gram':\narg\u00a7;:\"i\u00e9\" is:\u00a7\u20ac;3\u00a3ez:*.,  $5 {he year 2992, Except the\n\n  33s*ife:1'i\u00a7&lt;:a\u00a7&quot;~\u00abz;\u00a73&quot; t!:e&quot;\u00a7f3:&quot;\u00e9E were i\ufb01itfate\u00e9 5?: the year\n\n&#039; , \u00a7&#039;99f.a?;._V&#039;Ex\u00a7e:;:;f\u00a3 the asserz\u00a7o;2 made in ma r \u20ac3I?\u20ac'?i?i3_I\u00e9\"{if'Q\u00a7'a%'A-7.1:. ,\n\nof the grazfst within a reasonable' }\u00e9e:'i:'_&gt;of from  V  L.\ndate of the grant, The proceedings azf\u00e9 \ufb01riti\u00e9rred _;f\"a:\"   \n\nsanceiiation 91' the grant afzef 36  j:'.'\u00a2f\u00e9;\".*S from?  \ndate of {he gram'. Since {he ra.$:t5%3nde\ufb01t9--\u00ab\u00a3;\u00e9ve:'fai}\u00e9.\u00a7 \n\u00a30 i\ufb01itiate acfien witfgin a r,ea\u00a7\u00a7';naB\u00a3e pe\u00a7\"i&lt;:\u00ab:i._ \n\ufb02fd\u00e9f fmpnzzgned ,\u00a3}aF5S!.*3&#039;::7{ \u00a7}Ef \ufb01fe r\u00a7s\u00a7o9_d\u00e9f:\u00a7 Canceiiing\n\nthe gram&#039; is Mega}.  &#039;pd\u00a7a=&#039;\u00e93r&#039;V c\u00a2z?feffe\u00a7i&#039;_&#039;_.cn the\nrespondent to _ca{:ce! :\u00a3&#039;I}\u00e9&quot;  vfbiaiibn of the<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">terms 9:&#8217; the%_\u00a7:r\u00e9;;%2\u00bb\u00a3&#8217;_\u00a7s _k.4.,&gt;g::*.ire&#8217;a! 12;,-5 ::e&#8217;e&gt;ee;:ised within<\/p>\n<p>3 reasanabie &#8216;\/  &#8221;  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">4.  &#8216;=\u00a7n&#8221; the jthis not in dispute that the<\/p>\n<p>E35365 E23 qu\u20acst\u00a7;5nv \u00a72\u00a7:e:~ir\u00e9&#8217;~.v_:g&#8217;r\u00ab:\u00a7}1ted in the year 3952? and<\/p>\n<p>_..$V3guva\u00a7\u00e95&#8217;\u00abch}\u20ac$V&#8217;was \u00a7\u00e9;\u00e9ue:.d&#8230;m the year 1958. Petitioners N62<\/p>\n<p>fa-14 V:g5:;:&#8217;cLr:;avsec\u00a5;=\u00e9:&#8221;gor\ufb02on of the lands 3:1 question from the<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;erigism&#8221;&#8211;gra.f2t\u00a7%es \u00a7&#8217;Ei&#8217; the year 1986. From the materiai on<\/p>\n<p> regard, &#8216;uni; ;s\u00a7&#8217; dj:\u00e9&lt;;:.\u00a3osw that there are fruit yieidmg trees and<\/p>\n<p> &quot;&amp;;&#039;\u00a7-&#039;,_arv\u00a7d rosewaoci trees. The mzpert of {the Revenue<\/p>\n<p> I&#8211;::Ts:p\u00e9;;t\u00e9&#039;r9 discloses that the petitieners are \u00a39 gessession of<\/p>\n<p> t!\u00a7:VVe&quot;V&#039;E:ar:ds in questien. The revenue records \ufb01ke RTC<\/p>\n<p> \u00e9ctracts \u00e9iscloses the existersca sf fruit yielding trees and<\/p>\n<p>$9&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">\n<p>vaiuabie rosewood an\u00e9 B.T. trees. It is the case<br \/>\npetitioners that they and their vendors have<br \/>\nvaiuabie trees on the iand in question. The fact~:efi.A4.:ej&gt;&lt;\u00a5s:&#039;\u00e9e:nir;e 3  i<br \/>\nof these trees is not in dispute. The<br \/>\nreependent in the impugned wd-er   V<br \/>\nrsaturai growth and not grown  net \ufb01t<br \/>\nsupported by any mater\u00a5e;i&#8230;_&quot;1\u00a2nA  iaesex of@<\/p>\n<p> &#039;~&#039;VClC<\/p>\n<p>C.c::&lt;.&#8211;\u00bb\u00bb..\\A&quot; C&#039;  3;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">5} : 331151 in&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">years, the canceliatien of gAre.n:t &#8216;by&#8217; the :~:+\u00e9&#8217;cd\ufb01VdV&#8212;respondent is<br \/>\narbitrary exerciseiiyof:;1;3e*i:.;e\u00a7&#8217;&#8211;.i Wiithiri A.a&#8217;r\u00e9a*scnab|e time, the<br \/>\nrespondents have tare:-;erc&#8217;ise_VV&#8221;&#8216;th_&#8217;ei&#8217;r power in order te Eake<\/p>\n<p>away the vaiuabie Vrigizts of: the petzttoeer if&#8221;! emrrzevabie (H&#8217;~.~&#8217;DJ<\/p>\n<p>:_.4-;3reper\u20ac::y\u00a7;:. jfi2e_refe%e,\u00ab..\u00a3_\u00a53;ev impugned erder is Eiabie to be<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7Ba9hee._a'&lt;&quot;i<\/p>\n<p>&quot;#e&#039;:i&quot;ti1se&quot;re&#8211;_esf:$es stated above, the fe\u00a3iew\u00a7eg:~<br \/>\nA\u00bb &quot;W \u00bb eaeea<\/p>\n<p> i 3} ii \ufb01\u00e9he writ petitiere is aiiewed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\"> &#8216;Vise imeugne\u00e9 ereer passed es; the seeeee<\/p>\n<p>resporgeent =~ Geeety Commissioner,<\/p>\n<p>Ch\u00e9ckmagaiore District, Ch\u00a7:kmagia.\u00a54fo7\u00a7&#8217;a:&#8217;*~\u00a7a\u00abt\u00a2d_ &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>19.01.2909 at Annexure  R <\/p>\n<p>Or\u00e9ered accordingfyg <\/p>\n<p>C???&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 Author: H N Das 1 IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA, sANsALom3:%[jJ@ DATED THIS THE 26*&#8221; DAY or AUGUST 2q9e% &#8221; BEFORE THE HC}N&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE H,N;{NA\u00a2A&#8217;ma+AN&#8217; WRIT P\u00a7TmoN NQ,I;14&#8217;3_65\/4_?&#8217;e0:9&#8242;{KL_&amp;}_;\u00a7;i(}_.. \u00b0 .8; A V% wan P\u00a7&#8221;l&#8217;ITIO\u00a5\\I NQ_:14466~V6\u00a3&#8217;\u00bb120G9f.Kf!;B\u00bb&#8217;LG}:\u00a7 BETWEEN:- 1 SRIAVPAILY, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-12T03:04:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-12T03:04:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":372,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-12T03:04:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-12T03:04:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-12T03:04:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009"},"wordCount":372,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009","name":"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-12T03:04:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-v-paily-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri A V Paily vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268315"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268315\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}