{"id":268690,"date":"2008-06-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-26T00:03:14","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T18:33:14","slug":"shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 17486 of 2008(F)\n\n\n1. SHAREEFA, W\/O.P.M.REHIM\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), HOSDURG PO.,\n\n3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PANATHADY, PO.\n\n4. KHADEEJA.P., W\/O.LATE IBRAHIM RESIDING\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :12\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n               M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n      ...........................................\n             WP(C).No. 17486     OF   2008\n     ............................................\n     DATED THIS THE    12th    DAY OF  JUNE, 2008\n\n                       JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">    Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.205 of 2007 on<\/p>\n<p>the file of Munsiff Court, Hosdurg.   Suit is filed for<\/p>\n<p>a  declaration   that   revenue  recovery   proceedings<\/p>\n<p>initiated by second respondent in RR(ST)22\/2007-2008 is<\/p>\n<p>not binding  on the suit property and for an injunction<\/p>\n<p>restraining respondents from attaching the property or<\/p>\n<p>movables in the house.   Respondents\/defendants in the<\/p>\n<p>written statement raised a contention that suit is not<\/p>\n<p>properly valued and court fee paid is not sufficient.<\/p>\n<p>Issue No.4 was framed on the said contention.   Learned<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff, as per order dated 9.4.2008, following the<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench decision of this court in <a href=\"\/doc\/430318\/\" id=\"a_1\">Sreekumaran V.<\/p>\n<p>State of Kerala<\/a> (1996(2) KLT 21), directed petitioner<\/p>\n<p>to pay the court fee, after valuing the property at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,34,720\/-, being the amount claimed in the notice<\/p>\n<p>served under the revenue recovery proceedings.   It is<\/p>\n<p>challenged in this petition.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">    2.    Learned  counsel   appearing  for  petitioner<\/p>\n<p>pointed  out  that  revenue  recovery  proceedings  was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">WP(C) 17486\/2008             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>initiated     against  4th respondent, the  assignor  of<\/p>\n<p>petitioner as distinct from the facts of the case in<\/p>\n<p>Sreekumaran&#8217;s case(supra) and there was no demand for<\/p>\n<p>tax as against the petitioner and therefore learned<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff was not justified in directing payment of court<\/p>\n<p>fee, on the amount demanded in the notice.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">     3.       Petitioner  has paid  court  fee  of   only<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1000\/-, valuing the relief as provided under Section<\/p>\n<p>25(d) (i) of Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act<\/p>\n<p>(in short &#8216;the Act&#8217;). As rightly found by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff, when the decree sought for is a declaration<\/p>\n<p>that respondents 1 to 3 are not entitled to proceed<\/p>\n<p>against the plaint schedule property, the suit should<\/p>\n<p>have been valued as provided under Section 25(d)(i) of<\/p>\n<p>the Act and to that extent, Ext.P3 order is perfectly<\/p>\n<p>correct.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">     4.    But as long as petitioner is not the defaulter<\/p>\n<p>and the amount is not claimed from the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>no relief is sought as against the liability of fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent, there is no justification in directing<\/p>\n<p>payment of court fee on the basis of the amount<\/p>\n<p>demanded from 4th respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">\n<p id=\"p_5\">     5.     When the question of valuation and court<\/p>\n<p>fee to be paid is to be decided what is to be<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">WP(C) 17486\/2008            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>looked into is the substance of the relief prayed<\/p>\n<p>for by the plaintiff. When the declaration sought<\/p>\n<p>for is that plaintiff has no liability to pay any<\/p>\n<p>amount which is demanded under the revenue recovery<\/p>\n<p>proceedings      and   a   consequential  decree   for<\/p>\n<p>permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the<\/p>\n<p>authorities       from  proceeding  further  with  the<\/p>\n<p>revenue recovery proceedings, it is a case where<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff is seeking a relief in respect of a<\/p>\n<p>liability which is a fixed amount.     In such a case,<\/p>\n<p>suit is to be valued under Section 25(d)(i) of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Courts Fees and Suit Valuation Act for the<\/p>\n<p>amount demanded in the notice issued under revenue<\/p>\n<p>recovery proceedings.      But that cannot be applied<\/p>\n<p>to a case where plaintiff is not a defaulter and he<\/p>\n<p>is not seeking a decree     restraining realisation of<\/p>\n<p>the amount demanded under the revenue recovery<\/p>\n<p>proceedings from the defaulter but only contended<\/p>\n<p>that his      property cannot be proceeded against as<\/p>\n<p>it does not belong to the defaulter.        In such a<\/p>\n<p>case, plaintiff cannot be directed to value the<\/p>\n<p>suit for the amount demanded under the revenue<\/p>\n<p>recovery proceedings from the defaulter.     It may be<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">WP(C) 17486\/2008          4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that the actual market value of the property be<\/p>\n<p>less than Rs.25,000\/-.     It is possible that the<\/p>\n<p>arrears of the salestax or any other tax for<\/p>\n<p>realisation of which proceedings were initiated<\/p>\n<p>under the <a href=\"\/doc\/201374\/\" id=\"a_1\">Revenue Recovery Act<\/a> against the property<\/p>\n<p>may exceed even five lakhs.   A suit  filed in such<\/p>\n<p>a case by a person, who is not a defaulter and who<\/p>\n<p>is not personally liable to pay the amount demanded<\/p>\n<p>under the revenue recovery proceedings,   seeking a<\/p>\n<p>prayer     that  his property cannot  be   proceeded<\/p>\n<p>against for the liability    due from another,    he<\/p>\n<p>cannot be compelled to value the property for the<\/p>\n<p>amount      demanded under  the   revenue   recovery<\/p>\n<p>proceedings from the defaulter.  He need only value<\/p>\n<p>the   suit for the value of the property as provided<\/p>\n<p>under section 25(d)(i) of Kerala Courts Fees and<\/p>\n<p>Suit Valuation Act.     The facts of Sreekumaran&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>case (supra) shows that the prayer in the suit was<\/p>\n<p>for a declaration that revenue recovery proceedings<\/p>\n<p>initiated by the defendant is illegal, erroneous<\/p>\n<p>and unsustainable and also for a declaration that<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff has no liability to pay any amount and<\/p>\n<p>the liability of the plaintiff is only to pay the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">WP(C) 17486\/2008             5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>amount due to the second defendant upto a fixed<\/p>\n<p>period.      In such circumstance, the Division Bench<\/p>\n<p>held that       suit is to be valued for the amount<\/p>\n<p>demanded under the revenue recovery proceedings, as<\/p>\n<p>the amount demanded is a specified amount.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">       Instead,   learned Munsiff should have directed to<\/p>\n<p>value the plaint for the value of the property and pay<\/p>\n<p>court fee accordingly.    To that extent, Ext.P3 order is<\/p>\n<p>modified.        Petitioner  is  directed  to  value  the<\/p>\n<p>property on the value of the plaint schedule property<\/p>\n<p>and pay court fee as provided under <a href=\"\/doc\/201374\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 25(d)(i)<\/a> of<\/p>\n<p>the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p id=\"p_8\">                             M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>lgk\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 17486 of 2008(F) 1. SHAREEFA, W\/O.P.M.REHIM &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), HOSDURG PO., 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PANATHADY, PO. 4. KHADEEJA.P., W\/O.LATE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-25T18:33:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-25T18:33:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":866,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-25T18:33:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-25T18:33:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-25T18:33:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008"},"wordCount":866,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008","name":"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-25T18:33:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shareefa-vs-state-of-kerala-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shareefa vs State Of Kerala on 12 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268690\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}