{"id":268715,"date":"2009-10-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009"},"modified":"2014-03-16T13:12:23","modified_gmt":"2014-03-16T07:42:23","slug":"smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">residing in the house in question since her date of\nmarriage. Her specific case is that the \nhusband deserted her and is living  \nanother lady. Hence in the \nCourt was not justified in granting  \nrespondent husband.  'of ad'<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Commissioner is concerned.;i&#8221;&#8216;shej\u00e9xvoutd  that in<br \/>\nthe given set of circurnstanc&#8217;esi&#8221;&#8216;t:o  as to who is<br \/>\nresiding in    ought to have<\/p>\n<p>been appo1=inted&#8217;;\u00bb  C&#8221; &#8221; if<\/p>\n<p> Learned&#8217;fcounsei&#8221;&#8221;appearing for the respondent<\/p>\n<p>husband &#8220;suppovrtsauthedznpugned order. He submits<\/p>\n<p> thatignv the cause .t_i__tl__e,of the present proceedings as well<\/p>\n<p>   proc_eedings initiated under Section 125 of<\/p>\n<p> if-?r:_ocedure Code, the address given by the<\/p>\n<p>IVpetitioner:_vv1&#8242;&lt;fe is altogether different than the one where<\/p>\n<p>&#039;A Cfftheff respondent husband is residing. He further submits<\/p>\n<p>  that when the husband was not at home, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>\/<br \/>\nK&#039;<\/p>\n<p>forcibly broke open the lock and entered the prernises.<br \/>\nHence justifies the application as well as the ordcrl<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">5. I have perused the<br \/>\nApparently, the vexed question isastop  if if<br \/>\nat the particular point of time<br \/>\nIt is no doubt true that theVlad;dressA.of._theVAparties&#8217;in; the if<br \/>\nproceedings under V :&#8221;Section&#8221;&#8216;  l &#8216;the weflrirninal<a href=\"\/doc\/1645922\/\" id=\"a_1\"><br \/>\nProcedure Code<\/a> as well  plri\u00e9fldffiljtlfljflroceedings is<br \/>\ndifferent,    as well as the<\/p>\n<p>respondent  re&#8217;sui.dirigVf_&#8211; &#8216;V.-1tW different places.<\/p>\n<p>Incidentally, ,vth:=5:&#8221;-vyife&#8221;is:&#8221;staying behind the Durgamba<\/p>\n<p>Temple andt the _  is staying in front of the<\/p>\n<p> terraplev._&#8221;Indeed&#8217;~as____to whether the petitioner wife has<\/p>\n<p>  the house of the respondent where he<\/p>\n<p>Was7resid&#8217;ing1&#8217; is a matter which is required to be<\/p>\n<p> considered during the course of trial. As of now, the<\/p>\n<p>inat&#8217;erial placed is not enough to record a finding<\/p>\n<p>  ychether the petitioner is residing in the house of which<\/p>\n<p>X<\/p>\n<p>the respondent husband claims to reside or whether the<br \/>\npetitioner has trespassed into the house .\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">6. Be that as it may, the<br \/>\nboth of them are residing&#8217;  differlent<br \/>\nimpugned order is not   terms,<br \/>\ninasmuch as, the   has not<br \/>\naddressed herself to  Only on the<br \/>\nbasis of _&#8217;&#8211;:tit3%e:  one cannot<br \/>\ncome  the petitioner has<br \/>\ntrespassed  where the respondent is<\/p>\n<p>residing oia_for_tliata that the petitioner has been<\/p>\n<p> resid-i.r1g_ii&#8217;inp &#8220;&#8211;s.a;}_dgil10use right from the day of her<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;ma1riag.e&#8217;.&#8217;a &#8220;Indeed, in this regard some more material<\/p>\n<p>Was&#8221;requ\u00e9ired  the learned family Judge to come to the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;~_conclu.s;ion and grant the application of the respondent.<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;:iflixatfin.g regard to the fact that the order is not at all<\/p>\n<p>  satisfactory, I am of the View that the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>1\/<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\/<\/p>\n<p>insofar as the application \ufb01led by the respondent is<br \/>\nliable to be interfered. Insofar as the appointment&#8217;<br \/>\nCommissioner is concerned, the order:,:&#8221;<br \/>\ncircumstances, cannot be faulte&#8217;d.~-,<br \/>\ncircumstances, it was incumbentiluponl&#8217;<br \/>\nto record evidence in this  lithe V<br \/>\nparties to produce &#8216;to establish their<br \/>\nrespective contention.   Indeed,<br \/>\nthe family  1:_inst\u00e9.ad&#8221;:.liiolif&#8221;&#8211;\ufb01ohsidering these<br \/>\n &#8220;matter on merit and<br \/>\n  wayV,llViyhether the respondent<br \/>\nis entitled&#8217; &#8220;the ground of cruelty and<\/p>\n<p>desertion.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">if &#8216; V.   following order is passed:<br \/>\n&#8220;7&#8242;..__{1)&#8217;}5et.i\\tionfis allowed in part.<br \/>\n order on the application filed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner for appointment of commissioner<\/p>\n<p>stands con\ufb01rmed. Insofar as the application<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>X<\/p>\n<p>filed by the respondent seeking reentry is \ufb02<\/p>\n<p>concerned is set aside. The matter is remitted<\/p>\n<p>to the family Court for fresh adjudication&#8221;.the<\/p>\n<p>application \ufb01led by the respondent.      A<\/p>\n<p>(3) It is desirable that instead   it<\/p>\n<p>enquiry on the applicati-onll  &#8216;~ .by&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>respondent, the family\ufb02ourt  the V<\/p>\n<p>proceedings itself al&#8217;on\u00e9.:&#8217;:;yi&#8221;th&#8217;A thelvapplications<\/p>\n<p>Within an outer  .AA.ino11ths from the<br \/>\ndate    I<\/p>\n<p>(4)   &#8220;is permitted to take<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   an inventory in the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;pre&#8217;senc.e:  th&#8221;eV.iu-rivsdictional police.<\/p>\n<p>Petition hvdislposed of accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>.  issued\ufb02mand made absolute to the extent<\/p>\n<p>A   above.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">Sd\/9<br \/>\nIUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal residing in the house in question since her date of marriage. Her specific case is that the husband deserted her and is living another lady. Hence in the Court was not justified in granting respondent husband. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-16T07:42:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-16T07:42:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":617,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-16T07:42:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-16T07:42:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-16T07:42:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009"},"wordCount":617,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009","name":"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-16T07:42:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-s-suprabha-vs-sri-c-mahadevan-on-7-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt M S Suprabha vs Sri C Mahadevan on 7 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}