{"id":268722,"date":"2009-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-09T17:46:27","modified_gmt":"2018-11-09T12:16:27","slug":"kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 13%: DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONELE MRJUSTICE V.GOPALA 'GOWjDA'  L'  '\n\nAND \n\nTHE HONBLE MRS.JUS'\u00a3'ICfJBIV,_1\u00a7IAG}\\;f%YI\u00a7L'i'}~1N2X:: .V  \" \n\nw.I>.NO.3138%;\/2o09(EDNI--..II   \nBETWEEN: . ' A'\n\nKAVYAJ s D\/O ,\nJAYASHANKAR KULLAL  \n\nAGED ABOUTI8 YEARS,  _   \nR\/O sRI.LAIs:sI~I:\u00a7I,II'I\u00ab:RtIRA, \"  \nIST MA1N,.2?\"3\"CRQ$S'; .j \"   \u00bb\nRANDEsIIIVA;'g,'..v \"  I \nMANGALO_RE\u00a257*5,0o  ' '\n\n PETITIONER\n{By Sriz\u00e9 T Kt\ufb01gi\u00e9r Sunjay. Adv.)\n\n ,'   KARNATAKA\n\n _ }i}E.'.PAR'I'\u00a7VIENT OF' HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE\n\n. MEDICAEEDUCAITON,\n SOUDHA, BANGALORE\n EEP.EY ITS SECRETARY\n2 ~ KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY\n..  18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD,\n\n MALLESHWARAM. BANGALORE660 012\n\n' REP BY TIS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR\n\n 3 FATHER MULLER MEDICAL COLLEGE\n\nFR MULLER ROAD, it\n\/'\n\nV\n\n\n\nKANKANADY, MANGA.LORE--575 002\nREP BY ITS PRINCIPAL\n\n4 YEN}?-ZPOYA MEDICAL COLLEGE  \u00bb\nAFFILEATED TO YENEPOYA UNIVERSITY\nUNIVERSITY ROAD,   V\nDARALAKATIE. MANGALORSH-V575 0.18' A' 1-  . \"\nREP BY ITS PRINCIPAL \" ~ .  -1' . \"\n\n5 YENEPOYA UNIVERSITY\u00ab.__\nUNIVERSITY ROAD, ' \nDARALAKATTE,  \nMANGALoER--57*--5..018;\" -- \nREF' BY ITS PRINCEPAL  . \"\n\n6 RAJIV GANmH1:j1\u00a7iiVE:<Si5$;r-_AQF'* 'V V'\n\nHEALTH     \nJAYA1:xLAQAR;;- ' --   \u00bb\n\nBAN=3AIa0rRE--'560T<513A  A \nREP SB'; ITS :;REG.I_$2IjRAR---  .  \n\n7 MEDICALvvCQjUNCIaL"OP' INDIA\nPOCI_Qs."F-- 1'4, SECTC_}R--8,\n_ DWARKA, PHAS.E--I',\n NEW DELHI-110075\n \u00abBY ITS SECRETARY\n\n RESPONDENTS\n.'t\u00a53\u00a7AASri:_A}3'v;:Vij\u00a7\u00a71ya Kumar, AGA, for R\u00bb 1, Sri N .K.RameSh\nfof'~-R-2; 8: "F116, Sri. Mahbaleshwar Gowda, Adv. For R-4 81\nR--5,  Khetty for R-7, Sri Abhishek Naik for M \/ S Naik\n\n   and Naik Law Firms for R-3}\n\nA  O   THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226<\/a> AND 227<\/a> OF\n\nAEHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE\n\nA    R3 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO REPORT OT THE 13'?\n\nYEAR M.B.B.S COURSE FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2009-\n10 FORTHVVITH.\n\nThis WP having been heard and reserved for Orders on\nthis day, NAGARATHNA J, pronounced the foliowingr 3,;\n\n,5? \n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
This Writ Petition has been filed by a studerit<\/p>\n
to the first year MBBS for the academic <\/p>\n
The following prayers were made inithe writ ‘peti;tiori;’\u00ab._ _ V <\/p>\n
“a] Issue a   the. nature’; of
\nmandamus directing the “r.e’spondent._No.3 fgto
\npermit the petitioner to””report”-a,to the} year
\nM.B.B.S. course ‘for”\u00ab-the-‘pacademio “year 2009-10
\nforthwith, and;  ”   =    -.\n<\/p>\n
 E”)ireAc_tgth’e .f3t_\u00a71″1:\u00a2spo1ident\u00bb to approve the
\nadmission of the petitioner.r’to the 1 year M.B.l?3.S.
\nco1.1rse”‘a.t’ ” tli–s3.,_ 3″‘–.resp0.nden_t, institution for the
\na.cadem1c. _ year’ 2009\u00bbi0_ and permit her to
\ncontiiiue and_,com’p1_et~e_ her M.B.B.S. course and
\npermit him ‘to\ufb02appear’ for the examinations as
\nand rwhen it falls due as per the Regulations
\ngoverning” the. course, without any interference<\/p>\n
; in his academic curriculum, and;\n<\/p>\n
.0 V c},_OR Alterriativeiy, direct the respondents
\n  1~.and”~2\u00b0to give admission to the petitioner in
\n  Medical College\/ s to the I year
\n. VM.B.E3j.\u00abS,7=course for the academic year 2009-10<\/p>\n
 and permit her to continue and complete the
\ncourse as per the Regulations without
\nInterference in their academic curriculum, and;<\/p>\n
A (1) Direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pay
\n“costs to the petitioner for having made her to
\napproach this Hon’ble Court Without her fault
\nwhatsoever, and;\n<\/p>\n
e} Grant such other relief\/s as this Hon’b1e
\nCourt deems \ufb01t under the facts and
\ncircumstances of the case, in the interest of
\njustice and equity.” %<\/p>\n
. X<\/p>\n
this court by interim order dated 19.8.2009 directed the<\/p>\n
respondent Nos. 3 & 4 in the above writ petitions’4vtol”ad*rnit<\/p>\n
the petitioners therein and accordingly the peti\ufb01ionerl.’herein’ .<\/p>\n
was permitted to attend the classesi but  paccepptinlgd”<\/p>\n
any other fee. According to the pAetition\u00e9.rg3t.he.’  <\/p>\n
respondent institutions provisionallylpermitted’lherito attend  ;<\/p>\n
the classes subject to re–allotrnleiit;’ if made by the
\nsecond respondent \u00abdate anduxsubject to
\npayment of tuition fee of” subject to the
\nresult of the   effect endorsement
\ndated    Annexure~C. The
\nMedica;l’lCouncfil_v  reslpvondent No.7 herein being
\naggrieved  they:  dated 19.8.2009 passed by<\/p>\n
this court ti’i’ed”Specia}~._i,eaye Petition (Civil) C.C.No. 12979 to<\/p>\n
  13050\/322009 betore”—the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in<\/p>\n
 ‘v1rhiehpA’there’vi.\\:\u00a3fas an interim order of stay and thereafter<\/p>\n
resp’ondentV’.:I$3c\u00bb’s. 4 <3: 5 issued endorsement dated 7.9.2009<\/p>\n
  the provisional admission of the petitioner and<\/p>\n
 :j.othe'ryAstudents. However, the petitioner was permitted to<\/p>\n
  the classes. W.P.No.22628\u00ab~634\/2009 filed by the<\/p>\n
" petitioner and other similarly placed students were allowed<\/p>\n
by this court by its final order dated 29.9.2009. But on
\n30.9.2009 second respondent held counseling in re\u00e9pect of<\/p>\n
.\/('Q
\n2"'<\/p>\n
Vacant government seats available in Medical colleges and<\/p>\n
offered the same to the students who had secured a.d1r1ission<\/p>\n
at Yenepoya Medical College (dim respondent_..%herei}1j}–.: .<\/p>\n
K.S.Hegde Medical College, Mangalore.  psince * 99<\/p>\n
petitioner did not get any seat in  'peril<\/p>\n
30.9.2009, she continued ii'1-the 49 9lrespondentv_Lco_l\u00a7lege,.99\u00bb<\/p>\n
particularly in View of the Jt\ufb01gnient  cotzrt dated
\n29.9.2009. According on 9.ll0.l2009 she
\nreceived a telephone call"  of the second
\nrespondent  seat in the 3"?'
\nrespondentllcoliegelh  on account of surrender
\nof 9 app\/.~,.1'4;""'byei  on 30.9.2009 and that
\nthe sarne nrould her and the petitioner agreed<\/p>\n
for the saine a11dg'vthe*,_se'c'ond respondent allotted the said<\/p>\n
 '~  _seat_:  and sen\u00e9";—-the allotment letter to her to enable her<\/p>\n
 ltoljloin  Arespondent college.\n<\/p>\n
 4. it According to the petitioner on 09.10.2009 second<\/p>\n
0′ ‘respondent allotted three seats to Bidar Medical College, one<\/p>\n
 seat\ufb02each to Belgaum Medical College and K.V.J.Medical<\/p>\n
“College directing the students to report by 12.10.2009.<\/p>\n
Annexure–E is the admission order of the petitioner dated<\/p>\n
9.10.2009 and Annexure-F is the letter dated 30.9.2009<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
written by the Director of Medical Education to the Principal
\nof the said colleges including the 3″‘ respondent herein.
\nThereafter the 4″‘ respondent is said to have returnedsa-ll the<\/p>\n
academic records of the petitioner and when <\/p>\n
the 311* respondent college on 12.10.2009   <\/p>\n
admission order issued by the “\ufb02nfil respondent?’ on<\/p>\n
09.10.2009, the said college refus_e:c’i-_lVto .accept. <\/p>\n
admission order stating that there is no. vacant goifernmentl’<\/p>\n
seat available and informed Vtl’1’e-petitioner to”approach the
\nsecond respondent. The _r3′<""also gave a letter<\/p>\n
dated 12.10.2009___ad{_3ressed  Dxirector of Medical<\/p>\n
Education to  efieict  is produced as Annexure–
\nG. 'Iz'i:.e' \u00abpetitiorler._:once\u00bb,l again approached the second<\/p>\n
resporident"and letter"::lat'ed 15.10.2009 was addressed to 3"'<\/p>\n
  re-sp'on;;ient._ pandV"dir'*e–eted the petitioner to approach the 3rd<\/p>\n
 pl  When the petitioner once again approached the<\/p>\n
 it refused admission of the petitioner on the<\/p>\n
grouiidtthat there was no Vacancy in the college.<\/p>\n
  Learned Government Advocate has filed the<\/p>\n
it 'A-affidavit of the Principal Secretary, Department Medical<\/p>\n
 ….E\u00a7ducation of the second respondent has also filed<\/p>\n
\u00a397;\n<\/p>\n
\n
an affidavit and submitted that the same may be taken into<\/p>\n
consideration While disposing of the Writ petition.<\/p>\n
6. Counsel for respondent No.3 has \ufb01ie’d”‘st’ateinent  C”<\/p>\n
objections and counsel for respondent.. 4<\/p>\n
objections contending that .the__ initial ‘Cprayerv”‘i.nv…the<\/p>\n
petition was to seek a writ of Ina1’1darans  respondent
\nNo.3 but now the enti’reT’eaue\u00a7Ve   been changed
\nand a direction   Nos.4 & 5.\n<\/p>\n
7. The  are extracted
\nabove.  oi petition order dated\n<\/p>\n
3.I1.2(Iit}9 has ..-by the 2nd respondent which
\nreads as foilowst .   A S V <\/p>\n
  – _  :v”‘5li:’5receedings of he Executive Director,
\n g  Kanf1atal{a.’Examinations Authority, 18″‘ Cross,
\n‘  ‘  Malleshwaram,<\/p>\n
Bangalore<\/p>\n
HNo.KEA\/Legal Cell\/W.P.No.31384\/2009
\nDated:03-1 1 -2009<\/p>\n
” ‘Snb: Re~a1Iotme11t of a vacant seat in Father Muller<\/p>\n
Medical. College, Mangalore to Miss J .S.Kavya.<\/p>\n
CET No.MF 052, Medical Rank 3158 from
\nYenepoya Medical College, Mangalore.<\/p>\n
V\\.’&\u00bb’:.::;\n<\/p>\n
\n
Wig-\n<\/p>\n
Ref: 1. Original admission order i\\io.10152 dated
\n24-07-2009 issued to Miss Kavya J.S.\n<\/p>\n
2. Proceeding of the Director of Medical E_d_ucati’on’~ V.<\/p>\n
dated O3-10-2009 intimating the vacancies ‘in’   ‘ .<\/p>\n
Various medical colleges.  V _\n<\/p>\n
3. Request letter dated nil frozn Miss_.E'{;a’vya * _
\nsent by fax on 09-10-2009′ . &_  ,;\u00ab  ._ V\n<\/p>\n
4. Reallocation order no. 10152 dated 09- 1.0′-200:3 :, A
\nissued to Miss KaVyaVJ.S.  *   \u00ab. . *
\nWith reference to thellllllaljove, [reallocation of
\nmedical seat to Miss” Yenepojra Medical
\nCollege, Mangalore  ll  Medical College,
\nMarlgalore against  account of the
\nsurrender of_”all’iusieat by \u20ac51′-it  Kumar is hereby
\nwithdrawnf”  No.l0152 dated 09-\n<\/p>\n
10-2009._.sta11ds  :\u00bbind._the admission order given to
\nMiss  152 dated 24-07-2009 stands
\nrestored. ‘She is  report back at Yenepoya Medical
\nCollege, lllvlangaiore A’and._ll~7pursue her course in the said
\ncolliige.  C M V I
\nSd\/–\n<\/p>\n
Executive Director,
\nKarnataka Examinations Authority.”\n<\/p>\n
 8.__  in View of the said order, the petitioner has filed the<\/p>\n
V.  application for amendment of the prayers in the Writ petition<\/p>\n
and for directions against the respondent Nos. 4 8: 5. \/3;
\n,.\/L.’<\/p>\n
_ 1 1 _\n<\/p>\n
9. In the affidavit of second respondent, it is stated that<\/p>\n
pursuant to the final order dated 29.9.2009 counselirigpgwas<\/p>\n
held on 30.9.2009, out of tweniy students <\/p>\n
Medical College, eleven students opted  <\/p>\n
institution and those students were given’, freslfiadrnislsioii<\/p>\n
orders with a direction to join   <\/p>\n
6.10.2009. That out of eleve.n”‘~~seatsV. v_aca.r1t’%_: in*–.]Yenepoya’V’<\/p>\n
Medical College, eightstude\u00e9n-tslwiivrere-.tilledup and totally
\nthere were seventeen   ‘fenepoya Medical
\nCollege as on the  college refused
\nto admit lvJ.ho..V.were  seats on 30.9.2009<\/p>\n
and pursuantto %\u00a7p:\u00a7seV\u00a71iat:\u00a7.\ufb01”‘::iade by the parents and<\/p>\n
students, a\u00ab.rneetinvg_’under the Chairmanship of the<\/p>\n
Director of\u00b0’i\\\/Iedicpa–1 i\u00a3_duc’ation on 3.10.2009 and that the<\/p>\n
 ..v_Ava-.{aiit;p_seats in ‘the-Govemrnent Medical Colleges could be<\/p>\n
 L’  pfor:_re{~’a}loc.ation of the students who had complained to<\/p>\n
tlie”‘governvriiei’1t and it was decided to reallocate the said<\/p>\n
 students\u00ab:_of Yenepoya Medical College to the vacant seats<\/p>\n
00  ava\ufb02able in the government colleges and any other<\/p>\n
 institution Where there were vacant seats. That on the very<\/p>\n
0 “same day, a student by name Sanath Kumar approached the<\/p>\n
second respondent intimating that he had surrendered<\/p>\n
government seat in the 3”? respondent college, the petitioner
\n“J\/’.,,\u00ab<\/p>\n
A12-\n<\/p>\n
who was willing was re–allocated to the 3″‘ respondent<\/p>\n
college from the rim respondent college, apart<\/p>\n
allocation of other students to government coli~ege’sI”V.’ <\/p>\n
the said circumstances it was decided to.’re>”alIecate”eight”<\/p>\n
students including the petitioner and as per’thei.instrii’ctioi1s<\/p>\n
of the Director of Medical.\u00bbEducaticn; fresh””t’ojrders _:\u00a7were.:e.<\/p>\n
issued mentioning the date o’fu.1ad:a1ission._V: as 30.9.2009,
\ntherefore, the petitioner”‘p\u00ab–ha-all ..Vree_\u00a5al1ocated to the 3rd<\/p>\n
respondent college.\n<\/p>\n
10. The   Secretary, Medical
\nEducation stated that pursuant to special
\nround of co.unselin”gj~held:”on.~”30.9.2009 for all the students<\/p>\n
including tWop’dee’med, bhiversities, Yenepoya and NFITE<\/p>\n
‘”‘\u00ab–._carididatesawere ‘is’sued admission orders in respect of the<\/p>\n
 ‘said”vUi’1–iVersities also. But when they went for admission<\/p>\n
Yenepoya  refused to admit the students and some of<\/p>\n
 the students had fiied writ petitions before this court and<\/p>\n
0’ ‘..:tjv\u00bbthi’s”\u00ab\u00ab.tcourt issued interim order directing the Yenepoya<\/p>\n
 ilniirersity to admit the students selected on 30.9.2009<\/p>\n
0’ wvilrhich was challenged by Way of Special Leave Petition before<\/p>\n
the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, which however,<\/p>\n
dismissed the same. six”-\n<\/p>\n
\n
W13-\n<\/p>\n
1 1. On the basis of the report submitted by the Dvire’i:.i;o’r. of<\/p>\n
Medical Education that some seats weref   .<\/p>\n
government and other medical colleges, action to ‘*<\/p>\n
fill up those seats available in gover_vnme.nt\u00a7ar1ld1other’1riedi<:a};l<\/p>\n
colleges by the Director of Medical Edncationiatw\u00e9e<\/p>\n
Examination Authority. I–Iowe1uruerT,_V"inpi\/ileiiir'-of vifithdrawal
\nof the re–allocation of .fr.oin.YenevpoVyAra Medical
\ncollege to the V3"   order dated
\n3.11.2009. the  for   to the writ<\/p>\n
petition has _.-"arisen . as': also an" application seeking<\/p>\n
'amendment' olfiV5i.he fju}a;r\u00a2r..ii1 the  petition and a direction<\/p>\n
to respo'ndentVN–oVs'.' '5_t'o\u00bb.p.ermit the petitioner to continue
\nher st_u_diesd'i'n the {lib respondent college.<\/p>\n
   the fact that on account of the<\/p>\n
slubselquentti'j_ei}3ent and during' the pendency of the Writ<\/p>\n
 petition!' second respondent has issued the order dated<\/p>\n
 it withdrawing counseling and reallocation of<\/p>\n
—  medical seat to the petitioner from Yenepoya Medical Coiiege<\/p>\n
” “to Father Muller Medical College, Bangalore (Sid respondent<\/p>\n
herein), the amendments have been made with a View to<\/p>\n
seek restoration of her admission to Yenepoya Medical<\/p>\n
23:\n<\/p>\n
\n
mlglh<\/p>\n
College in terms of the admission order produced as<\/p>\n
Annexure-A, we are of the considered View that on acgcdouiit of<\/p>\n
this subsequent development of withdrawal of_<\/p>\n
issued on 9.10.2009 which was in any._V_Acase*~A.\/znot 3i’r’1._ <\/p>\n
accordance with law and particularlifgdlndd\u00e9yiclationc’oi;<\/p>\n
Judgments of the Supreme Court  case<\/p>\n
Vs. Union of India reported’i’e\u00bb.:in (200’5}_2V”SCC’.:  the<\/p>\n
applications for amendfnent  :4t:e#a}1oWed.V”Accordingly,
\nMisc.W.11105\/09 and V9   are allowed.\n<\/p>\n
Counsel for the  to petition within
\na period of  V<\/p>\n
I3.  far  of “the petitioner made to the \u00ab\ufb01lth
\nresponderitg coll\u00e9ge.”‘..j.s.. idctancemed, the same is as per<\/p>\n
AnneXure–A date_d24.:’7.2009 which has to be restored in<\/p>\n
  dated 3.11.2009 Withdrawing Annexure-E.<\/p>\n
 4m*ai*i.ci_ 5&}vt1’espondent cokkeges can have no grievance to<\/p>\n
al1oWing’of.the prayers made in the amendment application<\/p>\n
A. ‘    the-direction sought in View of the fact that as long back<\/p>\n
9’  an 24.7.2009, the petitioner was admitted to 4th<\/p>\n
  …_respondent college and by virtue of the interim order dated<\/p>\n
19.8.2009 passed by this court in W.P.No.22192-<\/p>\n
22203\/ 2009 and connected matters was entitled to<\/p>\n
W15-\n<\/p>\n
prosecute studies in the 41″ Respondent college, ___which<\/p>\n
interim order passed in W.P.No.22628~\u00bb634\/09 WaS’~\u00a7f’f1itI}1\u20acd<\/p>\n
by the Supreme court in Special Leave Petitio_n3V_:ffile’d.’  <\/p>\n
Medical Council of India and thereafter the”‘pe:tityio’nerAV”<\/p>\n
succeeded before this court by virtue of <\/p>\n
29.9.2009. Further in respect ofliother  <\/p>\n
students who were refused attend   the 43’
\nrespondent and who  before this court
\nwere granted interim against the aim
\nrespondent, ‘interim  been affirmed by
\nthe Supreriie   Vliea\\ife”15etit1on filed by the 4th
\nrespondentfi’  prayers made by the
\nDetitioncrll\ufb02zsai-yieldthe 4*” and 5*” respondents have<\/p>\n
to be granted by. ti1is”vcourt by allowing the applications for<\/p>\n
 ”  _ anie\ufb01ndrneiivtptof the ‘W’r’itV petition as well as for direction.<\/p>\n
 tconseiquently the Writ petition is allowed as against<\/p>\n
 ail the vrespondents except respondent No.3. The respondent<\/p>\n
A   8: 5 shall permit the petitioner to prosecute her<\/p>\n
studies the first year MBBS course in the 431 respondent<\/p>\n
college pursuant to the admission order issued by the<\/p>\n
second respondent on 24.7.2009 by accepting the fees and
\n5%\u00bb<\/p>\n
-15-<\/span><\/p>\n
extending all other facilities which a medical student is___<\/p>\n
entitled to in accordance with Regulations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13%: DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009 PRESENT THE HONELE MRJUSTICE V.GOPALA ‘GOWjDA’ L’ ‘ AND THE HONBLE MRS.JUS’\u00a3’ICfJBIV,_1\u00a7IAG}\\;f%YI\u00a7L’i’}~1N2X:: .V ” w.I>.NO.3138%;\/2o09(EDNI–..II BETWEEN: . ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-09T12:16:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-09T12:16:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2134,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-09T12:16:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-09T12:16:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-09T12:16:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009"},"wordCount":2134,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009","name":"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-09T12:16:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kavya-j-s-do-jayashankar-kullal-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kavya J S D\/O Jayashankar Kullal vs State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}