{"id":268830,"date":"2010-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010"},"modified":"2015-09-23T11:42:01","modified_gmt":"2015-09-23T06:12:01","slug":"eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
If\\I' THE HIGH COURT OFv\u00a7<_\u00a2gRNATAIK','\\ AT _EA:xI'GAL<:3:;i'E'I \n\nDATEE: THIS THE 3%  NGVEVMEEIR LQQITG\nTHE \n\nBETWEEN:   L\nERAIAH    ' 7\n\n3\/0   \nAGED ABGUTFZ"Y'E.ARS.f---., \n\nR\/AT GHIKI<AVE'ERAru\\IA" .o--PP'ALu} VILLAGE\n\n%%AME\\.\u00a5~i_"E'f" GEBEIIIIADA.M-ALLENAHALLI\n\nIYA 'DISTRICT-.5T7.1'4--342_.  APPELLANT\n(EV Sir1T.F4.G'E'ETH~A, ADV.)\n\n      LLLLL \n\nvi' 3 T ELEEGVAJAVAIDA\n\n L.S\/Q'II>AI31G0wDA I\n I I2;\/.A\"I.,'3II?I*I'ANAHALLI VILLAGE, ARAMANDI\ng ' :<E_I\\I'I:=AAN}A.HALLI POST, HONAKERE HOBLI\n \u00a7\\\u00a3v;!i\\Gi~\\\u00a7ViANGALA TALuK--571432\n\n   PRIMARY CO~OPERATI\\\/E AGRICULTURE AND\n\n RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD\n\nA  EIAGAIAANGALA\n\nREP. 55%' ITS SECRETARY  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
{BY ERI. K s RAMASVVAMY IYENGAR, ADV. FOR R1;
\nE2 SERVED)<\/p>\n
51<\/span><\/p>\n
A’3\\I’*I1\u00bb\/<\/p>\n
in.)
\ni<\/p>\n
RSA FILED u\/s. 100 OE-TCPC.”AGA1N’SwT’-_T’EilE’* it<\/p>\n
EUDGEMENT 8L DECREE DATED} 10.’e.2008 .i?’ASSVVED’ In
\nR.\/’-\\.i’\\iO.31\/2006 om THE FILE, 0.?-.THE\u00bb.’c:1v:L”Jubzse<\/p>\n
(SR.iDl\\l.) 8.: JMFC, NAGAMANGALA’,.. “DISMIS_SI’NvG’*  THE,
\nAPPEAL AND CONFIRlVlING’_'”-~. THE JUD_GE.MEl\\lT..1AND_”<\/p>\n
DEGREE DATED: 21.7.2005 “”s\u00ab.i\u00a7AssED’:N_ ‘o.s’;N(“3, 80\/2000
\nON THE FILE or Ti-_iE CIv1L_”;1uD.c3E (JR._DN.)V.%& JMFC,
\nNAGAMANGALA.   ”\n<\/p>\n
THIS COMING ON Eoiii’.DiCTAT’I~i\u00a7i’eJUDGMENT, THIS
\nDev THE c:ouRT l_VlADE'”i”liE”‘FOLl;Q\\\/\\\/INGis’<\/p>\n
 isludireeted against judgment in
\niaA.3:Vn\/E2005’cJ–.ate}ijV~.ii0\u00ab..06\u00bb…2.008 on the file of Civil Judge,<\/p>\n
Senior Di\u00a7}isi_on,..T–Na’gaVmanga|a confirming the judgment<\/p>\n
 ‘mill’ in ii0;’sT;80\/2000 dated 21.07.2005 dismissing<\/p>\n
 Z-..’H’e’ard regarding admission.\n<\/p>\n
 3. The appellant herein filed a suit in O.S.80\/2000<\/p>\n
it ___5egaiesi: the respondent for recovery of Rs.29,753\/– with<\/p>\n
18% interest on the basis that first defendant his brother
\nhad impersonated him as Eraiah and obtained loan from<\/p>\n
tirie second defendant~Bani<. To obtain loan, he pledged<\/p>\n
greg\u00e9riy in \ufb01urvey Ns3.7G\/3 measuring 4 acres ar_i'\u00a3\u00a7.:S–y:;N a.<\/p>\n
11%} measming 3 acres which pmperty __va;as4 "\u00e9vi:'i:%ia"\u00a72y<\/p>\n
pagrchaged by him under deed Qfsaie c:'ate:;–'Li[:;8;i51';1%97\u00a7;* 'V<\/p>\n
9.:\n<\/p>\n
ma? Zi?.11.i972from his father 5\u00a7\u00abase1g0.x;Jd\u00e9@B1\u00a7tid’\u00e9i.j’e.a,\u00a7i’z\u00e9.a:.<\/p>\n
Ra further aiieged that tai:iV;\u00a7’g..V..adx}’as<\\t:agVe i:}j'ati._';;~.1.aVin:;:\u00a7ffM <\/p>\n
pmximateiy reiated tga him,V__g\u00a3\u00a35\u00a7\ufb01_m\u00a7:ted.'"t\ufb01ef%Qf the saie
\n$935 am wedged i1:V'defendant–bank.\n<\/p>\n
Ha sbiained loan of-Hv\ufb01.s;:24;\ufb01\u00a9Q\/’;”‘v_’\u00a7:ff,”i\u00a73.11.1987 and
\nR:~;,16,.3G0.\/5′ was not \u00a30 his
\ni\u00bb3%j\u00a7:$Viz;&v:ia\u00ab,__i’:’b%;pt’:.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:…..represented as Eraiah and thus
\nir”sf’a;>e;’5A\u00e9:z.a:j’t:::*dV    V<\/p>\n
1% _  ‘i’%.1 e’fi’fst.’V’d\u00e9};endant denied the aiiegation and<\/p>\n
 V   pie\u00e9 “” Ht\u00e9hat piaintiff is not Eraiah, he is<\/p>\n
   first defendant further ax\/erred that his<\/p>\n
\u00e9a-time  ‘E%IaA\u00a73ppa @ Eregowda and in that name he has<\/p>\n
 AA\u00a7;3*s:%;\u00e923;.@\u00e9\u00a7=3d the property in question and thereafter piedged<\/p>\n
 segure Egan, The bank had instituted proceedings and<\/p>\n
  V. ._..;’\u20ac\u00a3\u00a7\u00a73’JE\u00a7’\u00a7\u00a7 the amount, The piamtiff paid no amcunt. It is<\/p>\n
\ufb01g :::.:\u00a7’:9 %”aa::i to dear me bank mam,<\/p>\n
5, Parties lead evidence in which the plaintiff had<\/p>\n
part\u00e9y examined himself as PW1 and examined twzoiother<\/p>\n
witnesses namely PW2 Bhadregowda <\/p>\n
Javaregowda and relied on ten documentS_.,’V_”_’~-TVhej:’ie4arne’d.,upf”<\/p>\n
tr\u00e9a\u00e9 judge on examining the evidence <\/p>\n
No’: as DWI and through: all theu_documVentsV”held’; <\/p>\n
plaintiff was actually called”.:la’\u00bb’aregowd”aihizanldi he had
\ncontested in the electi:onc_ in n’a._mie’.~–..Recordsxsubmitted
\nto the electionAcommissionVe’.;.”_l}l\/ere”~e\u00a7<AaI'm.i'ned and on that
\nbasis, it v\\:as2_"'he'l;jdl1.that'plaintiff' to establish that<\/p>\n
he was Era sallzznd'"i'2ot'3avarePovlrda.<\/p>\n
 = ' ti?eoafrdjilrigj'theloah transactions, the trial court
\nheld it  on basis of immovable property<\/p>\n
covered' in tw'o"'–saVl_e___deeds and since no sale deeds are in<\/p>\n
' ;th'e.uVna_:fne'o:f''''th_e first defendant; the plaintiff cannot claim<\/p>\n
'o.n't;hat.'   resultant position, the trial court dismissed<\/p>\n
thellspftupahn\u00e9d in appeal, the appellate court also concurred<\/p>\n
if exit-hp'  finding of the trial court. Against both these<\/p>\n
Aigiafddmentsf this appeal is filed.\n<\/p>\n
2′
\ni<\/p>\n
?, Learned counsel strived hard to contend that<\/p>\n
the issue for consideration is who was the ownerr.._of._the<\/p>\n
property in question. She would submit that___<\/p>\n
shown that he was a purchaser of the prope–rt.yfinV ‘r:iuestio’n.~\u00ab.. <\/p>\n
The defendant was not Eraiah buti-hef}in1p.ersonat’esdw.the<\/p>\n
plaintitt’ and obtained the lo.an-,__In other words,’  avgerrede.<\/p>\n
that by taking advantage of appearing in
\nthe saie deed, the i.’i’,\\iiVoi.1__Vrinisusedvliiit\ufb02xpledged it
\nbefore bank consequ.e,nt bank initiated
\n the amount to
\nd    \u00b0 if V<\/p>\n
 ‘  ei seen that impersonation is an<\/p>\n
incidentaliir-..grouVnd_Vtl1vat\u00ab:was raised by the plaintiff. The<\/p>\n
o\u00a7f’oi;:;n:d__f’ \u00ab::iairne’d\u00ab.,__b_y.\u00bb the plaintiff is that amount was<\/p>\n
‘ t:.borrowjed._the first defendant on the security of his<\/p>\n
 he had to discharge. Therefore, the suit<\/p>\n
was..a'”VbaVre suit for recovery of money and plaintiff was<\/p>\n
if nyreauired to establish payment of the amount by him for<\/p>\n
 on taeteaif of the first defendant. From the records, it<\/p>\n
is seen that loan was advanced on the security of the<\/p>\n
mrrw<\/p>\n
xj<\/p>\n
-5t<\/p>\n
immovable property which property according to the<\/p>\n
piaint\u00e9ttg was owned by him. The contention ofVVtn.e”efirst<\/p>\n
defendant that the amount due to the_;””‘ba..n_l<'.__iV4w.as.%<\/p>\n
discharged by him is not supported by evide:rice"A-lwhei'ea's–.2 <\/p>\n
the ptaaintiifs documents i.e., Ex.F%,? to…P'A9f}showythat\u00bb.<\/p>\n
the amount to the Bank. The payrnerit is nofdoubt i;nade',<\/p>\n
but  question is whether'Vth.e:'amou'nt-  misused by
\nthe first defendant.   plaintuiff virtually
\nfailed as the plaintiff  'in:.hAi's.';cross–examination
\nitseif that    ":iV'ds_~.y*itri\u00abfied by people as
\n  he had contested in
\nthe  is forth coming to show
\nthat   appears in the sale deed. In<\/p>\n
other 'indicated in the para supra in the suit filed<\/p>\n
 ot;ei'ore- 'trial Court, question was not as to whether the<\/p>\n
  ':rfeV.:owner or the defendant is the owner of the<\/p>\n
pi"c;%pe:j%;:;x.V'.i'~"Question was whether the amount borrowed<\/p>\n
 _i'r:::n':..  Bank was taken away by the first defendant and<\/p>\n
 was unnecessarily made to discharge the said<\/p>\n
.":EiabE%\u00a7J{:'\u00a3;2iL There is no evidence that the amount obtained as<\/p>\n
ioan  the bank was misused by the"first defendant or<\/p>\n
"7\n<\/p>\n
-,-\n<\/p>\n
that it was; discharged by the plaintiff. The trial<\/p>\n
appei\u00e9ate ceurt has rightly recorded its findir\ufb01’  <\/p>\n
abseree of evidence that first d:er’en’daht”._ha_s”:rh\u00a7’sueed.~ the ‘<\/p>\n
amount, no reiief could be granted, ‘InA’this”se’co.nd arpp\u00a2a:,_k<\/p>\n
no suastant\u00e9al question of ia.y\u00a7}”~~ariseV’forcorasitt-e\u00e9ratrdn. Irr’<\/p>\n
the re\u00a7t:%t,, the appeal ,–s.tands,td’i:\u00a5rh*\u00e9\u00abs\u00e9eti.
\n.  \\ \u00e9 MM
\n E QQQE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 Author: Jawad Rahim If\\I’ THE HIGH COURT OFv\u00a7<_\u00a2gRNATAIK','\\ AT _EA:xI'GAL<:3:;i'E'I DATEE: THIS THE 3% NGVEVMEEIR LQQITG THE BETWEEN: L ERAIAH ' 7 3\/0 AGED ABGUTFZ"Y'E.ARS.f—., R\/AT GHIKI<AVE'ERAru\\IA" .o–PP'ALu} VILLAGE %%AME\\.\u00a5~i_"E'f" GEBEIIIIADA.M-ALLENAHALLI IYA ‘DISTRICT-.5T7.1’4–342_. APPELLANT (EV Sir1T.F4.G’E’ETH~A, ADV.) LLLLL vi’ 3 T ELEEGVAJAVAIDA L.S\/Q’II>AI31G0wDA I I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-268830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nEraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-23T06:12:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-23T06:12:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1079,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-23T06:12:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-23T06:12:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-23T06:12:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010"},"wordCount":1079,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010","name":"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-23T06:12:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eraiah-vs-eregowda-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Eraiah vs Eregowda on 3 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268830"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268830\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}