{"id":269279,"date":"2008-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-05-12T16:42:47","modified_gmt":"2018-05-12T11:12:47","slug":"the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\"> \n\n \n\nTipturtcvisvn   ..... \n\n Diairict .. _  Pe\ufb01\ufb01g\ufb01ef\n\n\" Committee\ni\u00e9ieprwanted by its Secretary\n\nV'   ....:amc Yam\n\n t1lr I t\n\n\n\n \n\n2(8)\n\nA B Ramaiah\nS] 0 Ayodhya Ramaiah\nSince: deceased by 117: L.Rs.,\n\nBRJayaram\nS\/o latseAB Remaiah\nAgBdabout40ycars\n\nBoth are residing at No.38'? \n\nsch Main, an! stage zsrrysxoeig * , \n\nBasaves11wa1'auagare:_  _ \nBangalore - 79 \n\nY. Rama  Bli\ufb01ht  '\nSIG lair: Sflbb-f\ufb01ifltk\ufb02.\n\nRio Anugall\u00a3z'.Yclk\u00e9ma'\u00b0Ho1;\u00a7\u00a2 \n\nBe1?\u00a3h8B8a*5?'._\u00abTa1'\ufb01k   .  \nn.x;._Dis'm'.;~t *  '   =\n\nP.     \nS10 Govinda Bhat '\n about \n\nRtisitiizagw-gt  House\n\n \n\n   \n\nS\/o~~Thimoh' D' 30112::\n\n .. Agod\"about50ye=ara\n\n _\" V R\u00e9sitlcnt of Mamiela House\n Bcltbangady Taluk\n Dakshina Kannada District\n\nSmt. Gowramma\nW\/0 Eshwarra Bhat\n\nAgodabouts\ufb02ycars\n\n\n\n \n\n A\n\n.  Wfo   M\u00e9jaayana Bhat\n\n:  '--.\u00bb.g7,\"')\n\nResiding at Kattnr House\nAladangmii *\nBelthangauiy Taluk   \nDakehina Kannada District \n\nM. Har:ilu1'&amp; Bhat\n\nS\/0 Sham Bhat ' \nResiding at Gokul Hausa\nKunadi Village\nDharnmathnla V ~ .__  M\nBelthangady Taluk   _ \nD.K. District \n\nNarasi1nha\ufb01,l1at_\nS\/oMa\ufb01ga;'Br.}aa\u00e9V _ g   \nReam mg' Vat--iMc:cy'  a Hausa' A.  \nBelraaanaadywvaluk     %\nDakshiafa \n\nM.  Ei:a_a.f'  % . \nS\/o_VSham*B_hat.  \n \ufb01end by  \n\niyarmna\n\n \n\n3\/0 152:; M N Bhat\n\n Aged alzz-\"on-t42yca1's\n\n\"if  we lewd' cuts of Durga Pmaanna\n Past\n\nBclthangady Taluk\n\nV  \" -Vnakshina Kannada ffmtrict\n\nA V Sathyanarayma\nS\/o late Vcnkatachalaiah\n\n \n\n\n\nw\n\n \n\nAged about 66 yams\nResident of Adalagem\nNittur Hobli, Grubbi Taluk   \"    \nTumkur District  Rcspoadezgts \"\n\n(By Sri  m    tt   :, A\nSri Aahwin Kumar, Advocate for__R3j8, 10, _-'3(b); 2   '\nR2(a), R9(a) axzd-:t(i:\\Va1t: sczvc\ufb01l)  ' A ' V, 2\n\nThis Writ Petition is  ymdat' 2%Aa21d 227 of\nthe Constitution of  giraying $1  the award of the\ndisputes committee dated 35i2\u00ab9--r\u00a7!'JC96  Resolution dated\n1543-2006 passed by the  msgsoxule\ufb01lv  by\nthe cnmmunivation: (hated \u00a72.'3--'5:_!e Aunt-:m1m~B, C and 1'}\n\nThis Wtit    ' hcanh g in\n'B' Gmup.\u00a3hi1s_'(1ey,   t__mac\u00a7e_tVh-5*. \ufb01ollowing:\nA \n\nf;\u00a71:\u00a2 x has challenged in this writ petition\n\n  C. D as well as E under which they have been\n\n  titetamount awanied to mspondcnts-2 to 10.\n\n ..  x :'I'hc pc\ufb01tioncr is a Co-eperativn: Society mg'stc:red\nH V A   provisions of Kaznataka Co-operative Societies Act.\nV   \":.;Rc%%pondents-2 to 10 are farmrs. They contend that may have\n  ~ Lttstzpplied Capra to the petitioner during the period from\n\n\\x\/\n\n\n\n \n\nproduced any material before the Dispntg'   ~\n\nCommittee in support of their claim _, ...\u00bb..\u00a5n'th\u00a2;'  '\n\nmaterial' , thc Committee could not  A    , i:%11\n\ntheir men: say. In fact hcfom    \"\n\nheld, no evidence W88    C1033-\nexamine the wimcsscs  \" the impuwarl\norder passed is in vioxa\ufb01cgn a\ufb02f natural justice\nand     is also lziabic to be\n\nquashed. 1  5.. \n\n4.    counsel for the mspondtmts\nsubmittsrl    claim petition the respondents 2<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">    showing the supply of Capra and<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7;):f the same by the petitioner Committee.<\/p>\n<p>     tgontcn\ufb01on that they did not produce any<\/p>\n<p>and, therefore, the impugned order passed is<\/p>\n<p>   any basis is man&#8217; rmct. They ii1rthcr- eonmnded this<\/p>\n<p>V   is pending for the last 14 yeaxs. In every forum they<\/p>\n<p>  succeeded butin the and ofthc day tbcyazzzyet to see the<\/p>\n<p>fruits 0f the award. Therefore, they sought for <\/p>\n<p>Writ Pctitien.  t <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">5. I have gone thmugh   at &#8216;Au<br \/>\nAnnexu:ne-B. In the \ufb01rst page the  <\/p>\n<p>1net1cu&#8217; lously set out. in the nc3Ct__1:\u00bb&#8221;a1&#8217;a&#8217;   .  &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>Writ Petitions \ufb01led and    ~  Court<br \/>\ndirecting them to hair!  orders. In the<\/p>\n<p>operative portion itis   the mwting<\/p>\n<p>held on   did not produce any<br \/>\ndoeumentsttp : Acting on the order<\/p>\n<p>:_..-&#8216;the  &#8216;tr;  &#8216;ti1e..az;10unts cla\ufb01ned by Iwpondcnts 2 to<br \/>\n   is con\ufb01rmed by the \ufb01mt xespondcnt.<\/p>\n<p>  V   issued the impuged notice demanding<\/p>\n<p> the  when the petitioners have demed&#8217; the receipt<\/p>\n<p> and contend they are not liable to pay the<\/p>\n<p>  by xespondents 2 to 10 the buxden is on the<\/p>\n<p>T \ufb01eytiiiradents 2 to 10 to \ufb01at pmve the supply and then the<\/p>\n<p> ofthe Capra aw than only an award could be passed in<\/p>\n<p>their flavour. They have pmduoed mocipts   _<\/p>\n<p>complaint shearing the aclcnowledgemcnt of  of  -\u00ab .. <\/p>\n<p>Capra received. Tim authori\ufb01csg    X<\/p>\n<p>documents an: pmduoed. Ma\u00e9y     %\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>pmduocd on that par\ufb01cular da\ufb01t {ha  had<br \/>\nbeen pmduccd along    Ev3:ven the<br \/>\nrespondents 2 to 10 did &#8216;1V1dt   to lead oral<br \/>\nevidence. and     to the notice<br \/>\nof the  In fact no evidence<br \/>\nis mooxdecrfaf     is expected of the<br \/>\nCommittee  to adjudica\ufb01: the dispute<\/p>\n<p>between the  3:;  &amp;k of applimtion of mind&#8217; .<\/p>\n<p> has :i;:itVibB\u00a2wrcd any procedure and they have<\/p>\n<p>   which has no legal basis. Under these<\/p>\n<p>   impumed award, con\ufb01lmatitm of awazd<\/p>\n<p> the na\u00e9icc of d\ufb01mand issued by the autboxti\ufb01cs as per<\/p>\n<p>  c. 9 and E mt illegal and Babies to be quashed.<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;   liiatter has to be rczzzanded back to the said Committee to<\/p>\n<p> V    cnquixy, mnsidcr the avermcnts in the complaint, the<\/p>\n<p> dmumcnts produced along with the said complaint and also<\/p>\n<p>h&#8217;\/%<\/p>\n<p>would evidence of the parks, permit the<br \/>\nexamine the other side and also receive  <\/p>\n<p>parties choose to produce and than    <\/p>\n<p>the dispute and pass appmpriatg pxdevimh  ~ ._<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">5.<br \/>\n(&#8216;1<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">(ii)<\/p>\n<p>Hence, I pass the fo\ufb02q\ufb01viglg  :V-<br \/>\nwaitmaunatsazbuieg.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">The   of mmtrd and<br \/>\nthe  of  authorities as<\/p>\n<p>(Hi)<\/p>\n<p> .p.&#8217;&amp;zzIing3, docwnenm cmd lead eviderwe a\ufb01er such<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab   %  is remitted bad: to the c::ammiuee<\/p>\n<p>of the High Ccrurt<\/p>\n<p>   fonsfor mam&#8217; aneng-wry&#8217; qrmsh.<br \/>\n parties are at fiberty to \ufb01le additional<\/p>\n<p>AsiIuZsmatterispen\ufb01ngforthelast14yem&#8217;sitis<br \/>\nneoassazytodirecitfzepartiesioappearbefaretfre<br \/>\nCamzmlteeon I5.1\u20ac2.2008at1I.00AMfn\ufb02veo\ufb02iae<\/p>\n<p>of the\ufb01rst rmpondenl.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p>fvi)<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01d\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>ksp\/- _<\/p>\n<p>Ii\ufb01snuukaawnrnjh\ufb02hernm\ufb01beru%xi\u00a7\u00e9$\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7g\ufb02\ufb01gf <\/p>\n<p>&amp;:\ufb02uepe\ufb01\ufb01bner&lt;n&#039;upnwqgyuhwusli\ufb02fl\ufb01j\ufb01fsu\ufb01h&#039;. <\/p>\n<p>enqu\ufb01y.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">A\ufb01wrappeannu2\u00a2yWhg;x&amp;\u00a3g$1he\u20ac\u00a7\ufb01an\ufb01#\u00a7\u00a7s\ufb01aHE*<\/p>\n<p>nu\ufb02haeweayendhavd;%@immq\ufb02Hmx@h;e\ufb01gu\ufb01yrand<br \/>\npass oniers  the date of<br \/>\nappemm ,15.;a2m8\u00a7  %  A<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008 Author: N.Kumar Tipturtcvisvn &#8230;.. Diairict .. _ Pe\ufb01\ufb01g\ufb01ef &#8221; Committee i\u00e9ieprwanted by its Secretary V&#8217; &#8230;.:amc Yam t1lr I t 2(8) A B Ramaiah S] 0 Ayodhya Ramaiah Since: deceased by 117: L.Rs., BRJayaram S\/o latseAB Remaiah [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-269279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural ... vs The Agricultural Produce Market ... on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural ... vs The Agricultural Produce Market ... on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-12T11:12:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-12T11:12:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":521,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\",\"name\":\"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural ... vs The Agricultural Produce Market ... on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-12T11:12:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural ... vs The Agricultural Produce Market ... on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural ... vs The Agricultural Produce Market ... on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-12T11:12:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-12T11:12:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008"},"wordCount":521,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008","name":"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural ... vs The Agricultural Produce Market ... on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-12T11:12:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tiptur-taluk-agricultural-vs-the-agricultural-produce-market-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Tiptur Taluk Agricultural &#8230; vs The Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; on 20 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=269279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=269279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=269279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=269279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}