{"id":269354,"date":"2008-09-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-01-20T02:39:32","modified_gmt":"2015-01-19T21:09:32","slug":"smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">1\nIN THE FHGH COURT OF KARNATAI-{A AT BANGALORE\n\nBATE!) THIS THE: 1 1TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008.1\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HOPPBLE MRJUSTICE S. ABDUL \u00a3\"~2'AZE}_+';}? '   u  2\n\nE3E'}\"'WEEN :\n\nSmt. Rajalakshmi Manjunath\n\nW\/0. Sri. HR. Manjunath.\n\nAged abcut 53 years '  ~ ._  . V\n\nR] a. No.135, \"Champaka   \n\nVHBCSL Layout V   V\nMaha3akshmipura3nv._Post;.' \"  _  -  '\nBangalorew\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01i    \"   .... ..=..PET'I'I'IONER\n\n{By Srif-.__B.   ~ %\n\nAND :\n\nThe Bzgiiigalem \u00a3\u00a7t*\ufb01_t\u00a7ldpm\u00a7:nt Authority\n\n   Roadm. ..... \n Bangaimfe .5 S6Q02O  RESPONDENT\n\n   Adv.)\n\n Petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226 8:. 227 of\n\n the Constifutisn of India, praying to direct the nirspondent\n\n A . *'m Ccasiader the pctit;ioner'3 application fear ailetznent Le.\n _A{111-.|:_i5of an alternate site in lieu of the schedul\u00e9 pmperty\n'--\u00ab\u00ab-'acquirecd for formation of 'Sir M. Viahveshwaraiah Layout'.\n\nWRIT mrrrlon NO.1243:i\":w-\u00a338 1i:31:J&amp;l      A'\n\n\n\n2\n\nThis writ pe\ufb01tioe. coming on for preliminary he _g\n'B' group this day, the court: made the following: 9 \n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1 have heard the learned counsel for the   <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2. Petitioner contends that sI*1e&#8221;\\\u00a5-.9.s the   <\/p>\n<p>a revenue site bearing Kbaneshux\ufb01ejifiil-3$itj&#8217;;3&#8242;?f$,..e&#8217;.1{he:tf1.7\u00a7i&#8217;~..A &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>No.364, site No.24,  at<br \/>\nGramatana, Hullalu D9.kf;a1e,Vee3?eei:e.?ei11:}Lap:era &#8216;Hob1.i,<br \/>\nBangalore North Taluk,  the same<\/p>\n<p>under a sale   it is further<\/p>\n<p>contende-c_1 lies been acquired by the<\/p>\n<p>responder\ufb01: fox&#8221; _ 3;&#8221; H nameiy for the<\/p>\n<p>_.V{orrnatie\u00a31 &#8216;~f &#8220;Sir..V:M.\\\u00e9sveswaraiah Layout&#8221;. It is<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;Vf11f&#8217;c;f:e1fV eonterided that petitiener has made an<\/p>\n<p>  Annexure-B dated 03.12.2002 for<\/p>\n<p> a}I0t1nei1t&#8221;Qf  alternative site in lieu of the acquisition<\/p>\n<p>  efdresaxiel site- The respondent by its letters dated<\/p>\n<p>7\u00bbee&#8217;1:&gt;3.AQ3.\ufb01o04 and 26.12.2005 (Annexures-D and E<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">2<\/span><br \/>\n|<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>mm<br \/>\nrespectively) Image informed the petitioner to xp.I_&#8217;_!.3&#8217;C1&#8217;1V1CE\u00a7. -.4 V.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;T<\/p>\n<p>ce11:a3&#8217;11 documents far Veri\ufb01cation.  &#8216;  &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has complied with the: s.=.i1;1&#8217;\u00a7 &#8216;re:&#8221;;uir\u00a7:r};:t:t:1_&#8217;\u00a3s,V  <\/p>\n<p>respondent has not considered  appiicajfiozi  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Annexure&#8211;B till this date. The&#8217;ti3\ufb01*5re, sh\u00e9..h\u00e9.s:.V-&#8216;\ufb01l\u00e9id Hfiiis<\/p>\n<p>writ psfi\ufb01on saekmg  &#8216;1E&#8217;:f\u00a7l1m_x%i.&#8217;rH1&#8211;V_;;&#8217;,: <\/p>\n<p>(.21) Issue&#8217; &#8216;\u00a3?_i?&#8217;I&#8221;it it&#8217;)?  V1113 t}7.\u00e9&#8217; nature<\/p>\n<p>Qf&#8217;&#8211;__  ._ jjCi.\u00a7.:*\u00a2\u00a7:tii1g the<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;   &#8216; \ufb01fi &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;VVV&#8211;\u00e9~\u00a7:)nsider the<br \/>\nV &#8211;. &#8216;p\u00e9Vt:iti:f:rj1:\u00e9r,[f\u00e9&#8221;z3ij1:31ic2\u00a7ztian fer ailotment<br \/>\n&#8221;   i.e.,&#8217;  of an alternate site<br \/>\n ii&#8221;\u00a3 {if  &#8216;\u00a3i&#8217;1\u20ac schedule property<br \/>\n _ v..8A.Cq1A1V iVI&#8217;t:&#8221;x&#8221;&#8216;a&#8217;;&#8221;&#8216; for formaticm of &#8220;Sir M.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216; &#8216; ~ % ixkishveshsvaxaiah Layout&#8221;.<br \/>\n  any other writ or direction as<br \/>\n&#8216;  I-Ion&#8217;bIe: Court deems fit, in the<\/p>\n<p>interest of jusiicc and equity.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3. Material on E&#8221;\u20acETC{)I&#8217;d clearly establishes that<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221;  \u00ab~gj:-ztitionar has \ufb01led an appiication as per Annexure-B<\/p>\n<p>\\\u00bb<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>before the respondent seeking an alternative site. It_;..__is<\/p>\n<p>aiso evident that the respondent has not consideeeci:<\/p>\n<p>the said application. Therefore, I direct the   A &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>to consider the said application inv-aCcorda;nce.x$?ith Iaw.\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>wifhjn a period at&#8217; three months \ufb01&#8217;o\u00bbfn._&#8217;t:i-3,eA&#8217;e1ate&#8217;  &#8216;recei;f:\u00a7&#8217;f&#8217;&#8211;.,\u00bbV&#8217; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>of copy at&#8217; this order.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">It is hereby cIa1*i\ufb01e{&#8220;i..V_thateVthi:&#8217;-y;.: sheiiid &#8216;riot be<br \/>\nconstrued as expressizlg   merits of<\/p>\n<p>the matter. ;&#8217;Ie&#8221;ce\u00e9;te;.&#8217; &#8216;V _:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">Sd\/.-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer 1 IN THE FHGH COURT OF KARNATAI-{A AT BANGALORE BATE!) THIS THE: 1 1TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008.1 BEFORE THE HOPPBLE MRJUSTICE S. ABDUL \u00a3&#8221;~2&#8217;AZE}_+&#8217;;}? &#8216; u 2 E3E&#8217;}&#8221;&#8216;WEEN : Smt. Rajalakshmi Manjunath W\/0. Sri. HR. Manjunath. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-269354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development ... on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development ... on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-19T21:09:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-19T21:09:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":397,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development ... on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-19T21:09:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development ... on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development ... on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-19T21:09:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-19T21:09:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008"},"wordCount":397,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008","name":"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development ... on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-19T21:09:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajalakshmi-manjunath-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Rajalakshmi Manjunath vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 11 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=269354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=269354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=269354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=269354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}