{"id":269609,"date":"2008-03-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-08-20T20:41:43","modified_gmt":"2018-08-20T15:11:43","slug":"sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AsHoKIB;DN HIN.cHiNGEi{1fQf\n\nClw writ Petition !\\_l9,3g1g _o!' 2on3, \n\nSR1 ABHIJIT R;HON_AGGi3.1_J     I I\nS\/'O SR1 H.\u00a7.\ufb01A:viAms\u00a7A I   I  \nAGED ABOUT--25 YEA   ~~ _   \nR\/AT JZD 11.04, JUDGES Iqualmezns, D\nNA'l'IONALGA3VlES VMAGE  I. I\nKORAMANGALA,  *   \nBANGALORE 35. ~   I\n   '  PETITIONER\n\n. 4'  _ IE5\"!  em. NAIK.----sR. ADVOCATE FOR LAW ASSOCIATES)\n\n IJI;AI\" u a\n\nma) IeAnb\u00a7\u00a71I~umNERsm or\nnLn|. In .3 .-E\"u'C'~'$,\n\n *KARNATA.KA\u00e9V4\"\"' T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,\n  \n\n \" 'REPRESENTED av ITS REGISTRAR.\n\n Rtsvuuut\ufb02l\n(BY SR1 N K RAMESH, ADVOCATE)\n\nI THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227\n\n _ I\"\".I().IlI'?IITHE cousmunon or INDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE RESULT\n oecmaeo av me nesvonoem, AS coumneo m mm-:xune--r=\n\nAND ETC.\n\n\n\nNI\n\nnun. n_a.I.|.:..._ u._. !\"l1Q .3 man:\n L1\u00a3LElI\n\nBETWEEN'\n\nDR. SARA HARODN\n\nD\/0 LATE HARooN HASAN,\nAGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,\nR!AT.N0.166. N.I1.C.S.LAYOUT,\n3\"\" STAGE, 4\"\" BLOCK,\nDAsAwEsH.wAR.AnAeAR,.\nBANGALORE-79.\n\n      \n(av SR1 ARANDA K.' ADMJCATE)\nAND A A     R.  \n\nTHE RAIN GANDHILINEVERSITY   .j  :\nDE     \n4'\"'rBLocKJAYAMAGAR,_   _   A\nBANGALORE-41.,   A   .. A '\n\nBY ITS REGISTRAR. A\n\nA   A (\"E'S'if\u00a3:'-:l\u00a7I .51-\"\ufb02--.':F.'AHESH. ADvocATE) \n\nTHIs WRIT PE'i'I1'i\u00a25I\u20ac\u00bb\":I\u00a7.\u00bbR.?'I5IV.I.ED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227\nor THE consmunom or IRDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE RESULTS\n BY THE' RESPONDENT AS CONTAINED IN ANNEXURE-E AND<\/pre>\n
    ….. ..\n<\/p>\n
\n
 ‘SR1 SHNAFJANDA MANOHARJ<\/p>\n
A \u00ab.12\u00bb-2*ARE_s;’o. sR1 VJADAI SWAHY<\/p>\n
A  A A.GEDEAaom 27__YEARS
\n RlAT.,N(‘\u00a3-.675, 15′ FLOOR,
\n._’KUGUBANDE ROAD, E & F BLOCK<\/p>\n
%    KUV;’EMPU NAGAR, MYSORE – 570023.<\/p>\n
 PETITIONER<\/p>\n
{BY 5!?! Mi?” .. .I!(,– 5!; A QFATE FDR. Mia:-=  AS-$QQ1_A.’!’E\u00a7)<\/p>\n
Harv wt’: – -.,<\/p>\n
AND<\/p>\n
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
\nKARNATAKA 47″ T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR
\nBANGALORE ~ 560041.\n<\/p>\n
REP BY ITS REGISTRAR; I I<\/p>\n
(av sru N K Ranestj, Aus.\u00aboc.m’;I   _
\nms wnrr PETITION IS FILEI$”{INDERIIFi1TCLES 226 AND 227<\/p>\n
OF THE C\\’}a’u’S’5’i”\u00a5’u’i’E\\’}\ufb02 OF\u00bb Il’I’\ufb01II.\\’Pl’:-if-|V’I’\u00a7Ii(‘?.”T. T6 QW-‘”\\Si’i” THE \ufb01SUi_T<\/p>\n
DECLARE!) BY THE ,   IN ANX-F AND ETC.<\/p>\n
\nBETWEEN ‘    <\/p>\n
DR. K.B. GEETHA    >    ,’
\nMo on MANJU..PRAKASH   \u00ab I
\nAGeAaoLri’43v;:\u00a2xns
\nRESIDINGE AT_No.6\u00a33{1., 4?” seam!
\n57″ 09.0-SS’, C\u00a7!A!*E!|.R.5.~!PET   ”<\/p>\n
BANGALORE 7 550 018   <\/p>\n
 (B? 5’35. 52% E{‘\ufb01Au’-u’R6Z “-‘Tait’, r”\\I’3’\\fi’If’..F\\T’I3)<\/p>\n
~  V’\\i’Ii.’;;a?;”*:T’;iiiE$’iiisEiELLf1I'<
\nrquiv GANDMUNNERSIW OF HEALTH SCIENCES
\n4""'~'.T' amm, JAVANAGAR<\/p>\n
 BANGALQRE – 550 041<\/p>\n
I [f  G22';-. W-'lE…REvGISTRAR!EVALUAT10\ufb02]<\/p>\n
'  GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES\n<\/p>\n
-1″” ‘T’ BLOCK, <\/p>\n
 ”   EANGALORE – 550 041
\nI I      . I  73. THE DIRECTOR<\/p>\n
MEDICAL Em.’C.’=’.’E’I0″ “‘E”‘””””””””””<\/p>\n
II<\/p>\n
ANAND I’-‘(A0 CIRCLE
\nBANGALORE — 560 009<\/p>\n
(BY SR1 N.K.\n<\/p>\n
sn<\/p>\n
l-Ill<\/p>\n
Mensa.  ea;  ‘<\/p>\n
THIS wan !=1Ir=n Ill’-.|DE . Anni’?-== \u20ac25′  ‘F THE<\/p>\n
—n—iv \\’I I ru ‘1! Amount)<\/p>\n
CONSTITUTION OF I DIA PRAYING I  THE PROVISIONAL
\nMARK SHEET OF ExrA’u”III~r’\\.r.Es.’}I’I1 F  ENIWANCE
\nCONDUCTED BY FIRST RE PONDENT:.VI\ufb02E’.Ai’5EXURE-E PGET 2008;<\/p>\n
ET!’
\nAIIU I: I\\..-.\n<\/p>\n
!’I’l<\/p>\n
IN TH ‘SE PETE”\n<\/p>\n
v:1*ns.seeiJnEE”?r: amen Hanan, RESERVED
\nroe onoens on; e<\/p>\n
I
\nP’rEGi’v””u’iviCEi’) THE._FO\u00a7ei;GWING:  _V __ _A<\/p>\n
As i:i__1e*and law invoived in these four<\/p>\n
petitions areIlsubstentiaiiyi\ufb01sl\u00e9rniiar, they are clubbed, heard<\/p>\n
together: ‘end are being disposed of by t..\u00a3s common order.<\/p>\n
‘ .:.V’2.— _  facts of the cases are that the petitioners<\/p>\n
  apoeaired foruth_e..:’Post Graduate Entrance Test for admission to<\/p>\n
‘i~..___M.edIcal ‘a.ndg_Dental coursg for the ecedem… year 2908:2099.<\/p>\n
\u00ab   E*VTExa-gminetlon is of muitipte-choice type requiring: the
\n  ._”cendtdEate to choose one response out of four alternatives. The
\n,_  O   “notice! Mark Reader (‘O.M.R.’ for short) answer sheet Is required
\n to be marked in black or blue ballpoint pen; a copy of the O.M.R.<\/p>\n
  O \u00ab  it .i.%.r nssaonnenfs or f
\nRAMESH. Aovoceretreri as-Arid 2;” <\/p>\n
rm L?RQNOUNcE’M_ENTfE’HIS BAY, THE count<\/p>\n
answer sheet is retained by the candidate. Each quezstiori\ufb01irries<\/p>\n
one mark. For marking one response correctiygjtheeiifcisrididatet__’
\nwould be awarded one mark. The Iqu’esti’on”.4:pa:oer91acairriieed  3. <\/p>\n
‘questions. There is no negative mari\u00e9indn-‘for choosi-no <\/p>\n
the  :insvir\u00e9rsrv5%s,nd’7:’fountiijiiai: hewhas answered 154 questions<\/p>\n
correctly!\u00bb fie Vwas1″‘.therefo’r’e\u00abanticipating to get 154 marks.<\/p>\n
“However, when_:’the’.’- respondent announced the results, the
\n;j’:’Vpetttioneryhad ..secure”d”‘1V53 marks. Aoorieved by the denial of<\/p>\n
‘one’ vssnetltioner sought retotailing and veri\ufb01cation of<\/p>\n
III! I I3! IGIII-G III-I II “E,    <\/p>\n
ii<\/p>\n
web site, she found that she has answered 160i-V<\/p>\n
correctly. However when the respondent announced  <\/p>\n
o.M.R. answer sheet. “But on retoteiiino ‘ends-Vxe\ufb01\ufb01ta ‘ it<\/p>\n
there was no change In the*marks.'”The}\/’stood etV1*59.:<\/p>\n
I’D’<\/p>\n
5. The case e. hev-petitioner  1 <\/p>\n
2008 is that on 1:;he{*:fki.hg,v:the.. ‘eferer*e te the he;<\/p>\n
answers nvotiflleclzort:”theV”weh’V’slite.”he Vfgoulnd that he had answered
\n148 questions kl-‘|e.___was therefore hoping to ad 148<\/p>\n
marks. To   that he had secured only 139<\/p>\n
_marks_; when .Vth\u00bbe_V_V’res_piondent announced the results. on<\/p>\n
nleeesserifisetlen, the respondent University gave him<\/p>\n
142 ‘r-r1eri<e."–~.g'\u00a7\u00a75tetih\ufb01 th-t he is 'titled he 14% seems as eeeies.<\/p>\n
 the revised '1-ezhmarks, this petition is filed.<\/p>\n
on
\nin
\nl="!
\nII
\nILD
\nin<\/p>\n
of the petitioner in writ petition No.3379 of<\/p>\n
'*~26"38 is that when she checked ..er re.-….s in th_ I\u00a5;8.!.'!1.!!'!I.I.t!|_3.l!- in<\/p>\n
 pukquestlon with reference to the revis'd "ey i"'5Wii_'S hwheu-' en<\/p>\n
the web site, she found that she had answered 161 uestioes<\/p>\n
l'I.1"'5nI
\nO<\/p>\n
1|<\/p>\n
correctly. However, the respondent University ”<\/p>\n
results awarding only 98 marks. She therefore ” <\/p>\n
retotailing and revaiuation. It is.’ “her. g’rieyvenVce__Vtna’t the T. <\/p>\n
Sri M.R. Naikgthe iearnes-sensor connsei for W5.<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nLaw Associates appearing_…for’\u00ab.tr.ie ;i;etitiors\u00a7a\u00a7~s7′ in writ petitions<\/p>\n
:3
\nLI.)<\/p>\n
o. 395 oi’ zees taasyiraz\u00e9iei’  .zG9′”——VV”–rned Hm en—em<\/p>\n
contentions: 1 ..\n<\/p>\n
(I) = bene\ufb01t’-\u00bb—pro\ufb02ciency of the petitioners is<\/p>\n
nmvl nuigl-Ihur dates-:!r.s4′!.’ 1-‘ .  –
\nIIIIJIQ gag’  iglflll<\/p>\n
EU’ ‘B I<\/p>\n
  (mi…  petitioinershave marked only one response. There<\/p>\n
  marking at all. without prejudice to this<\/p>\n
  contention, Sr! Naik submitted that ev-n gnrning that<\/p>\n
 have happened in the course of machine reading or
\nhandling by the personnel in charge of conducting the<\/p>\n
examination;\n<\/p>\n
FIRM<\/p>\n
(ill)<\/p>\n
(Iv)<\/p>\n
(v)<\/p>\n
when the petitioners are not responsible fo.r1″the7$econd<\/p>\n
marking, doubting the pro\ufb01ciency of  <\/p>\n
answering the questions correctly, is \u00a7not_:VwfaVrrented; <\/p>\n
when retotailing and re’v.g_iuati’tm_dis sotagtrtpthe <\/p>\n
papers are not fed lnto%i_:i1eygvmacblnef  they are
\nmanually checke:f:l_.,”‘jg~–  t.lje.candidates’ answers
\nbeing correct ory.,.in\u00a2arrect;_  ascertained by<\/p>\n
an-nan  g    V   <\/p>\n
 very sensitive to any
\n_p,ressure;’7afny’i impression of marking on the 0.M.R.
\nt mtlected in its carbonless<\/p>\n
answer’  9<\/p>\n
  ef’~mayrking two responses in the carboniess duplicate<\/p>\n
 aniswgerA’.sheet, it cannot be there on the O.M.R. answer<\/p>\n
 .s’n_eet””also.\n<\/p>\n
  “it<\/p>\n
It more than one answer is marked, the f\u00e9\ufb01ii\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01f
\nUniversity construes the same as malpractice. But In
\nthe Instant cases, marking two alternatives is treated as<\/p>\n
a wrong answer only. It is Sri News contention that It<\/p>\n
HBH.\n<\/p>\n
\n
Is no answer for the University to has<\/p>\n
been considerate for it could have treated:  ‘a<\/p>\n
malpractice. He relied upon’ ij’udgri1ent1*i$E’on*blei. <\/p>\n
Supreme Court in the case  HIQDUSXAE <\/p>\n
conroeimon no. v.mu:. enA?o%Rl’iciriiErero Ares<\/p>\n
OTHERS reportedin 2005  4598.\n<\/p>\n
Ma) en Neil: sL-m!-,ed.:’_t7h._t..  can also be e<\/p>\n
object,’ rrietter * .oi’, ‘jtid_ici.ai” ”*-*V<\/p>\n
In:\n<\/p>\n
E
\n:3
\n“B
\n1:\n<\/p>\n
lb
\n:3\n<\/p>\n
-I:\n<\/p>\n
go
\nat
\n2:\n<\/p>\n
an\n<\/p>\n
-2<\/p>\n
deci:Sion7,.” gu;Jheti1er’V’Tecirnin’istrf;ative, judicial, ouisi-j’uo’iciai
\n   reviewabie. He sought to
\ndlreui .   the judgment of the Hon’ble
\n supremeiikrcoun\u00bb In the case of menu unwnv
\n  coumnv unrnso. v. AJAY<\/p>\n
d  vv\ufb01t\u00a3.f\u00a3.?-iareported in rzeeeye sec 5:19;<\/p>\n
  (urli\ufb01)  Court can correct the examination body’s decision.<\/p>\n
In su oort of his argument Sri Naik relied on the<\/p>\n
__’. ‘.\n<\/p>\n
gments .. the i-!on’b.!e supreme court in the cases of<\/p>\n
 ura”‘”””” ‘—–err WW-\n<\/p>\n
\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
omens reported In (1oa3)4 scc 3qg;%Lor%dtauetoa,tv<\/p>\n
CHI-IANDA v. cnamnau, JEE Auoomansrsponee<\/p>\n
an sees an scw son jand”o\u00abf._lrtBli$\u00a7\ufb02_tr;~.i9EAlI;’  <\/p>\n
6G’v”u’:RH’-‘:Eu’\u20ac’l’ u’\u00a2’.E.’}I\u00a3A.’.. ‘.’.’\u00a3.’\u00a7;.!,.eE,V’v_*F’..’.v!!.;#.!\u20ac=\u00a7.a..Aii’.!.5<\/p>\n
‘\\.I’ .\n<\/p>\n
Arie an ‘riirzii reported in itfli sees   * –:saa.<\/p>\n
The learned Csditnset fnr.the’%g$’et!ttoners sn Ananda K.<\/p>\n
and Sr! 5…. Kham-oz !<he.r:.,. smearing"! titre pettttenem In writ.<\/p>\n
petitions i\\io.37–?'8   'f4.'2-\ufb01\ufb013"'r*\u00e9sraer:c'iveiy, have arsa<\/p>\n
addressed slrntlar s;rgnr.n_ents%.'as:'dbnv'e  Srl M.R. Nalk.
\n  sn  Ramesh, the lrned<\/p>\n
Counsei arurrarini ffrt,hea…*es'pandent tiniversity subrnttta that<\/p>\n
 the ettamtnatlond system' Is time tested and over the years it has<\/p>\n
sbejcome~fdolfnr69f. The Instructions and guidelines governing<\/p>\n
th'e.t'I'i!I'ntv:.v u'f$'tjeffb;M.R. answer sheets were made available to the<\/p>\n
 'aveandtdates; nrell In advance. He particularly brings to my notloe<\/p>\n
'   '{\u00a7ns.rtI;t;t!e'n htetltl, which reads as follows:<\/p>\n
"10. Candidate should read the instruction given In
\nthe OMR sheet and question  and after which start<\/p>\n
\ufb01tting the ovais. Even a minute, .'::.=:r.*.*.s-r'.e:rt mark or<\/p>\n
HRH,<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
drop of ink on the other oval makes the ,4′
\nThink before ink.” 1  ”  ”\n<\/p>\n
10. Nextly, he also drew my atten.tIon.’_to’tnsti*h’ctton N93′ e. <\/p>\n
on the O.M.R. sheet Itself, whlch reads’vae’_foidlowe:_vA”    <\/p>\n
‘”150 not maize any streya.ritar’ks on this “For<\/p>\n
Booklet. ”\n<\/p>\n
. Sri<\/p>\n
I-ll<\/p>\n
‘1<\/p>\n
\ufb02l
\nII
\n5:\n<\/p>\n
‘El
\n13\u00bb
\nfl!’<\/p>\n
mark one oval,  the process he
\nrealises  “tenet;  may thereafter proceed
\nto blacken  oual. But then, the marking or
\nattemptlnohto dlsentltles the candidate to get<\/p>\n
_ the !’-‘-%!’k;s for the eveh Even !.f the merlclhg of the first<\/p>\n
‘~.\u20ac’lVtTIIn’I_3 \ufb01r-“BU’ \ufb01if\ufb01 u C , Hull 5<\/p>\n
.;n<\/p>\n
same-;..”He’:\u00a7_to_dt\u00a7ced the orloinai O.M.R. answer sheets to show<\/p>\n
 the merklhd on more than one alternative. He submitted that a<\/p>\n
h H M ” 4.””ca:rsd!date”is not entitled to net the welahtaoe for answer, which<\/p>\n
 have marked correctly, subsequent to the putting of a<\/p>\n
‘T  smell dot or mark on the other oval.<\/p>\n
12. Sr! Ramesh submits that almost ail entrance tests
\nn’BH’.\n<\/p>\n
\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
are conducted by adopting Identical procedure….._xj<\/p>\n
valuation, merit list is prepared. If any <\/p>\n
made In the<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
adjudicated by  _  jj\u00e9trncier”””\ufb01\\rticie 226 of the
\nconstitution”ofes.Ini!\u00a7e_.__  interfere in matters of
\nacademic.vV1educatlon..__::’5ri’Ramesh relied on the Judgment of the<\/p>\n
Calcutta High . Co:irt’l:e.fin’ case of IIAJOIISHI DIE v.<\/p>\n
  unwgnsm to-:=. [cA|.cerrh1’A AND omens reported in AIR<\/p>\n
 _which”*ls hounhd’ to succeed or the error is so gross or apparent<\/p>\n
‘  no other conclusion is possible for the purpose of applying<\/p>\n
 discretion by it.\n<\/p>\n
14. Using the magnifying giass, i have scrutinised the<\/p>\n
original O.M.R. answer sheets. I found that there are some<\/p>\n
e_!t!oners’ marks, it wlitresuit .!n’.a!ter!r!s.tljie’ enttre  <\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
dots\/marks\/erasing or scratching of the marking,-.:.,_t.l’|e
\ninstructions, extracted hereinabove, make ittpgahtindentifi <\/p>\n
that even a minute inadvertent touchllordrop.;ofJiekV:Von\u00ab’ otherf_ <\/p>\n
be held to be at fault for denviri\ufb01the  therais
\nmarking on two ovals.  surh’miesie\ufb01e._made’on ‘behalf of the
\npetitioners that the dot or   oval might
\nhave happened Einthe    or handling by<\/p>\n
the personn\u00a2\u00e9i”‘Irp:hia’rg5e.:of.j’eoi:dl\u00a7ctingV.. the examination, is ipse<\/p>\n
 opens wh!”ch”t:hie court cannot act.<\/p>\n
di:-:!t of the pe<\/p>\n
15.A”  a|so’v…’fInd\u00bb:_’thatthe respondent University ..has
\n_ manu_ei’iy checi<ed__'th'e ansvver papers, when their retotalllng and
\n  vvere sohlglht. Wherever the mistakes had indeed<\/p>\n
taken pie.\u00e9:\u00b0e,,"tt;e..5r$pondent University has e-.-amt'; reamed the<\/p>\n
impression on the carbonless duplicate answer sheet. i am
\nA-Du
\nroan.\n<\/p>\n
L <\/p>\n
 A !!s\u00bbstadrtt.rca_e an<\/p>\n
~_.h|a.\u00a2i an
\n‘ulwg Luau In nriliril<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
therefore In no position to give acceptability to <\/p>\n
urged on behalf of the petitioners that If thereatie  <\/p>\n
traces of marking two or more enswete. in  ‘ee.rb’eh-lvess  <\/p>\n
J LIJIIILI Km L1’L h
\n7 t\ufb01 CIISWUI bll t,  ‘lllllU;t U.\n<\/p>\n
answer sheet aiso.\n<\/p>\n
17. Just because’*\u00ab–.th_e_  University has not<\/p>\n
the conseq’ ‘ “uence wher’<\/p>\n
open to it to d4o\u00a7–.so,:fit._\ufb01oes no’ e_ntfii”in:’
\nthe Unlversltf ts ‘eb1!9ed ‘te’V’VI\u00a7.r:oVre:\u00a7th:e dot or mark or scratch on
\none ovaliand .,.1;he.’petItIoners on \ufb02ndlng that the<\/p>\n
oval is many’ blackenedff ft <\/p>\n
 _T_’There”t:an…..be no dispute with the proposition that<\/p>\n
AV”–an3(“arbitrary;’\u00abdecision, be It administrative, judlclal or quasi-
\n judictat,’ u–7jt_;d\u00a7.c|Ja||y revlewable. But I do not find any
\n ‘arbitrartnesshvon the part of the University. The facts of the<\/p>\n
the declslen of the Hen.’l_1!e supreme court<\/p>\n
‘ in.\n<\/p>\n
E5″\n<\/p>\n
an Al H’AIl\ufb02IIII IIIIIIIEDEITV I
\nII. waiavh \\<\/p>\n
‘V ‘  “”v.difr’erent. in the said reported case, the issue invoived was, if a<\/p>\n
‘ paper setter commits an error while Indlcatlng the correct<\/p>\n
ADM
\nnD.n_<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
answer to a question set by him, can the studentsi._yrh’o’a\u00a7snstyer<\/p>\n
that question correctly, be failed for the reason  <\/p>\n
answer is correct, it did not accord with”tl\u00b0:e ‘answer>*sopVplied”.by’ it<\/p>\n
-Hus nannr cal-I-Ar in -|- A ilnlunrel u an r-4:’~.-.,r nne\\.’us,||-“‘9
\nIII? PCP?! f\u00e9ii\u00e9l EU III? HIIIVTIEIIV’ 33 E91! i  I<\/p>\n
19. In the case of   (eupra), the<\/p>\n
Hon’bIe Supreme Court to\u00e9-kAthe;,*_\u00bbfoliowing considered View in<\/p>\n
“7.  or case, there can be
\nsome %_rfelaxa:tion in   submission of proof and
\nit urirr amt   apr2r’yl”any    it
\npertains  me ‘ppxedum;  redaction of
\nthe we -relatin\ufb01.:’to’:””5ubmiesion of proof need not
\nnecessarily’  In”re_i\u00e9r:tion of candidature. ”<\/p>\n
  observation was made in a different context<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
Etfh\ufb02\ufb02  nn camnnnce nr clrnlla ht hahunnn l- A -n e
\nI &\ufb01.T:lIl’ITI,O’  V If II? iKIll\u20acUIf3i WI fII’I”\u00a5’ I’, “W”TTII HI.’ IHEWT
\n_ 1.IA_x’_’V’__._, _”.”___AI’ l.I__ _._|_I .__-__._n.__I ____ u-_ LL- _._I_I ___- n.I__
\nEH95,’ CREE \ufb02\ufb02u IRE Sail} TEDDITECI C353. in “IE SHIU CISH, [He<\/p>\n
‘”77ik’ff\u00ab._si:udent,” on passing 10+2 examination, sought admission to a<\/p>\n
it  rnedtcai course availing the reservation meant for the children of<\/p>\n
 ‘I\u00a7’Ex.-\u00e9ewicemen who were discharged from armed forces on the<\/p>\n
  ~ aground of permanent disability. That was the case where the<\/p>\n
\ufb01.RH.\n<\/p>\n
\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
Ziila Salnlk Board had committed a mistake <\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate; the said mistake was rectified by  ofethxg<\/p>\n
20. In the case of ABH1jit11(‘supra),~–:the student who<\/p>\n
will<\/p>\n
_ t Rank in M=B;\u00a3.L\u00a7;–_ r1:c:e~,:ee..a;:~s Aiexamlttetton and who<\/p>\n
in S\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01.’Ei’s”5’f\u20ac.’:\ufb01uaLi1ua’ii uoioay, was rrt seiected<\/p>\n
for admission.to-..:tMtS}_’._Vdegjree   deduction of 5% made from<\/p>\n
the marks__oi7J:teIiri:e\u00a73i;_;t}\\(2″h’ii1iV:’.:on–  ground that he had passed
\nthe subject In.the–“sec’ond’ The Hon’bIe Supreme Court<\/p>\n
held such a’V.d:eductioh:to:.4be_ni’rhperrnlssibie, as the student had<\/p>\n
_ not apgoeared   first ‘examination on account of serious<\/p>\n
  the foregoing reasons, I do not find any scope<\/p>\n
 VA for Ahwiytnterference in the matter. I dlsmm these M-titlons, but<\/p>\n
iittg “o’er as to crsts
\nrt 1 I _
\nDu] ”\n<\/p>\n
iudge
\ninn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AsHoKIB;DN HIN.cHiNGEi{1fQf Clw writ Petition !\\_l9,3g1g _o!’ 2on3, SR1 ABHIJIT R;HON_AGGi3.1_J I I S\/’O SR1 H.\u00a7.\ufb01A:viAms\u00a7A I I AGED ABOUT–25 YEA ~~ _ R\/AT JZD 11.04, JUDGES Iqualmezns, D NA’l’IONALGA3VlES […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-269609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-20T15:11:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T15:11:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2407,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T15:11:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-20T15:11:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T15:11:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008"},"wordCount":2407,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008","name":"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T15:11:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shivananda-manohar-j-vs-rajiv-gandhi-university-of-health-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Shivananda Manohar J vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health … on 31 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=269609"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269609\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=269609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=269609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=269609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}