{"id":270126,"date":"2010-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-05T12:35:08","modified_gmt":"2019-02-05T07:05:08","slug":"ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                 Central Information Commission\n                                                                 CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001626\n                                                                  Dated January 28, 2010\n\n\nName of the Applicant                      :   Ms.Rekha R.Batle\n\nName of the Public Authority               :   Central Railway, Mumbai\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.    The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.16.3.09 with the PIO, Central Railway Mumbai<br \/>\n      requesting for Xerox copy of letters\/representations\/attendance register\/absentee<br \/>\n      register for the period Aug.2007 till Sept.2008. Dr.Satish Srivastava, PIO (Accounts)<br \/>\n      replied on 24.3.09 enclosing the copy of letter dt.25.9.08, copy of attendance register<br \/>\n      of Aug.2007, copy of absentee register\/late attendance register of 22-24 Aug.2007<br \/>\n      while denying the information with regard to the representation of Mrs.G.R.Naidu<br \/>\n      u\/s8(1)(e) of the <a href=\"\/doc\/671631\/\" id=\"a_1\">RTI Act<\/a>. Not satisfied with the reply, the Applicant filed an appeal<br \/>\n      dt.18.4.09 stating that the information provided against point (i) was not certified and<br \/>\n      reiterated her request for information against point (ii). Shri Vinay Mittal, Appellate<br \/>\n      Authority replied on 23.5.09 stating that the PIO has provided all the information<br \/>\n      except the copy of representation of Mrs.G.R.Naidu since the disclosure of said<br \/>\n      information will be violative of a fiduciary relationship as well as the confidence and<br \/>\n      trust between the employee and employer and is protected u\/s 8(1)(e) of <a href=\"\/doc\/671631\/\" id=\"a_1\">RTI Act<\/a>.<br \/>\n      Further, her plea for providing certified true copy of certain documents is not<br \/>\n      sustainable since it is not obligatory on the part of a public authority to provide<br \/>\n      certified true copy of any document sought under the <a href=\"\/doc\/671631\/\" id=\"a_2\">RTI Act<\/a>, 2005. Being aggrieved<br \/>\n      with the reply, the Applicant filed a second appeal dt.8.7.09 before CIC. In her appeal<br \/>\n      she submitted that her husband Shri R.g.Batle had submitted             representations<br \/>\n      dt.8.10.07 and 24.4.08 to his Head of Zonal Railway through his controlling officer as<br \/>\n      the railway administration had committed a very serious mistake because of which the<br \/>\n      Office had started harassing her husband. As a part of the harassment, the Railways<br \/>\n      had deliberately disclosed the said representations to Mrs. Naidu which according to<br \/>\n      the Appellant is highly objectionable. She wanted to know why if Mrs. Naidu can be<br \/>\n      given her husband&#8217;s representations although it is highly objectionable, she can&#8217;t be<br \/>\n      given Mrs.Naidu&#8217;s representation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the hearing<br \/>\n      on January 28, 2010 through video conference.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3.    Ms.Apala Singh, PIO, Shri N.G.Shete, Shri Motwani, APIO HQ representing Appellate<br \/>\n      Authority and Shri Rajesh Kumar, CI representing the Public Authority and the<br \/>\n      Appellant were present at Mumbai NIC for the hearing..<br \/>\n Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">4.     The Commission on review of the second appeal observed that the Appellant herself<br \/>\n       has admitted that disclosure of information in the case of her spouse to Mrs. Naidu is<br \/>\n       highly objectionable as was is being held by the Public Authority in a fiduciary<br \/>\n       relationship. In this case too the Commission would like to point out that the same<br \/>\n       consideration   is being upheld by the Commission and accordingly the Commission<br \/>\n       denies disclosure of Mrs Naidu&#8217;s representation to the Appellant, under <a href=\"\/doc\/1494553\/\" id=\"a_3\">Section 8(1)(e)<\/a><br \/>\n       of the RTI Act as the information has been furnished to the Public Authority in<br \/>\n       confidence and is being held in a fiduciary relationship by the Public Authority. The<br \/>\n       Commission accordingly disposes off the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">                                                                           (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                   Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">1.     Ms.Rekha R.Batle<br \/>\n       D\/64, 8 Block<br \/>\n       Near Hambardikar Bakery<br \/>\n       Bhusawal 425 201<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">2.     The PIO<br \/>\n       Central Railway<br \/>\n       FA&amp;CAO&#8217;s Office<br \/>\n       3rd Floor, New Admn. Building<br \/>\n       CST<br \/>\n       Mumbai 400 001<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">3.     The Appellate Authority<br \/>\n       Central Railway<br \/>\n       FA&amp;CAO&#8217;s Office<br \/>\n       3rd Floor, New Admn. Building<br \/>\n       CST<br \/>\n       Mumbai 400 001<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">4.     Officer incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">5.     Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 Central Information Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001626 Dated January 28, 2010 Name of the Applicant : Ms.Rekha R.Batle Name of the Public Authority : Central Railway, Mumbai Background 1. The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.16.3.09 with the PIO, Central Railway Mumbai requesting for Xerox [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-270126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-05T07:05:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-05T07:05:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":579,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-05T07:05:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-05T07:05:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-05T07:05:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010"},"wordCount":579,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010","name":"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-05T07:05:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rekha-r-batle-vs-central-railway-mumbai-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Rekha R.Batle vs Central Railway, Mumbai on 28 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270126"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270126\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}