{"id":270687,"date":"2008-02-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3"},"modified":"2014-02-28T16:20:32","modified_gmt":"2014-02-28T10:50:32","slug":"dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3","title":{"rendered":"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 6578 of 2008(G)\n\n\n1.  DR.K.C.CHACKO,KADAVIL HOUSE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. DR.CHINNAMMA CHACKO,RESIDING AT\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. CORPORATION OF COCHIN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SIBY MATHEW\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\n\n Dated :26\/02\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J.\n\n                           - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n\n                                  W.P.(c).No.6578 OF 2008\n\n                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n\n                    Dated this the 26th  day of February, 2008\n\n\n                                      JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">       Ext.P1   building   permit   issued   to   the   petitioners   for   the<\/p>\n<p>construction of a high rise building in the city of Cochin was cancelled<\/p>\n<p>by the Secretary of Corporation under Ext.P2.  Under Ext.P2 it is stated<\/p>\n<p>that Rule 16 is being invoked for cancelling the permit on the basis of<\/p>\n<p>instructions received from the Government.  Two reasons are stated for<\/p>\n<p>cancelling   the   permit.     First   reason   being   that   the   FAR   exceeds   the<\/p>\n<p>FAR   shown   in   the   approved   plan     and   the   second   reason   is   that   the<\/p>\n<p>proposed construction violates Rule 117 which provides for mandatory<\/p>\n<p>open  space  for  facilitating  fire  fighting    arrangements  in  the  building<\/p>\n<p>after   its   construction.     On   receiving   Ext.P2,   petitioners   submitted<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3   before   the   Secretary   of   the   Corporation   requesting   for   a<\/p>\n<p>reconsideration   of   Ext.P2   order   and   for   supply   of   a   copy   of   the<\/p>\n<p>Government   order   pursuant   to   which   Ext.P2   has   bee   issued.     Since<\/p>\n<p>there   was   no   response   to   Ext.P3,   petitioners   submitted   Ext.P4   and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">WPC.No.6578\/08                             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>along with Ext.P4 a revised plan was submitted by the petitioners and it<\/p>\n<p>was requested  in  Ext.P4  that  the revised  plan  may be considered  and<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 be revived on the basis of the revised plan.   It was claimed in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P4 that the revised plan complies with all the requirements of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala   Municipalities   Building   Rules.     Finding   that   there   was   no<\/p>\n<p>response   even   to   Ext.P4   and   the   revised   plan,   petitioners   submitted<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5 further representation to the Secretary of the Corporation dated<\/p>\n<p>11\/10\/2007   and   along   with   that   a   further   revised   plan   was   submitted<\/p>\n<p>and it was requested that the above revised plan may be considered and<\/p>\n<p>permit   may   be   granted.     Noticing   that   the   Corporation   was   inert   on<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5   also,   petitioners   preferred   Ext.P6   representation   before   the<\/p>\n<p>Minister.  It is submitted by that petitioners that Minister has forwarded<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 to the Corporation for appropriate action.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">       2.     When   the   writ   petition   came   up   for   consideration,<\/p>\n<p>Sri.C.M.Suresh   Babu,   Advocate,   took   notice   on   behalf   of   the<\/p>\n<p>Corporation.     Sri.K.J.Mohammed   Ansar,   Government   Pleader   took<\/p>\n<p>notice   on   behalf   of   the   second   respondent.     I   have   heard<\/p>\n<p>Sri.Philip.J.Vettickattu,   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   and<\/p>\n<p>Sri.Mohammed               Ansar          and         Sri.C.M.Suresh            Babu.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">WPC.No.6578\/08                              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sri.Philip.J.Vettickattu would submit that powers under Rule 16 are to<\/p>\n<p>be exercised by the Secretary on his own and not on the directions or<\/p>\n<p>instructions   of   any   other   authority,   even   if   the   authority   be   the<\/p>\n<p>Government.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">\n<p id=\"p_4\">       3.     I   find   merit   in   the   above   submission.     But   the   relevant<\/p>\n<p>question is whether the constructions violate Rule 117 or whether there<\/p>\n<p>is   any   deviation   from   the   plan   in   respect   of   which   Ext.P1   had   been<\/p>\n<p>issued or whether there is violation in the matter of permitted FAR or<\/p>\n<p>any other illegality.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p id=\"p_6\">       4.     The claim of the petitioners is that the revised plan which<\/p>\n<p>was   lastly   submitted   by  them  along  with   Ext.P5  rectifies   all  possible<\/p>\n<p>defects and would satisfy the requirements of the Kerala Municipalities<\/p>\n<p>Building Rules.  Sri.Philip.J.Vettickattu further submitted that only the<\/p>\n<p>piling   works   of   the   proposed   building   have   been   completed   and   it<\/p>\n<p>would   be   possible   for   the   petitioners   to   comply   with   any   direction<\/p>\n<p>which may be given by the Corporation so that the construction  upon<\/p>\n<p>its completion will satisfy the requirements of the Rules.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">       5.     Sri.C.M.Suresh   Babu submitted   that  though   a  direction  of<\/p>\n<p>the   Government   is   referred   to   in   Ext.P2,   it   was   on   the   basis   of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">WPC.No.6578\/08                               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>independent   enquiries   conducted  by  the   Secretary  and  on   satisfaction<\/p>\n<p>entered   to   by   the   Secretary   on   the   basis   of   such   enquiry   that   Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>order was issued.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">\n<p id=\"p_9\">       6.      Having   heard   the   rival   submissions   addressed   at   the   Bar<\/p>\n<p>and the claims of the petitioner made in the writ petition, I am of the<\/p>\n<p>view that the Corporation should consider the revised plan which was<\/p>\n<p>submitted by the petitioners along with Ext.P5, notwithstanding Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>order of cancellation and decide whether a permit can be issued to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners   after   approving   the   said   revised   plan.     I   record   the<\/p>\n<p>undertaking given by the petitioners to this court that petitioners will be<\/p>\n<p>prepared to abide by any instruction which may be issued to them by<\/p>\n<p>the Secretary of the Corporation during the course of the construction<\/p>\n<p>and that the mandatory fire fighting arrangements including open space<\/p>\n<p>necessary   under   Rule   117   will   be   available   in   the   building   once   the<\/p>\n<p>construction is over.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">\n<p id=\"p_11\">       7.      The   writ   is   accordingly   disposed   of   with   the   following<\/p>\n<p>directions:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">\n<p id=\"p_13\">       The Corporation will consider the revised plan submitted by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners  along  with  Ext.P5, conduct  necessary local  inspection  and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">WPC.No.6578\/08                                      5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ascertain as to whether it is possible for the petitioners to provide the<\/p>\n<p>mandatory   open   space   necessary   under   Rule   117   and   issue   permit.<\/p>\n<p>Periodical inspections will be conducted in the construction site by the<\/p>\n<p>Corporation   and   all   necessary   directions   will   be   issued   to   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners   so   as   to   ensure   that   the   construction   do   not   violate   the<\/p>\n<p>permit which may be  issued  on considering the revised  plan and that<\/p>\n<p>the   building   upon   completion   satisfies   the   Kerala   Municipalities<\/p>\n<p>Building Rules in all respects.  The Corporation will ensure compliance<\/p>\n<p>of all these directions and the direction regarding consideration of the<\/p>\n<p>revised plan and issuance of building permit will be complied with by<\/p>\n<p>the  Corporation  at the earliest  and  at any rate within  a period  of  one<\/p>\n<p>month   of   receiving   a   copy   of   this   judgment.     Final   orders   regarding<\/p>\n<p>grant of approval to the revised plan will be passed by the Corporation<\/p>\n<p>only after hearing the petitioners also.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">\n<p id=\"p_15\">                                                                               PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                           JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">WPC.No.6578\/08    6<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 6578 of 2008(G) 1. DR.K.C.CHACKO,KADAVIL HOUSE &#8230; Petitioner 2. DR.CHINNAMMA CHACKO,RESIDING AT Vs 1. CORPORATION OF COCHIN, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE For Petitioner :SRI.SIBY MATHEW For Respondent : [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-270687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-28T10:50:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-28T10:50:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\"},\"wordCount\":940,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\",\"name\":\"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-28T10:50:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-28T10:50:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008","datePublished":"2008-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-28T10:50:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3"},"wordCount":940,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3","name":"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-28T10:50:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-k-c-chacko-vs-corporation-of-cochin-on-26-february-2008-3#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.K.C.Chacko vs Corporation Of Cochin on 26 February, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}