{"id":271133,"date":"2009-01-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-11-19T03:03:02","modified_gmt":"2014-11-18T21:33:02","slug":"ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n<p id=\"p_1\">uwum Ur AAKNAIAIRA HIGH COURI  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGHCCURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUI?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNKIfA1{_A ~<br \/>\nAT GU;;I3;x:2G}x~  .  A % % u<br \/>\nDATED THIS THE 231% <\/p>\n<p>HONBLE  i~:1NcH1GER1<br \/>\n   (MV)<br \/>\nBETWEEN:  %%%%   V        AV<br \/>\nAmeerbee    &#8216; &#8216; &#8220;.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">Caste Muslim, Ag: 60 yaaxrs, <\/p>\n<p>Occ: Hausshnl\u00e9, rf e-:\u00ab.uB&#8217;i1t)gaf1t1aI1i,<br \/>\n&#8216;I&#8217;;;&#8217;;\u00bbAvfza1p&#8217;i}r,E  G\ufb01bhama. .. Appellant<\/p>\n<p>(By -Sri.:.C&#8217; E fx\ufb01vocatc)<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; fi&#8217;%1e&#8217;*&#8217;!s&amp;aLt?9a$r;&#8221;&#8216;<br \/>\n_  4&#8217;-\u20ac)I&#8217;ie1&#8243;:.t;:21_I1i:31;m.:1ce Co.<br \/>\n&#8216;&#8221;\u00bb..&#8217;*..Divfi,*-3i&lt;&#039;ma:1&#039;oi&quot;\ufb01ce,<br \/>\n &quot;  &#039;Crpp. Tc} Mini Vidhan<br \/>\n&#039;  1 V . _ _Scmdh3 of\ufb01ce at Gulbarga.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">.. Respcmdent<\/p>\n<p>This M.F.A. is filed undar Section 173g 1} 9f the M.V..Act,<br \/>\nagainst the judgment \u00e9ijfi\ufb01 awam dateu. 32.16.2003 in MVC<\/p>\n<p>No, 15212002 on th\ufb01 \ufb01le of ibri. Civil Judga (Sr:Dn.) at Gublarga.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">This M.F.A. Gaming on for Grciers this day, court made the<br \/>\nf9I10wing:-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAXA I-BGH COUR<\/p>\n<p>This matter has come &#8216;for Vhord\ufb01re  o \ufb01ice<\/p>\n<p>objections.\n<\/p>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">2. The apmilant    the judment and\nawarti dated    \ufb01gs Court of Principal\n\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_6\">cm; Judge (9.:-;D;\u00a7g};:4\u00a7t *:t1.&#8217;m&#8217;%c No.152\/2002.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">3. The 0\ufb01i\u00a2\u20ac&#8221;~\ufb01aS  objections:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">_ &#8220;I&#8217;h\u00a2:;\u20ac}\u00e93s.. a ciV.eiay V'&lt;\u00a7&#039;f Q25 days in \ufb01ling the appeal. LA.<br \/>\n&#039; &#039;  fear &#039;-Q.\u00b09:,_ -got Af11e&lt;i&quot;&#039;  &quot;&quot;&quot; &quot; &#039;<\/p>\n<p>4,   &quot; side has not made an application for the<\/p>\n<p> :&quot;r:&lt;;23&#039;1doI3&#039;ai:if_5r1 cf  On the other hand, the appelianfs learned<\/p>\n<p>. ..  h;a&quot;s.j\u00a7\u00a77ritten the following on the check slip:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\"> T &#8220;&#8216;fV\u00a7&#8217;ii&#8217;;13;&#8217;regax&#8217;d to o\ufb01ice objection or; limitation point, it is<br \/>\n~  made very much crlmar in pleading of appeal memo, on<br \/>\n  _,pa.ge~&#8211;9 itseif. Even, raising such xmnecassary and<br \/>\n&#8221; irmlevant objection is unjust and unfair, as it is clearly<br \/>\nillegal and does not stand in the eyes of law, and leads<br \/>\nto abuse of \u00a7)Z{&#8216;(}C6SS of mmt, creating hurdies in the Way<\/p>\n<p>sf speedy justics in accerdance with law.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">&#8211; 5. Sri C R Bau\u00e9h, the lmmm counsel for the appellant, submits<\/p>\n<p>that althaugh there is a \u00e9\ufb01fa\ufb01 91&#8242; 182.5 \u00e9ays in \ufb01ling \u00a31133 appeal, he<br \/>\n.35..\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">uuun: we RAKNAEAEA HEUH (&#8230;{)l.JR'{-QAF I(ARNA&#8221;!&#8217;AKA I-EGH COURT OF KARNAVAKA H!GH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>is not obiiged to make an application for   J<\/p>\n<p>He submits that there is no  rod:-e fdixag petitfon,<br \/>\nas the appea} proceedings  o;V3@&#8221;jie&#8217;V&#8217;ee.I1t.i&#8217;Iiuatio1; of the claim<br \/>\nproceedings, no app\ufb01ea\ufb01on; of delay need be<br \/>\n\ufb01ied. He brings go       subsection (3) of<br \/>\nSection 166 of the @988 (hereinafter referred to<br \/>\nas &#8216;the said ?Ae&#8221;t&#8221;&#8221; byd~O;:;e  by Act 53 of 1994 with<br \/>\neffect from   if-Iev submits that the said Act is a<br \/>\nsocial welfare eeiezfrateni Oie\u00e9gwi\u00e9ia\ufb01on. He has also relied upon a<\/p>\n<p> the &#8216;Hon&#8217;b&#8221;1e&#8221;&#8216;SiiVpreme Court in the case of Dhannalal &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\"> vs\u00bb  remrted in AIR 1996 SC 2155, wherein<br \/>\n vV.:AAi1i&#8221;ie  Par\ufb01ament rigney theught that prescribing :3.<br \/>\n .. of. iireitation and restsrietirlg the power of Tribunal to<br \/>\n  eiaim peti\ufb01on beyond the periw of twelve months<br \/>\n  _  -thee date of the accident was harsh, mmuitabie; and in many<\/p>\n<p> it was likely be cause izxjustice to the claimants. The relevant<\/p>\n<p>portions of the judgment, which the learned eeu\ufb01eel for the<\/p>\n<p>appeilant relied upon, are extracted hereirmeiew:<br \/>\n133%<\/p>\n<p>COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KAEHATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;7 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; .. The e\ufb02ect of dele\ufb01ond-of  <\/p>\n<p>Seeder} 166 of the Act caz1_1::e4_ tested by a::v&#8217;\ufb01:1i;$&#8217;u*a\u00a7:.ioi}.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">Suypose an accident had tak\u20ac%:&#8217;1&#8217;1% pla\u00e9:o, twc) &#8216;3fe\u00e9*sx*s&#8221; &#8216;Defers &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">14-} 141994, when $ub~scctioa,'{3) wad\ufb01omitt\ufb01d from<br \/>\nSection 166. For om: I&#8217;\u20acaS{}i1d_GI&#8217;V&#8221;&#8216;{11e other no claim<br \/>\npetition had been f\ufb01e\u00e9.__by thef.?i.C13.I_n,,Oozf_t11e heirs of the<br \/>\nvictim tin 14.11.1994. C311 a.:;:1ai1;:;*o&#8217;pe1:it:gn be not \ufb01led<br \/>\nafter 14.1 1.1994, in respect. of Asuc1i&#8217;.aC&#8217;oi.dent? Whether<br \/>\na claim petitigw._t&#8217;:3cd iaft\u00a2r:}I4.,V1-1&#8242;,=1994:-5 can be rejected<br \/>\nby the Triburial   oflixiiiiation saying that<br \/>\nthe period {of tweiv\u00e9..__m0:;ths._Whic}t1..had been prescribed<br \/>\nwhen sub&#8211;s\u00ab::c1;ie:1 (3) or Sectjdn I-756 was in force having<br \/>\nexpired; &#8220;t&#8217;I&#8217;1a~&#8217;-3. &#8216;:0 p7ri&#8211;&#8220;:::i&#8217;er th\ufb01wciaim yctition had been<br \/>\nextingt1ished&#8221;9.3:3dV_  &#8220;1&#8221;2\u00a7&gt;&#8217;i;.\u00a5:1\u00ab.=: revived after deietion of<br \/>\nsub-section (.3) acfyf  166 W.C.f. 14-11-1994&#8242;?<br \/>\nAccordirig to us, &#8220;\u20ac'{1&#8217;o_ answer should be in negative.<br \/>\nWhen sub;saction&#8217;._(3j\u00ab._of-&#8216;Section 166 has been omitted,<br \/>\nthen; &#8216;the:  has to entertain a claim petition<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; \u00ab&#8211;.witE51_out:_ n&#8217;m.\u00a2&#8211;~:~;:&#8217; the date on which such accident<\/p>\n<p>had &#8216;taken gniadce. The claim petitions caxmot be thrown<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\"> -;:&gt;s1t&#8217;o:1 th\u00e9o  that such claim peti\ufb01ons were barred<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;tizjs!&#8221;t&#8217;i4:;1e&#8221;1s%hcr;.\u00a7s1;ibsectic&gt;z1 (3) of Section 166 was in force.<br \/>\nIt mood 1_1.o&#8217;1&#8217;:~ impressed that Parliament from time to<\/p>\n<p>. tim\u00e9has iri\ufb01foduced amendments in the old Act as Well<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;as in t;1*1e :new Act in order to protect the interest of the<\/p>\n<p>&lt;  .,\u00a7zi:::\u00a3;ims bf the accidents and their heirs if tha victims<\/p>\n<p> &#039;&#8211;d_is:. &#039;\u00a33116 such amendment has been introduced in the<\/p>\n<p>_  Act&quot; by the aforesaid <a href=\"\/doc\/1210757\/\" id=\"a_1\">Amendment Act<\/a> 54 of 1994, by<\/p>\n<p>   szzzbstituting subsection (6) of <a href=\"\/doc\/1210757\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 148<\/a>, which<br \/>\n.. &#8221; -provides:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">&#8230;If a vi&lt;:t:im of the accident or heirs of th\u00e9<br \/>\ndaceased victim can prefer claim for compensation<\/p>\n<p>aithough not being preferred ci:ar1ie31* &#039;xadsauge (if 331:3<br \/>\nsxpiry sf tlza periad sf Zimitatiorz proscribed, how the<br \/>\nvictim 23:&#039; the hcirn; cf the dcccaacd 5113111 ht: in a worm:<br \/>\npositing if {he qii\u00e9\ufb01ti\ufb01\ufb02 df ceizdonation of delay in filing<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01gi\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT&#039;0_E KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR<\/p>\n<p>contained in <a href=\"\/doc\/1210757\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 173<\/a>{1) of the      I<\/p>\n<p>deleted.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">8. The judgment relied&#8217;   Ieeunsei for the<br \/>\nappellant is in the context oreeag  under <a href=\"\/doc\/1210757\/\" id=\"a_3\">Section 166<\/a><br \/>\nof the said Act,     of limitation is<br \/>\nprescribed \u00a39:    not w contended with<br \/>\nany Iate ef   lirnitation is there for filing the<br \/>\nappeal. If the   \ufb01led on time, it is not that the<br \/>\n&#8221; The Legislature has provided for<\/p>\n<p> agqvplicge\ufb01en fer the een\u00e9onatien of delay for entertaining<\/p>\n<p>  amgaal&#8217; eeee\ufb01j expiry of the said 90 days, if the Court. is<br \/>\n  ;=\u00a7_f Ilh\ufb01 appellant was grevented by suf\ufb01eient: eause<\/p>\n<p>  the apml within the prescribed period.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">  -Tiiexe can :10: m any dispute that the eai\u00e9 Act: is a social<\/p>\n<p> oriented iegelatien, but the fruits of beneficial legislation<\/p>\n<p>are to be given 01123; in a manner krlewn to law. I re}eei: this appeal,<br \/>\nas the epgeilam has failed &#8216;:0 \ufb01le an applicatien fer the cen\u00e9orzatien<\/p>\n<p>ef delay: Hewever, iibeity is %d be the appellant \ufb01e file the<\/p>\n<p>W.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">7 a;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">W<br \/>\n%<br \/>\nM<br \/>\nC<br \/>\nm<br \/>\n%u<br \/>\nm<br \/>\nma<br \/>\nM<br \/>\n%._<\/p>\n<p>1:&#8221;fof\u00bb.t1ie &#8216;cQi1ii&#8217;e19i\u00e91tion \u00a33&#8217;? &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_21\">delay.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_22\">Bkm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri uwum Ur AAKNAIAIRA HIGH COURI KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGHCCURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUI? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNKIfA1{_A ~ AT GU;;I3;x:2G}x~ . A % % u DATED [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-271133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance ... on 23 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance ... on 23 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-18T21:33:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ameer Bee W\\\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-18T21:33:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1188,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Ameer Bee W\\\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance ... on 23 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-18T21:33:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ameer Bee W\\\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance ... on 23 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance ... on 23 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-18T21:33:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-18T21:33:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009"},"wordCount":1188,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009","name":"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance ... on 23 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-18T21:33:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ameer-bee-wo-mahaboob-patel-vs-the-manager-oriental-insurance-on-23-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ameer Bee W\/O Mahaboob Patel, vs The Manager, Oriental Insurance &#8230; on 23 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}