{"id":27115,"date":"2008-09-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-09-15T18:01:02","modified_gmt":"2015-09-15T12:31:02","slug":"bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
 \n\n,.I ..\nIN THE HIGH coum ore' KARNATAKA\ncmcurr BENCH AT DHARWAD\nDATED THIS THE 413 DAY or SEPTEMBER 2003\nBEFORE _  \nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE ANAND BYRA'li.';1:\u00a7iD\"i35_i'::-'---I: f  \nwrerr PE'I'I'l'ION NO. 1S_.>641l;.'>,A(H}07{G!*\u00bb'.\u00e9\u00bb5.:E\"%~:1_:_A'1A-.:::   :\nBETW EN: %   M  \n\n1. Bhamtkumar Vastimal \nAged about 4-0 ycaxs, \n\n2. Javaharalal  \nAged about 50 ycar\ufb01'.   .. . '\n\nAged about 45 ' A  ._\nAll an: R\/9:   V' \n\nNear Abb5gc:i'%cp'mpoum:=,.L  \n\n(By M\/zs.\u00ab Spaafc  A.C.Puh:1,\nS.P.Hudeciag4a:1di,V'Mah.aI1At\u00e9;ah S.I-Iosmath, Adva.)\n\n   thaldain.\n\n2; R'a' 'nama  .  '*.i  Jain,\nAgedgabaut 53 years, Ooc: Business,\n\n . {All zs1'\ufb02:;R\/0: Malmvecrcolony Road,\n\nA  Abbigcti Compound,\n\nV'  Dist. ..Rcscponx1cnt3\n\n   ]    Sri. Jayakumar S.Pati1 Assocnatcs' . Advs.)\n\n8\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\nIg-\n\nThjswn'tpe1itionis\ufb01ledunaderArIicle3226and 2270!\"\nthe Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned\norder pasted on I.A.lX and X in O.S.No.299\/03 dt.17.7.200'~7\npassed by the Civil Judge (J1-.Dn.), Gadag vide Annex.W and\nallow the l.A.IX and X with a direction to the Civi_1..__Judge\n(Jr.Dn.) to complete evidence in the first instance,Fthen\nappoint the commissioner if he requires such \n\nThis writ petition coming on for    \n\nCourt made the tbllowing:  \nORDEfi-._\n\nHeard the CounselV'ii\ufb01::.!'_V  tog\n\nrespondents.<\/pre>\n
2. The roots of the   <\/p>\n
Th’ P9.”-W93?”   3 \u00b0i”’1 3″” in
\no.s.No.299;  eeee  Civil Juttge
\n(Jr.   the respondent hetein,
\nhad   or a Court Commissioner to
\n   in respect of the suit
\n   petitioner herein rained objections to<\/p>\n
 ”  of a Court Commissioner in question, the<\/p>\n
   to is’ been appointed and he had submn1ed’ his<\/p>\n
report  closure of the p)ainti\ufb02F’s evidence, the<\/p>\n
 was examined as a witness and he was cross-<\/p>\n
   by the petitioner. When the case was posted for<\/p>\n
  evidence, the petitionexs\/de\ufb01ndants made an<\/p>\n
 application for the appointment of a second Court<\/p>\n
. \u00bb~ 3 –\n<\/p>\n
Commissioner and yet another application to recall the<\/p>\n
Commissioners Report \ufb01led earlier. The impu\ufb01ed ortier is<\/p>\n
passed on these applications.\n<\/p>\n
3. The trial court hav’mg rejected the apg\ufb01eafitaes<\/p>\n
has opined as follcwsz<\/p>\n
The Court had   <\/p>\n
commissionefs report, nor zejeacted thee   <\/p>\n
having peen examined has be.ez;_.cmsv”sA:e$&:sminct\u00a7’.   v<\/p>\n
the Court Commissioner wast  ‘\u00a316  been
\ncross-examined, even   However,
\nsince the peti\ufb01oper  that the Court
\nConxmissbnex\u00e9 \u00a35{\u00e91::t:’\u00bb’1}i:xe work in
\nterms of   report is incomplete
\nand  eppointmcat of a second
\nCourt  The trial court has<\/p>\n
observed  ‘vthe’v.defe:1cf2eents\/petitionexs were yet to lead<\/p>\n
    lewlisng their evidence have filed<\/p>\n
 ‘the”  appointment of a second Court<\/p>\n
  ‘I’he- reasons shown in the appiication fer<\/p>\n
-V   the Ccmmissionefs Report were not tenable<\/p>\n
‘A u ” –. the appointment of second Court Commissioner<\/p>\n
.’   not arise at the stage of the defendants’ evidence in<\/p>\n
T  V’ “the suit and aoconiingly has rejected the application.<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\n.–LI’<\/p>\n
4. Assuming that the report of the Court
\nCommissioner was inaccuxate and did not refer to all the
\nterms of refemncc and has not addressed the saint, the<\/p>\n
petitioners would be in a position to seek the  of<\/p>\n
second Court Commissioner, if it is so  <\/p>\n
laying the foundation for such a prayer.’   the A V’<\/p>\n
ma!’ court, the petitioner is yet   EVT    <\/p>\n
and though the pctii:io31cr’ V_1_Viz::$V  “to; the- <\/p>\n
Commissioncfs Rcportjn the   can
\nbe better highlighted  _t11\u00a7: leads his cvitiencc
\nin support of   is   dcmonsiratc,<\/p>\n
with refcrcng  ci}-iden\u00e9e o4i1:_3V’fI’i\u00a3\u00a7”6;ocume1zts ava1la’ ble,<\/p>\n
the  ino\ufb01i\u00e9y’ report of the \ufb01rst Court
\nCommxo sioncr  to seek the appointment of<\/p>\n
 5;’..o.:’I’hi\u00a7 is zici\ufb01:i1mstanoc which can be addressed by<\/p>\n
    after the petitioner tenders evidence on<\/p>\n
Iiis”‘ochga 1.f.V’oo..i’hc merits of the case. The impumed under,<\/p>\n
 thezoofofcg oannot be faulted on the primaxy principle that tbs:<\/p>\n
V  ~  conic! not have sought for appointment of a so-new<\/p>\n
  Commissioner without tendering end’ mice in support<\/p>\n
V’ “of Ira case. As on principle, a Court Commissbncr is not<\/p>\n
appointed to gather or furnish cvidcncc on behalf of the<\/p>\n
\u00e9<\/p>\n
party to the suit and it is on this pxincipie that without
\nte\ufb01dexing evidence on behalf of a party,  of<\/p>\n
appointment of Court Commissioner is -4<\/p>\n
impermissible. On this principle, the trial  <\/p>\n
rejected the appointment of a  H   ‘A u<\/p>\n
instance of petitioner even before :Iead_mA    <\/p>\n
and cannot be interefered      L’<\/p>\n
the petitioner may make out a   the  in\ufb01rmity
\nwrit large in the report Flhe  Cogeoxissioner and if the
\nTrial Court is    of a second.\n<\/p>\n
Court   court would be
\nobliged tog’   ega\ufb01lication that may be
\n a_t._\ufb01aVVV’V1.e1ter point of time. The
\npe1;i\ufb01on:e:r.    shutout from seeking the<\/p>\n
appoi11me:oi”Va~  Commissioner. This will depend on<\/p>\n
 .,  1AtI:1e’:\ufb01:i’ez:it.:?. his  he would seek to make out, after<\/p>\n
V’  he  <\/p>\n
  these observations the petition is disposed<\/p>\n
 of  o\u00e9zhergt  no warrant for interference in the order of the<\/p>\n
V’ Q ;   at tins’ point of time.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
Sub*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 Author: Anand Byrareddy ,.I .. IN THE HIGH coum ore’ KARNATAKA cmcurr BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 413 DAY or SEPTEMBER 2003 BEFORE _ THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE ANAND BYRA’li.’;1:\u00a7iD”i35_i’::-‘—I: f wrerr PE’I’I’l’ION NO. 1S_.>641l;.’>,A(H}07{G!*\u00bb’.\u00e9\u00bb5.:E”%~:1_:_A’1A-.::: : BETW EN: % M 1. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-15T12:31:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-15T12:31:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":638,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-15T12:31:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-15T12:31:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-15T12:31:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008"},"wordCount":638,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008","name":"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-15T12:31:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharatkumar-vastimal-banda-vs-sumermal-himmatlal-jain-on-4-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bharatkumar Vastimal Banda vs Sumermal Himmatlal Jain on 4 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}