{"id":27146,"date":"2011-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011"},"modified":"2016-10-24T10:19:52","modified_gmt":"2016-10-24T04:49:52","slug":"employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATES THIS THE 15?\" DAY 0:: JUNE, \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.\\.{eNuGc>:s--AvL4}\u00a7;~_V.:;'e\u00a7;v<QA  * 2\n\nMiscellaneous First I-'\\DD\u20aca\u00a5 N._S5\u00e934 :\"EE':'V~1fTEe.\\e_A \nBETWEEN: V % 1'\n\n1. Employees State Insurance  V'\nCorporatienf Represented  = \nIts Regionaf Director,'  ' \nRegionai Office,   x\n10, Binny Fie\u00a5ds,_E>innyfp.et;_ '\nBangafore -- S_6.0.Q2.3. 1 \n\n2. The D\u20acfJU'E\u00a7\u00a7~.D.f'F{fCfC5%\"\u00a7_2..,,,_ \nE.S,I. Corpqrairierj, ' '  \n\n10, Bin:-wevfie'I':3s, Vi:':\u00a7\u00e9:,r*.ny';:\u00bb.Ve't:--\u00a7'\nBangaiore _~ S\u20ac,aQQV23,%  _ _' .,Appe%\u00a7am';s\n\n(By SriXi,N'a;faSi:1fiheA':--i\u00a75'i'{\u00a7:]'A'dv.,)\n\nAND; 'V _\n\n% ' - \u00a7;~i*S\u00a3; bf-.h'as'\"M\u00ab_ Kameff\ufb01 8+: 18,\n ' Ra\\:.im;*-.rjva1na'*:h\"Tagore Marg;\n'  Fest K:,m'j.\u00a7.i\u00a7et'\u00a7:i,..~~\n\nUd:.'1--_r:E =~ S75-:1{}2. ., Respendem:\n\n; {eyuwg\/\u00e9'V.M\u00a7'e,Naik an\ufb01 Asstsw, Adv')\n\nAA  Teis MFA is filed under sect\u00e9en 82(2) sf ESE Act\n\n 'x._ag.a\u00a7_;<\u00a7et the gudgmeet am erder dated i\u00a7.O2.2G{38 gassed\n\nin ES} \ufb01xee\ufb01eatierz \u00a7'\\ie'i.1,\u00ab'G2 en the fife ef the Presi\ufb01\u00e9rzg\n\nM\u20ac:_,15'fi:E\u20acE\u00a5', ESE mm Lamar Ceurt; \u00a7,\u00a7<, \u00a7'4a;\u00a7ge\u00a7:;:s'e, ai\u00e9ew\u00e9eg\n\n\n\n1%.)\n\nthe appiication \ufb02ied under section 45-\u00abA of ESE not far\ndeterminaticzn of contribution. I \n\nThis appeai ceming on for a\u00e9mission t:'\ufb01\u00a7.\u00e9\n\nCourt deiivered the foiiewing:\n\n \n\nJUDGMENT\u00bb\n\nAccording to the appe'!._ianf;s...:' \n\nestablishment having nad\u00bbi'-empievei\u00e9i  ferwii'\n\nmanufacture of goid ornamen:%s,.',v:xivaVs iiesibie.  covered\nunder the ESI Act   with effect from\n12.16.1989. Anintimetiijhni-.te'V..iii.e  was sent to\nthe respondent;";:,e\ufb01icif,;1~.qi\u00e9esiioneii':'V.th:e""said intimation, by<\/pre>\n
filing ESIZ:.{\\pi_i\u00a7’i;i&eafi’tari:..:f;;?’1..9’9’i  the ESI Court at<\/p>\n
Mangaiore. “Tii;.e_a”ap,u–i.i}:atVi_0r} _’ was dismissed for non<\/p>\n
prosecuxt’inun”by’aVn’ 26.8.1997. Noticing the<\/p>\n
dismiessai oi5″aA;.fspiication, the appeifants issued<\/p>\n
” ‘”vsho'{x:.’:’ce’use’..noti<:esWiinder SASA of the Act seeking to<\/p>\n
.:\u00a7iei;en*ni:neLt'iie".e{\u00a7~ntribution for the period from 1.18.2000<\/p>\n
 An erder was passed an 21.5.2802<\/p>\n
 "-.~.._"dire_,”.SfA3,687;~ with interest fer the eerieef :\u00a5.2.:Q.198\u00a7 to<\/p>\n
 The eepeiiant eise issued snewggceuse neiiees<\/p>\n
sf<\/p>\n
dated 6.9.2081 and 13.2882 te the respondent, preposirzg<\/p>\n
ta determine ESI ccmtribeticn fer ihe subsequent’ve.e’:*i_ed_,v<\/p>\n
2, The resperadeet questioned the”‘4’.__:erdje% ‘<\/p>\n
2135,2392 passed under $.45 ;a’*’efethAe”e.\u00a2Ac\u00e9: %\u00e9gr2e:e_:’s;:’ {he 4<\/p>\n
Show cause netices dated 6.V9.2O{ZiZ2__   <\/p>\n
Es: Apga\ufb01cetien 11\/2002 ;\u00a2g;;eess:e Cemtej’atVV””E’f\u00a7’\u00e9r%gVaIore.VV<\/p>\n
The said appiieatien $3.3 ciis;*r1’i’s:.:”g%c\u00a5’VV\u20ac5′::.’the\u00a7r’eur\u00a7ef that, on
\nacceunt ef dismissai 04? JESI for defauii:
\non 26.8.19\u00a7?e,.[\u00a7r:ve   reached fina\ufb01ity<\/p>\n
and the pg<:n\u00a2i_,'2fe::'v-  .3 re attracted.
\n  t\ufb01Ve"~\u00ab.ffespen:\u00a7ent filed I'v'iFA 4886\/2003<\/p>\n
which eggs" aiiezage\ufb01ieff\u00e9"-\u00a7';9.'2QG5 and the impugned order<\/p>\n
thefe\u00e9eef 'th:e"Ev:SI *Co.L:rt wag set aside and the ES:<\/p>\n
 $;3"';3i\u00e9i'<3:*i" ..1A'1\/2ff\u00a7\u00e9;'Z9'\u00e9\u00e9~\u00a2as directed te be hears: on merits;<\/p>\n
 mean the questien as is, whether it is<\/p>\n
beeje\u00e9 v_%}'g_;L34\u00a7':~'1:;s<:\u00a7;z;\u00a7es of res judieetee The ES: Ceert having<\/p>\n
 taken.' the matter, has gaessee the impugned .}:.3egr2*2ent,<\/p>\n
""x_AAv%;\u00a7f2_e}?ee5i, it has e\u00e9ieesed the aee\ufb01eetieri. Feeiieg aggrieved;<\/p>\n
ifie E$: Qereeret\u00e9erz hes fiiee this aeeeei. <\/p>\n
is
\nif?\n<\/p>\n
.\u00a7<\/p>\n
4. Sri \\f.Narasimha He!ia,k’\u00ab\u00a3e\u00e9:~rrieci cegrzse\u00e9 <\/p>\n
appeltants raised severai cor*;-tsehtions”egairzesttjtheHir\ufb01ptugned’<\/p>\n
Judgment and submitted s(\u00a7bst’a,ht\u00e9a\u00a5euestviens ef few<\/p>\n
raised in the appeal mtereo \ufb01es E1r:;se_”ferr\u00bb;jeterminatieh.<\/p>\n
5. Sr;A!e%;rhed_”Qcxtr\ufb01s-eE~’:for the respondent,
\non the   that, there is correct
\ndete::h1ihVe’tieir;_.,  the ES! Court and hence,<\/p>\n
the imAp:::g’ned’}.ud3:jmer;t__’ti’ees not call for interference.<\/p>\n
 ‘V6; HavVth’gV.h__eerd the teamed counsei on both sides<\/p>\n
 ar1c\u00a3V.,ha.visg>__perused the record; the question for<\/p>\n
‘ *–d’e’tern.\ufb01h\u00a7atio’aV’is:\n<\/p>\n
“.f’V_\\A:’t!hether the impugned order is perverse and<\/p>\n
 estegaret<\/p>\n
7. Undeniabiy, ES}: Application 3,\/1991 was dismissed
\nfer defauit\/hon prosecuticm en 26.8.1997′, The appeiiants
\ninitiated further eroceedings; taking notice 0?’ the dismissat
\nef ES: Appficet\u00e9erz 3\/1991. The ercier passed by the
\nepee\u00e9terzts under 3.45% :3? the Act and ‘th% 2 shew cause<\/p>\n
er<\/p>\n
\/’\ufb02y
\nwe<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
notices issued was questioned in ESI Applicatieh 11\/2002.<\/p>\n
The application was opposed by the appeiiants C0.r’g20’traVti0n<\/p>\n
by fiiing its statement 01′ objections. The ap:j’fiee:’\u00a7ve_hF<\/p>\n
decided against the respondent e_s~te.bi’i:s.hr0:eh.t <\/p>\n
13.5.2003. However, the sarq jgidemeinf4._h’e\u00a7km0__’__Vbeen<\/p>\n
chaiienged was set aside ih.*M4_FA <\/p>\n
dated 5.9.2005 and the E31  xgxiasiidireeted  hear ESI
\nAppiication  question,
\nwhether it is barred  0.\u00a2ii,,r\u00a2efg.I’_j;i2.\u00a7;i.icata.<\/p>\n
8.    ‘i:h-emioiiowing issues on
\n  has taken note of and
\nhas repr0dur:Ve”{1’~ impugned Judgment,<\/p>\n
(i)'”*._ ” _ \\i’\u00a7?’het.her.’:_”..’2’petitioner is not covered from
\n _ ji2′{10.’1989 under the erovisiens 0f
\nE.S’;’IfAct as contended?\n<\/p>\n
:v”‘iV:::”-Whether order 01’ the respondent dated<\/p>\n
j ‘A’;;.”‘2’Z1.Or:3,2{3C32 is iiabfe to be set aside?
\n{f_’i’ii}~.  Whether the hetiee of the respendem’: dated
\n” 6.0.2001 and 2.32002 are iiabie to be set:<\/p>\n
aside?\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
2′<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATES THIS THE 15?” DAY 0:: JUNE, BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.\\.{eNuGc>:s–AvL4}\u00a7;~_V.:;’e\u00a7;v<QA * 2 Miscellaneous First I-'\\DD\u20aca\u00a5 N._S5\u00e934 :”EE’:’V~1fTEe.\\e_A BETWEEN: V % 1′ 1. Employees State Insurance […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nEmployees State Insurance ... vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Employees State Insurance ... vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-24T04:49:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-24T04:49:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":628,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Employees State Insurance ... vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-24T04:49:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Employees State Insurance ... vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Employees State Insurance ... vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-24T04:49:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-24T04:49:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011"},"wordCount":628,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011","name":"Employees State Insurance ... vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-24T04:49:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/employees-state-insurance-vs-sri-subhas-m-kamath-on-16-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Employees State Insurance … vs Sri Subhas M Kamath on 16 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27146\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}