{"id":271465,"date":"2010-09-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010"},"modified":"2017-10-25T03:28:56","modified_gmt":"2017-10-24T21:58:56","slug":"state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto<\/div>\n
-3-\n\nEN T'\u00a7'{E PHGH CGUQ'? G?\" K\u00a7&R\u00a7'\u00a7\ufb01'??\u00a7.KPs AT EAWC\u00a7AL{)R.:\u20ac{T\nBat\ufb01\u00e9: 23% day of Sczpiembar 2&3   \n\nPmsent   '\nEwiazfbig Mr. Jus\ufb01ce K.SRE\ufb01\u00a7IZ}%iAR _F'<'\u00a3x{:%. :2. b  <\n\ufb01nd & ' M '\n\ni-'\u00a3<:}33.'b1e Mr.Justic;\u00a7 3.v'.":?;.:s%*:*0\n\ncamzrsgi, APFEEEL i9&:{[1 :26. 1 {V\u20ac2'\u00a3%:;f'.3 ' \n8 BEN; \\' V _ _ .. _\n\nStats 3:' Iiaxmataka  H \n\nRegby Ja,E,a_1:2a}fii.fP'<:r?;;i<:e;_S\u00a5a'f;ia\u00a7\u00a7.1;\u00a7.:'  '  "\nBaixgaiere.        \n\nAggy S\u00a7fi,i?\u00a7..\u00a3\u00a7i;;:\u00a7,?:::a;\u00a7fg,1;\u00a7a:fnez:\u00a7iv  _ 3??)\nAnd": V & A %\n1. Ma:1\u00a7{::3g?{Kti2a;.V'(\u00a7: \n\nS'5;j'~::L_  '\n._' ;%'\u00ab:..g:f:\u00e9E aiaoui 2'?---\u00a7,f@;ars.,\n\n    {B\ufb01a\u00e9}.\n\n3, A  \n"W\/v{:z. $331116-aiah,\n\ufb01xge\u00e9; abmri 45 gems.\n._ F395. 1 and 3 313% R\/a N0. 135,\n" ;?\u00a3r1.:__1r;:3si;a\u00a7?az';a 81-szssak.\nYeshwanthgura,\nEanga3;\u00a7raI3d:=:: -~ \ufb01xdvmrzate}\n\n\/\/1\n\n\n\n\",2-\n\n(;Tii:':7:11\u00a7:1a} Apggtzai is \ufb02ied zmaieaz\" Saciiazi \n\u20ac:'31'.P.\u20acfl against. tizzz or\u00e9ez' of acqxi\ufb01ttal iiaitztd }.3~3'\u00a2\u00a7%:\u20ac?{\u00a7\u00a3%\n\npassad ':33; Km: X1} zalfiiiigif\ufb01f Civil 3% Se\ufb01sir\u00e9ns\u00e9'\";i';:__\u00a7_\u00a7g;a::_? _\n\nBangalare City, in S.\u20acZ.N0.E34{),\/43?.\n\nThig C3:'1,A C\ufb01liiiiig 012 for \u00a71r\u00a7}:\u00e9} 4i:\u00a7g A\u00a73{:\u00a7b:*c_TVi\u00a79:\u20ac; V{T';<33iu:'t;;\nthis day, upon h\u20ac:ari:1.g, B.V.\u00a5\u00a7i$1{f\u00a7;" .. *ri_e'\u00a7iv'*e:"c::<{=..,_ i;'\u00a7~;:.;'\n\nf\u20ac::1}Qw\u00a7:':g: -  _ \nJ5Dam\u00a7\u00a737\n'mgwmag\ufb01@ma@s@gm\ufb02w@gme\narder Gf acquittal dated. 1:3\u00bb3vj?QG\u00ab3 p;\u00e9I$\u00a7ed by the XE};\n\nmas. City _c:::_\u00a7rg1  ,%1;;;agek,%B%a;zga1om City, in\n\nS.C.NQ;V5M4"\u00a33'   reapandents of the\ne\ufb01enaeg.gna\u00a2r;s\u00a7;aegg.\u00e993-A,:xy@\u00a3a 302 read 34\nWC 312-\u00a7LASe4t\u00e9tir:31;1sV.v3,A.%%\u00bb  62 5f 'Qma2'r'y Pz*9}1ibi.ti\u00abi:a:1 Act'\n\n    cf the presecagakun \ufb01g that the\n\n{\ufb01e\u20aci:\u00e9_a\u00e9\u00e9\u00a7"_~?\u00a7_a\u00e9;'afatE1na was married tats A4 Majzjzzrgath\n\nV --V 0:1  Surizig the mamriage, on the yart af\n\n ' . ~bi:\u00a7'dgwgfb0m a \u00e9ema\ufb01\u00e9 was ma\ufb01a far \u00e9ewry an\u00e9\n\n'  \u00e9';;c <.3'\u00e9'r:133;'::g}j\u00ab_y-' the parents Qf \u00e9\u00e9ceased gave Qs.25,0\u20ac)G\/ -\n\n 23} cash, 8 gins of Kapaii ring to the gmom A4 and 45\n\ngmg sf Rvaiakk\u00e9 Chaim 15 gms Gf M'ange:~11}\u00bb*a chain, 32\n\ngmg sf $2iI"~$t\u00a5_1\ufb02, hangings ameci maxi, $:.{b3eque:*:$ Ea\n\n\n\n-3."\n\nthe marriage, when the deceased P\u20acag:a_:*athna"--..:aras\n\nresiding in the heuse 0? her \n\nrespc::f:1der1t~acc'used were abusing fiiiif\ufb01i ._ \n\niariguage and ugeci ts assaultii\ufb01 j. \n\nwake her up at 2.00 am a\u00bb:'1.z\u00a7_ for\u00e9ziegi' 1:9 d;o '%t\u00a7:%\u00a7_V_}1o_\u00a7;1$\u00e9M \n\nbald work, A\u00bb I \/ }r1i;1sb:a;:1.:'1:1 AM}, and Ar? Eaek\ufb01 the\n\nham\ufb01s cf 7(iL\u00a2%c9ev:a$e;df\"' gacresi fire hen {homada\n\n \"kur;:.d:a}'vv3\":;3dj AV-- I3\"-::\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7::,\u00a7}_,;$.~*\u00bb.3~<:i keregene avg: her and iii: fire,\n\n ._\u00e9\u00a3a:e"--.to~ ;rL:%1\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7'deceased sustained Etmrn\u00e9ng ifijur\u00e9es.\n\n was shifted ta Raghavendra. Nursing\n\n "<,., 'Hc\u00abm.e "f'\u00a7f:: treatment am\ufb01 she East hm" breath an S7?'\n\n   about 3.45 pm, thereby, the proseauiian\n\n aifages that the accuseci haxra aammftted the\n\n' " afarementimzed Gffermgg.\n\n\u00a7\n\n\n\n_. 4 VR\n3. 'E'.E3& pmsecution, in rarder is pmvg its "case,\n\nhas exajnirza\ufb01 -it': all 22 ivitness\u00e9s, gcat markea:;\u00a7_"'w\u00a7x.3'."E??--\n\nE in P-26 an\u00e9 pm\ufb01azced 5433-} to 4, Aftar--E\u00a7.:'&3z"\u00a7%1'\u00e9\u00a7 \n\npresecution aud tha \u00e9efence, V-!:?'ie'~\u00abEea:'ne.ri *ESy3e$s--\u00a7.{:;nV\u00e93\n\nLiudge was pkease\ufb01 to   \n\nindependagfit carrobaratierl "~:\u00a7\u00a7"\u00bbthe '&3x;%_Ic\u00a7e.\u00e9.-'.m\u00e9v_  the\nwitnesses; {km the \ufb01j\ufb01zag d' \u00e9\u20ac: \u00e9f:J"\u00e9.'\u00a7:i\u00a2fk..ifS 110$ gcifcsve\u00e9 as\nthe \u00e9ociar has net cariifietig \u00a7{{}_\u00a7efr&'\u00a7_f3ViE"i;';f--V'the fpati\u00e9nt is\n\nin 3. fit \u00a2o1f;ei\u00a71"\u00a7ti{\u00a7:'i'_V  _s5:a\u00a3 ef\ufb011'eiii an\ufb01 that the\n\nevi\ufb01engi\u00e9 5&5'~2%\u00a7:{:tm\u00a3\u00a7$s=3\u00e9aia ctz\ufb01tra\u00e9iciorjs. Cir: 'ihesa\ngr::;m1ds"'*\u00a3:;}3'ieM 35e:\u00bb*=;:%*:2L}Qw';\u00a5}""S_;{:=i;'s::\u00bb:.*"*\u00a3mr:$ &udg& aequitte\u00e9 the\n\nrespegnzis\ufb01isj;  appeai is fiiad $35? the S\u20ac:.a.t.em\n\n  \ufb01\ufb01arasaiah is the campiainant artz\ufb01\n\nf?\u00a27J?T_}iT'%::f\u00abA07Vf 5f1_:_v21~:~__ \u00a7\u00a7.:fe'{:7ea.sed'. Pie: has Stated \ufb01zat at tha time\n\n.19?"  asf his \ufb01aughwr Nagarathzza 1%: gave\n\n "'. \u00a7;\u00e9.Q\u00a7.A,A5\u00a7'G\/- as \u00e9owr}? ta tha accused mid 8i} gins sf\n\nHts E23 daughtar, A5311: 3% msnths after\n\n " .mar3*:'age_\u00a7 the scrapie was resi\u00e9ing happiiy.\n\n'E'hereaf1:er, {ha first respondent cieman\u00e9e\u00e9 fer \u00a7~\u00a7e:*o<\/pre>\n
it<\/p>\n
\/\/V<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
Handa, vehiitia, far Wixich PW\u00ab\u00bb\u00a7 staie\u00e9 that %:h\u20acre\u00a7’–._:Isa_s<\/p>\n
rm d\u00e9scussiarz in this regami am\u00e9 refuse\u00e9 ‘1:G_….1i’:E”;eE’\u00a7;\u20ac33’t.'”ihftfj<\/p>\n
aieman\u00e9 . Thereafter, the: accuse\u00e9 starfz:\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7E”~;ans’:\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9;;1i\u00a7t\u00a3f:gT  ‘ <\/p>\n
his \u00e9aughter an\u00e9 about 3-4 t:”:Aneg fif3\u00e9’._\ufb01’i9$<: :<\/p>\n
assau\u00e9te\u00e9 hm \ufb01zaazghter a\ufb01d.__.se\ufb01t.V_h':zr t\u00a5T:V"\u00a7"\u00a7,\u00a7VE\u00a74_}1C)_:1';1$ \u20ac%._ .<\/p>\n
The 'adiiageg \ufb01\ufb01ers a\u00e9\ufb01sed  ':'I–Q  gQe 'x%\u00a7%ahic1e 'ta
\nfirst accused hjg: next.-..V\u00a7'1az\u00a7VI\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:i Thereafier, he
\ncama \ufb01e kxm\u00a7vf_ 'L151_ a.t ".bm":1t in the
\nhmzse of   ta Eag\u00a7*1a';re1i1dra
\n suffering \ufb01ne :0
\nbum i1*3;\u00a7':;*vjr%*f\u00a3"es;. '  &3__'fJ8 '\u20ac\u00a7':\ufb01\u20ac'@E\u00a7;fi'E1' SE15 &\u00e9ee:i.<\/p>\n
Thereafter \u00a2\u00a2mp1a ;in\u20ac;' usgags gi"i}e?. 1:0 the p\ufb02iiceb E%:x,i~3'\u00abE.<\/p>\n
 V  C:\u00e9;;"\u20ac::\u00a7'ii3._ir:t, HS has been. <m:3s$—e:<:aIt3\u00e9:1e\u00e9 E3}? the<\/p>\n
\u00a7e\ufb01\u00e9.:;\u00a7:\u00e9"  is suggeste\ufb01 that hig daughter<\/p>\n
— 3u$\u00e9\u00e9’s:”\u00a71’*:\u00e9:\u00e9Ad 7{::7\u00a7;1r”:”: izgjazriea acc\u00e9\u00e9entaiiy ax ‘tha time when<\/p>\n
V’ ‘. E1i\u20ac3r*:2z\u00bb; was perfgrrned in \ufb01e hmise.<\/p>\n
”  ?\u00a5\u00a7?’~\u00bb2 Smt.Jaya1nma, ?’W’-3 Smt\ufb01atihnamma,<\/p>\n
 Sm$w;%ra.samm_a.,, PWF5 Sm:.Laks?:1’r2a:r”r:ma$ ?’\ufb01\u00a7\u00bb\u00ab<\/p>\n
5 Smi\ufb01havani 832%; P”*.?\u00a5J-?’ Sm’\u20ac-E=?3.amaba;\u00a7. and FW~\u00ab8<\/p>\n
.5-\n<\/p>\n
Rama have fumed hostiie :3 the case Qf-~.___$:.he<\/p>\n
pmsecutian. All of them are ne\u00a7gh’%30u;f$_’ <\/p>\n
aacuged persons.\n<\/p>\n
6. PW~9 Ra1T1akrishn23;p;:\u00a7\u00e9AA’V\u00a7’$_3\u00a7A”tAh’\u20ac_ <\/p>\n
the seizure cf kerasene s’:;\u00a3\u00a7L1’i..ff:I.I’1.d ‘th\u00e9r cloth\u00e9s.  ths-2 <\/p>\n
seem: cf Qffence, as per Ex, <\/p>\n
‘? . PWWIQ T  is igh\u00e9 elder
\nbr\ufb01ther Qf  \u00a7*i”e7  about the
\npaymam: of LgA{}’i’;i\u00a7\u00e9va9\u00a7”v %3rnaments in the
\naccu4s5:[dEH \u00e9s”   thereafter the
\n accuseci daman\ufb01izzg fer<\/p>\n
scocter ;*e\u00a7”c:Tei\u00a7t \u00a7:>f\u00a7i;:\u00a3’at:z1ati_an regarding \u00e9eafta sf<\/p>\n
{he  a’@\u00a27e:a.=\u00a7\u00a2:c\u00a7_.0n accaunt of bum injuries.<\/p>\n
  Gangaiah 3.3 another elder brethear cf<\/p>\n
V -V TPWVJI.  alga; stated ragar\ufb01ing the paggmarzt af<\/p>\n
   d7m3:-3:};  3.130 the demand for scocater and the talks of<\/p>\n
 ccgmpromise 17:”: connection with the ciemarz\ufb01 far<\/p>\n
 St\ufb01\ufb01ikf\ufb01f’. it “sis suggested to him that a faE:~3& \u00e9amplaint<\/p>\n
has been \ufb02ied against the accused<\/p>\n
,7-\n<\/p>\n
Q. PW~E’2 Gcswramma is the mother af d\u00e9\u00a2:\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7;$:\u00e9d<\/p>\n
Nagarathna. She has aim) corroborated  <\/p>\n
of PWs-“1, ‘\u00a36 and H. rega.rc’vi%Zi9i\u00e9g “t..’r\u00e9;\u00e9’_ <\/p>\n
scooter after th\u00e9 max\ufb01agzp a:’::.i *..t}xe <\/p>\n
metedmzut ‘$9 the  the
\ndeman\ufb01’, She has  0f\u00a7 c\u00e9:ming to
\nknow ef the ‘bu’t**r1 in\u00a7;.3i*\u00a7:\u00e9s:’~\u00a7:%\u00a51’;%\u00a73′<:i i#\u00ab:\u00bb':\u00a7\u00a7\u00bb.2%\u00a7a":*athna, she
\nwent ts thfe-V  her \u00e9aughte?\n<\/p>\n
was    far three daj\u00ab:;~:.,
\n“3”heres:;i’i\u00a2f’,4’_”\u00a7’p:<::ken it: her arz\ufb01 t03& her<\/p>\n
that accus"e:d"ha$:eA~\u00a7;m?u'%e& kerasene and 3&1: fire is<\/p>\n
   [3r.Fvi.G.Shi.vara:nu has con\ufb01ucied<\/p>\n
\u00a7oAs–f;:_Vrz':\u00a2e'r'\u00a3:;e7:\u00a7::1V;a\u00a7 the deceased on 6~n"?\u00ab~}_9\u00a7'?, H3 has<\/p>\n
 'v3:.'\u00a7\u00a7a3: daczease\u00e9 suffered 65% bum injurias an<\/p>\n
  giersan and that the death is dim to gai\u00e9 S\u20ac':V\u20acI"8<\/p>\n
 'warn i.nj\u00b0:..2:*ias.\n<\/p>\n
‘H. P’\u00a5.7\\?–~}4~ Eivenkatesfz is a relative of<\/p>\n
ciecaase\ufb01 P\u00e9agarathna. \ufb01e ‘has aigo stat\u00e9\ufb01 ;Qa\u00a7;\u00b0=1*r1&n’E af<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
\/X<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
Rs.25,000\/~ and gold articies given to the 3.CC’L3.$\u00a3%_%Zi’~._at<\/p>\n
the time of marriage of deceased. with A:’–“i:..’ <\/p>\n
further stateci regarding the harms_me:’\ufb01:”g:\u20ac%\u00e9\u00a7n \u00a7;:;;%_:3;hLe;  ‘<\/p>\n
aacuszed persans while decaas\u00e9tzi \u00a33-Y\u00e9\u00e9; },\u00a7;\u00a5Q”‘3’\ufb02g_i’t.”}’V<\/p>\n
hcnuse. He has; also stateci’-fIfi\u00e92A\u00bbrec”e*ipf ;:3\u00a7’:”iI2u\u00a7*:\u00a74i%\ufb012\u00a7tio:1″‘<\/p>\n
regarding \u00e9eath of 3I)_\u00a7.1I”1’;’ii’Vi”]7’\u00a3n.{A:Vt:,”‘V’:’i&S.<\/p>\n
12% PW45   of the
\ndeceased.   taken part in
\nthe neg<3iiia\u00a5{3;\u00a7ic:i\u00a5i:\u00a7\u00a7VVh\u00bbV. an& giving of
\ngold   turned hestiie to tha
\ncase of <\/p>\n
  P\\\u00bbVu~\u00a5'f\u00a7_6—…T}1imma\u00a7,ah is the Witness m the<\/p>\n
 on the dead body of the deceased<\/p>\n
as pa\u00e9r 3:'-:1.'<\/p>\n
 x j  PW~–}'? ?.R.Jayara1\u00b0n is the Scierztifiscz Qf\ufb01cer<\/p>\n
. in_ *F\u00a7L, Bangalezsre. H3 has subjected the clothes<\/p>\n
  -w\ufb01nrn by the \u00e9ecease\ufb01 at the time af burning anci 3339<\/p>\n
ihe kerosana can and a match ‘I303: far ch\u00e9micai<\/p>\n
8\u00a7{aI”\u00a3Iiif\u00a7.&'{iQ1′”\u00a3 and has Qpineci that M03 1 an\u00e9 2 Sare&<\/p>\n
-9″\n<\/p>\n
and Petticaat of \ufb01eczeased cazatained. k\u00a33Ef\u00a33SfB.’i”EE<\/p>\n
reznnanis. He has issua\u00e9 the certificata a.s_.’;\u00a7;_\u00a7:r ‘E3*\u00ab~u<\/p>\n
13. He has camgorica\ufb01jg cimiie\u00e9 i:1.V__l’1:I::\u00a7:e”\u00ab<\/p>\n
examinaticn that if karcgene jsj; “‘pii\u00a5;’\u20ac)nvv..L%’Vth$A’<\/p>\n
‘homakunda’ an& set fire, \u00a3}1a3aIii.’3.iX?0ui:i”s:;:\u00a7I\u00a7 \u20acIvl’\u00a7:\u00a7 the: *.<\/p>\n
szaree and petticcai ”  Elfge ” .{:i\u00e9V\u00a7;:ejas%fd, thus
\nnegativing the thegiggf .. <\/p>\n
\n\n15. W35: an Assistant\nin the  Bangaiare Rafa}\na3:3.CI    Bangaism North\nTaluixz\ufb01  Medical Ht33pi'ita.E\n\n<\/pre>\n
and ff\ufb01{\u00a7)I’ld1,ID(f\u00a7*\u00a33\u00a3VC\u00a7’..i’\u00a7?’E\u20aci:\u00a7L3.1E\u00b0,*V\u00a7”& preceedt\u00e9ngs over the \ufb01ea\u00e9<\/p>\n
 ae\u00a2e5;.gea as per Ex,P-12 the isrfiquest<\/p>\n
A  _ ‘V <    i V V <\/p>\n
 };\u20ac*–._;"  Dr.K.M.Venkatara.ma.na was a<\/p>\n
 Raghaverzcira Nursing Heme during the<\/p>\n
-‘ perimci. He has stated that C3\/V\u00ab2E3<\/p>\n
‘”w. \u00bbVD”r.}?amachandraiah has given treatment to the<\/p>\n
\u00e9eceased Nagarathria on Qiw\ufb01-1.997. He has fuzthex’<\/p>\n
…1(}..\n<\/p>\n
statad that whiie in th& hospita}, Nagarajihanawgave<\/p>\n
statement t0 the poiice as per Ex.P- 14 <\/p>\n
i\ufb01entifie\u00e9 his signature as Ex.P~14{a)’ ,<\/p>\n
that he was present when the gstatt.-;{I’11e5i1\u00a3’:\u00e93f’–.d\u00a3;r:e\u00a7$\u00a7:df<\/p>\n
was recorded by the police’ agtad thaf r1e<:~.ea;\u00a7cd_w2\u00a7s i1:._ \u00bb<\/p>\n
3. fit condition to give ‘stater:;\u00e9ff;;\u00a3\u00a7.–..<\/p>\n
\n
17. PW—-2O  Emspectmr
\nof Police in ‘V  the Poiice
\ninspector    during ihe
\nreievaxgt’  an 3&3?-1997 he
\nhas recg\u00e9sigg\u00e9d  ta this case fan’ further<\/p>\n
inVas;V*:ig3.ti::;41’1  oA’if1V 4—8~1.99\u00a7’7 he has visite\ufb02 the<\/p>\n
.’ V. ‘”s<::ef1'5-; 5-\u00a7*:~c"r\ufb01e1j:Ce,A 1\ufb01$'f\u00e9AJpareci the $ke'\u00a3c:h as per' Ex.F'~i\u00a7,<\/p>\n
1*43c:\u00bb:'3_;"\u00ab:iec'{"'-\u00ab3Vt;2.\u00a3&e.:'ir1ant3 sf certain witrzessas, serif: the<\/p>\n
V _ mai\u00e9riai\ufb01. ':25 FSL, Bangalczre, taken statement fmm<\/p>\n
 and after' cza\ufb01ecting the me&\u00e9ca}<\/p>\n
 c:i?t'\u00a7C';::'1'i;r1er1t3, \ufb02ied the Charge: sheet'<\/p>\n
'18. Pww\ufb01i is Dr.C}.Ra1nachandraiah wag<\/p>\n
vmrking in Raghavendra Nursing Rama as a visi'\u00a3i.ng<\/p>\n
I'<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
,1},<\/p>\n
ccynsuitant since 1989. He has state<:1 that he.__has<\/p>\n
treated She deceaased \ufb01agarathna in the h:3\u00a7~;3\u00a7\u00a5::.5\u00a7ELj'~.T:'iv:2<\/p>\n
the year E998 the management. ch1a 3:_ige <i <\/p>\n
thereafter he is net visiting fh\u00e9 I"\u00a5_\ufb01f'3\u00a71\u00a71'7!_g'1<\/p>\n
hag stated that in View :35 _4cha1*1':ge"~ sf a'::'\u00e9i:*3.\u00a3\u00a7g:e:1i\u00a2Sfi\u20ac; "' <\/p>\n
the case sheet pertaining   is not
\navailabie. He has  hagg V\ufb01nfczzrmed
\nthe Court sheet of *:h&
\ntie ceased x=a\u00a7rI*'1%r;\n<\/p>\n
I9:   was the Police
\n\u00a7I}spec:’\u00a3;’:3;””  Stat\u00e9an during the<\/p>\n
reievaj\ufb01 \u00a7::1e ?i’=\u00a70fi.._QI\u00a7’–.\u00a3h\u00a32i’:basi.3 of the Cempiaint EXP\u00bb<\/p>\n
 ,’ h’\u00a7\u00a7.”‘:ha\u00a7:\u00a7 re:a;:er\ufb01V\u00e9&””ihe mra in cmama,\/9′? Cm 2:>\u00bb\u00e9-<\/p>\n
  he has v’isi_t@\u00e9 Raghagfenzira<\/p>\n
%  J %\u20acuAr:~’;ing_v’\u00a7*l’r:\u00a7:E\ufb01\u00e9 am; after cxbtax\ufb01ning the Qpir’:i.GI’: of the<\/p>\n
#%iii;;*:c:\u00a5,:_:t*,.1.’**;e could rm’: record the $t.3i’i$i’}fT\u00a3$i’1f of<\/p>\n
Nsagafathna since sha was not in a positian to give<\/p>\n
\u00e9\u00e9aternent. Thereafter, he visited the scene cf<\/p>\n
\u00aeC$1J:{T*3t’l(3$, seized EV\u00a7’C}-5 tha plastic kaemgene can, 2<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
42$<\/p>\n
%umt matci\ufb01es, 6 Ewing match gt\u00e9ckg as par \u00a7’s\u00a3\u00a3Z3s;’-:_E to<\/p>\n
\ufb01n He has arreated Aw”! to 3 on *2I~6\u00bb~\u00a799′?4,.A..;\u00a7;;\u00a7:&\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7?;$\u00a7\u00a7V.<\/p>\n
the statement Gf injure\u00e9 in the hospitaih   <\/p>\n
14 befare ‘rim doctcrer and at thaf :,\u00e9h_e*<\/p>\n
condz’3:i_0n ‘:16 give $t3_teme2*1\u00a3..* Q1″: $’=.?%”299?\u00bb”\u00a7’r$~ .\u00a7jj\u00e9ce:f.v\u00e9:f <\/p>\n
the Death Memo
\nThereafter, he has  to AC? fear
\nfurthar invest\u00a7_g_a;iiig\u00a7n.  — if Vv V<\/p>\n
26. it fa these witnesses
\nfiiae  fburz\ufb01 that the
\nprms:ecz;: ‘ii\u00abc>if1″_  in bringing heme the<\/p>\n
guiit 0f_ihe%xr:\u00a2’usefd \u00e9::2 ci” }:1e:nce acquittgd the accused<\/p>\n
 0.f  ;r;L\u00a7’fe’r1.ces’V\u00e9E1e7i?\u00e9I’\u00a7e\u00a7 agains\u00e9 tham. E: is this<\/p>\n
v”T.r–:\ufb01:f:.quittaI which is chaiienged by \ufb01ne<\/p>\n
  ‘ Sta’b<5.__\u00a7n  .:'~*a\u00a7pea\u00a7.\n<\/p>\n
 .A  \u00e9’iv—-.:\u00a7-I\u00e9arci Mr. H’.S.Cha_n.dramQuIi, learne\ufb02<\/p>\n
 _””.!S ;”?v,’P;”Aa\ufb01\u00e9 Mr,.\u00a7?.B.Beshparz\u20acie Eesxned Ceunsei far<\/p>\n
T  ..if\u00e9spen\u00e9entswaccusad and perused the materialg,<\/p>\n
(‘<\/p>\n
,1}-\n<\/p>\n
22. Learned SPF’ submits that the eviciezj__;::e of<\/p>\n
PWS 1, :0, 11, 12, 14 and 19 is materia} to <\/p>\n
:33.” the prosecution an\ufb01 gut (sf them PWS   <\/p>\n
19 have spoken regaz\ufb02ing the iiiwfr\u00e9affr\u00e9ezzt <\/p>\n
ta the deceased and also the d\u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01iad <\/p>\n
the accused at the time    the
\ndemand fer scooter     further
\nStated that P- .14 c\u00a7_aa.r\u00a73.>
\nand squa1″:.e.1\u00a7–.:,   of offgrmes by
\nthe   cgharged, in that the
\n\u00e9ying i\u00e9sit\u00e9blishes the satting caf fire<\/p>\n
by A43  \u00a7i:\u00e9\u00e9’\u00a2eased by Au} and A53 at the<\/p>\n
 …. .~’?herefm”e, he submitg that the<\/p>\n
 estab\ufb01shed the case of c3mmi\u00a7:ti.ng<\/p>\n
Yf1\u00a31YF$\u00a7\ufb01E”V.Of” }_ci*\u00e9cea.$ed by the acztmse\ufb01 and tharefara<\/p>\n
 3;1=’\u00a7*iiable to be convicted for the Said effemce.<\/p>\n
 _”i+EV\u00e9-f\u00b0e_.z;9:’ther submits that the dgcifar wha taras presant<\/p>\n
  -atftiae time 0′? recm*diz1g the dying deciaratian Ex’?-1.4<\/p>\n
 has mat QI’}.\u00a7\u00a7-‘ signe\u00e9 it but icierfztified tha same befbra<\/p>\n
..;4,.\n<\/p>\n
the Caurt. Ha has aiso stajte\u00e9 {\ufb01at injure\u00e9 ‘$3933 in a
\nfit C\ufb01\ufb02d\ufb01ii\ufb01fi ta giare statemem’: at the time cf recarding<\/p>\n
E>;:.E3-\u00a74′ Ba fu.z*ther submits that since <\/p>\n
thumb c::\u00a7 the injured 2.19353 bmnt, tha <\/p>\n
takan the {EM Qf tha deceiasaci .a.ne1ie’ve the v\u00e9rsii\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01’  <\/p>\n
deceased at the time V0_f”‘~.._raci%1’z?iif1gV”,t?:\u00a7”‘Lcif\u00a2’ing ‘<\/p>\n
deciaration, Un\u00e9erv rthe \u20ac\u00a711f’ff”‘C:TLA2:fi’1S \u00a5’i&7′!.}Z”1{Zt”.~*’,SA,’ E1\u00e9E\u00a7  further
\nsubmits that the \ufb01\u00e9ff-Z\u00a7f’iV{‘.:\u00a3\u00a7A <::v'1\u00a7'v'\u20ac::h?5e  baing whiie
\n\u00a2o1;.ducti_:n.g  151:: g\ufb01ie }E3\ufb01:.'uw$e.\u00a7 the deseased
\nacc:\u00a7de1\ufb01:aE_I\u00a7  "iii:-*_:':v.fr~,1_g};.1i:  in _' her" sari and therafare<\/p>\n
burning i.r?:\u00a7:1r\u00a3es~–xa?e\u00e9"a. E:-a\u00e9ised to the decease\u00e9 \u00a33 net<\/p>\n
 prabgfbiise\ufb01V1f::\u00a7:._ \u00a7ef\u00a7nc:e. The defenca has not<\/p>\n
 pi*fcsx\u00a7::,2c\u00a7c:i'.3.z1Af;*~-.r1::3.!:eriaE is shew that whglrzirz hnma svag<\/p>\n
EQ';5}C;{'E\u00a3Cf6C3–.v.V'_:='%'\u00a7f\u00a71$tf\u00a7 the deceased szmtaizmd bumg<\/p>\n
'.aCci\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9:1t:3\u00a7}}?. Ever: the answers to the qamstians put<\/p>\n
   Sect\u00e9cgn 3&3 Cr:P.\u20acZ statement in\u00e9icate that<\/p>\n
 was 1:0 suggestican \ufb01\u00e9at the deceased had<\/p>\n
 ~  ac:::i\u00e9e::ta\ufb01j; mzffem\ufb01 bum \u00e9rxjurieg whib ::':\u00a7r:d2,a<:t1'n.g<\/p>\n
~13\u00bb-\n<\/p>\n
hsma in the house. Ur\ufb01er the circzjmmances, he<\/p>\n
submits that the accused. have takea i”‘a3;.ge <\/p>\n
xxfhich is \ufb01at probabie’<\/p>\n
23. The learned HCCXF? ‘\u00e9:a,s\u00ab Q \u00a2sAg2.g;a%%;:k%VA<\/p>\n
d@ci.si0n reportecl in   A’ <\/p>\n
gaoviwmpm 82; Others V\u00e9””L’=\u00a7’f;ATE k:3%1%*%&%%:\u00ab:;w_%rsg,A;9i’%A:_\u00a3 _ 7 ‘ Certi\ufb01cation by
\ndoctor;-_\u00bbVa3;5’tiQ fit. <:LoI1c1i?:\u00a7V::;'i' o'f""ciecaa$ed -~ is
\nesseinti.ajE1\u00a7?'"fa1e"–\u00e9\u00a7f E:33;g.ti}::\u00bb:1_=-4- Voiuntargs and
\nt1f*_1;_th\ufb01;%"' 1'\u00ab;:;;s:,tu.:'e~V_"–\u00bb3"fA …,<ie,\u00a3:1aration can be
\n;;~\u00e9s1:$\u00a7*3\u00a5.is:fhed f'V<\u00a7?}\u00a7,e:.::fix:\u00a3_se_  Evidence of dcaater
\n{:~1ea':I*'iyV s}\u00a3;i)fza;ST.thT:3gf'–decease\u00e9 was in szsught
\nstaife' of 'm.i::.\u00a3:i– \u00a5:hii'e""giving sizseiemmiic bafam
\n'\u00a7'ahS–i\u00a7c:ia;: —-~_ Sv_,:Ch~7&\u00a7.:ir2g \ufb01eciaraticm hag gcgt<\/p>\n
5 'wgight in \u00e9x'.%id\u00e9z1ce".\n<\/p>\n
23\u00a2 _4C;?_r1 the other hand, Mr.RB.\u00a7eshpar:de<\/p>\n
 learned Sessions Ju\u00e9ge has<\/p>\n
-‘appr e:Qie’1:;eCi”t}1e evidence in a preper perspective and<\/p>\n
   \u00a31%1a order cf aczquittal. He further suismits<\/p>\n
 t}i;;3f: in the F’\u00a5F\u20ac. there is 1710 mention regarding \ufb01emarz\ufb01<\/p>\n
  f\u00a7r dswry at a\ufb01 and th\ufb01 a\ufb02egatimzs under the DOW3″:’;\/<\/p>\n
Prahibition Act are net prcvesti- He aise gubm\u00e9ts that<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
.. 15 ..\n<\/p>\n
30 far as the <;\u00a5j;'ing decxiaratian ig C\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9g fh\ufb01
\npregecuizimrtz papers \u00e9ndicatg that the left hand of th\ufb01<\/p>\n
\u00e9ec:eas3& was fuiijs burrs: and the medical {wipers<\/p>\n
indicate that the right palm cf the damaged ..'\u00e9i;'.\u00a7;E\u00a7. ?i.i~\u00a7t<\/p>\n
burnt. Therefom, the presacutimz t%1e02jg);'– <\/p>\n
pa\ufb01ce have taken the LTM of C1i&<:\u20ac\u00bb."3.se<:}'1 o\u00e9_\u00a7 E:.~?–7% :i;:~::  V<\/p>\n
faisa agrzci '\u00a7Zh3I'8f{3I'\u00a2P3.; in viau? of ".e:1,::;?f2xa. s'2'\u20ac.:,2z~;ta7ori,,\u00bb_"1;:}; e7'._<\/p>\n
contents Qf Ex.P~ 1.14 &LI'7t"\u00a7.:F"MT{1(\u00a73ZV."-:\u00a3f;\u00a7f"\u20ac;"%.'a:?'\u00a7={i '1.b':\u00a7\u00e9:g:fOI"\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7.V'<\/p>\n
reaacnabie doubt, if  -'  t%z ai ft\u00a7.9\u00bbw*h8re<\/p>\n
in E\u00a7<:.f'-3; the dczctor that the
\npati&r2t \u00a7*qL2$ \u00a321:  'to give statement, 1*: is
\n{mi}; bef0Vf'a_<  i:h\u00e9  desist states that the
\npatiezjit' wag 'Vin izsn\ufb01iiian ts: give the 3t3:l:eme:1t.<\/p>\n
  'E;Fr1Vc'\u00a7E\u00ab'::; s5=:l';\u00a7::%9i a<;irc1:1"\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7ta.z1<::es, he submits that E3;:,P~\u00abE4<\/p>\n
':33"s}i:*s"ji:\u00ab\u00a7\u00e9\u00bb:i"A.Tjga\ufb01\u00a7.ih suspicion. The 991111893 further<\/p>\n
sz:}:::::t%eCd'.V–V\u00a5:h\u00a7'\u00e9l\u20acV strangeiy in this case th\u00e9 entire saga<\/p>\n
 sheeh'i:"  b\u00e9en suppressed b}; the pmsecutimz an& it<\/p>\n
n   ~s?a\u00a7.\u00a7_;<:\u00e9t\u00e9Vci. 0:53};-* in {\ufb01e evidence 9%' E. that tha {:a_\u00a7e<\/p>\n
   are net ava\ufb02abie dug ta changa 3?"\n<\/p>\n
r<\/p>\n
-1?\u00bb<\/p>\n
management’ Ur\ufb01er {ha c\u00e9rcumgiancasg ;  tha<\/p>\n
candition 0%’ %:E”:& patietzt\/cieceased at the <\/p>\n
gh\ufb01 gave the statament E:\/<:.P~'i4 is nGt_pz \u00a7\u00a7fV\u00a7c\u00a7.A.T.ii:;\u00a7.;_  ..<\/p>\n
pmse:::u,tion bejgand reasenai\ufb01ie :..ci Gf1_{\u00a7:&$:."' , '.i*\u00a7f\u00a7\u00e9:vf@Lf@r\u00a7:,'<\/p>\n
he submitg that the crder*Gf__acqi1~f_t'\u00a3.a3\u00a7V  <\/p>\n
Sessions Judge is in accardg\ufb01ae with i5E'3@:V\u00a7':%i\u00a2'f:er1<:s-3 can
\nrecord and (36233 \ufb01at 'iraii.-.fCr 3.%\u00a7.z*\u00a7.tf’~\u00a7:c::;qLii’\u00a5f:a}7 rm  be aon\ufb01zmed<\/p>\n
by rejecting’ Ii\u00a5_\u00e9sh.pande reiieci upon
\nthe Cie?\u00a7#\u00a3!i:$k’j;%)!#3VA gosj\u00e9mg saw 797 {SAIEQH
\nRAFIQ ,?3xnat}1_ \u00e91’\u00a7L:.’A”$%\u00e9*””\u00ab.. : E;?TATE OF M’A}-fA\u00a5\u20ac_ASi-iTRA)
\nsvhezf\u00bb;3i:1L.}\u20ace$%;&’N_VG5tie  Iieads thus\u00bb<\/p>\n
V ‘s'{.$?X}.Ei.$;i<".ie:1ce Act (1 af 18'?'2) $.32 ~ Sjiimg<\/p>\n
T.d<~:_;(i%i:–*s.1V'::1i:i;=:}:1 ~ Reaor\u00e9ed by Patiice C\ufb01fficer —<\/p>\n
  Executive Magistrate thaugh<\/p>\n
 a2z_ai1':-3,i3T\u00a7e not summcrngd ~– iier\u00e9\u00e9f\u00e9cate \u00a7\u00b0rc:z*:2<\/p>\n
" .E*\u00e9EgC\u00a7.\u00a2a1 Qfficer as ti: fitness arz\u00e9<\/p>\n
'cehsciausraess of &ec'::1arani net taken ~\u00ab– Time<\/p>\n
AA  af recerdizag of daclaratiazz 9339 mm recordeci\n<\/p>\n
 — Beciaratiara carm.$ms\u00a7.:1g<\/p>\n
” \ufb01e matariais on recarcf, befam vsza embark upm”:<\/p>\n
a;\u00a73pmc:\u00a7_at\u00a7.0m Q? the evidence, we wm\ufb02d like is remin\ufb01<\/p>\n
P<\/p>\n
\/%<\/p>\n
“gg,<\/p>\n
decaased as per EX.f3-}4 retarded E3}; the poiice: jE_t?:___th&<\/p>\n
‘\u00a7.)’E’\u20acS8f,’iC\u20ac’: 0f the dactor. By raa\u00e9irzg the c\u20ac2rs’f\u00e9i:?:::~: ‘\u00a33.f<\/p>\n
Ex.?-‘i4, we are Of the Gpiniotz that ‘i}2e?”‘-$.veV:*rfie*’t:tg\u00e9;’T V’<\/p>\n
thereirz are naturaii\ufb01,-* na:’ra:Eed: b\u00a7.; _:\u00a3%;\u00a7\u00e9”d&\u00a7\u00a3e.\u00a7.$e:iV:”:3;;\u00a71_&7<\/p>\n
has been recard\u00e9d. ‘E.’he stz:d.:\u00a7me:rif_ Q? tha,.:\u00a7Ae;=s::V\u00e9a’se5:+\u00a7  as <\/p>\n
per Exxp-\u00ab 3% is in acc$r6ar;\u00a7::’\u00a2::”;:V’.v:x%e#\u00a7\ufb01h t%1\u00e9 f3’r<;\u00a7\u00a7,j%@c1;t\u00e9r3t:
\ncase and the facts  tim_\u00a7 Qhen the
\nstateman\u00e9: was ' .re cerda3c'; .. :1':  1,\u00a2:}rc:,1.:2\ufb01$ta:2<:es\u00a7
\n30 far as,   we are sf Etha
\nQpiwg ….   =};Vj:ev\u00a7\ufb01eA2a7:\u00a7ee3'.  has carreat\u00e9y and
\nc:m\u00abi*:<.s<:ic_;.$'11's';i}'~%  i\u00e9icfs in Ex? 14.<\/p>\n
 What ;f&*m%;1_\u00a3\ufb01S"t\u00a7 be gem': is the getzuiamermss<\/p>\n
 "v<\u00b0:ff'  sAaid'+-\u00a7eaef&i'1'*\u00a7g as sgaliqen is by the dgctar an\ufb01<\/p>\n
  \ufb01acter has met c:er\u00b0t3'.f'ied ir: Ex.P–\u00ab\u00a7.\u00ab\u00bb'I~<\/p>\n
thai\u00ab\u00ab..t}:e:_:*;;\u00e9i:\u00a7\u00e9I1% was ii': iii Candii\u00e9orz ta giva statement<\/p>\n
H  ,pe:*'$\u00a7;P\u00bb\u00a74 but in {\ufb01g ev\u00e9dezzzce be\u00e9bre thg Cam"?<\/p>\n
.'   stated ihai \ufb01rm gzatient. was in 3. fit. ztond\ufb01afeata<\/p>\n
 it} give the statament, The fact tiftzaf the c%L\u00ab3:;?:i::.22'*';r\ufb01.e\u00e9 befare me” impiias thaji: ha was<\/p>\n
‘Q<\/p>\n
–\u00ab2{}\u00ab<\/p>\n
prese\ufb01t at the iime Qf reezasrding ‘\ufb01x Statamgm, arlci<\/p>\n
that {ha pai\u00e9e\ufb01t was givmg the st.:::t&m&r:.15:;;~%;\u00e9-._ \u20ac\u00a7i:e<\/p>\n
paiiae an\ufb01 fh\ufb01 patient ix-‘$33 ii: 3 e0nd:’$\u00e9\u20ac3_*;\u00a7;7t::.7 S;f\u00a78a\u00a7\u00a5;;-T\u00ab”<\/p>\n
Nath\u00e9ng \ufb01gs been eiicited En thebmss–\u00a7xg.::ii\u00e9’:3;%i@_2?’2 6!?<\/p>\n
the dmatar that tfw patierzti wasA:7r;<:bi\u00e9:_V\u00a7:1. <\/p>\n
giva statement er that ?:.he sia*\u00a7&–;m&\ufb01t'a%;\u00e9;g iztzzfggii\u00e9len by V<\/p>\n
the \ufb01ecaase\u00e9. F'u:'th\u00e9'1'-, _\u00e9t  \ufb01fudence
\nthat the damtgr   the \ufb02ying
\ndeciaratian  a fit cmn\u00e9iiian
\nto give  \u00a7$':o'\u20ac:;aVV'ru}e Qf imxa Under
\nthe cir\u00a7_un:s\u20acz%\u00a7;:fg\u00a7:%'2\u00a7?\u00e9 _\u00a7\u00a7ave \u20ac10 hesitaticn :0 held tiiiat<\/p>\n
the d\u00a7;s%:r1ig.__<  <;}';.;&::: '\u00a3\u00a2*:3.I';zs2'ff,2'1\u00a2':–?'::\u00a7.'L' E;s<:.P-$4 is ganuine, the<\/p>\n
.–.A_;a<)r1V_*::5g*3\u00absz'3;':;_s;\u00a7'a:'\u00a7f wE*:'\u00a7':;h.._.;mi\u00b0a a\u00e9missime and that they have<\/p>\n
b~%e\ufb01 r\u00a7:.;:5?o*:fV\u20ac\u00a7\u00bbs\u00a7\u00a7d~–.'by the paiict-3 in {Thee pmsarzcze mi' She<\/p>\n
\u00e9crfc\ufb01\u00e9r \u00e9fz\u00e9t the dac\ufb01asad was fui\u00e9gf azcszigit\u00e9ezm :\u00abm:i\u00a7<\/p>\n
 ~  _  'a::ai;3abE9_\u00a7f gizzmg statement.<\/p>\n
V' * ._  Tile d\u00e9ceased sustainad \u00e95'% bum": imuries,<\/p>\n
   _,?.'%\u00a715\u00bbi$ K.E'\u00a7.'Qaman\u00a7ane\u00a7;?appa has stated in his Qfassw<\/p>\n
Vexam\u00e9rzatia\ufb01 t%\u00b0iaf Eha bum i\ufb02jufi\ufb01\ufb01 had %3e$r: caimgd<\/p>\n
C<\/p>\n
\/\/<\/p>\n
-2E.\u00bb<\/p>\n
ta the \u00e9eceaate\ufb01 a<:c:i&er2.t.aE\u00a7}\u00bb: E*Eic:3a-3;eve:', the c:3:1f:m";ts<\/p>\n
an? E:\u00bb;.p~I.Q, the inquest reps??? ci.z*a2=v:} E3}? h_\u00e9m_,,_.'%':2:\u00e9i;\u00ab\u00e9\u00e9:3t@<\/p>\n
that the irzjairias sustainad by the '<\/p>\n
\ufb01amici\ufb01ai in nature. Therefare;~the–'_4az;s\u00a7\u00a7:;\u00e9r ir*:[':EE\u00a7<3<\/p>\n
::rQss–eXam\u00a3n.*atim"; of PWFES   i:"ij';;_\u00a3i'e$:<\/p>\n
\ufb01\u00e9ceased are 3.cc:3'den*{aE,V  sown
\nstatement in B::”;’z,:Vs;;@*C\u00a3’\u00a71.?\u00e9g;:?e’ gi\ufb01gureai k\u00e9f\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 ?4;.,m::E set firg ff}<\/p>\n
 ?1e1″.,.\u00ab?}’h;3;\u20ac ajpar<':.,'__tb\u00a7: ev'i::;\u00a5erwe: mi' @"E:.?":afr' xx.'-'\u00a3tne$s@3,<\/p>\n
"'._'n_a;:f:\u00bba1\u00a7\/5,'gtzeifg\u00e9vrzs vmm are reiatives sf the daceasad,<\/p>\n
 Vthafc life: Qf 'aha deceased was :10: uz\u00e9zii<\/p>\n
 _ i\u00a3:;f2 the~~}f1};;rus@ 0;? accusa\u00e9 an\u00e9 thare were repeaied<\/p>\n
  %:.iYemaf*;\u00ab.d for giving $:*\u00a7ngi:’3g Efmrne the gu\ufb01t sf ihe a::::L:.s\u20ac:c:i far the csffence<\/p>\n
!’<\/p>\n
-22-<\/span><\/p>\n
un&$r Sac\ufb01\u00e9en 332 {PC arid am:ord\u00a7.r:gi\u00a7 we ‘r;;\u00e9’:*\u00a7’b}\u00bbF<\/p>\n
convict resparncients E and 3 “f(}I’.”\u00b0 tfha gaid   <\/p>\n
28. in 3:3 far” as the cbfferzces une\ufb01.-:=,+Ti_:\u00a7SeVc\u00a7\ufb01i’0:1s  -, <\/p>\n
and 4 0? Dewy}; Prahibiiien AEj:t  <\/p>\n
WC aria conceme\ufb01, we E11313 fziigaft 3Z”1′};$.3:”‘t”2. is<\/p>\n
matariai ta h\ufb01i\u00e9 that fixes a\u00bb::::’_uuS&_r::i”VV3:;a1%e.’ ;3_f;rzf;\u00a7tte& the
\nsaici affences and  Qf acqziittai it:\n<\/p>\n
SO far as tha S&?;.ii\u00a7v.Qf”frs3jr 1c\u00e9\u00a7s’*\u00a7:=:  <\/p>\n
   \u00a33 \u00e9haw that ‘iih\ufb01 d\u00e9ceaseci<\/p>\n
was $ub_f:;3,:; E$\u00e9 ‘Em  aria? hara$smera’i: by the<\/p>\n
acc2,;.<:\u00a7\u00e9?'.tz:_: s  by fercing ha? ta “bring scaat\u00e9r.<\/p>\n
 \u00a7”””’15\u20ac:’3”.iN:CE, ‘%T’g7i\u00a3:i? A %’i\u00a7i& that iim acausa\ufb01. are Eiaizsie far<\/p>\n
\u00a2gI;grm%;e%;%;gm section 4\u00a78\u00bbA 21%<\/p>\n
 .A  lit} the resuit, We pasg the \u00a7\u00b0Q}i0w\u00a3ng:~<\/p>\n
QRIDEMQQ;\n<\/p>\n
\n
-233″\n<\/p>\n
The appea} is partiy ailezwed. The Qitier Qf<\/p>\n
acquittal passed zgzn\u00e9er Sections 498%. <\/p>\n
with Sectimn 34 FPCZ is get aside.\u00a7 <\/p>\n
ccznvicmd fzzrr the said affences.\n<\/p>\n
Having regard ta theT.f”acts’~;az\u00a7id cirr.:\u00a7:.;;Iifis\u20ac’iamI?c\u00e9\u00a73. 2:?<\/p>\n
the case, we\u00bb: haid that ii: is  ‘:”‘a.rv\u00e9:’: t’\u00ab’VC\u00bb\u00a7;V-jt\ufb01f\u00e9\ufb02w\u00e9ases to
\nimpose &ea\u20acr3 sente1’1r;\u00a7\u00a7..  would be
\nto iirnpose imprisonnjiarnf offence un\u00e9er
\nSec:t:’m’:   which we irnpasse<\/p>\n
an i:he:’acQ:,:s&V:\u00a7’..V–~.__ “< "\n<\/p>\n
F01?’ \ufb01h\ufb01 effgf\u00e9-:51;i\u00a3V::\u00e9V”‘a::i*ic.?’\u00e9r Sectisn 498v~A raa\ufb02 with<\/p>\n
Se\u00e9zticjm 34\u00a7’\u00a7”3{:?VV’3Z:\u00a7*ie’3’V’a{1J\u00a7i,I;\u00a7\u20ac\ufb01 are Sentenrzad :0 R1 for<\/p>\n
  \u00e9\u00a7’ic{;_vfi.::e”;f Rs. 3 ,{}Q\u00a7\/- for each Qf them\ufb01<\/p>\n
 ._  far offence under Seeation 4\u00a78-r3, if.-Rf:<\/p>\n
. W113 \u00a7fr3Ve1’\u00a7;e”E’i;2 the \ufb01fe sentence imposed fer the o\ufb01\u00e9zme<\/p>\n
‘\u00abV”‘4″‘V.:z.\u00a7ric}e.:f \u00a7 :<-zctictm 3912 WC. The acsuseci are direeted ta<\/p>\n
' –'3ti:rendm* and serve the sentence impese\u00e9 or: them' in<\/p>\n
ax<\/p>\n
\/\/7<\/p>\n
":24-\n<\/p>\n
\n
their fai..i:2:’e to an $0, the tzia\u00e9 C\u00a7u:*i: \u00a33 <:\u00a7\u00a7re;:_;t_.ed to<\/p>\n
axecute the santence as hmfeinm~abm*m {}'\u00a7'"\u20acZ\u00ab\u00a7\u20acTE"'8\u20ac\u00a7." ". "'. ' <\/p>\n
3., –in:\n<\/p>\n
  _  <\/p>\n
 %  }’%udC3\u00b0<\/p>\n
\u00a7iP””‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto -3- EN T’\u00a7'{E PHGH CGUQ’? G?” K\u00a7&R\u00a7’\u00a7\ufb01’??\u00a7.KPs AT EAWC\u00a7AL{)R.:\u20ac{T Bat\ufb01\u00e9: 23% day of Sczpiembar 2&3 Pmsent ‘ Ewiazfbig Mr. Jus\ufb01ce K.SRE\ufb01\u00a7IZ}%iAR _F'<'\u00a3x{:%. :2. b < \ufb01nd & ' M ' i-'\u00a3<:}33.'b1e Mr.Justic;\u00a7 3.v'.":?;.:s%*:*0 camzrsgi, APFEEEL i9&:{[1 :26. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-271465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-24T21:58:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-24T21:58:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":3506,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\",\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-24T21:58:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-24T21:58:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-24T21:58:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010"},"wordCount":3506,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010","name":"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-24T21:58:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-manjunatha-manju-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Karnataka vs Manjunatha @ Manju on 28 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271465\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}