{"id":27381,"date":"2009-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-06T20:48:06","modified_gmt":"2015-12-06T15:18:06","slug":"the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
EN THE E’iI{.}i–{ COURT OF KARNATAKA<\/p>\n
CIRCUIT E3EZI’5C;H AT GULBARGA<\/p>\n
\u00a3353′-11:3 THIS THE: 15% my 09 JKENE,   L’<\/p>\n
BEFORE<\/p>\n
THE i-~\u00a3{)N’BLE\u00a7 MR.JUs*r1c:{~: ‘\u00a33.\u00a7S;%1%a’:*1L\u00bb’,.*’_%A ‘ = * V’ ‘<\/p>\n
“s.%’RI’1′ PE3’I’\u00a7’E’E’\u00a7N NO. 81E3\u00a7T:\u00a7v-OF’ 2{>e::\u00a7f'{bK\u00a7.=  J
\nB\u00a7:\u00e9?’I”e’JE’:1\u00a7:P\u00e9: ‘V 1’ ”<\/p>\n
L ‘W26 Nomi: East Karnataka ‘I”1*\u00e9:_:_\u00a73′:\u00abs\u00a7$:”-:.1″f:i”Z’   V . -.
\nCorpcyratiori ‘I’h:rough its Managing’ Di\u00a3f\u20ac(t”\u00a7(}I\u00bb:  -. <\/p>\n
Cxintrai Ci\ufb01ice,  Road,:_AGu:1b\u00a7;Igg;.”~ “.__ ‘  I<\/p>\n
 Nirsrth
\nCorporatigjn, through. figs DiVi$io11ai_C0ntroiler,<\/p>\n
Raichur Er’};V\u00a7S_iOI1, Rai\u00e9higr.\n<\/p>\n
30th we patii\u00e9-.on&:*s \u00a5ar\u20ac”;7e13re*:3:6nt5d by
\nits Chief_I.aW Cii\ufb01c\u00e9r. _  ”\n<\/p>\n
3’~\u00a7E}\u00a7{\u00a7\u20ac:”I'{;\u00a73 ifesgtral Cii\ufb01ce,
\n“::;::1\u00a7323?;gia.   H  —–\n<\/p>\n
‘ A \u00ab ” A   Petitioners<\/p>\n
(By  Si_:i3}sx\u00a7;<{:–m :a15V.T'i2\u00bb..Vf\ufb01aciawadagi} \ufb01dvocate)<\/p>\n
" " –\u00abE}Va::=;\u00e9;iaab 8\/ cs ._{\u00a7<;kuisab,
\n.1 –..\u00e9'-kgfce:i'L\u00bba}E)0Tut_n45 years, Ocrc; E2X–C11ductor,
\n..  ‘=R[*:; }~i’.}W.,S,.–‘i’~3(}: 853 Nijaiingappa {l’31011\u00a7;,
\n Raitfimufj Division; \ufb02ist; F\u20aca:ich.ur.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a55{ Res\u00a7)0::d\u20ac1′.1t<\/p>\n
 P. Viias Kumai’, Aiivocrat\u00e9 for C\/R\u20acspm1::i.c:nt)<\/p>\n
‘}’}’:is Pati\ufb01on is; fled 1mderA.rti<:Ie 2226 of the C11stitu\u00a3iQn of
\nImi\u00e9za prajgmg :0 quagh Eht: Order di-ii\u00e9ffd 18.08.2008 passed by the
\n1\u20aci\u00a3:”?I;{’11Cd Presizziirfzg O\ufb01itscr Labour Caurl: Gulbarga in E{I[}.__ No.
\n398\/2004 and Consequ\ufb01ntiy be pieassd. to dismiss the Ki7E)_”\u00a7’sI<3.
\n1\u00a78\/12004 \ufb02ied by {ha I'\u20acSp(}I1dE.'I}.t on the \ufb01le of P1"esidi13'g:'i3.fi3.g:i\u20acr<\/p>\n
Labotxr Court Gilkbarga and the ccagy cf the same is ;}rQ<;_ii:Ce?_iV*-531$'  _<\/p>\n
A1112-13 {Q the Writ Pettition.\n<\/p>\n
This petition coming on for p3″*e1imiriai9jr”heaIi11g.;LhAiS;b\u00ab:ia\u00a7\u00a73:316″.<\/p>\n
Court made the foliowing:\n<\/p>\n
Q_R!.2.;.7-‘ER<\/p>\n
in this writ \u00a73\u20acii’iiC}}C} await} pa$’:2@ai1’~.b\u00a7\u00bb* ti1t:._I,’a\u00a5cr.\u00a7.*;=11r'”1.;ef;oViV1::”i 1’11<\/p>\n
K13} NO. 1Q8;,’–:2QQ%i:’  \u00ab’b}”-*~i”3{“‘ th\u00e9 claim mack: by tbs
\nr\u20ac:sp0ntient–\u20ac::3}\u00a7ic\u00a7_%f\u00a2.a _ {\ufb01g-C_i.<'";"A,3.V'   10 MA} of th\u00e9 Industrial
\n.{)i's;3*at\u00a3s  zan\u00e9  %E:.~L.Si\u20aci\u20ac'. this cmtier Qf dismissai siateii<\/p>\n
   i"f:$\u00a7}Y)(}I1('}\u20ac11?-Em\ufb01l\ufb02y\ufb01\ufb01 and {}i1E'\u20acCI,\u20acd hi3<\/p>\n
:  r\u20aci11s\u20ac\u00e9%\u00a7;e,\u00a7i\u00e9_g:31i'*\u00a2\u00a3iL3<;  bzawiiwage.<\/p>\n
–V 25 T\ufb01c\u00e9 Ii3$p{>%;<ie:zt.-\ufb01mpleyee wag apgai\ufb01tsd as 21 comiixciez'<\/p>\n
4. ::j\u00a3i3.{\u00a7”$r.:as :a\u00a7t.t_3}i\u00e9<i {:3 Liixgasugux Depot: Whila E36 was c<):::\u00e9.1zc:ting 3<\/p>\n
 }.9'~95 an thf: rmate Lingasugur to Sawadatii, ma bus<\/p>\n
  .T _  %::}::<':%:l<:e{i. by the C\u00a31e<:#}:.r(_\u00a7;\u00a2r if ‘ <\/p>\n
pamad ma 17.03. 2094.\n<\/p>\n
.3. Th\ufb01 ziismissal orcier was  the ” V<\/p>\n
empioytis b\u20ac::f<:31~e this': Labr;aur Cgxuri. 'lV'_h\u00a7'La\u00a5:v~:)._V13.r  halal
\nthat the enq'uir\u00a7-* <:011d:3.c'iTed  :vpi#\u00a7p:.=jf'11as examine\u00e9 the<\/p>\n
illa\ufb01fli" and after  on record has come to
\nthe {E{33f1<31t1S3'.et}%:\u00a3"\u00a7".ifc;?,iT, 'ihe wcarkmam f\ufb01k\ufb01ll up stating
\nthat as t}1eVfg;1'\u20ac h\u00e9\u00e9 siiajlei\u00e9gxiy incrtzaseci the passengsrs had
\nt;\u00a7.}i\u00a7::_;_t3p wit}! i'J:'.7::rf:..r:,'0:1ci11<:*I:{:a1" fan\u00e9 had refuse\ufb01 tax pay {ha<\/p>\n
fam__a:::iV'\u20acQiie(:t\u00ab.th\u20ac; "ii\u00a2ke:ts. in such circumstances as thaw: was<\/p>\n
d\u20aciay"i1f1 1*,}:_?1Jt:wAV.T'f\u00a33.\u00ab;:'};<:et$ and it was ecmiy at that time \u00a31121? th\u00e9<\/p>\n
:'v : '\u20acf\ufb01}f\u00a3*I"\ufb01C*}{j;1f1g;'\u00a33\u00a7E,Z3d'}";f\u00a7\u00a7:%J, i}I?i'[f:3i"C\u20acf}3'ii3{1 the: bus to \u00ab::h.t3<::1< the tickats, the<\/p>\n
_ 'e_?:1314j;\ufb01ris:1y\u20ace has Egan feimd gtziity. 'T116 L-about Court has epined<\/p>\n
' 't;E1at~ i:3 V ::i1*v::11msta:1ct:s Eike this where th\ufb01ifi was :19 deiib\u00e9raijie<\/p>\n
i.\u00a7::1\u00a3:i.\u00e9s1' <$i} \u20ac;'f}.\u20acf part 0:)" the \u20ac\u00a7\u00a3~:!i11q_':1er11 {pr\u00a7,e o’fa11c\/\u00a3}.1<:=:r izrlporf:-mt. factor name\u00e9y that the maxlagemei\ufb01 hag<\/p>\n
taken 9 ytzars 3:0 compiettz the emqizirgz and punish. the mspb\ufb01z\ufb01eftig<\/p>\n
amployee. it is in this bac:kgmu.nd that the Lab01_1 {—- *<\/p>\n
wizils invoking its povmrs tinder Sectian    $113 <\/p>\n
order of di:-zmissai taming it as shectkixxfgly ::\u00a3is\u00a7)rGpex1:i\u20aci\u00e913.a'i::}\u00a7'L—33?i&i_'<\/p>\n
has onikzred his rei.11$t:atemeI1t with :"5E)'? baczkasqgigas.  A<\/p>\n
4. I have Ezeard the iearnmi co:[:_i:_:\u00a7\u00a7%:\u00a3V_;{“oa:_Vt}1e p:2%1*3?,i_\u00a7;ws3 \u00a7 ‘\u00a7’h0ugh
\nin  matt\u00e9tr ‘i?\u00a7?’h\u20acI’\u20ac a11egafic311s \u00e9f  a1\u00a7tiVLjn\ufb01sapprop:ia\ufb01nn am<\/p>\n
E\ufb01vei\ufb01ii, this   of the deiinquent by
\nsilewizzg any   matter, the \ufb01ndings recortieci
\nby the Lahgur   the iieljnquant coxlducter was
\ni3fEvf{3’c?{?iTIf\u00a3?>{i.” i7iA:<:g2\u00a7~\u00a7.j'~i\u00a2(\u00a71}:<tc%'if_"\u00a7:*1'g_:3i;\u00a7:v{am by the quarr\u00e9lsemc geasasrzgars
\nwhis. fer the hik\ufb01 3&1 fara and it was at thai<\/p>\n
fime {'L.a'i" \u20ac:}:\u20aci 'W'\u00a2",%:S"\u00e9fh\u20acCk\u20acd. This is 1101; 3 case vahere he hati<\/p>\n
 , '.AAC3\u20ac}}E;(3\u20ac"3TE{iA7\u00a3]f\u00a7.\u20ac f\u00e9i??{:' :af.f;dT had not issueci the tickets. This is 22: zrasa Of<\/p>\n
. ;'1Q:3=~i$s31c and "\ufb02an-coi16c:i0:3 that too far the reasan that the<\/p>\n
, re:f\u00a7\u00a7is&:\u20ac3 ta psay tkm fain It is 23,330 an recesrti that. the<\/p>\n
p:%.S35r2jg\u00e9I*s-A"h&ve paid that paziaitjg. in suszrh ir\u20acL1ms{a11r::\u20ac:s it.<\/p>\n
{i::.~:f1;2c;j\u00a7___\u00a7>\u20ac state\u00e9 that 1:113 a.w:>,m:i p{e}$Sff{3. by the Labour Cauxi.<\/p>\n
,,  E-:5<\/p>\n
suffers; fmm 2-}pp\u20aciI’Ef:f\ufb01’. iiiegality’. The order ef m\ufb01lstai\u00e9\ufb01li\ufb01nt<\/p>\n
t}’;c2rr:for{: is p{:rf6:\u20ac:fly jusii\ufb01ed. Hawevittr, ih\ufb01 Labour  <\/p>\n
jizst\u00e9\ufb01ati 12:1 awmrimg 30\u00b0\/0 hackwagcs.\n<\/p>\n
5. it is $6611 from t.’;1:=, records that f\u00e9wf :z%%_\u00e9ts{}n\u00a7’b\u20ac’S\u00a7 ‘k:i0\u00e9[7\u00a2–:1 \u20acf:::<\/p>\n
\ufb01gs: petit,i0:1er~C<3rp0ra\ufb01@n it has  9 i\ufb01ai\u00e9g ycaii-\u00a7  '\u00a3c: vc{:m\u00a7':1ete 2 L'<\/p>\n
t\ufb02fi \ufb01xxquixy, The E',\ufb02;1}}IO}'\u20ac:\u20ac was 9111451' ..3\u00a7s1\u20ac:f:’jjz3;ti::i” &i9j ._’\u20ac}i\u20ac I4′ t%S1}’1*{.’ uo’1f”:tE1:~3 .I1o:1~r.:\u00a7i]jg(:m, act<\/p>\n
an ‘data’. paI’t , 0f –_ \u00a3’:”\u00a5(;: \u20aci’\u20ac):}{i;\u00a71ff\u00a7f{}’\u00e9T%.: ‘\u00b0%’\u00a7’hO” should hava stapped bus,
\ncrai\u00e9ectaci the  fu\ufb01her. Te thia axtent.\n<\/p>\n
thg\u00e9: i’3\u00e93n2\u00a2 ;hz~*:.:::L..tr:3  ‘V{>nvhim. Alth\u00e9mgh the Labour Caryurt
\n  i11g1 <;\ufb01fii11.g that he had not coliscied. {ha {are<\/p>\n
1191" \u00e9S~S;1'i&.*\u20ac1  z\u00bb33\u00a7\u20aci-xvag '{}.l\u20acF\u20acf2:73"f: not guifty ssf migapjgmpriatioiz<\/p>\n
T'  ih\u00e9: fuiadea Q17  C10:x."p<:s1"a.t_ie3:::.\u00a7, $216 fact r\ufb01mai\ufb02s that ha had not<\/p>\n
 cam \ufb01oitcap {he has and ita\ufb02ect Q16 fares Eivzm assuming<\/p>\n
 .;{);%:\u00a3$Sf:I}g\u20acI'S 1123:}. taken up quajmftl with him r\ufb01zfusing ta pay'<\/p>\n
' 9t3:2.\u00e9:_faI'\u20acf, %.%.:er\u20ac: is no 6)-I\ufb01f\ufb01sfi for him in next stop}:-ing the bus 1113111<\/p>\n
  t%;_;\u00a7:.'fa;'\u20acr was Cekilectmi. in this *s?\u00a7{i"W sf the matter, the r\u20ac\u00e9\u00a7pC::t:::i\u20ac3;1'i.\u00ab~<\/p>\n
\/\/
\nL\\<\/p>\n
:3,<\/p>\n
U<\/p>\n
e1::q:3Ea}s~'<=:& has ta be puuishatci 'rzy d.\u20acp:"ivi:1g hiiaa cf
\nbactiqwsggczsz to W}1ic:h he w2:3111d have been oth\u00e9xwise er2:i%1\u20ac\u00a7i.i\u00bbi3';:"'  3<\/p>\n
6\u00bb. {ms more: aspact which is :*::+r:;112*1*-cc? tag) be :=s:"\u00bb;~=,'4.2;~_m:_1 'i;<;u{1:5:i"gj:\u00a7::'<\/p>\n
11$ that {he i"f:S\u00a7.}{}}Ti\u20ac.'\u00a3\u20acii1{\u00ab~("fII}.})IO}'C\u20ac;\u00b0: is sa;i<;i'r.to"–.have _b\u00e9:'%+:;3L irzvial\u00e9ed <\/p>\n
a\u00e9sfli\ufb01r in swarm} cic\ufb01-wit cases. En afxssifct" to thi$, "ie\u00e9rn\u00e9ujl counsel.
\nfar {ha r\u00e9ispancic:nt\u00abem.p}0y1i’ofVV the \u00a370111?
\ntr} \u00a73’ara–‘?’ of \ufb01lm awarti passed  1′:;’:.:::’ uCcr_m”i: whertzin 18<\/p>\n
\u00e9m\u00e9zxmega\ufb01s }31″f3{\u00a7?;1C\u20ac(i  the f:f\u00a7.IHplQ}i?\u20acC-“V\u00e9\u00a7{?E’3″‘P\ufb01f\u00e9ff\ufb01d to Where under<\/p>\n
in some af {“}”},6 sim:’i.:~:n__1V vi-:’1″\u00a7r1:i13=::_;~;:r_,*2a1T:_<;t:':=f: 'c2._t'd;e,-'3 of dismissal passed<\/p>\n
against asi\ufb01ie by th\u00e9 Managing Director
\nand {hi-: t:133.}j2l::3ft3r:\u00a7  tbs appeals aubmittefi in this
\nIfig\u00e9ii\ufb01 by grit': :;foz1(4:%::1**;:\u00a7:_\u00a7IV \u00e9m}\u00a7%1o};ecs, Counsel for the r<=,spo11den'\u00a3-
\n fiv1xz%'H"f'}\u20acf11Sa1 of the c<;3u.r\u00a3: (3116 such order<\/p>\n
pa$32\u00e9':Ei ig:   Ni-teiappa in appsai 5E0. 392\/ 2902 Vid\ufb01<\/p>\n
 . : "\u00e9:'(,\u00a5,2tr ziafed 1C3;O9; ,f';%(A}Q5', "fhis dtzsctiment which is pI"(}d1iC\u20acfi. along"<\/p>\n
 m\u20acm\u20ac3 tt;day in com": is piacfzci an record. It is 1101; in<\/p>\n
  this is six: of fhf: decum\u00e9nts exhibitecl beferf: the<\/p>\n
'EL;-.23::;)11r {E-ouzi<\/p>\n
17. in 1133.6 light \u00absf the evidence on recsrd anti the fact that {ha
\npetifi0ne2″–CQrporati\u00bb:311 had extsnciad bene\ufb01t of reixzstatramegat to<\/p>\n
3im:iia1*}y piaced employees and partieularly beating in mi1jd_ 1h\u00a2<\/p>\n
finding i’f3C<31'df':d by the Labour Court that this is 3   .<\/p>\n
3233116 311:} n0n~c<:;a}1ecti011 (hit: to ths: passeggars' '::o '13a\u00a7\u00bb*_th\u00a2 <\/p>\n
amouni: due to the hike in fare, I am  ,\u00a7}Eii"$\u00a711;5i:\u20ac:?.f,\u00a5\u20ac{{—-,.t.i0..'\u00a7\u00a7ICf'(i\u00a7t_.<\/p>\n
awaxd passed 2)}-* tbs: Labour C0u’1″‘-{R    ;\n<\/p>\n
However, the bacrkwages awargit\u00e9rii ta\u00bb v’ii::\u00a7’ez31p1cSf,#e.e&’VVA2z:*\u00a71% d i\u00a7a1lowec\u00a3<\/p>\n
for the reasons stated hersin  <\/p>\n
‘f’1?is  pa:~tiijicj’i3.’is\u00a7V disposed of in terms stated<\/p>\n
aha-V8. N0 c::>sts:.  \u00bb<\/p>\n
Sd\/W
\nIEEBGE<\/p>\n
 j””:;;aa.~;<::<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil EN THE E’iI{.}i–{ COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT E3EZI’5C;H AT GULBARGA \u00a3353′-11:3 THIS THE: 15% my 09 JKENE, L’ BEFORE THE i-~\u00a3{)N’BLE\u00a7 MR.JUs*r1c:{~: ‘\u00a33.\u00a7S;%1%a’:*1L\u00bb’,.*’_%A ‘ = * V’ ‘ “s.%’RI’1′ PE3’I’\u00a7’E’E’\u00a7N NO. 81E3\u00a7T:\u00a7v-OF’ 2{>e::\u00a7f'{bK\u00a7.= J B\u00a7:\u00e9?’I”e’JE’:1\u00a7:P\u00e9: ‘V 1’ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe North East Karnataka ... vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The North East Karnataka ... vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-06T15:18:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-06T15:18:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1636,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\",\"name\":\"The North East Karnataka ... vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-06T15:18:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The North East Karnataka ... vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The North East Karnataka ... vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-06T15:18:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-06T15:18:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009"},"wordCount":1636,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009","name":"The North East Karnataka ... vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-06T15:18:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-north-east-karnataka-vs-dawalsab-so-gokulsab-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The North East Karnataka … vs Dawalsab S\/O Gokulsab on 16 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}