{"id":27701,"date":"2009-07-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-08T09:18:00","modified_gmt":"2018-09-08T03:48:00","slug":"smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n
 - my  ;:\u00a7\u00abI1.__De$z\u00a7i',~Adv.}\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA'i'AKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE mm DAY OF Ji*3L'{;'2{}G9:\"  T 1\n\nBEFoRE y\n\nTHE I-1N'm,E MR. JT_3STIGE_ B.S'REEN1vg$\u00a7\u00a7 t3bv\u00a7f:5A  ,\n\nMisceliancous First  -\u00e9?04?5\u00a5'ef':(CPC1\nMiscttllancmls    \".3 pf 2008 {CFC}\n\nnmwr.-:33:      '\n\nS1111; S3.1ni't11aVB-ai\".;__\nW\/0 V.  '71\" \nAged about 35 \" ._  ' ~\nR\/at No}.1.5,.. 131 Maii1, H\ufb01 'ba5;~,\nBaxlgaiorefi\ufb01\ufb01 O24.  \u00bb \n * V   ' ...APPELLAN\"'i'\n(Common)\n\n     \n\n1.  A  \n'-W\/go we Venkataramana Raddy',\nAggci about 49 years,\n\n     ;3ri Ravichandra Rccidy,\n\n\" 'S\/0 late Vsnkataramana Raddy,\nAged about 30 years.\n\nBath am R\/at: No. 179,\n\n15* Floor, Shivaram Campicx,\n\ufb01nd Main Road, Hcbba},\nBangalore 560 025.\n\n\n\n  Ii1\u00a3lt;-Legal Inc. Advs. for R 3. m 3\n\n3,; 8111:. V. Saraswathi,\n\nD\/0 late Venkataramana Raddy,\nW\/Q RM. Purztshatham Raddy,\nAged about 28 years,\nR\/at: No.32', 4&1 Grass,\nVinayaka Nag.-ar, Hebbal,\nBarzgaiorrzz 560 024\n\n4. Smt. Frema,\nW\/0 Ramaiah,\nAged about 53 years,\n\n3:: Ramaiah,     \nS\/0 late Mm\ufb01venkataggpsig; 1\n\nAged aboxit\ufb01\ufb01 yeafsg' -- ..  \n\n5;}!\n\n$11. Neg. .4 & residing.'\nAi: No. 232,. Siiamiatzfxa Layout,\nSumangali S';-:=Ai:1VA'P.--sI*:1fa1na Road,\nHehbaj;   \n_\u00a7f\u00a739.Iig81()I'?\u00a7 45 {1 G24.\n    -----   IQESPQNDENTS\n{Common}\n\n ._ \n\nA\"'\u00ab\u00ab7I'hr:_~s%1:. -:\u00a7rIAF'A$ filed under Orclar 43 R1113 Hr) CEPC\n\n 'vagajnst. 31\u00a2 order ciated 2O.12.E2S{)7 passed an 15 No.11 & I\n\n  r\u00e9spgec\ufb01vcly in (3.8. 1310.858] 06 on the \ufb01le 3f the E06! Add}.\n\n\"  '*f\"_f\u00a7it,y'  & Sessions Judge, Baxtxgaiare (CCH 23) ailowing\n\n.  _ -I\ufb01:._N=\u20ac};'II fie\u00e9 unciar Qrder 39 R1136 1 8:. 2 H\/W Sectsisan 15}\n' ' _.. Q1Pt?3 for temporary injunction.\n\nThis appeal {taming on far Admission, this \u00ab\ufb02ay, 1:313\n\n \u00e9 \" Caurt, delivered the folIowix1g:\n\n\ufb01g)\/.\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Though thf: mailer is posted for admi$$i\u00a7ii;” <\/p>\n
consent of learned C3<;u;1$\u00ab5':3. appcaiing fo1"'t1*1t:.:_t3.a:fit;icf'::V it is;." . 1 <\/p>\n
taken up for \ufb01nal ciispesal.\n<\/p>\n
2. For tha purpose of   \ufb02ames are
\nreferred to as they  the suwitubcfore the<\/p>\n
trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
3. Tia\ufb01se\u00e9’  ffhe 3″ glafendant in th\ufb01 suit<\/p>\n
aggicved u}3_’\u00a7f_ f.i1\u20ac’~~:iZht3 trial Cltstlrt. dated 20.12.2007<\/p>\n
 V.   If; I’$i*1\u00ab:i.._I:’%.*\u00a3I respvactively whereby it gantcd an<\/p>\n
 Grfi\u00e9zr. _ =  mjunc\ufb01on restraining the 3113<\/p>\n
d\u00e9f\u00a7:f:da\ufb01t’.vfif:}\u00a7i: put\ufb01ng up any constructicsn in the suit;<\/p>\n
g_ pfoperty CH’ changing the xxatxzm 9f the suit<\/p>\n
A  pmperty and restraincd the 3″? defendant fmm<\/p>\n
V.   aiiexxating, encumbeiing or cmating t11in’:1 party rights in<\/p>\n
 . ‘4 respect at’ the suit scheciuic pmperty pending ciisgnosai 9f<\/p>\n
the suit.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. Br;is*::f facts of the case: areas.1~;n<j?{\u00a2:':V    '4 V<\/p>\n
The undisputed facts  the.\u00bb'pafti\u00a7.5. aA<\/p>\n
residmitial site  x 40' M\u00e9\u00e9longa\ufb01i tra-
\ntwo brothers na\ufb01nsziy  " VS;.1VcVi\u00bb'ashiva–  R\u00e9V(V1\u20acly and C.
\nVenkataramana Redd\u00a7r',_  betxzmen them.<\/p>\n
There:-, is 11:) –\u00a2.{} __t.:l?ie portion of site falleti<\/p>\n
to   T-'f 03;” the site fallen to the share<\/p>\n
of  v\u00e9n2<ata:aLn:La\ufb01a~~%Ready.\n<\/p>\n
    vie; th\u00e9  of th\ufb01 3″‘ defendant who is in appeal<\/p>\n
V   Raddy had entered into an<\/p>\n
Piaf mile and G.P.A.. in favour of arm Bhuvana<\/p>\n
 Prakqsh and sold the suit schedule: pmpcrty to him, whc:<\/p>\n
V’ = .i_\ufb01:{..’:11rn sold it to defendant 1 Lander :3 rrxgj\ufb01tercd sale deed<\/p>\n
 and defendant 1 in tum scald it in favour {sf defendant :2<\/p>\n
1,1:1d\u20ac:;* a rw\ufb01stcrcd sales”: (lead date\u00e9 29.03.1999 and<\/p>\n
dcf\ufb01ndant :3; said the 331116 under a rsgstered sale deed
\n%<\/p>\n
 .. ~  trvxicunxbezing, creating the third party rights in<\/p>\n
maperty got the huiidixtxg dexneiished, it was_.L*\u00a7i;;1\u00a7f”<\/p>\n
the first tzinze the plaintiffs camvr: 1;\u00a7x1\u00a7:1ow   \u00bb <\/p>\n
act. of the defendants and i;nmedi:$;te:\u00a7\u00a7rT fi 1ei’}:1ti’: 1.t ‘i51u:it<\/p>\n
seekmg the fallowing rcliefst’ 9   ‘=~ ._<\/p>\n
3\u00bb)<\/p>\n
33)<\/p>\n
declaring that m\u00a2.. _\u00a7ia\ufb011tj\ufb01s  absohlte
\nownar of t11\u00a7:’ ‘~s11it_”sc1;c:5d.;i3.eL’ ‘pmpcrty.<\/p>\n
Direct. the   p0SStEiSSi{)I1 of
\nthe  sc}:1}edu}a-g pmp::\u00a7:i;y 122;.) the plaintiffs.<\/p>\n
T, {f;01\u00a7isE;:;;1\u00a211\ufb02}<_::d\u00e93C}ar\u00a7.{hat the sale cited ciamd<\/p>\n
23.?-..:,%Q1.1999 W..he31’i,I1g documant No.BNG{U)<\/p>\n
— B:x:T;<;:4%6E;;':9&9s499 and sage deed dated<\/p>\n
2?3.G'3:V.:2Qf;)4""-..__ decument NELBLN-1"<\/p>\n
V i?:.*7zS.21'\/_2\u00a3}\u00a7)4.–\u00a73'5 are not bindmg an the<\/p>\n
 *<\/p>\n
 thircl defendant. from aiienating,<\/p>\n
 of the suit schedtlic property by way cf
\n' }\u00a76I*:na11ent: inj axnction.\n<\/p>\n
*3} ” \u00b0;\n<\/p>\n
geruscd<\/p>\n
fa yam; such other ixftiittf or mli\ufb01fs as this<\/p>\n
H0n’b1c Court deems \ufb01t to: gem: in the
\ncircumsiances of the case, in ms interest of
\njusticxa and aquity.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘? , I haw: heard the laamed Counsei far the partie\ufb01 and<\/p>\n
the iiI11}11$16(\u00a7 ardsr. Admittzzciiy <3.<\/p>\n
Ve:1katara:I:a1":a Re\u00e9dy 113$ not. Cxfictlt\ufb01\u00e9 any kind Qf salt:<\/p>\n
dsed in respect of the suit schedule pr<3per\u00a3y "' in<\/p>\n
favour of Bhuvan Prakash or in favour cf  VT\u00a3i:Ei\u00a7V\u00bb <\/p>\n
lasing St), the vaiiclity of the    jm; 7<\/p>\n
dsfamciant. in favour of End d<3fa&ndaAi1T_\u20ac:, 'th::  \u20ac'.i:':i'\u00a2f\u00e9I1(ii$it.'ViI: <\/p>\n
favaaur of 3"? defcndant are t:(::' "i':\u00ab:%;:_'%e:xamii1.2(fuh.13r':::;t the time
\nef trial. Any of the o\u00a5:;$\u00a751::at.ii)I:gs<{ 'abqL1t  validity er
\nathcrvvisc <31' tifye salq   pmjudiczt the
\ni:1terest.of     suit on 111<:rit.s. The
\nplamtiffs r rxair\ufb01 \u00ab th\ufb01: suit fer recuvering the<\/p>\n
posse$sie"1';.__ sfV tV:\u00a71_e  ';~fgui\u00a7::_"..'L3chad1\ufb01\ufb01 property fmm the amt<\/p>\n
  d\u20ac:f{:\u00a7.:\u00a7d.a"I'1t st,ax\u20ac:i\u00a3:gV__tb.gt he: has come {(3 the possesaion {sf<\/p>\n
  _  Thcir only gievancc is til} the<\/p>\n
f"i$1:2\u00bb';:$:s-.a \\1' i'1Vji<: s11i1: on m\u00e9arits the 3rd defendant. should not<\/p>\n
 be  to put. uy C\u20ac)I}StI"uCf;iOf1 and he shcjul\ufb01 be<\/p>\n
'A * fe\u00e9mtaj\ufb01ed frem aliarzatjng the stlit schedui-3 pmperty. I<\/p>\n
'  \ufb01nd S6136 force in Th\ufb01 said centerition of the plain\ufb01\ufb01s.<\/p>\n
'Th\ufb01 triai C0111': after examining the firtrima facic: case 0%' the<\/p>\n
piaintiffs, r\ufb01faxzing :9 tbs documents produced by the<\/p>\n
yiafintiffs as Wall as defendants by i1:'s C{'}I1Si\u20acit3I'\u20ac:d erdm'<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
aliewad IA I and IA 11 g*antt:d an order   <\/p>\n
injunction vzhemby 3'\u20acSt1"a.iI1f:Ci the -355 .'_'def;\u00e9:Iifi'aii't=V ffdf\ufb02 V'<\/p>\n
put.t'1r;g up any c:0:r1$trL1<:t:i11   <\/p>\n
schedule property. This ord\u00e9aafiis\u00e9 n1\u00e9\u00e9i:~’:__  $3?” ‘ V<\/p>\n
both the parties. As\u00a7L1ch_,I”*$\u00a7=tti<3t.. \ufb01nd' 'san}:v"3i11ega1ity,
\nirregl\ufb02arity or  $1.31' \ufb01gfxpugxed inviting<\/p>\n
8.  ‘Tv\u00a53a1;1;i$e3. the defendants appr\u20ac:h<3;"1ciir1g
\nthat the  may a}i\u20ac,–I1at.e the suit propxty<\/p>\n
rsqu\ufb01gsted fof a flir\u00e9ctian. to the parties to maintain status<\/p>\n
 I V {:1119_.x"\u00a7'h\u00e9L?.s\u00bb:1\u00a73;:\u00bbi:seif is for posascssion and 1:9 restrain the 3rd<\/p>\n
Acfi::\u00a7'tir;;:1@;i;f\u00a7\u00a3"\ufb017:\u00a7fQ;\u00e9fig'alienating the suit. schsdulc prcsperty, That<\/p>\n
 _  34;}; it :\u20ac::a1m<;t baa irxferred that the piain\ufb01\ufb01s would<\/p>\n
H H "  .\u00a7\u00a7ii42.:1at.e'V'tt\u00a21e suit praperty dtirring \ufb02it: pendency of the suit<\/p>\n
a\u00a7.1df"the:(*(: is 13.9 reason for such an apprehension of the<\/p>\n
T    dc-if\ufb01ndants.\n<\/p>\n
%”\n<\/p>\n
Accordingly the: appeals art: CiiSII1iSS’f.t\u20aci as  V’   <\/p>\n
inerit.\n<\/p>\n
Vb}-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda – my ;:\u00a7\u00abI1.__De$z\u00a7i’,~Adv.} IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA’i’AKA AT DATED THIS THE mm DAY OF Ji*3L'{;’2{}G9:” T 1 BEFoRE y THE I-1N’m,E MR. JT_3STIGE_ B.S’REEN1vg$\u00a7\u00a7 t3bv\u00a7f:5A , Misceliancous First -\u00e9?04?5\u00a5’ef’:(CPC1 Miscttllancmls “.3 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late ... on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late ... on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-08T03:48:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Sunitha Bai W\\\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\\\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-08T03:48:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":950,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Sunitha Bai W\\\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\\\/O Late ... on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-08T03:48:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Sunitha Bai W\\\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\\\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late ... on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late ... on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-08T03:48:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-08T03:48:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009"},"wordCount":950,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009","name":"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late ... on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-08T03:48:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sunitha-bai-wo-v-mithalal-vs-smt-ravanamma-wo-late-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Sunitha Bai W\/O V. Mithalal vs Smt Ravanamma W\/O Late … on 16 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27701"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27701\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}