{"id":27707,"date":"2010-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-10-22T19:35:11","modified_gmt":"2018-10-22T14:05:11","slug":"provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                                                                                                       1\n\n                                                                                        Court No.21\n\n\n                          Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.2657 of 2009\n\n                                    Provogue (India) Limited\n                                             Versus\n                                    State of U.P. and others\n\n\nHon'ble V.K. Shukla, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>Recall Application<br \/>\n        On 19.08.2009 illness slip was sent by Sri Ayank Mishra, Advocate. This<br \/>\nCourt (Tarun Agrawal, J.) passed following order:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                        &#8220;Passed over on the illness slip of Sri Ayank Mishr. The<br \/>\n                 order sheet indicates that the learned counsels for the petitioner<br \/>\n                 are sending illness slips.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                         The learned counsel for the petitioner in the connected<br \/>\n                 writ petition and the learned standing counsel in the connected<br \/>\n                 writ petition state that he had filed a counter affidavit on 14.7.09<br \/>\n                 and rejoinder affidavit on 6.8.09. Office to trace and place it on<br \/>\n                 record.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                          List peremptorily in the next cause list.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>        Thereafter the matter was taken up 26.08.2009 and on the said date Sri<br \/>\nRajeev Chauhan (mentioned as Rajeev Chaddha) had sent illness slip. As the<br \/>\nmatter was directed to be listed peremptorily, this Court ( Hon&#8217;ble Tarun<br \/>\nAgrawal, J.) passed following order:\n<\/p>\n<p>        &#8220;This matter has been listed peremptorily because the learned counsels for the petitioner was<br \/>\ncontinuously sending illness slips. On the last occasion, Sri Ayank Misra had sent his illness slip and<br \/>\ntoday Sri Rajeev Chaddha has sent his illness slip. This case has been listed peremptorily today and<br \/>\ntherefore, the request for adjournment at the behest of Sri Rajeev Chaddha who has sent his illness<br \/>\nslip today is rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>        List has been revised. Other counsels appearing for the petitioner, namely, Sri P.K.Jain and Sri<br \/>\nRajeev Chaddha are not present. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if<br \/>\nany, stands vacated.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>        After the aforesaid order had been passed, present application has been<br \/>\nmoved for recall of the order dated 26.08.2009. In the affidavit filed in support<br \/>\nof the aforesaid application, it has been mentioned that the aforesaid writ<br \/>\npetition was listed peremptorily on 26.08.2009 at serial No. 26, and the names<br \/>\nof Sri Rajeev Chauahan and Sri Ayank Mishra, along with Senior Counsel Sri<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>P.K. Jain, were shown in the cause list; Sri Ayank Mishra, who was assisting<br \/>\ncounsel, could not mark the case, and as such nobody could appear in the<br \/>\nmatter. Further mention has been made that Sri Rajeev Chauhan (Rajeev<br \/>\nChaddha mentioned in the order) was out of station and had gone to Lucknow,<br \/>\ntherefore, he could not notice the matter. The grounds which are sought to be<br \/>\ntaken are nothing, but bundle of false facts mentioned only for the purpose of<br \/>\nthe case. On one day illness slip was sent by Sri Ayank Mishra, then the matter<br \/>\nwas directed to be listed peremptorily. On the next day when case was so<br \/>\nlisted, the other counsel, Sri Rajeev Chauhan, sent illness slip, and in the<br \/>\napplication for recall, it has been sought to be contended that the said counsel<br \/>\nhad gone to Lucknow. The fact of the matter is that the other counsel Sri<br \/>\nRajeev Chauhan had sent illness slip on 26.08.2009, before this Court, and as<br \/>\nit is sought to be contended that he was out of station and had gone to<br \/>\nLucknow, shows falsity of the matter, as on one hand, he has sent illness slip,<br \/>\nwhereas on the other hand, he is stated to have gone to Lucknow. Theory of<br \/>\nnot marking the case in the facts of case, cannot be accepted, as joint<br \/>\nvakalatnama of Ayank Mishra and Rajeev Chauhan was there. For putting<br \/>\nillness slip of Rajeev Chauhan, cqase had been marked and as his illness slip<br \/>\nwas not entertained, then clearly as an after thought present theory of not<br \/>\nmarking the case has been set up. Circumstance clearly reflect that present<br \/>\napplication is nothing but pretense to get the order passed by this Court, on<br \/>\nfalse facts. Liberal view in such matters, does not give the privilege to<br \/>\npetitioner to set up any false case, and get order recalled as a matter of<br \/>\ncourse.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Once this is the factual scenario that the privilege of the illness slip is<br \/>\nbeing misused with impunity, and sufficiency of cause is not at all there, then<br \/>\nthis Court refuses to recall the order passed. Consequently, there is no<br \/>\noccasion to recall the order passed. The application is rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>02.02.2010<br \/>\nSRY\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 1 Court No.21 Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.2657 of 2009 Provogue (India) Limited Versus State of U.P. and others Hon&#8217;ble V.K. Shukla, J. Recall Application On 19.08.2009 illness slip was sent by Sri Ayank Mishra, Advocate. This Court (Tarun [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-22T14:05:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-22T14:05:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":698,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-22T14:05:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-22T14:05:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-22T14:05:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010"},"wordCount":698,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010","name":"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-22T14:05:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/provogue-india-limited-vs-state-of-u-p-and-others-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Provogue (India) Limited vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27707"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27707\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}