{"id":27852,"date":"2008-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008"},"modified":"2015-12-02T01:31:00","modified_gmt":"2015-12-01T20:01:00","slug":"s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"><\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT <\/p>\n<p>AT DHARWAD<\/p>\n<p>Dated this the 13th day of November, 2002;&#8217;  f   J&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BEFORE   <\/p>\n<p>THE Homsm MR. Jus&#8217;r1c;EAu;&#8217;_ m:naAR~ :&#8217;  \u00ab     <\/p>\n<p>Writ Petition No.     <\/p>\n<p>Between:\n<\/p>\n<pre>Svcnkatesh   , ..     \" \n\nS\/o late S     V '\n\n84 years H i__  \" ' ._  A \n\nBusinessman\u00bb  \n\nResiding Hear A  H   \n\n<\/pre>\n<p>Vijayanag-f-it Cnllcgc &#8221;  &#8216;-~ %  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Hospet  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Bcllary E)istri\u00e9{.__&#8217; VA _ &#8216; _  &#8221; ,  &#8230;Peti\ufb01oncr<\/p>\n<p>  3:1&#8217; Jay\u00e9vaatai Rae Kolar, Senior Counsel<br \/>\n2 &#8216; _ _ &#8220;for S11&#8243;. M. Gurutaj, Advocate)<\/p>\n<p>. Sfd \u00abJ G Lingappa<br \/>\n1_ . _12_=hWax~d, om Medar Road<br \/>\n Hospet<br \/>\n Bcllary District E\/X&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>2 J G Pampapathi<\/p>\n<p>S\/o J G Liagappa<\/p>\n<p>45 years<\/p>\n<p>1293 Ward, 01:! Medar Road<\/p>\n<p>Hospet<br \/>\nBcll.a1y District &#8230;Respo11dcn_fs  <\/p>\n<p>(By Sri V M Sheelavant, Advocate] H  &#8216;  L.<\/p>\n<p>This Writ Petition is \ufb01led uad\u00a2:rVarti&lt;fk1:sfjv226&#039;a.\ufb01d i3u?&#039;?&#039;_ of, .&#039;<br \/>\nthe Constitution of India, praying to quash the o:\\cEcr,vpas3e.;1. &quot; &#8211;.<br \/>\nby the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.I)n)&#039;_ Hospc_t,&#039;.9n IA\u00bb&#039;I&#039;-39.5 in GS&quot;<br \/>\nNo.188\/2005, dated I7-O7-2008 pm\u00e9uccd &quot;a.s__ &quot;<\/p>\n<p>This Writ Petition c\u00e9ming  frog; cfiagm this \u00e9ay, the<br \/>\nCourt made the: following:  &#039;    1  A.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9&#8230;%;L;.;:.;&gt;&#8230;@._I.a<\/p>\n<p>This is &#8216;\u00a7%\u00bb;;3a2n\ufb01\ufb01*s&#8217;.sa&amp;r:\u00a7:~i&#8217;pctitson. He has challenged in.<\/p>\n<p> wg\u00e9pgigiaign  sxfdm&#8217; passad by the ma; Court on 17\u00a2<\/p>\n<p> Jg1lyV &#8217;20G8-,_v the compromise pctitkm mm by the<\/p>\n<p>  V   defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p> V  &#8221; *   phinti\ufb01\ufb01ksd a suit \ufb01n&#8217; speci\ufb01c pcxformancc of<\/p>\n<p>  of sale dated 17.03.2000 and for execution of the<\/p>\n<p>T  and delivery sf possession against the dciiendants.<\/p>\n<p>R\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>After service of summons, the \ufb01rst deft:-ndmt entered into a<br \/>\ncompromise with the plainti\ufb01&#8221;s. An appkication under&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>23 Rule 3 91&#8242; cm duly signed by the plaintiff and &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>as well as the \ufb01rst defendant md his CounscE..\ufb01\u00a3fa\u00a7    9 <\/p>\n<p>Court whcreunder the \ufb01rst defendang<br \/>\nsale deed intcrms of the agreemgnt   &#8216;V<br \/>\ndefendant who was duly served<br \/>\nhe was placed expartc  -p.()stt&#8217;E'(&#8216;iVv&#8217;f&lt;3$&#039;A&#039;VV CX}3\u00a3iJ&#039;f\u00a3<br \/>\nevidence. The second   \ufb01kzci<\/p>\n<p>application to  &#039;\u00e9\ufb01side {he  experts and<\/p>\n<p>pennit  ta  The oxticr placing him<br \/>\nexpartc wa\u00e9. z;1s.Vis&#039;.,*.Lc:.&#039;,a  statement \ufb01icd by him was<br \/>\n_. \u00a3in~recoI{i; written statement, he denied the<br \/>\n  the suit to be dismissed. However,<\/p>\n<p> October, 2006, he exccutr-,c1 a salt: deed<\/p>\n<p>M&#039; in faviiur efthapzajn\ufb01am so \ufb01aras his share in the pmperty<\/p>\n<p>&quot;    along with his mmim Thereafter, the piain\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>   copy of the sale deed brin\ufb01ng to the notice of the<\/p>\n<p>%   the subsequent dzvclapment and in fact he did not want<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;   decree against the second defendant. In those<\/p>\n<p>x\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\ncircumstances, only thing the Court was expected to do was to<\/p>\n<p>pass a decree in terms of the compromise petition \ufb01led which<\/p>\n<p>is duly si\ufb01cd by the plainti\ufb01 and his Counsel. i:1stca\u00e9i&#8211;..\u00bbof<\/p>\n<p>msor\ufb01ng to the aforesaid legal procedure, it A. V<\/p>\n<p>evidence: on merits as the second defendant  H<\/p>\n<p>agreement in qucs\ufb01on. Plainti\ufb01&#8217; was   V<\/p>\n<p>defendant was examined and he   i*cs&#8217;;&lt;;<\/p>\n<p>witnesses. No and&#039; cncc was   bct1al;f__ &#8211;<br \/>\ndefendant. Thereafter, tht\ufb01t. trial  h\ufb01m<br \/>\ndecree can be passed by  of first<\/p>\n<p>dcfendanf  Court: ought to have rejected<\/p>\n<p>the compmi\ufb01ig\u00e9   he took exception to his<\/p>\n<p>. in  evidence of the parties and<\/p>\n<p>  the compromise petitixan. Aggricved<\/p>\n<p>by&quot; th\u00e9 .sa__ xi&quot; V  plam\ufb01\ufb01is before this Couxt.<\/p>\n<p>     Sri. Jayavittai Ran Kolar, ltsarnmi Counsel<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;app$a1&#8217;ing for the petitioner assaiiing the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A   &#8220;demands that when the \ufb01rs: defendant has duly cxccutcd the<\/p>\n<p>compromise petition which is also duly signed by  ,V<\/p>\n<p>the H131&#8242; Court ought to have recorded the   K<\/p>\n<p>passed a decree against the \ufb01rst defcsidam.   {he  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>second defendant is concerned  s\u00a7\u00e9g\u00a7em\u00a2n.t &#8216;\\\u00a7s\u00a73:\ufb02*~.\/.:<br \/>\n\ufb01led denying the ageement, s&#8217;dbeequentiy,\u00bb__he&#8211; {he<br \/>\nsale deed in favour of the piafen\ufb01ii. wam.a_e suit<br \/>\nto be dismissed as against;   Instead of<br \/>\npassing the decree    recorded and<br \/>\nuitimatzely   g\u00a7,[diii;:ga1 and contrazy<br \/>\nto the   23 Rule 3 ope and<\/p>\n<p>therefore\ufb02le    set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>   the ksalned Counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>respe-3;;3.en\u00a3;&#8221;*\u00ab:;_e.;&#8217;.d&#8217;x&#8217;\u00a2iefcndant&#8211;1 submits that though the \ufb01rst<\/p>\n<p> _defenda:3;t..__&#8221;  A executed a compromise petitrion, second<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8221;  has exwum a reglsteted sale deed in favour of<\/p>\n<p>  The said eompmmise and the sale deed am now<\/p>\n<p>%  -.th_e.}subject matter of a separate compnehensivc suit: where the<\/p>\n<p>  ~ edefeztzdant have alleged fraud against the plain\ufb01\ufb01 and seeking<\/p>\n<p>1:\/<\/p>\n<p>appropriate reieif. His gievanoe was that though&#8221;<br \/>\ndefendant stepped into the Witness box, gave   H<br \/>\nexamined two witnesses, his evidex1ce&#8221;i\u00e9    <\/p>\n<p>the \ufb01nal order Passed by the (30&#8217;11&#8217;t  :*h\u00e9&#8217;e~\u00a7mp1vmsr&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01tion is unexceptionable ar\u00a7{i.._VL:&#8217;L&#8221;therefo1e__ he  for<\/p>\n<p>dismissal of the writ petition&#8230;&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>5.  &#8216;plaoed on meord it is<br \/>\nclear that  entered into a<br \/>\ncoxnpromiae  into writing, signed by the<\/p>\n<p>parties&#8221; 3 and    in the Court. The second<\/p>\n<p>_ defenda\ufb01f eontcs&#8217;ux1_:V&#8221;t1ae etzit Subsequently, he set\ufb02ed the<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab\ufb01ne sale deed. Copy of the sale deed was<\/p>\n<p>  Court an\u00e9 piainti\ufb01&#8221; made a request to<\/p>\n<p> dismiss the   so far as second defendant is concemeci as<\/p>\n<p>W    action did not survive by virtue of the execution<br \/>\nVA    deed. in those circumstances, all that the Court<br \/>\n  to have done is to see whether the compromise<\/p>\n<p>   Ipmscnted before it is lawful and if it is convinced that it is<\/p>\n<p>lawful and duly executed by the parties, to pass a ,,<\/p>\n<p>terms of the compromise. There was no scope for  K<\/p>\n<p>evidence. At any rate, in View of t,*.1&#8217;e&#8221;&#8216;  events-,<br \/>\nrecording of evidence was Who\ufb02yVunneL*eoogijvf.<br \/>\nthe trial Court that when once;  of the \ufb01led<br \/>\nWritten statement denying  aii\u00e9gav\ufb01on\u00e9, the<br \/>\ncompmmise petition is     cannot be<br \/>\nrecozded, is withoutiagoy   can record<br \/>\ncompromise   of in a suit if<br \/>\nthe said  the claim of the<br \/>\nplaintiff  fa&#8211;x&#8221;&#8216;a,e  concerned. Evidence is to<\/p>\n<p>be I&#8217;\u00a33COI'(1f3(\u00a3l&#8221;&#8216;-.(&#8220;&#8216;L)IJL}\\_Sv7 &#8216;in  of the defendants who are<\/p>\n<p>_ _conte$i:&#8217;_\u00a7;og the cIai:.r1_V{V (313 that gonad the compromise petition<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I been rejected. In that View of the matter, the<\/p>\n<p> be sustained. Hence, it is quashed.<\/p>\n<p> _Accordingly&#8217;,&#8217; I. the following order:<\/p>\n<p>2 V\u00bb  ; petition is allowed. The impugned order passed<\/p>\n<p>  Court is hereby set aside. The matter is remitted<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  to the mat Court with a diredion to the learned trial Judge<\/p>\n<p>to consider the compromise petition; to \ufb01nd out whether it is<\/p>\n<p>5\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><br \/>\nduly executed or not and then \ufb01nd out whether it is  or<\/p>\n<p>not&#8217; and thereq\ufb02er pms appropriate orders stnbtly in  A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Order 23 Rule 3 CPC&#8217;.\n<\/p>\n<p>kspf\u00ab~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 Author: N.Kumar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT AT DHARWAD Dated this the 13th day of November, 2002;&#8217; f J&#8221; BEFORE THE Homsm MR. Jus&#8217;r1c;EAu;&#8217;_ m:naAR~ :&#8217; \u00ab Writ Petition No. Between: Svcnkatesh , .. &#8221; S\/o late S V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-01T20:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-01T20:01:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1079,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\",\"name\":\"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-01T20:01:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-01T20:01:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-01T20:01:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008"},"wordCount":1079,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008","name":"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-01T20:01:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-venkatesh-vs-j-g-virupakshappa-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S Venkatesh vs J G Virupakshappa on 18 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27852\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}