{"id":2791,"date":"2010-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-04T02:56:45","modified_gmt":"2018-01-03T21:26:45","slug":"beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>Between:\n\nIN THE HIGH comm OF KA_RNA'I\"Al&lt;A AT BANGALORE\nDated this the 22&quot;&#039; day of September, 2016\n\nBcforc:\n\nTHE HON&#039;BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G A.\n\nRegular Second Appeal 844 \/ 2005 \n\nBeerappa S\/0 Kodappa -- since dead by \n\nA\n\n erffee\n\nSml Chowdamma W\/0 iate Ba\u00e9mppa V\nR\/0 Beeradevara Tempie Stretzt&#039; \nBirur Plobli, Kadur, Chikmagalur  .\n\nNeeiakanthappa S\/0 B\u00e9e1;}\u00a7p})a\n\nR\/0 Beezfadevara Tempie Sircter     --\nBirur Hobli, Kaduz&#039;, Chikmva.gae1uV:&#039;---- A \n\nSml VD_e\\firarnnfae&#039;i \nBetI&#039;adah_aIIiA Vi1}:.1g\u20ac&#039;;A&quot;i&quot;:1ri&#039;k&lt;-;re Tq\nChik1n:1ga&#039;!ur&#039;v V   \n\n.S1&#039;}at R_\u00a2.n:1v]_&lt;z11nm&#039;a &#039;D\/s}Bcer;1pp21\n\n&quot; ,Rx&#039;.&lt;w Mtjdi.gc\u00ab:.&#039;\u00a7:. Anthz-1raga11a}-I0bii\n T a1ji1&lt;e.1&#039;c~Tq,AV Chikmztgaltlr\n\nAppellants\n\n   (By Sn&#039;  V&#039;Vig11csh\u00a7Jj;.;:7e:S Sluzsfri, Adv.)\nVA {  _ &#039;_ 4\/i:1_d:\n\n_ 3}} Dddzm1al1appa. 69 yrs\n 'SIG Heggzllilm\n\n'[ B H Dc\\-'anna CC? DCVEIIIIILE, 56 yrs\nS\/0 Hcggannzt\n\n\n\nIQ\n\nBoth are r\/0 old Ajjampurzt Road\nBirttr Hohli, KadtirTalt1k  C.\nChik.rnagz1lt1r District Respontie1t_ts_  \n\n(By Sri Ram Bhat for S R Kulkarni, Adv.)\n\nThe Second Appeal is filed undc.i:_ S.l:(.l.l)C \nProcedure praying to set aside the judgmeri':. and decree dated _l9..2.2005\n\nin RA 40\/2003 by the Civil Judgeh(S1'.Dvri.); Kadur'h-ireversirgg Vthe\";\njudgment and decree dated 7. l2.20()2.t_Vii'i~.VQS 295.\/21999 by \"t--he'\"P1't'. Civil\"\n\nJudge (Jr.Dn.), Kadur.\n\nThe Appeal coming &lt;)n&quot;&#039;for .l%ie.ari?:jg tliiiyid\u00e9iyi Court delivered the\nfollowing: C  1 ~   &#039;\n\n:JU1:3-C:-}:ilJE.3\\lTT&#039;--:_i&quot;&#039; .. \n&#039;is   assailing the order of the\n\nCivil Judge&#039;&quot;(sr&#039;.13v&#039;n.).;:1%;;\u00a7&#039;;;.t;g&#039;itt_ i2A \u00ab+0\/2003 on 19.2.2005.\n\niA;&#039;s&#039;tzit&#039;. in OS..l9C;9 was filed by the plaintifts\/respondents<\/pre>\n<p> the  udge (_&#8217;Jr.Dvn.), Kadur seeking for a declaration and<\/p>\n<p>in&#8217;}&#8217;t&#8217;;rie&#8217;ti.on &#8220;z&#8217;:rtd~.,_als:o*l;or cancellation of the sale deed in respect&#8221; of<\/p>\n<p>CV propeity in Block No} of Birur Kaval to an extent of 5.00<\/p>\n<p>C V&#8217; &#8216; .4&#8242;:&#8221;t:&#8217;;re:-: av_hiehVV&#8217;i&#8217;s said to have been granted to the father of the plziititiffs by<\/p>\n<p>__tl1e7&#8217;gove&#8217;rninent under the Grow More Food Scheme.<\/p>\n<p>g f).\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb -1:\u00bb.  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>=.-&#8230;;\u00bb:r&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>{\\J<\/p>\n<p>approached the lower appellate court. The lower appellate eourt_.while<\/p>\n<p>deereeing the suit of the piztintills. reversed the finding of the tri&#8211;\u00a71l&#8217;eo&#8217;u.rt&#8217;.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>According to the lower appellate court, what has s_tj:E.;l_&#8221;i&gt;z3___<\/p>\n<p>favour of the appe.llant herein is a different Mhloe.k i.e;;&#8221;&#8216;Sy:.:l\\lol\u00a7&#8217;6l3&#8217;&#8211;andl <\/p>\n<p>deelziration sought for by the plztiritiffs is in S4y.l\\3_'().6}&#8221;l.i&#8217;Aee-ordingl:w_hi&#8221;leA<\/p>\n<p>allowing the appeal, the suit was decreed&#8217;against-whizth,  idefe_nVda_.i1t is<br \/>\nbefore this court in second appeal, on va1fious_gropunds. ass_ai1.i:.1g?the order<\/p>\n<p>of the lower appellate court.\n<\/p>\n<p>At the time oi&#8221;.ed_ni.iss.iez1,l&#8217;the following points were &#8216;framed for<br \/>\nconsideration: &#8216;  l<\/p>\n<p>1 Wl&#8221;\u00a7Cll3f1_1&#8242; thelowerzilppellate court was justified in holding that the<br \/>\nV&#8217;  sa1.e:&#8217;deed &#8216;dated 22;.&#8221;9&#8217;.&#8221;E976 in favour of the appellant is only a<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ;.sham ;1ndibo.gu:;&#8211;.trztnsaetion and is not an out and out sale?<\/p>\n<p>W4hethe;*.tlie.V.s&#8217;uit or the plt1.ii1ti.l&#8217;l&#8217;s is barred by limitation&#8217;?<\/p>\n<p>31  .. Whether the lower ztppellate court erred in grzmtirig it decree of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;deel&#8217;zti&#8217;2iti&lt;)1i and injunction although there is identity of the<br \/>\nfproperty involved as contended by the defendant&#039;?<\/p>\n<p>Heard the counsel representing the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>It is the submission of the appeilanfs counsel. the lower A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>court without looking into the prayer sought for by the pia-}.4tit&#8217;ifi&#8217;s,ysitnpiyi1 &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>proceeded on merits only on the ground tliat-What.has&#8211;i_4beeni&#8217;retf&#8217;ecterjj.in7..<\/p>\n<p>the sale deed is Sy.No.6\/3 which has been  <\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs are seeking for a declaration  Both 4dVif&#8217;terent<br \/>\nproperties. Without looking intoythe t&#8217;ac&#8217;t&#8217;t1al:_:position and&#8217;t&#8217;iAtE.e&#8221;Vava_i1able<br \/>\nto the p1aint.ift&#8217;s, accepting the sale -bv&#8221;e;1nd.2tries, when the<\/p>\n<p>defendant is in possess:ion=oi&#8217; the 1att1\u00e9;i&#8217;o1f i&#8217;:&#8221;rtor.e than twenty years after<\/p>\n<p>the sale dectthas b_eerti&#8217;:_=:&gt;giste1-ed,v despite ndrnission by the pEaint.i.&#8217;ff in his<br \/>\ncross exa1n.in2ttio_n ttsrV._hia~nding&#8212;.oycf possession of the land that has<\/p>\n<p>been gt-aiitedv to they t&#8217;atAhietf&#8217;ioi&#8221; the plaintilt&#8217; and the same {and has been<\/p>\n<p>iczoniveyedi;  that the arithmetical error crept in in the sale<\/p>\n<p>deed\u00bb was  of.Ve1;*sight, proceeded to decree the suit which is<\/p>\n<p> t3;t&#8217;t'()t}t:t)t1&#8242;:&#8217;.s&#8217;~.._<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217; , i giPer.fcontra. counsel for the respondents submitted, Sy.N&#8217;o.6 is a<\/p>\n<p>T y&#8217;_;tst..vexteiit of landt What has been conveyed by the father of the<\/p>\n<p>32: ,&#8211;~<br \/>\nK (:5<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs to the deiendant as per the sale deed, is only Sy.N_o.6\/3.<\/p>\n<p>Sy.No.6\/ 1. and 6\/3 are two d.i&#8217;fferent lands. There is no error<\/p>\n<p>committed by the lower nppellate court. Further. it is SUbt&#8217;1:I&#8217;iiE'(&#8216;:.d;&#8217;i$&#8217;\u00e91\u00a7~\u00a7\u20ac;1&#8243;&#8216;-, &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>on the cause of action. since there was 9. threat&#8217; of dispossession__and&#8217;_<\/p>\n<p>encroachment on the Ennd in Sy.No.6\/1 which wits gianteiiviitci ethe <\/p>\n<p>of the plaintiff under the Scheme 01&#8242; ._gfo&#8221;=tiei&#8217;11i11.et1t_, the ii&#8217;tjwiettiaprpeiiiate<\/p>\n<p>court has rightly decreed the suit .whiehV.does_notiCall for in&#8217;te.rferenee.<\/p>\n<p>In the case on hand, whatis7n_otieec5.j_ i:::, &#8216;d\u00e9&#8217;:C\u20ac&#8217;fding to the admission<\/p>\n<p>of th6 Plaintiff in his.Veross\u00bb\u00a2xami3\u00a7&#8217;tttio&#8211;f1.~&#8217;*,S3&#8242;.ii&#8221;i0t6},I&#8221;alone has been<\/p>\n<p>granted in &#8216;I&#8217;;w()u_r _of&#8221;th*e .fathei&#8221;oAi&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;th_e plaintiits and not any other block.<br \/>\nIt appears, the seine e(&gt;t1tda}i;t_Ve\u00ab&#8211;._been conveyed by the father of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff it;1&#8217;t&#8221;a\\\u00bbfou1* ot&#8221;&#8216;\u00bbthe&#8217;dei&#8217;eiidant. Might be there is a mistake\/error<\/p>\n<p>in &#8216;crept in  the m_ef&#8217;o_t&#8217; drafting of the sale deed unnoticed by either of the<\/p>\n<p>p2trtii&#8217;e.s.&#8221;-i&#8217;__The*   was executed in September, 1976 September<\/p>\n<p>whereas the gm-: is said to have been made in July 1976. The suit for<\/p>\n<p>it &#8221; &#8216;:_iieeIai=attie(__)n isV&#8217;i&#8217;i1ed during 1999 nearly after it iapse of twenty two years.<\/p>\n<p>I__n~__tEi;-1t&#8221;&#8216;view of the matter, having noted the relief sought for by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;\u00ab;3:liai&#8217;Iat&#8217;iiE&#8217;f&#8217;s, since it is a suit for declaration holding that it should be filed<\/p>\n<p>a&#8221;&#8216;=.\u00bb&#8217;\u20ac &#8220;W<br \/>\nJ &#8216;3<\/p>\n<p>within three. years. the trial court dismissed the suit. The appellate _c_ourt_._<\/p>\n<p>however, without visualising the situation whether no other -&#8216;!ivi,i..l&#8221;l.-dii&#8217;-&lt;V&#039;\\-&#039;;i&quot;&quot;i.$<\/p>\n<p>granted to the father of the piaintiffs so as to convey ths;j1&#039;:::a11&#039;iell&#039;tii&#039;&#8211;t *<\/p>\n<p>defeiidant and also without verifying whether&quot;i&#039;n..addiiiorrtoe&#8211;Sj,r.No_i(i\/l;._y<\/p>\n<p>Sy.No.6\/3 was also granted or not, pr&#039;ocie.ededi A&#039; to ttecreey tliei<br \/>\ntechnically presuming that what has been_i&#039;:o_nveyed._is&#039;dii&#039;i&#039;erei&#039;it&quot;atiitl What<\/p>\n<p>has been retained by the plztiiitilifs i&#039;athe1&quot;&#039;is&#8211;.ti:ifferent.<\/p>\n<p>It is needless to say that the eannoytt eoi1:t&#039;er better title than<\/p>\n<p>what he has. It is also_:no_t ma-tie lo&#039;ut.l\u00a5t7y ithei..;)laii1tiffi;iithat there are two<\/p>\n<p>lands granted in i&#039;:-txi\/oar .ofi&quot;the-ir_fatyheri. _&#039;lf any material is available on<\/p>\n<p>record to show that there pieces of land available to the<\/p>\n<p>p1aintiE&#039;fs&#039;;&#039;father  1 and 6\/3, then necessarily, the finding<\/p>\n<p>Vayrriyedy   ll &quot;titer appellate court could have been accepted.<\/p>\n<p>I  ll _Soli&#039;atr:&#039;a..$ conveying of the land whether it was against the Land<\/p>\n<p> Grant Rates C?vi&#039;~(,)ll}.&#039;CAl&#039;WlSC it is nobotly&#039;s case. More over, plaintiffs have<\/p>\n<p>i&#039;  If&#039;&quot;n_ot~;)leade.d v:&quot;i_o&#039;i* protiucecf any material in this regard basically to seek for<\/p>\n<p>&quot;:1. deelaratgioii. Further, what is noticed is, apparently the tower court<\/p>\n<p>at it &#8212; .\n<\/p>\n<p>without. entering into :1 di.~;eussie11 as to the tttztintaiatztbility of the sui-.t:__, on<\/p>\n<p>the point of limitation. proceeded to decree the suit which is er:'(b&#8217;:iee.=.is, <\/p>\n<p>Aeeordingiy answering the second stzbstatttiztl qtte\u00e9it-i..(m&#8217;  l:&#8217;1w&#8217;,&#8217;&#8211;\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>white setting aside the judgment and deeree _p4zis.~-:sed_j ..t:11&#8217;e.VV\u00ablVV(_&gt;&#8221;vvje_ar_ <\/p>\n<p>appelkate court. the matter is remitted: te thed&#8217;E\u00a2:&gt;.&#8221;.&#8217;Ver  et&gt;u1*t.&amp;.t'(&gt;<br \/>\ndispose of the same in \u00a31CC()1&#8217;dEtl&#8217;1CC with   1it&#8217;ti\u00e9\u00a7tettta1<br \/>\nalso on merit&#8217;s, if need be, after   to   parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>The parties are permitted to  if need be.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appeal  attowed. H        <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/1<br \/>\nEedge<br \/>\nAn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh Between: IN THE HIGH comm OF KA_RNA&#8217;I&#8221;Al&lt;A AT BANGALORE Dated this the 22&quot;&#039; day of September, 2016 Bcforc: THE HON&#039;BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G A. Regular Second Appeal 844 \/ 2005 Beerappa S\/0 Kodappa &#8212; since dead by A erffee [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-03T21:26:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-03T21:26:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1185,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-03T21:26:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-03T21:26:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-03T21:26:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010"},"wordCount":1185,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010","name":"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-03T21:26:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beerappa-vs-b-h-doddamallappa-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Beerappa vs B H Doddamallappa on 22 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2791\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}