{"id":28038,"date":"2008-05-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-29T12:27:05","modified_gmt":"2016-09-29T06:57:05","slug":"kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 235 of 2001()\n\n\n\n1. KOTTOPPADAN HAMZA\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. STATE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\n\n Dated :21\/05\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                   A.K.BASHEER, J.\n      ------------------------------------\n        Crl.Rev.Petition No. 235 of 2001\n      ------------------------------------\n       Dated this the 21st day of May 2008\n\n                      O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>         Petitioner   was   tried   for   the   offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable under Sections 451 and 435 of IPC. The trial<\/p>\n<p>Court  found  him  guilty  and  he   was,  accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>for one month and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000\/- under<\/p>\n<p>Section 435 of IPC. For the offence under Section 451<\/p>\n<p>of IPC he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>for three months and to pay a fine of Rs.500\/-. In<\/p>\n<p>appeal the Sessions Court confirmed the above Order of<\/p>\n<p>conviction and sentence. Hence this revision petition.<\/p>\n<p>    2.   The prosecution case in a nutshell was that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner\/accused  had committed trespass into the<\/p>\n<p>single room tenament (hut) of PW1 at about 10 PM on<\/p>\n<p>August 6, 1991 and then set fire to certain clothes<\/p>\n<p>belonging to PW1, PW2 and their children. The value of<\/p>\n<p>the  clothes  damaged  in  the  fire  was  assessed  at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,000\/-. In support of its case the prosecution had<\/p>\n<p>examined Pws.1 to 6. Exts.P1 and P2 and MO1 series were<\/p>\n<p>marked in the case. There was no oral or documentary<\/p>\n<p>evidence on the side of the defence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    3.   PW1 who was none other than the brother-in-law<\/p>\n<p>of the accused was not admittedly, available at the<\/p>\n<p>residence  when  the   alleged  crime  was   committed.<\/p>\n<p>According to him, he came to know about the incident on<\/p>\n<p>the next day. He went to the police station and<\/p>\n<p>reported the matter. The police recorded Ext.P1 First<\/p>\n<p>Information Statement. Accordingly,    Ext.P1(a) First<\/p>\n<p>Information Report was registered.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    4.   PW2, the wife of PW1 deposed before the Court<\/p>\n<p>that she and PW3, her sister-in-law (her husband&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>sister) had gone to her uncle&#8217;s residence in the<\/p>\n<p>neighbourhood for spending the night there, since PW1<\/p>\n<p>was not at home. According to PW2 the accused had come<\/p>\n<p>to their residence during the night. She and PW3 saw<\/p>\n<p>the accused when they came out of the house to attend<\/p>\n<p>the call of nature. On the next day, it was found that<\/p>\n<p>some clothes had been burnt by fire. In short, PW2 did<\/p>\n<p>not see the accused setting fire to the   clothes. She<\/p>\n<p>further stated that she could not say as to how the<\/p>\n<p>clothes happened to be burnt. PW3 is the wife of the<\/p>\n<p>accused (sister of PW1). According to this witness, she<\/p>\n<p>had been living separately from her husband because of<\/p>\n<p>ill-treatment  for the last two years. PW3 deposed that<\/p>\n<p>she accompanied  PW2 to the residence of her uncle. She<\/p>\n<p>also stated that the accused had come to the residence<\/p>\n<p>of PW1, in the night. At that time, they had gone to<\/p>\n<p>the neighbouring house. But she stated that she had<\/p>\n<p>come out of the house to attend the call of nature at<\/p>\n<p>about 10 PM. At that time, she saw somebody lighting<\/p>\n<p>the torch. Then she saw some smoke. She went and tried<\/p>\n<p>to find out what had happened. She also stated that she<\/p>\n<p>saw the accused and identified him.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    5.   PW4 attested Ext.P2 Scene Mahazar. PW5 Head<\/p>\n<p>Constable  stated  that  he  had  recorded   the  First<\/p>\n<p>Information  Statement   and   registered   the   First<\/p>\n<p>Information  Report.  PW6  who  was  the  Investigating<\/p>\n<p>Officer spoke about the process of investigation.<\/p>\n<p>    6.   PW2 and PW3 are the prime witnesses on the<\/p>\n<p>side of the prosecution. It was admitted by PW2 and PW3<\/p>\n<p>that they had slept in the house of the uncle of PW1 on<\/p>\n<p>that night. PW2 admitted that she did not see the<\/p>\n<p>accused setting fire to the    clothes. Of course, she<\/p>\n<p>deposed that the accused had come to the house in the<\/p>\n<p>night while she was in     uncle&#8217;s house. Her husband<\/p>\n<p>(PW1) was away. Interestingly PW3 stated that she and<\/p>\n<p>PW2 had come out of the house at about 10 PM to attend<\/p>\n<p>the call of nature. At that time, she saw somebody with<\/p>\n<p>a torch and a little later, late  she found some smoke.<\/p>\n<p>According to PW3, she went to scene of occurrence on<\/p>\n<p>seeing the smoke and found the accused there. But PW2<\/p>\n<p>did not have such a case at all.\n<\/p>\n<p>    7.   There is yet another aspect to be noted.   PW2<\/p>\n<p>had stated that she had gone to the police station on<\/p>\n<p>the next day (August 7, 1993). The police had recorded<\/p>\n<p>her statement and obtained her signature. But the<\/p>\n<p>statement had never seen the light of the day. On the<\/p>\n<p>contrary,  the prosecution had produced Ext.P1 First<\/p>\n<p>Information Statement admittedly given by PW1 on the<\/p>\n<p>next day of the incident. There is no explanation as to<\/p>\n<p>what  happened to the signed statement of PW2, which<\/p>\n<p>according to her, was recorded by the police first.<\/p>\n<p>Though, there is some force in the contention by the<\/p>\n<p>learned public prosecutor that the deposition of PW2<\/p>\n<p>and PW3 are quite natural and trustworthy. I am not<\/p>\n<p>satisfied that  the accused can be convicted solely on<\/p>\n<p>the basis of the identification made by his estranged<\/p>\n<p>wife, particularly, since the prosecution had failed to<\/p>\n<p>give any plausible explanation for its omission to<\/p>\n<p>produce the statement of PW2 which was the earliest one<\/p>\n<p>recorded by the police.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         Having  regard   to  the   entire  facts   and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of doubt.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the order of conviction and sentence against<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner is set aside. Revision petition is<\/p>\n<p>allowed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                (A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE)<br \/>\nskr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 235 of 2001() 1. KOTTOPPADAN HAMZA &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER Dated :21\/05\/2008 O R D E R A.K.BASHEER, J. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-29T06:57:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-29T06:57:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":892,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-29T06:57:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-29T06:57:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-29T06:57:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008"},"wordCount":892,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008","name":"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-29T06:57:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kottoppadan-hamza-vs-state-on-21-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kottoppadan Hamza vs State on 21 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}