{"id":28120,"date":"2009-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-12-22T05:09:02","modified_gmt":"2016-12-21T23:39:02","slug":"ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<pre>HWTHEIHG%ECOURT(H?KARNATAKAJ\u00a5FBANGALORE_\n\nDATED THIS THE 15th DAY or JULY 2009 ~_'  1.\n\nPRESENT\n\nTI-IE I-ION'BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARALLI QHIEEJUSTTSE   \n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTTCE v.d'.~S.\u00e9LEHAI--TIT..4j   \n\nWRIT PETITION N0. 6134}L2Ij;oaVV(G1~}1;'II1I\u00a7\/LS) E\nBETWEEN:  ' 3 A 2\n\nM\/S JSW STEEL LIMITED H  V\nHAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE\u00bb; _  _ -  '\nAT JINDAL MANSION'5A,. DRIG. DE'SH'MAUK'H \nMARS, MUMBAI-4.00 o2:j6,:_ 'V _    .\nREP BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT   7'\n\nKRISHNEGO--\\_?VDA-.   - 3  PETITIONER\n\n(By SIVIT. S R ANT) RADE{A';'.Ad.\u00a7:6cRtE.}\n\n \u00bb GO'IE1?\u20aci_\\fNIE\u00abN'}' OF KARNATAKA\n' B':T_~THEVSvECRETARY\nMIi\\fFSS SS:'.{AN'E TEXTILES\nCOMME.R~C_E..~AND INDUSTRIES\n-- DEPAR'FMEN'l'\n' I EANGA.L_oRE--0 1\n\n 2 \" M.\/:S\"'1f&lt;ABINI MINERALS PVT LTD\n\n &#039;No;1&#039;20, HOODI APPTS,\n CUNNINGHAM ROAD\n -~-BANGALORE-52\n\n \n\n\n\n3 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA\nMINISTRY OF MINES\nSHASTRI BI-IAWAN\n\nNEW DELHI 110 001  RESPON~E--ENT_S  A&#039; \n\n(By Sri BASAVARAJ KAREDDY, GA FOR R1 , GUHA.AS&#039;SOCiIfA~TEST&#039; \n\nFOR R-2 )   _\n\nTHIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES__ 225 as 2;2:I7&quot;OF \n\nCONSTITUTION OF INDEA FRAYING To EQUVASjH...__Tz~IE\nCOMMUNICATION \/ RECOMMENDA&#039;\ufb02ON.DT.4.1\u00abQ.U&quot;Z, fi?AS,SED BY\nTHE R1, AND ANN--J. QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS, OF THE R1\nWHEREBY IT HAS RECOMMENDED&quot;&quot;&#039;FHE CASE OF R2, FOR\nGRANT OF MINING TO R3, ANNEXED AS ~.AN,N:K. DIRECT THE\nR1, TO GRANT THE MINING ,LEA,SE; IN&#039;-FTAVIOUR OF THE\nPETITIONER IN TERMS OF THEMINING LEASE:-V -!&#039;I\u00a5&#039;PLICA&#039;l&#039;IONS\nOF THE PETITONER _P&#039;ENDING &quot;EEFORE__IT- IN &quot; ACCORDANCE\nWITH APPLICABLE LAWS,,,.RUI;ES:A-ND REGULATIONS.\n\nTHIS W&#039;RIT._PEiI&#039;iTION&quot;C\u00bbOMiNG&#039;UP FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,\nTHE COURT MADE THE FOLLO__wINc.;-: --\n\n&quot;-oRnER\n\n1. {&#039;Deii{r&#039;eTed by PD. Dinakaran, C.J.)\n\nThe._abov.e~Efifitiipetition is filed by the petitioner challenging\n\n _cc-mmuni&quot;ca_tion\/ recommendation dated 04.10.2007 passed by\n\n &quot;.;feSpor..ident &quot;No.1 recommending for grant of mining lease to an\n\nit  of 127.48 hectares in Thimmappanagudi village, Sandur\n\n Bellary District in favour respondent No.2, pursuant to<\/pre>\n<p> 3 gvpersonn. \/\ufb01gx<\/p>\n<p>2.2 The further contention of the petitioner is that,<\/p>\n<p>recommending the grant of lease in favour of 2&#8243;&#8221; respc-&#8216;ndent; V&#8217; 1&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>State Government has not followed the proecedurei  <\/p>\n<p>under Rule 26 of Mineral Concession <\/p>\n<p>referred to as M.C. Rules, 1960). He&#8217;nce_faiI1ire  the<\/p>\n<p>Government to consider the same is arbitraryaand nnreavsonvable.<\/p>\n<p>3. Heard learnedvcounselthepetijiioner and the<\/p>\n<p>learned Government     it   <\/p>\n<p>4. We havegiven&#8221;  an%3f;ioi1_s&#8221;.:o11sideration to the submissions<\/p>\n<p>made on behalfof theipetitioner&#8217;a_s&#8221;we1~1 as the respondents.<\/p>\n<p>  CQrfeeded1y_ theiiiimpugned proceedings dated 27.09.2007<br \/>\nreads. _as jhereunderzi &#8216;  ii &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>0&#8243; ~\u20ac\u00e9.;e.No\u00a3iee&#8221;.&#8217;un\u00a7ief Rule 26(1) of M.C.Ru1es, 1950 was<\/p>\n<p>_  issued\u00bb to..__al1-the applicants to appear for hearing on<br \/>\n 2-0&#8243;&#8216;! Feiariiary, 2007 at 11.00 am. to make<br \/>\n&#8216; iipreisentation for sanction of mining lease in their<br \/>\n The hearing was held as scheduled and 33<\/p>\n<p>  ..ap_p1icants who attended the hearing were heard in<\/p>\n<p>!: \/u ::\/\/i:\/&#8221;Mt . &#8211; &#8216;<br \/>\nJ\/&#8217;V<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, we do not agree with the contention of petitioner _<\/p>\n<p>the procedure contemplated under Rule 26 of M.C_.. Vvva:s.not&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>complied with.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.2 That apart, the reasoning  impugned..vprok7&#8217;eedings<br \/>\nreads as hereunder: &#8216;<br \/>\n&#8220;9. It is desirable to  &#8216;areas to<br \/>\napplicants who\u00e9liaye already.V\u00a5esta1\u00a7li_she-d\u00abtheir plants<br \/>\nin the State&#8221;  :Znv_es.tii1gihugepjlarnclunts. The Ore<br \/>\nrequirement. for&#8221;&#8221;pr&#8221;od11ct4iorivroftonne steel is about<br \/>\n1.6 tonVno&#8211;s.of&#8217;i~ro&#8217;n;o3:e&#8217;7.  V l l I<br \/>\n5.3 It  also  to__notice that the Government has<br \/>\nfollowed the criteria me&#8211;nt&#8217;ioVned&#8221;&#8221;&#8212;-i_n&#8217; Section 11(3) of M.M.D.R Act,<br \/>\n1957 for gzjanting rnininglease as per which the following matters<br \/>\n &#8216;bathe biauisiskfor  of mining lease:\n<\/p>\n<p>(a)~..Any special&#8221; lV&lt;p&#039;r:.o&#039;i.vledge of, or experience in reconnaissance<\/p>\n<p>operations,_p.rospecting operations or mining operations, as<\/p>\n<p>&quot;  &#039;&#8211;the ca&#039;seV_rnay be, posse ssed by the applicant;<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab..(b):vi_T&#039;eh_e&quot;iinancial resources of the applicant;<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>(c) The nature and quality of the technical staff employedp&#8211;or&gt; to<\/p>\n<p>be employed by the applicant;\n<\/p>\n<p>(d) The investment which the applicant proposes to=makei&#8217;e &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>mines and in the industry based on the mine.=&#8217;rals\u00a7'&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>(e) Such other matters as may be prescri.bed_A_.l * <\/p>\n<p>5.4.1 The Government while considering the Iner1ts_ of <\/p>\n<p>respondent has observed as  ;_&#8217;  T&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>14. M\/s. Kabini Mineral  :CoVmpanyi&#8221;does.p.&#8221;not hold any<br \/>\nPvt. Ltd., _   [mining l.ease.._in&#8217;Karnataka. They<br \/>\n3  . &#8220;prc&#8217;rpose&#8217;_ xto&#8221; invest Rs.262.50<\/p>\n<p>.V  &#8220;&#8216;They__a1so propose to set<br \/>\n  ._ &#8216; &#8216; up-f_&#8217;::; &#8221; &#8216;Stee?g\/ Sponge Iron plant\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;&#8212;&#8211;  _  iig,  &#8216;-near Hospet&#8217;. Proposed use of ore<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;  &#8221; &#8216;is-._for captive consumption, for<\/p>\n<p>  export and also for local supply.\n<\/p>\n<p>5:41  the other l&#8217;i&#8217;and..tl1e merits of petitioner reads as<\/p>\n<p>hereundt&#8217;-;r:,   l<\/p>\n<p>17. M\/s&#8221;.\u00bbJ.S.W.&#8221;p:StAeels The Company does not hold any<br \/>\n Ltd;&#8211;.,  mining lease in Karnataka. They<br \/>\n&#8216; propose to invest Rs.10 crores.\n<\/p>\n<p>Proposed use of ore is for<br \/>\nindigenous consumption and<br \/>\ncaptive use. Iron ore will be<br \/>\nsupplied to their Steel Plant at<br \/>\nToranagallu, Hospet Taluk,<br \/>\nBellary District.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.5 The above comparitive merits of petitioner  _<\/p>\n<p>respondent herein reveals that while the 2nd respondent&#8221;~herein_:it<\/p>\n<p>proposed to invest Rs.262.5O lakhs, the pet.ition&#8217;e_r.:<\/p>\n<p>invest Rs. 10 crores and further pi&#8221;o_posed&#8217;* = use 1the..:o_re for<br \/>\nindigenous consumption and captiveiiiise pandii   to<br \/>\nsupply the ore to its existing $&#8217;te_el  ._&#8217;ri.i{.5W.ever,  fact<br \/>\nthat petitioner is prepared to   also has set<br \/>\nup a Steel Plant at :Fo:?airiga1l&#8217;;,  District was<br \/>\nnot taken note of bythe Government. On<br \/>\nthe other  &#8216;arbitrarily recommended the<\/p>\n<p>grant of mining lease to End re.spondent herein.<\/p>\n<p> v_ Even though we&#8217;are__not in a position to support the reasons<\/p>\n<p>that &#8216;rimpugnedvi&#8217;proceedings CELIIIC to be passed with material<\/p>\n<p> irregzilarity&#8217;  oblique &#8211; motive in granting lease just<\/p>\n<p> before the  Chief Minister laid down office, we are<\/p>\n<p>.:ipe&#8217;o4nvinCed&#8217;that the order of State Government in preferring the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;V &#8216;-.p_iire_spontien&#8217;ti as against the petitioner for granting mining lease is<\/p>\n<p> and unreasonable and contrary to the matters that are<\/p>\n<p>I0<\/p>\n<p>infrastructure and overall development of the lifestyle<\/p>\n<p>of the public at large of the locality and region.<br \/>\n22.2. The major concern in mining sector is they-&#8220;v.<\/p>\n<p>undue and protracted delay in clearing approval frorri, <\/p>\n<p>various Ministries and departments, viz. Mines  .;. <\/p>\n<p>Geology, Pollution Control Board, Environment-._arid&#8217;e. L&#8221;<br \/>\nForest, Revenue and Survey, Indian.Bu::*.eau<br \/>\netc. and in processing and granting m.,inineg it 1ea&#8217;se.&#8221;&#8216;V&#8221;&#8216;t<br \/>\nSuch delay, not only causes hardshipltoithe appli2;an&#8217;ts<br \/>\nwho invest huge amount, butlaffjeets ectonomiclgrovutli<br \/>\nof the nation. Therefore, it is ap_pr&#8217;opriate for th_eV_State<\/p>\n<p>Government and the Ce_n&#8217;tral .Gover&#8217;nz_rieVnt.,pto evolve a<\/p>\n<p>single wvindoxv &#8216;  V sys&#8217;tem\u00ab   .vs_rit.hi_i1 their respective<br \/>\njurisdiction \u00ab. to -not&#8217;:i_iy,l&#8217;ur_e'&lt;:e,i&#039;s.re, scrutinize, process,<br \/>\napprove  to take &#039;aplpriopriate decision in granting<\/p>\n<p>mini:-jig&#039; lease without undue and protracted delay&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>  7.1 1&#039; ~. Wave e{re;&quot;,&#039;:he,\u00a5e\u00a3ore, unable to agree with the decision of the<\/p>\n<p>Government  preferring the 2nd respondent as against the<\/p>\n<p>ll_:p&#039;eti&#039;ti.orier__&#039;in sew of decision taken by us in W.A.No.5026\/2008<\/p>\n<p>  and in W.P.No.5022\/2009 (GM~MM&#8211;S~P1L).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit HWTHEIHG%ECOURT(H?KARNATAKAJ\u00a5FBANGALORE_ DATED THIS THE 15th DAY or JULY 2009 ~_&#8217; 1. PRESENT TI-IE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARALLI QHIEEJUSTTSE AND THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTTCE v.d&#8217;.~S.\u00e9LEHAI&#8211;TIT..4j WRIT PETITION N0. 6134}L2Ij;oaVV(G1~}1;&#8217;II1I\u00a7\/LS) E BETWEEN: &#8216; 3 A 2 M\/S JSW STEEL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-21T23:39:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-21T23:39:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":898,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-21T23:39:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-21T23:39:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-21T23:39:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009"},"wordCount":898,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009","name":"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-21T23:39:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-jsw-steel-limited-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Jsw Steel Limited vs Government Of Karnataka on 15 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28120\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}