{"id":28236,"date":"2011-09-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-29T20:20:54","modified_gmt":"2018-07-29T14:50:54","slug":"mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                          In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                   at\n                                                          New\u00a0Delhi\n\n               \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/901422\n                                                                                            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0        \u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a01,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a01,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n\n           Shri\u00a0\u00a0N\u00a0R\u00a0Choudhary\n           H.No.\u00a0440,\u00a0\u00a0Sector\u00a039\n           Near\u00a0Medanta\u00a0Medicity\n           Gurgaon\n           Haryana.\n\n\n\n           Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0present.\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n\n\n           Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways\n           EDV\u00a0(S)\u00a0&\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0V\n           Railway\u00a0Board,\u00a0\n           Rail\u00a0Bhawan\n           New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0\u00a0R\u00a0K\u00a0Shekhawat,\u00a0DVE\u00a0-\u00a01\n           \u00a0                 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Anil\u00a0Kumar.\n\n                                 Information\u00a0Commissioner                       :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                            In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                             at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                                                         \u00a0\n                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/901422\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
   1.   The\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 Application\u00a0 dated\u00a0 \u00a0 5.4.11\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0 \u00a0M\/o\u00a0Railways,\u00a0Rail\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Bhawan,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a019\u00a0\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0case\u00a0<\/p>\n
        No. \u00a0 2007\/V\u00ad3\/RVNL\/5\u00adCTE \u00a0 & \u00a0 CVC\u00a0 File\u00a0 No.\u00a0 0725\/Rly\/1\u00a0 dated\u00a0 18.9.2008.\u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 \u00a0 on\u00a0 29.4.11\u00a0<\/p>\n
        transferred\u00a0the\u00a0points\u00a0e,\u00a0f,\u00a0g,\u00a0h\u00a0and\u00a0p\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0\u00a0requesting\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0directly\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0PIO,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0Railways\u00a0on\u00a06.5.11\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0branch.\u00a0Thereafter\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n
        filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0 \u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a024.5.11\u00a0 \u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0registered\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
        6.6.11,\u00a0\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0missing\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0Commission\u00a0issued\u00a0an\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a017.8.11\u00a0directing\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0\u00a0Railways\u00a0to\u00a0appear\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0hearing\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
   2.   The\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0rejoinder\u00a0\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a029.8.11\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0M\/o\u00a0Railways\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        office\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0sent\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a06.5.11\u00a0and\u00a016.5.11\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        first\u00a0appeal\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0office\u00a0.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0items\u00a0(e),\u00a0(f),\u00a0(g),\u00a0(h)\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
        (p)\u00a0were\u00a0transferred\u00a0to\u00a0CPIO\/CVC\u00a0on\u00a029.4.11\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0CVC\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a030.5.11\u00a0indicating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        information\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0items\u00a0on\u00a020.5.11.\u00a0 \u00a0According\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0
\n            pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0remaining\u00a0items\u00a0(a),\u00a0(b),\u00a0(c),\u00a0(d),\u00a0(m),\u00a0(n),\u00a0(i),\u00a0 \u00a0(j),\u00a0(k),\u00a0(o),\u00a0(r)\u00a0(s)\u00a0 \u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Application\u00a0<\/p>\n
           concerning\u00a0vigilance\u00a0Dte.\u00a0Has\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a06.5.11.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Decision.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     3.    During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0inspected\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0file\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0shown\u00a0<\/p>\n
           to\u00a0him\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0CVC\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0on\u00a020.5.11\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0identified\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n
           him. \u00a0 He \u00a0 complained \u00a0 about \u00a0 the \u00a0 delay \u00a0 in \u00a0 finalizing \u00a0 his \u00a0 case \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Public \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 \u00a0 about \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           chargesheet\u00a0having\u00a0been\u00a0\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0after\u00a0nearly\u00a0two\u00a0years\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0investigation\u00a0was\u00a0completed\u00a0<\/p>\n
           by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Vigilance \u00a0 branch. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Respondent\u00a0 from\u00a0 the\u00a0 Vigilance\u00a0 branch\u00a0 (Railway\u00a0 Board),\u00a0 however,\u00a0<\/p>\n
           insisted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0level\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0vigilance\u00a0branch(Rly\u00a0Board)\u00a0\u00a0while\u00a0explaining\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
           the\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0issuing\u00a0the\u00a0charge\u00a0sheet\u00a0was\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0new\u00a0facts\u00a0being\u00a0having\u00a0been\u00a0brought\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           Vigilance\u00a0branch\u00a0at\u00a0different\u00a0points\u00a0of\u00a0time\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0 \u00a0Respondent\u00a0reiterated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a0\u00a0a,\u00a0b,\u00a0c,\u00a0d,\u00a0l,\u00a0m,\u00a0n\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0disclosed\u00a0in\u00a0their\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a06.5.11\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           same\u00a0was\u00a0exempted\u00a0from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant’s\u00a0case\u00a0\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0\u00a0yet\u00a0been\u00a0finalized.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n
           added \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 matter \u00a0 at \u00a0 present \u00a0 is \u00a0 lying \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 office \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Disciplinary \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 awaiting \u00a0 its\u00a0<\/p>\n
           finalization\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0his\u00a0decision.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     4.    The\u00a0Commission\u00a0is\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0opinion\u00a0that\u00a0three\u00a0years\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0long\u00a0enough\u00a0period\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0such\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0one\u00a0<\/p>\n
           pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0reached\u00a0its\u00a0finality\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0taking\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0<\/p>\n
           would\u00a0tantamount\u00a0to\u00a0deliberate\u00a0harassment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0connection,\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0noted\u00a0<\/p>\n
           from\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0lying\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Disciplinary\u00a0Authority\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
           his\u00a0decision\u00a0for\u00a0almost\u00a0two\u00a0months\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0known\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
     5.    The\u00a0Commission\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0therefore\u00a0 recommends\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0 \u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0its\u00a0<\/p>\n
           observations\u00a0in\u00a0para\u00a04\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Disciplinary\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0finalize\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0take\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           matter\u00a0\u00a0preferably\u00a0by\u00a015th\u00a0October\u00a02011.\u00a0Once\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0is\u00a0taken,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0allowed\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
           inspect\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\u00a0and\u00a0be\u00a0\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a06.   The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                                                            \u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                                                                      (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                           Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0\u00a0N\u00a0R\u00a0Choudhary
\n         H.No.\u00a0440,\u00a0\u00a0Sector\u00a039
\n         Near\u00a0Medanta\u00a0Medicity
\n         Gurgaon
\n         Haryana.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.\u00a0\u00a0     The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n         Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways\n         EDV\u00a0(S)\u00a0&\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0V\n         Railway\u00a0Board,\u00a0\n         Rail\u00a0Bhawan\n         New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n\n\n3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\n         Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways\n         Advisor\u00a0(Vig)\u00a0&\u00a0AA\u00a0-\u00a0V\n         Railway\u00a0Board,\n         Rail\u00a0Bhawan\n         New\u00a0Delhi.\n 4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC.\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/901422 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a01,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a01,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0\u00a0N\u00a0R\u00a0Choudhary H.No.\u00a0440,\u00a0\u00a0Sector\u00a039 Near\u00a0Medanta\u00a0Medicity Gurgaon Haryana. Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0present. Respondent(s) Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways EDV\u00a0(S)\u00a0&\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0V Railway\u00a0Board,\u00a0 Rail\u00a0Bhawan New\u00a0Delhi. Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0\u00a0R\u00a0K\u00a0Shekhawat,\u00a0DVE\u00a0–\u00a01 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Anil\u00a0Kumar. Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/901422 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 Application\u00a0 dated\u00a0 \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-29T14:50:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-29T14:50:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":641,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-29T14:50:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-29T14:50:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-29T14:50:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011"},"wordCount":641,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011","name":"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-29T14:50:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-n-r-choudhary-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.N R Choudhary vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28236"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28236\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}