{"id":28358,"date":"2010-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-07-18T22:12:43","modified_gmt":"2014-07-18T16:42:43","slug":"sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAK\/-\\ AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 18*\" DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINcHIGERI_....__\"*  \n\nWRIT PETITION NO. 22792 OF 2910 (EXCISE)  .\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSRI BOGGU POOJARY\n\nS\/O RAMA POO3ARY\n\nAGED ABOUT 60 YEARS\n\nD NO 1040 A, KATTADABUDA\n\nKODAVOOR VILLAGE _      \nUDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT .   'T  j'  PETITIONER\n\n(BY SRI S :&lt; ACHARYA &amp; SAN OH&#039;rA.,P&quot; E&lt;AO,R2&#039;A,DV&quot;OCATES)\n\nAND:\n\n1. THETAH:;%3VILDARf5\u00bb_,   .\nUDUPI TA._Eu:&lt;,&#039;UDUPIH-DISTRICT, &#039; -\n\n2. SHIVANATHAN -\nS\/O KALIIYAPPAN&#039;&#039; , ._\nAGED BOUT 33 YEARS\n v ._KOPFTA&#039;E;AT_HOTA, KO&#039;DA.VOOR VILLAGE\n\n V UDUPI TA&#039;IUI&lt;_&#039;   RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>   .._(E;V S&#8217;RI,%.HVTH-NLEARENDRA PRASAD, HCGP FOR R1,<br \/>\n=SRI&gt;I&lt; SI&#8211;:ASHII&lt;ANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)<\/p>\n<p> _ THISDMIRIVTD DPETEITION IS FILED UNDER ARTECLES 226 AND 227<\/p>\n<p>..,OF_.TH.E CONSTITDTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER<\/p>\n<p>, D&#039;AT&#039;ED&quot;.O5.O7.2O&#039;1O PASSED BY THE 1&quot; RESPONDENT, VIDE<br \/>\n &#039;A&#039;NN_EXi;&#039;RE~A..AND ETC.\n<\/p>\n<p>  . _ _ ._,2.&#8217;.&#8211;TH&#8217;ISVVRIT PETITION COMING ON EOR PRLY. HG. IN &#8216;B&#8217; GROUP<br \/>\n TH&#8217;I&#8217;S,O_A3\/f, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:<\/p>\n<p>l\\J<\/p>\n<p>QRDER<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner has challenged the Tahsildar&#8217;s V.<\/p>\n<p>06.07.2010 (Annexure&#8211;A) prohibiting the sake of toddy  H<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in the premises in question.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Sri S.K.Acharya, the learned,counsevl&#8221;&#8216;for petitiorgerl<\/p>\n<p>submits that the reason for Passing tVh&#8217;e.:_i&#8217;rn.pugVned&#8217;g_VV:o&#8217;rderf\u00a7is that<br \/>\nthe petitioner has violated  entered into<br \/>\nbetween the respondent No.2&#8217;Aaifl:d_He brings to<br \/>\nmy notice that  &#8220;a:lre&#8217;adji:*V.oi:taiined an order of<br \/>\nstatus quo against  VC)&#8217;.S.No.10\/2009. To<br \/>\novercome this:Vvorder;  filed a false complaint<\/p>\n<p>with the responide-ntoMNo.w.1i.&#8217;   <\/p>\n<p> 3. S.ri.{:I&#8217;\\VcilaryaVlfurther\u00e9isubmits that the petitioner is not<\/p>\n<p>heard inlthe  is not given an opportunity of hearing in<\/p>\n<p>:7V__the  that there is total non&#8211;app|ication of the<\/p>\n<p>V77lr_ninciV on  the Tahsildar. The documents available on<\/p>\n<p>.1therecor~d.._of the Tahsildar was not given any weightage. He<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner has the licence to vend the toddy<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; -__Vunder&#8221;th0e Murthedarara Seva Sahakara Sangha.<\/p>\n<p>IBEEH<\/p>\n<p>4. Sri H.T.Narendra Prasad, the learned High Court<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader appearing for the respondent No.1 <\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner has no licence whatsoever to  .<\/p>\n<p>in the premises in question. Therefore _the__i4mpugried&#8217;jorldievr-is.,_ <\/p>\n<p>passed as per the provisions containedain1&#8217;_Se&#8217;ction  of.&#8221;&#8216;t.ri\u00e911.ij<\/p>\n<p>Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Sri Shashikanth, the learned-&#8216;coup-s&#8217;e&#8217;l\u00bb..for.thle-resvpondent<br \/>\nNo.2 submits that the challanst&#8217;p\u00ab&#8217;ro&#8217;d&#8217;uc,e:&#8217;dfbyjtvh\ufb01tiypetitioner are in<br \/>\nrespect of different that the<br \/>\npetitioner has no  inlthe shop belonging<\/p>\n<p>to the respondent  if<\/p>\n<p>6. The earlier piartvA..of_llthewimpugned order refers to the<br \/>\nsecond respo.,nden4&#8217;t&#8217;s,_:allegati&#8217;on\u00ab&#8221;&#8216;of the sale of the toddy by the<br \/>\npetitio-ner&#8221;:a&#8212;lunautraorisedly&#8217; &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; and in violation of the tenancy<\/p>\n<p>agreemegjetll.&#8217;  discussion, no finding that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>V7U&#8221;&#8216;i~s&#8217;vnot ail_i44cence.\u00a5h&#8221;o.id;er at all. Only on this short ground, the<\/p>\n<p>-\u00ab.l.i.fmp_ug.ned order is liable to be quashed and accordingly it Is<\/p>\n<p>  7.?The quashing of the impugned order does not mean that<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;jatDthefpetitioner can continue to vend the todcly in the second<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01BH,<\/p>\n<p>respondent&#8217;s shop, if he is not a valid iicence-hoider. __The<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 is directed to hoid the enquiry afresh and.vgi:v-ei_ia_V<\/p>\n<p>clear finding as to whether or not the petitioner <\/p>\n<p>licence. If the petitioner fails to produceithe vaiid&#8221;ii&#8217;ce&#8217;nce~~:o&#8217;r_ifit &#8216;*~ 1&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>the Tahsidlar is satisfied that he does notviqavaaafivaiid ii\u00a2ence;ne::si&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>shall pass the order prohibiting the__ saie-._o.&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>petitioner in respect of the second&#8217;-..iresupondentif\u00e9 shop in<br \/>\nquestion. 1 VA 2 it it<\/p>\n<p>8. Both the p4et&#8211;itione,r&#8221;&#8216;  No.2 are<br \/>\ndirected to appear\u00bbhefore&#8217;-.&#8217;_the.: on 03.12.2010<br \/>\nwithout waiting__for&#8217;~.a:hyi\u00ab:.;inotiiseiV&#8217;f.riorri_::t&#8217;he&#8217;:\u00a7respondent No.1. The<br \/>\nrespondent   .tvhe.:_o&#8217;ppo&#8221;rtunities of hearing to both<br \/>\nthe petitioner aindsttie  in the matter. Both the<br \/>\npetii;ionerv_..a.\u00e9nd &#8216;the  No.2 are directed to co~operate<\/p>\n<p>with_theV&#8217;TahsiidAai&#8217;&#8211;.in\u00abthe speedy disposai of the matter.<\/p>\n<p>9.&#8217;This  accordingly disposed of. No order as to<\/p>\n<p>Iud\u00a73<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAK\/-\\ AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18*&#8221; DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINcHIGERI_&#8230;.__&#8221;* WRIT PETITION NO. 22792 OF 2910 (EXCISE) . BETWEEN: SRI BOGGU POOJARY S\/O RAMA POO3ARY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-18T16:42:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-18T16:42:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":610,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-18T16:42:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-18T16:42:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-18T16:42:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010"},"wordCount":610,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010","name":"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-18T16:42:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boggu-poojary-vs-the-tahsildar-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Boggu Poojary vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}