{"id":2863,"date":"2008-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-11-08T19:09:03","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T13:39:03","slug":"munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 25375 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 200f$\"\"&lt;_\n\n   \n\nBEFORE\n\nSmt. Munirathnamma,\n\nW\/0. Late Ashwathappa,\n\nAged about 4-8 years,\n\nResidingal No.151\/12,  ~ --  .V &quot; V\n\nBehind James English  &quot;       _\n\nAvalahalli, Baugalon: SouthfI&#039;_aiu,k\u00bb __ L   ._  APPELLANT\n\n(By Sue. Shripad V. Amy&#039;:  if  A. \nAND:   _  ._ _ .\n1. K. G:,&#039;i&#039;i?\u00a7ia1:a\u00a7\u00a7:sh\u00a7=\u00a7ia3V&quot;r..%&#039;  I\n\nS\/o.   &#039; &#039;\n\nN0-BIA-58. B, camp,%%. % \nKuenook =A&#039;11d.;ap:ra_ad\u00a2sh,&#039; &quot;\n\nV 2. Tm: Na\ufb01ona1V&quot;in:\u00e9.\ufb01ja\ufb01\u00a7:c Co. Ltd.,\n\n _ Iiuin-391 Branch,&#039;  Complex,\n, *{}a1)d1u&#039;13ag&quot;a:, Kurniil,\n  \n ._ Byits&#039;vManagt:1&#039;L .. RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p> {By Sm s.  ziegde Mulkhand, Adv. for 122)<\/p>\n<p>1 &#8216;mas &#8220;Misc. First Appeal is \ufb01led under Section 173(1) of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;M.V.A::t&#8217;against the judgment and award cit. 16.01.2006 passed<\/p>\n<p> MVC No.700\/3000 on the file -of the II Add}. Civil Judge<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;(VS:r_..: Dix), MAC&#8217;i&#8217;~V, Bangalore Rural Dist, Bangalore, partly<\/p>\n<p>  the claim petition&#8217; for compensation and sccidng<br \/>\nA &#8221;  enhancement of compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal coming on for Hearing this day. the Court<br \/>\n\u00e9elivered the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>.2-\n<\/p>\n<p>J U Q G g Q E I<br \/>\nThis is an appeal by the claimant for enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Claimant is mother of the deceased.  =.:\u00a7ra;:..\n<\/p>\n<p>travelling in a tempo. when the   \u00b0 <\/p>\n<p>Ammavarapalli. a lorry bearing NoeAAA\u00abt\u00a7&#8217;7\u00a7SV.d\ufb01vee  e<\/p>\n<p>negligent manner dashed  &#8216;Dee  u1V;V1VV1e said<br \/>\nimpact, the elajmanfs 803$&#8217;   and was<br \/>\ntaken to the Government   and from there<br \/>\nhe was shifted   inpatient from<br \/>\n17.9.2000 to  he succumbed to the<\/p>\n<p>injury.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. It ie ateted&#8217;  was aged about 23 years<\/p>\n<p>and was \u00bbearnA mt g.   per month. The Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>Zeee\ufb01-3ide1i:{ig5\u00bb*.the eneemfeund that, the income of the deceased<\/p>\n<p>  -. however. deducting 50% of the income<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  calculated the loss of dependency.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;A   &#8221; &#8211;*\u00a2-.e..&#8217;al.&#8217;he&#8221;on]y contention urged by the learned Coamsei for the<br \/>\n  is that, the deduction of 50% is unreasonable. Though<br \/>\nT  was bachelor. however. it is not neeessazy that the<\/p>\n<p>xe1ecIue1ion could be always 50%.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;\\<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>5. in this case. the deceased was aged 23 years and<br \/>\nclaimant being mother of 42 years and deceased could pct have<br \/>\nbeen expected to spend more than 1\/3*&#8221; of the &#8216;UH:\n<\/p>\n<p>submitted that, 5096 (ieducticn. is adopted on the bacis <\/p>\n<p>of a Division Bench of this Court reported  ILRM   V&#8217; &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>in the matter of GULAM KHADER &amp;<br \/>\nmsumzvce CQLTD. &amp; ANO?\u00a5lE.&#8217;l._V&#8217;w};erein  cut *<br \/>\nthe earlier decision in case cf bachelcjf  12 as<br \/>\nunder: .. V 1 .\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I2. Invso fa3&#8243;&#8221;&#8221;asf baclaelcrs  concerned,<br \/>\nnormally,  is;   fpatsqfnal and living<br \/>\nexpenses  ii.i&#8217;s cacnsidered  a bachelor will<br \/>\nbe more as    acquired a wife and<br \/>\nchildren and&#8217;\u00bb-!lsgrefc.~re,-. tend &#8216;to  more on himself<br \/>\n&#8216;!?1erc&#8221;lis\u00ab.\u00a2;L&#8217;\u00ab;o &#8216;of&#8217; the bachelcr getting<br \/>\nmanfied in&#8217;   &#8216;\ufb02ing, it: which event also the<br \/>\ncon111?)uiicn&#8217;!c i}&#8217;r,e.&#8217;pcz1*ei2.l\/ siblings is likely to be<br \/>\ncut drac$iicalIy;w..  subject 29 evidence to the<br \/>\ncontrary, e4!\u00a7zevfatlaerwil\u00a3_~i1az:e his own income and will<br \/>\nIn)! be corwidered  ca. defemlcmt and only the mother<br \/>\nalcbjrte &#8220;w:&#8217;lI  mn.f3_idered as a.  Similarly<\/p>\n<p> A eezbj\u00e9ci. tcxa.-pidermce to the contrary, brothers and skiers<br \/>\n. are noi\u00ab_cQnsidered as dependents, because they will<br \/>\n   eviiaziejgendent and earning, or married, or be<br \/>\n~.  cnthe father. Thus even if the deceased is<br \/>\nQunrived by parents and siblings, the fam\ufb02y is taken as<br \/>\ncxirastlr-:ltingf;&#8221;of only two members, that is the bachelor<br \/>\n and the mother, who is considered as the cnly<br \/>\n  .. dafetzeiaxzi, and 50% is treated as the personal and<br \/>\n Vlizkfng expenses of the bachelor and 50% as the<br \/>\n Vamiribution to thefamxly. However, where family of the<br \/>\ngbClC}I8tOT was latge and defendant on the income of \u00a3129\n<\/p>\n<p>-Ideceased, as in at case where he has a widowed mcther<br \/>\nand large number of younger new-eaming sisters or<br \/>\nbrothers, the contribution to the family will be taken<br \/>\neither as two-third, or calculated by adopting unit<br \/>\nmethod.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>.41..\n<\/p>\n<p>This Court has held that. 50% could be deducted towards<br \/>\npersonal expenses. Lcamed Cmmsei submitted that, agaitsst the<br \/>\nsaid decision, a special leave was filed before the Ap&lt;;;(.1and<\/p>\n<p>the Apex Court in a (iccision mportcd in (SZ(}O8)-4   <\/p>\n<p>matter of BILKISH mus\u00bb UNITED HVDE%&#039;&#039;&#039;EVS{Li5A;!\u00a7C1&#039;\u00a7.&#039;j\u00ab 4&#039;<\/p>\n<p>L\ufb02\\\u00bb\ufb02&#039;I&#039;ED AND Awomm has new   <\/p>\n<p>reasonable deduction instead     <\/p>\n<p>decision, he submitted  that,  ciQ&lt;&#039;iu&lt;\u00a7\ufb01\u00a3)n.._AA cf; 5094;. is<br \/>\nunrcasonabie. . &#039;4 V &#039; &#039;V\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Learned  fc5r&#8221;f1.i\u00a7  submitted<\/p>\n<p>that, in cases of    id\u00e9\ufb02uction given is 50%<\/p>\n<p>and the    has considemd the said<br \/>\nmatter andv&#8221;i3\u00a7as&#8217; ad\u00e9duc\ufb01on is reasonable in case of<\/p>\n<p>bacheltm. _<\/p>\n<p>    &#8216;~&#8211;c1ecisfi6t1 %%%% or GULAM KHADER (supra) fell for<br \/>\nthe Apex Court and the Apex Gourt against<br \/>\n  the  of GULW KHADER in the decision of<\/p>\n<p>   has observed at para-4 as under:\n<\/p>\n<p> V &#8216;?\u00a5;.A\ufb02er hearing learned counsel for the parties. we are<br \/>\n &#8216;of -the opinion that the view taken by the High Court and<br \/>\n gthe Tribune! is not correct. The incumbent was a<br \/>\nxbaoheiorand he could not have spent more than 1\/3&#8243;&#8216; qf<br \/>\nink total income far persanal use and rest of the ammmt<br \/>\nearned by him wouid certainly go to the fmnily kitty.<br \/>\nTiverefore, determining the loss of dependency by 5096<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>was not correct. Therefore, we assws that he must be<\/p>\n<p>spending I\/3&#8242;&#8221; towards personal use and contributing<\/p>\n<p>2\/3&#8243;&#8216; ofhis income to hisfamily . . . . . . . .&#8217;<br \/>\nThe van; same judgment of the Division Bench of<br \/>\nfor consideration before the Apex Court and   .. d<br \/>\nthe same judgment has held that,    &#8220;I  \u00abV<br \/>\ndeduction couid be 1\/3&#8243;&#8216; and not   ,<br \/>\nam of the opinion that, the said   the V<br \/>\nApex Court and has    case of<\/p>\n<p>bachelor is reasonable.\n<\/p>\n<p>      of 50% is<br \/>\nconcerned, it    L_   the compensation is<br \/>\nenhanced   -&#8216;\u00ab. \u00a7*vs:1j and above the compensa\ufb01on<\/p>\n<p>awarded by iiiagg  at 6% per axmuzn.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8217;<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25375 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 200f$&#8221;&#8221;&lt;_ BEFORE Smt. Munirathnamma, W\/0. Late Ashwathappa, Aged about 4-8 years, Residingal No.151\/12, ~ &#8212; .V &quot; V Behind James English &quot; _ Avalahalli, Baugalon: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-08T13:39:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T13:39:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":871,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T13:39:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-08T13:39:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T13:39:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008"},"wordCount":871,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008","name":"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T13:39:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/munirathnamma-vs-k-g-venkateshwarulu-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Munirathnamma vs K G Venkateshwarulu on 25 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2863\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}