{"id":28646,"date":"2010-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-18T04:37:46","modified_gmt":"2017-09-17T23:07:46","slug":"k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 8582 of 2010(W)\n\n\n1. K.V.SUSHAMA, BRANCH MANAGER, CHENGAMANAD\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE\n\n3. CHENGAMANAD PANCHAYAT SERVICE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN\n\n Dated :04\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.\n             =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n              W.P.(C) Nos. 8582 &amp; 9641 of 2010\n             =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n           Dated this the 4th day of August, 2010\n\n                         JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Petitioners in both these writ petitions challenge<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P4 and P9 orders, by which requests of the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>for relaxation of the educational qualification prescribed<\/p>\n<p>under Rule 185(8)(b) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies<\/p>\n<p>Rules (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;the Rules&#8217; for short), have<\/p>\n<p>been declined.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. The nature of the challenge in both these writ<\/p>\n<p>petitions is the same and hence, they are being considered<\/p>\n<p>together and disposed of by this common judgment.<\/p>\n<p>      3. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.8582 of 2010 entered<\/p>\n<p>the service of the third respondent bank on 26-11-1997,<\/p>\n<p>after passing S.S.L.C., J.D.C. and Diploma in Electronics<\/p>\n<p>from Vanitha Polytechnic, Ernakulam. She was promoted as<\/p>\n<p>Senior Clerk on 1-2-3003 and thereafter as            Branch<\/p>\n<p>Manager with effect from 1-5-2005. As per the Feeder<\/p>\n<p>Category Rules, the next promotion of the petitioner is to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No. 8582\/2010 &amp; con. case.  2<\/p>\n<p>the post of the Assistant Secretary. As per Rule 186 of the<\/p>\n<p>Rules, the qualification for the post of Assistant Secretary is<\/p>\n<p>graduation.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 9641 of 2010 is a person<\/p>\n<p>who had entered the service of the third respondent as a Peon<\/p>\n<p>on 6-5-1981. He was promoted as Junior Clerk on 6-12-1985,<\/p>\n<p>Senior Clerk on 12-2-1987 and later as Accountant with effect<\/p>\n<p>from 1-4-2008. His next promotion is as Branch Manger. As<\/p>\n<p>per Rule 186 of the Rules, the qualification for the post of<\/p>\n<p>Branch Manager is graduation.\n<\/p>\n<p>        5. Since the petitioners in both these writ petitions do<\/p>\n<p>not possess the qualification of graduation, the Managing<\/p>\n<p>Committee requested the Government to grant exemption to<\/p>\n<p>them from the said qualification. According to the Managing<\/p>\n<p>Committee, the petitioners in both these cases are efficient,<\/p>\n<p>well experienced and suitable for being promoted to the next<\/p>\n<p>higher post. According to the          Managing Committee, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are valuable assets of the society and their services<\/p>\n<p>would enhance the progress of the society. However, by the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No. 8582\/2010 &amp; con. case.  3<\/p>\n<p>impugned orders, Exts.P4 and P9, the exemption sought for by<\/p>\n<p>the    Managing        Committee     has been   rejected  by   the<\/p>\n<p>Government without assigning any reason.<\/p>\n<p>        6. A counter affidavit has been filed in W.P.(C) No. 8582<\/p>\n<p>of 2010, wherein it is pointed out that the petitioner in the said<\/p>\n<p>writ petition is only aged 39 years. Exemptions have been<\/p>\n<p>granted only in cases where the incumbents had completed 45<\/p>\n<p>years of age. If the petitioner is granted the relaxation that has<\/p>\n<p>been sought, that would result in denying the chances of<\/p>\n<p>promotion to various other employees who were older to her.<\/p>\n<p>It is pointed out that it was for the said reason that the request<\/p>\n<p>of the petitioners for relaxation of qualification was declined.<\/p>\n<p>        7. I have heard the learned counsel for the respective<\/p>\n<p>petitioners, the learned counsel for the society and the learned<\/p>\n<p>Senior Government Pleader.\n<\/p>\n<p>        8. Rule 185(8) (b) of the Rules stipulates certain<\/p>\n<p>conditions that are required to be satisfied for the grant of<\/p>\n<p>exemption from the educational qualification. The provision<\/p>\n<p>stipulates three conditions, which which are the following:-<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No. 8582\/2010 &amp; con. case.  4<\/p>\n<p>1) The     incumbent         should  have passed J.D.C.  or<\/p>\n<p>   equivalent.\n<\/p>\n<p>2) The incumbent should have a minimum service of five<\/p>\n<p>   years in the feeder category post.\n<\/p>\n<p>3) The incumbent should not be less than 45 years of age.<\/p>\n<p>        9. Since the application for relaxation submitted by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners in these cases are for relaxation of the basic<\/p>\n<p>qualification; the same can be granted only by the Government<\/p>\n<p>under rule 181 of the Rules. Therefore, the matter was<\/p>\n<p>considered by the Government and orders have been issued<\/p>\n<p>rejecting the request, as evidenced by Exts.P4 and P9 orders<\/p>\n<p>in both these cases.\n<\/p>\n<p>        10. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the<\/p>\n<p>rejection of the request of the petitioners is not supported by<\/p>\n<p>any reasons. Since the petitioners have been recommended<\/p>\n<p>by the Managing Committee, the Government erred in not<\/p>\n<p>accepting the same. It is also submitted that similarly placed<\/p>\n<p>persons have been granted relaxation of all the three<\/p>\n<p>requirements stipulated under rule 185(8) of the Rules.<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No. 8582\/2010 &amp; con. case.  5<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, it is contended that the rejection of the request of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners for exemption is without any basis.<\/p>\n<p>        11. Exts.P5 series Government Orders show that in<\/p>\n<p>other similar cases relaxation has been granted with reference<\/p>\n<p>to all the conditions stipulated by rule 185(8) of the Rules. As<\/p>\n<p>per G.O.(P) No.5\/2007\/Co-op dated 4-1-2007 (Ext.P5(35)), one<\/p>\n<p>Sri.P.S. Sabu was granted relaxation in age as well as the<\/p>\n<p>condition regarding five years&#8217; service in the feeder category<\/p>\n<p>post. Similarly, in G.O.(P) No.14\/2007\/Co-op. Dated 5-1-2007<\/p>\n<p>(Ext.P5(56)) one Smt. P.Sheela was also granted relaxation of<\/p>\n<p>the age limit of 45 years as well as the condition regarding five<\/p>\n<p>years&#8217; service in the feeder category. These Government<\/p>\n<p>Orders would show that both the above conditions were<\/p>\n<p>relaxed by the Government to the benefit of the incumbents<\/p>\n<p>therein. However, in the present cases, similar requests of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners have been rejected without any valid reasons. If the<\/p>\n<p>recommendations of the Managing Committee are not<\/p>\n<p>acceptable to the Government, proper reasons should have<\/p>\n<p>been given, which is conspicuously absent in the impugned<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No. 8582\/2010 &amp; con. case.  6<\/p>\n<p>orders. The petitioners have also placed reliance on a<\/p>\n<p>judgment dated 30-6-2010 of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 31167<\/p>\n<p>of 2009 to contend that in similar circumstances, this Court<\/p>\n<p>had set aside the rejection order and directed the Government<\/p>\n<p>to consider the matter afresh in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>        12. Resolutions of the Managing Committee in both<\/p>\n<p>these    cases      show       that the petitioners are efficient,<\/p>\n<p>experienced and competent and that according to the<\/p>\n<p>Managing Committee their services were necessary in the<\/p>\n<p>interests of the concerned society. The petitioner in W.P.(C)<\/p>\n<p>No. 8582 of 2010 is the senior most employee in the service of<\/p>\n<p>the society while the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 9641 of 2010 is<\/p>\n<p>not only the senior most employee but also a person aged<\/p>\n<p>more than 55 years. It was in the said circumstances that<\/p>\n<p>relaxation was sought for by the Managing Committee. Ext.P5<\/p>\n<p>series show that similarly placed persons have been granted<\/p>\n<p>exemption. There is no reason as to why the requests of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners for exemption have been rejected by the impugned<\/p>\n<p>orders. No materials have been placed before me to come to a<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No. 8582\/2010 &amp; con. case.  7<\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the case of the petitioners are in any way<\/p>\n<p>different. Hence, I find that the rejection of the petitioners&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>request in these cases is without any basis. Therefore, Exts.P4<\/p>\n<p>and P9 in both these cases are liable to be set aside.<\/p>\n<p>        13. In the above circumstances, these writ petitions are<\/p>\n<p>allowed and Exts.P4 and P9 in both these cases are set aside.<\/p>\n<p>The first respondent in both these cases is directed to consider<\/p>\n<p>the matter afresh and to pass appropriate orders thereon in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law. A fresh decision, as indicated above,<\/p>\n<p>shall be taken as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a<\/p>\n<p>period of two months from the date of receipt of receipt of a<\/p>\n<p>copy of this judgment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                    K.SURENDRA MOHAN,<br \/>\n                                    JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>mn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 8582 of 2010(W) 1. K.V.SUSHAMA, BRANCH MANAGER, CHENGAMANAD &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE 3. CHENGAMANAD PANCHAYAT SERVICE For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN For Respondent :GOVERNMENT [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-17T23:07:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-17T23:07:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1215,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\",\"name\":\"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-17T23:07:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-17T23:07:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-17T23:07:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010"},"wordCount":1215,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010","name":"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-17T23:07:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-sushama-vs-government-of-kerala-on-4-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.V.Sushama vs Government Of Kerala on 4 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}