{"id":29142,"date":"2011-11-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011"},"modified":"2019-03-10T22:24:51","modified_gmt":"2019-03-10T16:54:51","slug":"manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Z.K.Saiyed,<\/div>\n<pre>  \n Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n    \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/14205\/2008\t 9\/ 9\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 14205 of 2008\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 14206 of 2008\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nMANGLABEN\nK UNADKAT &amp; 1 - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nYN OZA, SR. ADVOCATE for MR. NISHANT LALAKIYA for\nApplicant(s) : 1   2. IN CRI. MISC. APPLICATION NO.14205 OF 2008\n \n\nMR\nND NANAVATI, SR. ADVOCATE for MR YAS NANAVATI for Applicants in\nCRI.MISC.APPLICATION NO.14206 of 2008\n \n\n  \nMR\nSP HASURKAR, APP for Respondent(s) : 1 in both the\nmatters, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 29\/12\/2008 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tRule.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned A.P.P. Mr. S.P. Hasurkar waives service of Rule on behalf of<br \/>\nthe respondent   State in both the applications. Senior Advocate<br \/>\nMr. Prakash Thakkar appeared on behalf of the original complainant.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tSince<br \/>\nboth the applications are arising from the same Crime Register, they<br \/>\nare disposed of by this common order.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tPresent<br \/>\napplicants of both the Criminal Miscellaneous Applications have filed<br \/>\nthese applications under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal<br \/>\nProcedure (for short  Cr.P.C.) for anticipatory bail in connection<br \/>\nwith Criminal Case No.23 of 2005 filed before the learned Chief<br \/>\nJudicial Magistrate, Rajkot, on 10.2.2005. Applicants of Criminal<br \/>\nMisc. Application No.14205 of 2008 are accused Nos.4 &amp; 5 and<br \/>\napplicants of Criminal Misc. Application No.14206 of 2008 are accused<br \/>\nNos.1, 2 &amp; 3 of aforesaid criminal case.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tIn<br \/>\nshort, the fact of the case is that the complainant Smt. Kusumgauri<br \/>\nGulabrai Doshi is Non-Resident Indian lady. She is the owner of land<br \/>\nadmeasuring 2857.03 sq. yds. since the year  1967. It is alleged in<br \/>\nthe complaint by her that the applicants have prepared forged, bogus<br \/>\nand duplicate documents and title deed in respect of her land, and<br \/>\nthe applicants have deposited the said documents as security for<br \/>\nmortgage purpose in which she was cited as guarantor and her address<br \/>\nwas wrongly shown and accordingly loan was obtained from the Bank.<br \/>\nDue to failure in payment of loan amount, litigations were filed by<br \/>\nthe Bank before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (D.R.T.). The D.R.T.<br \/>\nissued notice to the complainant, but due to incorrect address shown<br \/>\nby the applicants the said notices were not served upon the<br \/>\ncomplainant. Thereafter when the Notice was affixed at the<br \/>\npremises\/plot in question, the complainant came to know about the<br \/>\nfraud committed by the applicants in the month of June, 2004. To make<br \/>\nan inquiry, husband of the complainant came to India and thereafter<br \/>\nit came to the notice of the complainant that the applicants have<br \/>\nprepared forged and bogus documents and used the same as genuine<br \/>\ndocuments with an intention to cheat her and thereby the applicants<br \/>\nhave committed breach of trust. She, thereafter, filed the above<br \/>\nmentioned complaint. After filing of the complaint, to avoid<br \/>\ncustodial interrogation, the applicants have settled the dues<br \/>\nremaining with the bank.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned Counsel Mr. N.D. Nanavati for applicants of Criminal Misc.<br \/>\nApplication No.14206 of 2008, learned Counsel Mr. Y.N. Oza for the<br \/>\napplicants of Criminal Misc. Application No.14205 of 2008, learned<br \/>\nCounsel Mr. Prakash Thakkar for the original complainant and learned<br \/>\nA.P.P. for the respondent   State.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tLearned<br \/>\nCounsel Mr. Nanavati, has contended that the applicants are the<br \/>\npartners of Amiraj Exports and they are related with each other. He<br \/>\nhas mentioned the date of offence and contended that the offence in<br \/>\nquestion took place between 23.7.1995 and 17.4.1996, and on 10.2.2005<br \/>\nthe complaint was lodged before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,<br \/>\nRajkot. It is also contended that Vijaya Bank granted the loan<br \/>\nfacility to the applicants. The Title Deeds were deposited in the<br \/>\nyear 1994 and due to non-payment of instalments, the recovery<br \/>\nproceedings were initiated before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The<br \/>\nDebt Recovery Tribunal passed an Award and as per the Award amount<br \/>\nwas paid and the Bank has issued No Due Certificate.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tIt<br \/>\nis also contended by Mr. Nanavati that the complainant has sold her<br \/>\nproperty in question in the year 2003 and thereafter in the year 2005<br \/>\nshe has filed complaint against the present applicants. It is also<br \/>\ncontended that Vijaya Bank is a real party who can file complaint,<br \/>\nbut, the Bank has not filed any complaint. He has contended that the<br \/>\ningredients of Section 405 &amp; 406 I.P. Code cannot be said to be<br \/>\nattracted in these matters and when they were not entrusted and<br \/>\ndominion over the property, ingredients of both the provisions cannot<br \/>\nbe attracted. He has contended that from the contents of the<br \/>\ncomplaint also, it cannot be established that all the applicants have<br \/>\ncommitted  offence punishable under Sections 405 &amp; 406 I.P. Code.<br \/>\nHe has also contended that the offence under Section 419 I.P. Code is<br \/>\nbailable offence and after reading the provision of Section 463 Mr.<br \/>\nNanavati has contended that the present complainant has no right to<br \/>\nfile complaint against the present applicants under Sections 465,<br \/>\n467, 468, 471 I.P. Code. Mr. Nanavati has also drawn the attention to<br \/>\nthe provision of Section 511 I.P. Code and contended that the attempt<br \/>\nmade by the complainant to involve the applicants in the alleged<br \/>\noffence is not established on record and finally contended that since<br \/>\nno loss is caused to the complainant she has no right to file<br \/>\ncomplaint against the present applicants.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tLearned<br \/>\nCounsel Mr. Yatin Oza appearing on behalf of the applicants of<br \/>\nCriminal Miscellaneous Application No.14205 of 2008 has adopted the<br \/>\narguments advance by learned Counsel Mr. Nanavati. He has contended<br \/>\nthat the property of the complainant is not auctioned and the amount<br \/>\ndue has already been paid at the stage of notice. He also contended<br \/>\nthat the Bank who is real and necessary party has not filed any<br \/>\ncomplaint or application and, therefore, the present complainant has<br \/>\nno right to file the present complaint. Mr. Oza has contended that<br \/>\napplicant Manguben is aged 65 years old. He has also contended that<br \/>\nwhen the case is based upon the documentary evidence then the<br \/>\nquestion of custodial interrogation cannot arise. Mr. Oza has relied<br \/>\nupon the decision of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court reported in (2004) 3<br \/>\nSCC 602 and tried to establish that the intention to commit above<br \/>\noffences by the applicants cannot be termed as if the applicants have<br \/>\ncommitted illegal wrong.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tLearned<br \/>\nCounsel Mr. Prakash Thakkar, appearing on behalf of the original<br \/>\ncomplainant, has raised a question that whether any person can obtain<br \/>\nloan without the consent of landlord and whether he can use the<br \/>\nlandlord&#8217;s property by putting it as a guarantee with the help of<br \/>\nforged documents for obtaining loan. Mr. Thakkar has read the<br \/>\nprovisions of all the sections alleged in the offences and contended<br \/>\nthat the complainant was the owner of the property and without her<br \/>\nconsent and permission the applicants have forged the documents of<br \/>\nher property and have obtained loan from the Bank. He contended that<br \/>\nit is established on record that the applicants have committed<br \/>\noffence by forging the documents and it was in their knowledge that<br \/>\nthe said documents are forged and not genuine, yet, they have<br \/>\nproduced the forged documents before the bank and obtained loan and<br \/>\ndue to the non-payment of instalment of loan amount the proceedings<br \/>\nwere initiated before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and when the Award<br \/>\nwas passed by the Tribunal, the amount was paid by the applicants. He<br \/>\nfurther contended that due  to this wrongful act of the applicants<br \/>\nthe complainant received irreparable loss and injury. Mr. Thakkar has<br \/>\ncontended that from the conduct of the present applicants itself<br \/>\ncollusion of the applicants with each other is established and to<br \/>\nobtain illegal benefit with the common intention they have committed<br \/>\nsuch wrongful act. Mr. Thakkar has vehemently opposed the grant of<br \/>\nbail to the applicants of both the applications.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\tLearned<br \/>\nAPP Mr. Hasurkar has supported the arguments advanced by Mr. Thakkar<br \/>\nand contended that the presence of the applicants for custodial<br \/>\ninterrogation is necessary. He has contended that prima facie case is<br \/>\nmade out against the applicants and vehemently opposed the grant of<br \/>\nbail to the applicants.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.\tI<br \/>\nhave gone through the contentions and averments made by learned<br \/>\nCounsel for the parties. I have also gone through the observation<br \/>\nmade by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in the above decision. I have also<br \/>\nperused the documents produced on record. I have also considered the<br \/>\nfact that the applicants have paid the amount to the Bank and the<br \/>\nBank has also issued No Due Certificate. The learned Counsel for the<br \/>\napplicants have tried to establish that the provisions of Section<br \/>\n406, 419 and 427 I.P. Code cannot be attracted, when the applicants<br \/>\nhave paid the amount.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.\tIn<br \/>\nmy view, this is not the stage to decide the alleged question on<br \/>\nmerit. Apparently, it appears that the applicants have misused the<br \/>\ntitle deeds of the complainant&#8217;s property and they have prepared<br \/>\nforged documents and used the same as genuine documents for obtaining<br \/>\nthe loan. It appears that without the consent and permission of the<br \/>\ncomplainant the property of the complainant was mortgaged to the bank<br \/>\nby using the forged documents and obtained loan from the Bank.  The<br \/>\ncontention was made by the learned Counsel for the complainant that<br \/>\nwithout the consent of the complainant her property was mortgaged and<br \/>\nwhen the Award was passed by the D.R.T. they have repaid the loan<br \/>\namount, therefore, provisions of Section 44  I.P. Code is attracted.<br \/>\nThe said section 44 provides a meaning of injury and from the<br \/>\noffences committed by the applicants  meaning of injury  is<br \/>\nfulfilled.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.\tI<br \/>\nhave also gone through the provisions of Sections 463 &amp; 464 I.P.<br \/>\nCode. Section 463 provides meaning of  dishonest intention  and<br \/>\nSection 464 provides the meaning of word  dishonest and<br \/>\nfraudulantly  which covers the present case. It appears that prima<br \/>\nfacie the complainant has established sufficient case. Prima facie it<br \/>\nis also established that the applicants have misused the property of<br \/>\nthe complainant fraudulantly and dishonestly. From perusing the<br \/>\ndocuments, it appears that the genuinness of the papers is required<br \/>\nto be investigated and custodial interrogation of the applicants is<br \/>\nrequired to be made.\n<\/p>\n<p>14.\tFrom<br \/>\nthe above, prima facie, it appears that the serious offences are made<br \/>\nout against the applicants and, therefore, it is not desirable to<br \/>\nallow these Applications. Accordingly, both these applications are<br \/>\nrejected. Rule discharged.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Z.K.SAIYED,<br \/>\nJ.)<\/p>\n<p>sas<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 Author: Z.K.Saiyed, Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/14205\/2008 9\/ 9 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 14205 of 2008 With CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 14206 of 2008 ========================================================= MANGLABEN K UNADKAT &amp; 1 &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-10T16:54:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-10T16:54:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1615,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-10T16:54:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-10T16:54:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-10T16:54:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011"},"wordCount":1615,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011","name":"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-10T16:54:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manglaben-vs-state-on-14-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Manglaben vs State on 14 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}