{"id":29443,"date":"2009-03-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009"},"modified":"2015-07-08T18:11:48","modified_gmt":"2015-07-08T12:41:48","slug":"ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: Anoop V.Mohta<\/div>\n
ssm\n sm            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n                      WRIT PETITION NO.1708 OF 2009\n\n      M\/s. Andrade Motors.                                      ...Petitioner.\n              Vs.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                              \n      The Additional Collector\n      (Eng.\/ Rem), & Competent\n      Authority & Ors.                                        ...Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n      Mr. N.H.Seervai, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Chirag Balsara\n      with Mr.Anil Jagrayal i\/by Legal Associates for the\n      Petitioners.\n\n\n\n\n                                                     \n      Mr.Rajeev Matkar, for Respondent No.6.\n\n      Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.                           2 and\n      3.\n\n\n\n\n                                          \n      Mr.D.D.Madon, Sr.Counsel with Mr.S.A.Sawant for\n      Respondent No.7.\n\n\n      Respondent No.18.\n                           \n      Ms. Neeta Masurkar with Mr.               N.R.Prajapati for\n                          \n      Mr.Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr. G.D.Utangale\n      i\/by M\/s. Utangale & Co. for Respondent Nos. 4 and\n      5.\n\n      Ms.Shramila Deshmukh for Respondent No.19.\n        \n\n\n                                 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.\n<\/pre>\n
                                 DATED : 06th March, 2009<\/p>\n
      P.C.:-\n<\/p>\n
      .    By consent, heard finally.\n\n\n\n\n\n      1.      The       Petitioner   has       basically      challenged           the\n\n      impugned          order   passed    by    the    Administrator               and\n\n\n\n\n\n      Divisional          Commissioner,    Konkan Division, Mumbai                   in\n\n      Appeal     under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas\n\n      (I.C.         &    R.) Act, 1971 (for short, \"the Act\")                   dated\n\n\n\n\n                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>\n                                            ( 2 )\n\n\n\n\n     19th     January,        2009, whereby his Appeal               against        the\n\n     impugned         order        dated     21\/08\/2008      passed         by      the\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                \n     Assistant         Commissioner,          G-South,       MCGM,        has      been\n\n     dismissed.         In     the     result, the basic           notice         under\n\n\n\n\n                                                       \n     Section     33     of     the Act and the order passed                  by     the\n\n<\/pre>\n
     Assistance Commissioner has been confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
     2.     Admittedly, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (for<\/p>\n
     short,     “SRA”) has sanctioned the Redevelopment Scheme<\/p>\n
     on     plot bearing C.S.Nos 209 (pt), 224 (pt), 226 (pt),<\/p>\n
     231<\/span><\/p>\n
     Nagar,
\n             (pt),<\/p>\n
                       232     (pt) and 991 (pt),<\/p>\n
                Worli Koliwada, Worli, Mumbai- 400 025,
\n                                                            known       as       Belani<\/p>\n
                                                                                 under<\/p>\n
     Section 33 (10) of Development Control Regulations for<\/p>\n
     Greater     Bombay,           1991, (for short,”D.C.R.Rules”).                     A<\/p>\n
     Letter Of Intent dated 04\/08\/2006 shows the Petitioner<\/p>\n
     is     eligible     for        an alternate accommodation               as     per<\/p>\n
     Municipal record in Annexure-II at Serial No.174.\n<\/p>\n
     3.     The Petitioner is in possession of 330.35 Sq.Mtrs.\n<\/p>\n
     and     loft of 49.40 Sq.Mtrs..               It is also shown in              the<\/p>\n
     Municipal       record        that the Petitioner is vacant                   land<\/p>\n
     Tenancy     holder (for short, “VLT”).                 The said VLT            was<\/p>\n
     on     temporary        basis.        The Petitioner’s structure               has<\/p>\n
     been     declared as slum for redevelopment of the plots.\n<\/p>\n
     The     structure        of     the Petitioner is         affecting           120′<\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>
\n                                  ( 3 )<\/p>\n
     D.P.Road     – nearly 50% and remaining portion affecting<\/p>\n
     BEST Bus Stand (for short, “BBS”) reservation.\n<\/p>\n
     4.     A   notice under Section 33 of the Act was                 issued<\/p>\n
     calling upon the Petitioner as to why he should not be<\/p>\n
     evicted from the structure for enforcing the scheme.\n<\/p>\n
     5.   Section 33 of the Act reads as under:-\n<\/p>\n
           “33.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            33.   Power of eviction to be exercised only by
\n                  the Competent Authority.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 Where the Competent Authority is satisfied
\n           either upon a representation from the owner of a
\n           building or upon other      information in its<\/p>\n
           possession that the occupants of the building
\n           have not vacated it in pursuance of any order or
\n           direction issued or given by the Authority, the
\n           Authority shall, by order, direct the eviction
\n           of the occupants from the building in such
\n           manner and within such time as may be specified<\/p>\n
           in the order, and for the purpose of such
\n           eviction, may use or cause to be used such force<\/p>\n
           as may be necessary;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 Provided that, before making any order
\n           under this section the Competent Authority shall
\n           give a reasonable opportunity to the occupants<\/p>\n
           of the building to show cause why they should
\n           not be evicted therefrom.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     6.     Though   objected,   but     as    requisite            numbers\/<\/p>\n
     percentage      was   available,    the      scheme        has        been<\/p>\n
     sanctioned in accordance with the Act and Regulations.\n<\/p>\n
     A    majority of the eligible hutment dwellers have been<\/p>\n
     shifted    to the Temporary Transit Accommodation.                     The<\/p>\n
                                               ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>
\n                                           ( 4 )<\/p>\n
     Petitioner           being in the list, has been informed about<\/p>\n
     this     Temporary          Transit        Accommodation,         shop        No.18<\/p>\n
     constructed            at    site,     enabling       to       conduct          his<\/p>\n
     commercial activity.\n<\/p>\n
     7.     The concerned Respondent has been proceeding based<\/p>\n
     upon     the scheme since 2006.               The concerned Respondent<\/p>\n
     is     under obligation to give and provide the requisite<\/p>\n
     area     as     per his existing commercial                activity           based<\/p>\n
     upon the circular No.              70 dated 30th December, 2004 if<\/p>\n
     he     falls<\/p>\n
     entitlement.<\/p>\n
\n                           \n                      within the ambit of the said\n\n                             Whether       that circular applies\n                                                                    circular\n\n                                                                              to\n                                                                                     and\n\n                                                                                     the\n                          \n     structures           of the Petitioner is also a matter,                      which\n\n     the Appropriate Authority needs to take note of.                               That\n\n     itself,        according to me, just cannot be the reason to\n      \n\n\n     oppose        and even resist the impugned notice and action\n   \n\n\n\n     of eviction.\n\n\n\n     8.      The     Petitioner's entitlement for structures                         has\n\n\n\n\n\n     already        been     reconsidered and          accordingly           allotted\n\n     Transit        Accommodation.         The Concerned Authority in                    a\n\n     given     case,        may    or     may    not   decide       his      case      of\n\n\n\n\n\n     entitlement           for two structures, in view of Rule                      1.12\n\n     and     1.16 of the D.C.R.Rules, if the case is made out,\n\n     provided        he     should submit to the scheme.                 This       also\n\n\n\n\n                                                        ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>\n                                           ( 5 )\n\n\n\n\n     according      to      me,        cannot be the reason to              halt      the\n\n     project.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                 \n     9.      As    the point was raised, the Authority below                            in\n\n\n\n\n                                                         \n     the      impugned        orders,       considered         the      aspect          of\n\n     applicability          of        CRZ Regulations to the            land.         The\n\n\n\n\n                                                        \n     contention        that       the structures in question                  are     not\n\n     urgently      required           to be demolished, just              cannot        be\n\n     permitted         to        raise     on     this    count        under         this\n\n\n\n\n                                           \n     proceedings         initiated        under Section 33 of               the      Act.\n\n     Once\n\n     available\n                         \n<\/pre>\n
              the Scheme is sanctioned based upon the material<\/p>\n
                    at the appropriate time by considering                            all<\/p>\n
     these     aspects, unless that is disturbed or set aside,<\/p>\n
     at this stage, in my view, the action of eviction just<\/p>\n
     cannot be halted on these grounds.\n<\/p>\n
     10.     This Court by an order dated 02\/02\/2009 permitted<\/p>\n
     the     Petitioner          to     carry out   amendment           and       issued<\/p>\n
     notices      to     the Union of India through the                     Secretary<\/p>\n
     Ministry      of Environment and Forest (IA-III Division),<\/p>\n
     Central      Secretariate,           New Delhi and the             Maharashtra<\/p>\n
     Costal       Zone Management Authority, Mumbai and there is<\/p>\n
     a     report the validity of which can not be decided                              in<\/p>\n
     such     proceeding initiated under Section 33 of the Act<\/p>\n
     as     contended including the basic prayer to quash                             and<\/p>\n
                                                         ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>
\n                                           ( 6 )<\/p>\n
     set aside the Scheme and all other proceedings arising<\/p>\n
     out of the same.\n<\/p>\n
     11.    The     issue          of     the    Petitioner’s            entitlement<\/p>\n
     pursuance     to Circular No.70 dated 30th December, 2004<\/p>\n
     and   issue of CRZ, affecting the scheme are kept                                open<\/p>\n
     for   appropriate challenge by appropriate proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
     In my view, the Authority under Section 33 of the Act,<\/p>\n
     has   very     limited          power and jurisdiction.                   It     only<\/p>\n
     requirs      to consider if the person though directed not<\/p>\n
     shifting<\/p>\n
     affecting
\n                  or<\/p>\n
                         vacating the plot in question and as<\/p>\n
                   the progress of the scheme\/ project,                             after
\n                                                                                         it<\/p>\n
     hearing      such person, to pass order of eviction.                             This<\/p>\n
     Authority     has        no jurisdiction and authority to                        test<\/p>\n
     the   validity          of     SRA   Scheme and         Letter        of       Intent<\/p>\n
     already issued on such issues.\n<\/p>\n
     12.    The Schemes under the Act are with intention                                 to<\/p>\n
     redevelopment           of Slums and Rehabilitation of the slum<\/p>\n
     dwellers.         The        “Competent Authority” and                the      “Slum<\/p>\n
     Rehabilitation            Authority-          SRA”      or       “High         Power<\/p>\n
     Committee”        are     distinct         Authorities         with       “Special<\/p>\n
     power and jurisdiction”.\n<\/p>\n
     13.   The Authority under Section 33 of the Act, is not<\/p>\n
                                                          ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>
\n                                           ( 7 )<\/p>\n
     empowered        to        interfere      with   the       final       sanctioned<\/p>\n
     scheme.         Therefore,          no    question to         deal      with      the<\/p>\n
     various     challenges             raised    about      the      CRZ      and     the<\/p>\n
     entitlement           of extra area\/ structures, merely because<\/p>\n
     the     Petitioner has raised such issues and resisted by<\/p>\n
     the     other     side, that itself noway enlarge the                          scope<\/p>\n
     and     purpose        of     Section 33 of the            Act     and     related<\/p>\n
     Rules.      Even           otherwise, the Petitioner’s                remedy        is<\/p>\n
     elsewhere.\n<\/p>\n
     14.<\/p>\n
              In view of this, and in the public interest<\/p>\n
     development of proposed public utility, I see there is
\n                                                                                       for<\/p>\n
     no     reason to halt the project at the instance of                              one<\/p>\n
     Petitioner,           in    view     of     above.     I    am     declined         to<\/p>\n
     interfere with the action of eviction as initiated for<\/p>\n
     removal     of        the     structure of       the       Petitioner.            The<\/p>\n
     impugned        order\/ action of eviction is well within the<\/p>\n
     frame     work        of     law    and the      record.         There       is     no<\/p>\n
     perversity.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n     15.      Resultantly,           the Writ Petition is dismissed                      by\n\n     keeping     all points open, with regard to the                           circular\n\n\n\n\n\n     No.     70 dated 30th December, 2004 and issue of CRZ, if\n\n     any.     No order as to costs.\n\n\n\n\n                                                          ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>\n                               ( 8 )\n\n\n\n\n     16.    Considering   the facts and circumstances of              the\n\n<\/pre>\n
     case   and in view of the reasonings already given, the<\/p>\n
     request   for interim protection is restricted only for<\/p>\n
     one week from today.\n<\/p>\n
                                      (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)<\/p>\n
                                         ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:23:38 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 Bench: Anoop V.Mohta ssm sm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1708 OF 2009 M\/s. Andrade Motors. …Petitioner. Vs. The Additional Collector (Eng.\/ Rem), & Competent Authority & Ors. …Respondents. Mr. N.H.Seervai, Sr.Counsel with […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-08T12:41:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-08T12:41:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":928,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-08T12:41:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-08T12:41:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-08T12:41:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009"},"wordCount":928,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009","name":"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-08T12:41:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-andrade-motors-vs-the-additional-collector-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. Andrade Motors vs The Additional Collector on 6 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29443\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}