{"id":29459,"date":"2009-08-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-24T17:33:10","modified_gmt":"2015-09-24T12:03:10","slug":"divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n1\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 12\"' DAY OF AUGUST. 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVAS:E  ~\n\nM.\u00a7+'.A. N0. 2008 ofggos [W7CI\"\"':._':p.     I\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nDivisional Manager,  \n\nNew India Assurance Co Ltd.,  \n\nC.G. Hospital Road. \nDavangere, '  2,\n\nNow represented by its,\" 'A\n\nRegional Manager,    V' - \nThe New India A:s'su_ra:f_1ce C0 Ltd\u00a7;--,_ .\nRegional Of\ufb01cie,  V .       \n2~B, Unity  '     \nAnnexe, P. Kaninsra RaoRo\"ac1;'  \n\nC3.\n\nBanga10re*=5\u20ac\u00a7O O27. \n\n APPELLANT\n\n[By  Pradeep.._.Adv. appearing for Sri. AN. Krishna\n\n I \"vSwa;Iiy for A.ppe11ant';' }\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p>  Rualresh,<br \/>\nI \/&#8221;0, Smt. Gangamma,<br \/>\nI A New aged abeut 21 years,<br \/>\nI A &#8216;I*u_pR\/0. Lenin Nagara.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00ab. _.i\\Eea.r Mosque, Nittuvalli.<br \/>\nDavangere.\n<\/p>\n<p>w.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2. D8. Nagaraj,<br \/>\nS\/o. Shivanna D.S.,<br \/>\nOwner of Lorry No. KA~i6\/A2598,<br \/>\nR\/o Bhararnasagara,<br \/>\nChitradurga District.\n<\/p>\n<p> RES?-c5NoErfi:&#8217;s.:&#8217; &#8216;Vi   .\n<\/p>\n<p>[By Sri. Mahesh R. Uppin for R. 1,__R.2.4serVe&#8217;d}&#8221;:.&#8217;_&#8217;:\u00bb.    <\/p>\n<p>This MFA is filed U\/Sd3&#8217;O{.1] Qfvrc. AcTta.agam the&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Judgement dated 18. 12.200&#8242;? \u00b0passed~. _ in &#8212; CR.No.<br \/>\n268\/2006 on the file of_.._..t_he_ &#8216;-~Labot11&#8242;&#8211;.._Of\ufb01cer and<br \/>\nCommissioner for Woajkrneniis _Compe&#8217;nsati0n, Davangere,<br \/>\nawarding a compensation of Rs&#8217;;\u00bb2v,4.&#8217;3,t\u00a7&#8221;_.3V&#8217;7&#8242;;&#8217;:\u00a7 with interest @<br \/>\n12% RA. &#8221; C V &#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>This IWFP.V:_eorI:iI1g&#8221;&#8216;o1:.___for orders regarding non-<br \/>\neomp1iance&#8221;eoi&#8217;. office _&#8221;o};3jeetior1&#8243;s, this day, the Court,<br \/>\ndelivered the foiiowirigr&#8217; ., &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>it &#8216;\ufb01gUnGMENT<\/p>\n<p>  the Insurance Co. challenging the<\/p>\n<p> eorripensation awarded by the Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>for   Compensation, Davangere Dist,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.VDaVangere, Vhereinafter referred to as the Commissioner for<\/p>\n<p>C_&#8217;sho1&#8217;t..A<\/p>\n<p>We<\/p>\n<p>2. Parties are referred to as they are referred to in<br \/>\nthe claim petition before the Commissioner for Work.=nen&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Brief facts of the case   <\/p>\n<p>On zowswos while the c1\u00e9im\u00e9t[nti&#8217; vs}as i&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>cleaner of the lorry bearing registratio:1__ NoV,gfvi(:A\u00a71&#8217;8&#8242;;&#8217;A?2598&#8242; if<\/p>\n<p>under its owner, the lorry  acciderjit and he<br \/>\nsustained injuries. Ashtheret-.i:s ::no:&#8217;d.is._nu-te regarding the<\/p>\n<p>injuries sustained_    thin the accident<\/p>\n<p>occurrehd\ufb02inir   out of employment, as<br \/>\ncleaneryving the  registration No. KA&#8211; 16\/A-2598<\/p>\n<p>and the iiahtiiity offthe Insurance Co., the only substantial<\/p>\n<p>. .&#8221;&#8216;quest.ioh*of&#8217;i&#8217;law thatma\u00e9rises for consideration in this appeal<\/p>\n<p> whe&#8217;thezj thfe._.Commissioner is justified in assessing the<\/p>\n<p>it  _  of  cfairnant at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; per month and<\/p>\n<p>  Tassessiiigh the loss of earning capacity at 60%.<\/p>\n<p>(W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>4. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the parties and perused the judgment and award&#8221; of the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Sri. Pradeep, learned Counsel__ga&#8217;r)pearingl&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Sri. Krishna Swamy, learned   it<\/p>\n<p>insurance Co. submits that _although- thecgclairnantg <\/p>\n<p>sustaining injuries in the accident wasltreated in the Govt.<br \/>\nHospital, he examined.4_._only&#8211;&#8216;_;thieA Vllpirijvate doctor, and even<br \/>\naccording to thesaid prixrate doctorfhe&#8217; sustained 60%<br \/>\ndisability to the  and the Ciornniissioner is not justified<br \/>\nin taking -loss &#8216;&#8221;::ap&#8217;acity as 60% and awarding<\/p>\n<p>compensation oft\/~&#8211; and therefore, he prays for<\/p>\n<p> , A al1ovw5inlgi&#8217;this ai)peal__and reducing the compensation.<\/p>\n<p>   contra, Sri. Mahesh R.Uppin, the learned<\/p>\n<p>Counsel&#8217;  for the claimant submits that the<\/p>\n<p> drawing salary of Rs.4,0{}0\/~ per month<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  &#8216;bata&#8217; of Rs.50\/&#8211; per day while working as<\/p>\n<p>cleaner in the lorry and the salary taken by the<\/p>\n<p>%&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Commissioner at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; is on the lower side. He<br \/>\nsubmits, the claimant was initially treated in Govt.<br \/>\nHospital, i.e. KJMS, Hubli and thereafter he has&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;tgaken<\/p>\n<p>treatment in the CG. private hospital and <\/p>\n<p>in the private hospital was examined  rightiyggl <\/p>\n<p>assessed the disability to  :at__  if<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner is justified in riassessing the did-ssyoil earning&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p>capacity at 60% and awarding&#8217;vcornperisation.  further<br \/>\nsubmits that Commiss_io&#8211;ner&#8211;fVl is  in awarding<br \/>\ninterest from thecdate of ginsteald&#8217; from the date of<\/p>\n<p>claim petition\ufb01fr _ &#8220;ff.\n<\/p>\n<p> The  sustained compound fracture<\/p>\n<p>of left .f_erriur}* I\ufb01leiw.asA&#8221;working as a cleaner in a lorry. But<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;his &#8220;eor1&#8217;t,ention  was drawing Rs\/1,000\/- excluding<\/p>\n<p>bata day is not established by examining<\/p>\n<p>  the the lorry or by producing documentary<\/p>\n<p>3u&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;-..Vevidence&#8230;&#8217;Ito that effect. Considering that he was aged<\/p>\n<p>  19 years at the time of accident, nature of job as<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>cleaner in the lorry and year of accident is of 2006, the<br \/>\nsalary assessed by the Commissioner at Rs.3,000\/- is<\/p>\n<p>almost equivalent to one prescribed under the <\/p>\n<p>Wages Act. However, in this appeal \ufb01led by <\/p>\n<p>Co. I cannot disturb the said \ufb01nding of  <\/p>\n<p>which is based on facts. C0rigsideririg4&#8242;&#8211;,,thle&#8217; ..,\ufb02ie C<\/p>\n<p>claimant, nature of job, nature ofAinjuries&#8221;&#8216;st1.stainledllby&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>him and the disability statedrby the  the loss of<br \/>\nearning capacity asses&#8211;s_e}j_by tlj_ieiCiomniissioner at 60% is<\/p>\n<p>on the higher side.    V<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;.At.ll&#8221;lV&#8217;i&#8217;r1i:s&#8217;i  the learned Counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing'&#8221;&lt;.__for_   submit that instead of<\/p>\n<p> rematidirig the&quot;&#039;&#8212;imatter to the Commissioner on this<\/p>\n<p>  this Court can assess the percentage of<\/p>\n<p>loss of  capacity of the claimant on the basis of the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;.Vmateria}l*,:_ ayailable on record and award just and<\/p>\n<p>A freiasonable compensation, considering the age of the<\/p>\n<p>  claimant, the nature of injuries sustained by him and the<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>nature of job he was doing prior to the accident and the<br \/>\nloss of earning capacity of the claimant can be fixed at<\/p>\n<p>40%. The question of law is answered accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>9. With regard to interest, the matter iscovered<\/p>\n<p>by the decision of the Supreme Court of<\/p>\n<p>ORIENTAL INSURANCE co. LTD. VS.   1 A<\/p>\n<p>ANOTHER reported in 2009 AiR1 scw&#8217;e7&#8217;1.g7,&#8217;aA.a\u00a2\u00a2orciingto &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>which interest shall be payabie at 75% p.a.;&#8221;frcm_ the da.t;{:&#8221;e.<\/p>\n<p>of claim petition till the date award t_&#8217;1&#8242;:2&#8243;\/Vi} p.a. from<br \/>\nthe date of award till tliietigrjat-;e oi&#8217; ;iaynie&#8217;iit_.<\/p>\n<p>tO.._ &#8221; &#8220;appeal is allowed. The<\/p>\n<p>judgment  &#8216;passed by the Commissioner is<\/p>\n<p> ._VIno&lt;igiiied_gAV&#039;ari_d the\u00abc1a.irnant is entitled for a compensation<\/p>\n<p>  with 71\/2% p.a. interest from the date of<\/p>\n<p>til} the date of award and 12% p.a. from the<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;date of award till the date of deposit.<\/p>\n<p>w,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF AUGUST. 2009 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVAS:E ~ M.\u00a7+&#8217;.A. N0. 2008 ofggos [W7CI&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;:._&#8217;:p. I BETWEEN: Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co Ltd., C.G. Hospital Road. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-24T12:03:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-24T12:03:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":904,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-24T12:03:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-24T12:03:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-24T12:03:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009"},"wordCount":904,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009","name":"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-24T12:03:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-vs-rudresh-on-12-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Divisional Manager vs Rudresh on 12 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}